Measuring brand equity in the car market: a hedonic price analysis
- 181 Downloads
This paper designs and implements a hedonic model to investigate brand-name effects in the car market. The proposed model provides considerable empirical evidence in support of model-name premia, after controlling for observed product differentiation. Such premia incorporate not only manufacturer equity but also effects that are specific to individual models. The estimated price premia are remarkably intuitive and consistent across carmakers and models. The results yield important implications for brand and range management in the car market and suggest directions for future research.
Keywordscar market brand equity price premium marketing
We thank the editorial team of the Greek edition of Top Gear, two anonymous JORS reviewers and several professionals in this field for their valuable suggestions. The views expressed are those of the authors, who are also responsible for any errors.
- Aaker DA (1991). Managing Brand Equity. The Free Press: New York.Google Scholar
- Aaker DA (1996b). Building Strong Brands. The Free Press: New York.Google Scholar
- Alba JW, Hutchinson JW and Lynch JG (1990). Memory and decision making. In: Kassarjian H.H. and Robertson T.S. (eds). Handbook of Consumer Theory and Research. Prentice-Hall: New Jersey, pp. 1–49.Google Scholar
- Farquhar PH (1989). Managing brand equity. Market Res 1: 24–33.Google Scholar
- Gibson R (1990). The end of the line? Overkill on extensions. Wall Street J 18: Bl.Google Scholar
- Greene W (2002). Econometric Analysis. Prentice Hall: New York.Google Scholar
- Hickman T and Ward J (2007). The dark side of brand community: Inter-group stereotyping, trash talk, and schadenfreude. Advances Cons Res 34: 314–319.Google Scholar
- Hulten CR (2003). Price hedonics: A critical review. Federal Reserve Bank of New York Econ Pol Rev 9: 5–15.Google Scholar
- Kiley D (2001). I'd like to buy a vowel, drivers say. USA Today: Money/Auto Section 9 August: 3.Google Scholar
- Kotler PH (1991). Marketing Management, Analysis, Planning, and Control, 8th edn. Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
- McAlexander JH and Schouten JW (1998). Brand fests: Servicescapes for the cultivation of brand equity. In: Sherry J.F. (ed). Servicescapes: The Concept of Place in Contemporary Markets. American Marketing Association: Chicago, pp. 377–402.Google Scholar
- Monroe KB (1990). Pricing: Making Profitable Decisions. McGraw-Hill: New York.Google Scholar
- Romeo JB (1991). The effect of negative information on the evaluations of brand extensions and the family brand. In: Holman R.H. and Solomon M.R. (eds). Advances in Consumer Research Vol. 18. Association for Consumer Research: Provo, UT, pp. 399–406.Google Scholar
- Sethuraman R (2000). What makes consumers pay more for national brands than for store brands: Image or quality? Report No. 00-110, Marketing Science Institute, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- Sethuraman R and Cole C (1997). Why do consumers pay more for national brands than for store brands. Working Paper No. 97-126, Marketing Science Institute, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- White R (2004). How people buy cars. Admap, February, pp 15–17.Google Scholar
- Woodyard C (2006). Automakers hope love for car equals love for brand, http://www.usatoday.com/money/autos/2006-06-19-halo-cars-usat_x.htm, accessed 25 August 2008.