Advertisement

Journal of Information Technology

, Volume 31, Issue 2, pp 152–165 | Cite as

To share or not to share: the effects of extrinsic and intrinsic motivations on knowledge-sharing in enterprise social media platforms

  • Henning Rode
Research Article

Abstract

In order to foster knowledge-sharing among employees, an increasing number of companies has recently begun implementing social network-based enterprise social media platforms (ESMPs). Although employees are expected to adopt these platforms quickly and use them as actively as they use public and free social media, patterns of private and corporate usage differ. While some research on the determinants of using public and free social media like Facebook has been conducted, empirical studies on the factors determining active participation in ESMPs is scarce. Based on research derived from a survey of 492 respondents carried out in a large knowledge-intensive firm, this paper addresses this gap. The results of our empirical quantitative study reveal that extrinsic motivation in particular – that is, anticipated gains in reputation and reciprocal benefits – drives employees to share knowledge in ESMPs. Knowledge-sharing self-efficacy also facilitates participation, while the enjoyment in helping others does not. The study contributes to information systems and knowledge management research, as it reveals motivational factors that drive the individual adoption in terms of active use of ESMPs. Managerial implications are derived from these results.

Keywords

enterprise social media platforms enterprise 2.0 knowledge-sharing extrinsic and intrinsic motivation empirical quantitative study 

References

  1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50 (2): 179–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alavi, M. and Leidner, D.E. (2001). Review: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues, MIS Quarterly 25 (1): 107–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amabile, T.M. (1997). Motivating Creativity in Organizations: On doing what you love and loving what you do, California Management Review 40 (1): 39–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andriole, S.J. (2010). Business Impact of Web 2.0 Technologies, Communications of the ACM 53 (12): 67–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Antonius, N., Xu, J. and Gao, X. (2015). Factors Influencing the Adoption of Enterprise Social Software in Australia, Knowledge-based Systems 73: 32–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ardichvili, A., Page, V. and Wentling, T. (2003). Motivation and Barriers to Participation in Virtual Knowledge-sharing Communities of Practice, Journal of Knowledge Management 7 (1): 64–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baker, W.E. and Bulkley, N. (2014). Paying It Forward vs. Rewarding Reputation: Mechanisms of generalized reciprocity, Organization Science 25 (5): 1493–1510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy Mechanism in Human Agency, The American Psychologist 37 (2): 122–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Barney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage, Journal of Management 17 (1): 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bartol, K.M. and Srivastava, A. (2002). Encouraging Knowledge Sharing: The role of organizational reward systems, Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies 9 (1): 64–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Baruch, Y. and Holtom, B.C. (2008). Survey Response Rate Levels and Trends in Organizational Research, Human Relations 61 (8): 1139–1160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bibbo, D., Michelich, J., Sprehe, E. and Lee, Y.E. (2012). Employing Wiki for Knowledge Management as a Collaborative Information Repository: An NBC universal case, Journal of Information Technology Teaching Cases 2 (1): 17–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Blau, P.M. (1964). Exchange and Power in Social Life, New York, London, Sydney: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  14. Boateng, R., Mbarika, V. and Thomas, C. (2010). When Web 2.0 Becomes an Organizational Learning Tool: Evaluating Web 2.0 tools, Development and Learning in Organizations 24 (3): 17–20.Google Scholar
  15. Bock, G.W., Kankanhalli, A. and Sharma, S. (2006). Are Norms Enough? The Role of Collaborative Norms in Promoting Organizational Knowledge Seeking, European Journal of Information Systems 15 (4): 357–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bock, G.W., Zmud, R.W., Kim, Y.-G. and Lee, J.-N. (2005). Behavioral Intention Formation in Knowledge Sharing: Examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological forces, and organizational climate, MIS Quarterly 29 (1): 87–111.Google Scholar
  17. Bosco, F.A., Aguinis, H., Singh, K., Field, J.G. and Pierce, C.A. (2015). Correlational Effect Size Benchmarks, Journal of Applied Psychology 100 (2): 431–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Brown, T. (2001). Modernisation or Failure? IT Development Projects in the UK Public Sector, Financial Accountability & Management 17 (4): 363–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cabrera, A., Collins, W.C. and Salgado, J.F. (2006). Determinants of Individual Engagement in Knowledge Sharing, International Journal of Human Resource Management 17 (2): 245–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chui, M., Manyika, J., Bughin, J., Dobbs, R., Roxburgh, C., Sarrazin, H., Sands, G. and Westergren, M. (2012). The Social Economy: Unlocking value and productivity through social technologies [WWW document] http://www.mckinsey.com/insights/high_tech_telecoms_internet/the_social_economy (accessed 3 June 2015).
  21. Coleman, J.S. (1988). Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital, American Journal of Sociology 94 (Supplement): 95–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Compeau, D.R. and Higgins, C.A. (1995). Computer Self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test, MIS Quarterly 19 (2): 189–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Constant, D., Sproull, L. and Kiesler, S. (1996). The Kindness of Strangers: The usefulness of electronic weak ties for technical advice, Organization Science 7 (2): 119–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Davenport, T.H. (1998). Putting the Enterprise into the Enterprise System, Harvard Business Review 76 (4): 121–131.Google Scholar
  25. Davenport, T.H. and Prusak, L. (1998). Working Knowledge: How organizations manage what they know, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  26. Davis, F.D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology, MIS Quarterly 13 (3): 319–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P. and Paul, W. (1992). Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace, Journal of Applied Social Psychology 22 (14): 1111–1132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Deci, E.L., Koestner, R. and Ryan, R.M. (1999). A Meta-analytic Review of Experiments Examining the Effects of Extrinsic Rewards on Intrinsic Motivation, Psychological Bulletin 125 (6): 627–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. DeLone, W.H. and McLean, E.R. (1992). Information Systems Success: The quest for the dependent variable, Information Systems Research 3 (1): 60–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams, Administrative Science Quarterly 44 (2): 350–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Emerson, R.M. (1976). Social Exchange Theory, Annual Review of Sociology 2 (1): 335–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Erol, S., Granitzer, M., Happ, S., Jantunen, S., Jennings, B., Johannesson, P., Koschmider, A., Nurcan, S., Rossi, D. and Schmidt, R. (2010). Combining BPM and Social Software: Contradiction or chance? Journal of Software Maintenance and Evolution: Research and Practice 22 (6‐7): 449–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A. and Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical Power Analyses Using G* Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses, Behavior Research Methods 41 (4): 1149–1160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Frey, B.S. (1997). A Constitution for Knaves Crowds out Civic Virtues, The Economic Journal 107 (443): 1043–1053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Fulk, J. and Yuan, Y.C. (2013). Location, Motivation, and Social Capitalization via Enterprise Social Networking, Journal of Computer-mediated Communication 19 (1): 20–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gangadharbatla, H. (2008). Facebook Me: Collective self-esteem, need to belong, and internet self-efficacy as predictors of the iGeneration’s attitudes toward social networking sites, Journal of Interactive Advertising 8 (2): 5–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Granovetter, M. (1983). The Strength of Weak Ties: A network theory revisited, Sociological Theory 1 (1): 201–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Günther, O., Krasnova, H., Riehle, D. and Schöndienst, V. (2009). Modeling Microblogging Adoption in the Enterprise, in 15th Americas Conference on Information Systems (San Francisco, CA, 2009); San Francisco, CA: scholarONE, 1–9.Google Scholar
  39. He, W. and Wei, K.-K. (2009). What Drives Continued Knowledge Sharing? An Investigation of Knowledge-contribution and Seeking Beliefs, Decision Support Systems 46 (4): 826–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Healey, M. (2011). Rebooting the antisocial network [WWW document] http://reports.informationweek.com/abstract/83/8596/it-business-strategy/rebooting-the-antisocial-network.html (accessed 3 June 2015).
  41. Hendriks, P. (1999). Why Share Knowledge? The Influence of ICT on the Motivation for Knowledge Sharing, Knowledge and Process Management 6 (2): 91–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hsu, M.-H., Ju, T.L., Yen, C.-H. and Chang, C.-M. (2007). Knowledge Sharing Behavior in Virtual Communities: The relationship between trust, self-efficacy, and outcome expectations, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 65 (2): 153–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Huang, J., Makoju, E., Newell, S. and Galliers, R.D. (2003). Opportunities to Learn from ‘Failure’ with Electronic Commerce: A case study of electronic banking, Journal of Information Technology 18 (1): 17–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Huber, G.P. (1991). Organizational Learning: The contributing processes and the literatures, Organization Science 2 (1): 88–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Janzik, L. (2010). Contribution and Participation in Innovation Communities: A classification of incentives and motives, International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management 7 (3): 247–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Jarrahi, M.H. and Sawyer, S. (2013). Social Technologies, Informal Knowledge Practices, and the Enterprise, Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce 23 (1–2): 110–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Jarvenpaa, S.L. and Staples, D.S. (2000). The Use of Collaborative Electronic Media for Information Sharing: An exploratory study of determinants, Journal of Strategic Information Systems 9 (2): 129–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Johnson, R.D. and Marakas, G.M. (2000). Research Report: The role of behavioral modeling in computer skills acquisition -toward refinement of the model, Information Systems Research 11 (4): 402–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kaiser, S., Kansy, S., Mueller-Seitz, G. and Ringlstetter, M. (2009). Weblogs for Organizational Knowledge Sharing and Creation: A comparative case study, Knowledge Management Research & Practice 7 (2): 120–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kaiser, S., Mueller-Seitz, G., Lopes, M.P. and Cunha, M.P. e (2007). Weblog-technology as a Trigger to Elicit Passion for Knowledge, Organization 14 (3): 391–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kankanhalli, A., Tan, B.C.Y. and Wei, K.-K. (2005). Contributing Knowledge to Electronic Knowledge Repositories: An empirical investigation, MIS Quarterly 29 (1): 113–143.Google Scholar
  52. Kaplan, A.M. and Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the World, Unite! The Challenges and Opportunities of Social Media, Business Horizons 53 (1): 59–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Kietzmann, J.H., Silvestre, B.S., McCarthy, I.P. and Pitt, L.F. (2012). Unpacking the Social Media Phenomenon: Towards a research agenda, Journal of Public Affairs 12 (2): 109–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Kim, H.-W., Chan, H.C. and Gupta, S. (2007). Value-based Adoption of Mobile Internet: An empirical investigation, Decision Support Systems 43 (1): 111–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Kim, W., Jeong, O.-R. and Lee, S.-W. (2010). On Social Web Sites, Information Systems 35 (2): 215–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Kollock, P. (1999). The Economies of Online Cooperation, in M.A. Smith and P. Kollock (eds.) Communities in Cyberspace, London: Routledge, pp. 220–239.Google Scholar
  57. Koplowitz, R. (2014). The Forrester Wave – Enterprise social platforms – Q2 2014 [WWW document] ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/software/kr/pdf/The_Forrester_Wave_Enterprise_Social_Platforms_Q22014.pdf (accessed 4 June 2015).
  58. Kügler, M., Dittes, S., Smolnik, S. and Richter, A. (2015). Connect Me! Antecedents and Impact of Social Connectedness in Enterprise Social Software, Business & Information Systems Engineering 57 (3): 181–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Kügler, M., Smolnik, S. and Raeth, P. (2013). Determining the Factors Influencing Enterprise Social Software Usage: Development of a measurement instrument for empirical assessment, in 46th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) (Wailea, Hawaii, 2013); Wailea, Hawaii: IEEE. 3635–3644.Google Scholar
  60. Lakhani, K.R. and von Hippel, E. (2003). How Open Source Software Works: ‘Free’ user -to-user assistance, Research Policy 32 (6): 923–943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Lee, M.K.O., Cheung, C.M.K. and Chen, Z. (2005). Acceptance of Internet-based Learning Medium: The role of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation, Information & Management 42 (8): 1095–1104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Leonardi, P.M., Huysman, M. and Steinfield, C. (2013). Enterprise Social Media: Definition, history, and prospects for the study of social technologies in organizations, Journal of Computer-mediated Communication 19 (1): 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Lerner, J. and Tirole, J. (2002). Some Simple Economics of Open Source, Journal of Industrial Economics 50 (2): 197–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Liang, T.-P., Liu, C.-C. and Wu, C.-H. (2008). Can Social Exchange Theory Explain Individual Knowledge-sharing Behavior? A Meta-analysis, in International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), (Paris, 2008); Paris: Association for Information Systems, 1–18.Google Scholar
  65. Lin, H.-F. (2007). Effects of Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation on Employee Knowledge Sharing Intentions, Journal of Information Science 33 (2): 135–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Lin, K.-Y. and Lu, H.-P. (2011). Why People Use Social Networking Sites: An empirical study integrating network externalities and motivation theory, Computers in Human Behavior 27 (3): 1152–1161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Löcker, A.-K., Eraßme, D., Jakobs, E.-M., Schaar, A.K., Valdez, A.C. and Ziefle, M. (2014). Yet Another Platform? Motivational Factors for Using Online Communities in Business Contexts, in S. Trzcielinski and W. Karwowski, (eds.) Advances in the Ergonomics in Manufacturing: Managing the enterprise of the future, Kraków, Orlando, FL: AHFE Conference 2014, pp. 152–163.Google Scholar
  68. Loonam, J., McDonagh, J., Kumar, V. and O'Regan, N. (2014). Top Managers and Information Systems: ‘Crossing the rubicon!’, Strategic Change 23 (3–4): 205–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Majchrzak, A., Faraj, S., Kane, G.C. and Azad, B. (2013). The Contradictory Influence of Social Media Affordances on Online Communal Knowledge Sharing, Journal of Computer-mediated Communication 19 (1): 38–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. McAfee, A.P. (2006). Enterprise 2.0: The dawn of emergent collaboration, MIT Sloan Management Review 47 (3): 21–28.Google Scholar
  71. McAfee, A.P. (2009). Enterprise 2.0: New collaborative tools for your organization's toughest challenges, Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.Google Scholar
  72. McAfee, A.P. (2011). Shattering the Myths about Enterprise 2.0, MIT Center for Digital Business Research Brief 8 (1): 1–6.Google Scholar
  73. McFarland, L.A. and Ployhart, R.E. (2015). Social Media: A contextual framework to guide research and practice, Journal of Applied Psychology 100 (6): 1653–1677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Müeller, J. and Stocker, A. (2011). Enterprise Microblogging for Advanced Knowledge Sharing: The references@BT case study, Journal of Universal Computer Science 17 (4): 532–547.Google Scholar
  75. Musser, J. and O’Reilly, T. (2007). Web 2.0 – Principles and best practices, Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Radar.Google Scholar
  76. Nadkarni, A. and Hofmann, S.G. (2012). Why Do People Use Facebook? Personality and Individual Differences 52 (3): 243–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Noe, R.A., Clarke, A.D.M. and Klein, H.J. (2014). Learning in the Twenty-first-century Workplace, Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior 1 (1): 245–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Nonaka, I. (1994). A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation, Organization Science 5 (1): 14–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Organ, D.W., Podsakoff, P.M. and MacKenzie, S.B. (2006). Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Its nature, antecedents, and consequences, Thousand Oaks, London: Sage.Google Scholar
  80. Orlikowski, W.J. (1992). Learning from notes: Organizational issues in groupware implementation, in Proceedings of the 1992 ACM Conference on Computer-supported Cooperative Work (Toronto, ON, Canada, 1992); Toronto, ON, Canada: ACM, 362–369.Google Scholar
  81. Osterloh, M. and Frey, B.S. (2000). Motivation, Knowledge Transfer, and Organizational Forms, Organization Science 11 (5): 538–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Papadopoulos, T., Stamati, T. and Nopparuch, P. (2013). Exploring the Determinants of Knowledge Sharing via Employee Weblogs, International Journal of Information Management 33 (1): 133–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Paroutis, S. and Al Saleh, A. (2009). Determinants of Knowledge Sharing Using Web 2.0 Technologies, Journal of Knowledge Management 13 (4): 52–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Ratcheva, V. (2008). The Knowledge Advantage of Virtual Teams – Processes supporting knowledge synergy, Journal of General Management 33 (3): 53–67.Google Scholar
  85. Richter, D., Riemer, K. and vom Brocke, J. (2011). Internet Social Networking. Research State of the Art and Implications for Enterprise 2.0, Business & Information Systems Engineering 3 (2): 89–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Ross, C., Orr, E.S., Sisic, M., Arseneault, J.M., Simmering, M.G. and Orr, R.R. (2009). Personality and Motivations Associated with Facebook Use, Computers in Human Behavior 25 (2): 578–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Ryan, R.M. and Deci, E.L. (2000a). Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic definitions and new directions, Contemporary Educational Psychology 25 (1): 54–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Ryan, R.M. and Deci, E.L. (2000b). Self-determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-being, The American Psychologist 55 (1): 68–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Staples, D.S. and Webster, J. (2008). Exploring the Effects of Trust, Task Interdependence and Virtualness on Knowledge Sharing in Teams, Information Systems Journal 18 (6): 617–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Steinfield, C.W., DiMicco, J.M., Ellison, N.B. and Lampe, C. (2009). Bowling Online: social networking and social capital within the organization, in The Fourth International Conference on Communities and Technologies (University Park, PA, 2009); University Park, PA: ACM, 245–254.Google Scholar
  91. Stocker, A., Richter, A., Hoefler, P. and Tochtermann, K. (2012). Exploring Appropriation of Enterprise Wikis: A multiple-case study, Computer Supported Cooperative Work 21 (2–3): 317–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Treem, J.W. and Leonardi, P.M. (2013). Social Media Use in Organizations – Exploring the affordances of visibility, editability, persistence, and association, in C.T. Salmon (ed.) Communication Yearbook 36, New York: Routledge, pp. 143–189.Google Scholar
  93. Vaast, E. and Kaganer, E. (2013). Social Media Affordances and Governance in the Workplace: An examination of organizational policies, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 19 (1): 78–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Van den Hooff, B. and Van Weenen, F.D.L. (2004). Committed to Share: Commitment and CMC use as antecedents of knowledge sharing, Knowledge and Process Management 11 (1): 13–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Van Dyck, C., Frese, M., Baer, M. and Sonnentag, S. (2005). Organizational Error Management Culture and Its Impact on Performance: A two-study replication, Journal of Applied Psychology 90 (6): 1228–1240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Venkatesh, V. and Bala, H. (2008). Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions, Decision Sciences 39 (2): 273–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F.D. (2000). A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four longitudinal field studies, Management Science 46 (2): 186–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B. and Davis, F.D. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a unified view, MIS Quarterly 27 (3): 425–478.Google Scholar
  99. Wang, S. and Noe, R.A. (2010). Knowledge Sharing: A review and directions for future research, Human Resource Management Review 20 (2): 115–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Wang, Y. and Fesenmaier, D. (2003). Assessing Motivation of Contribution in Online Communities: An empirical investigation of an online travel community, Electronic Markets 13 (1): 33–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Wasko, M.M. and Faraj, S. (2000). ‘It is What One Does’: Why people participate and help others in electronic communities of practice, Journal of Strategic Information Systems 9 (2): 155–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Wasko, M.M. and Faraj, S. (2005). Why Should I Share? Examining Social Capital and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice, MIS Quarterly 29 (1): 35–57.Google Scholar
  103. Wasko, M.M., Teigland, R. and Faraj, S. (2009). The Provision of Online Public Goods: Examining social structure in an electronic network of practice, Decision Support Systems 47 (3): 254–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Wattal, S., Racherla, P. and Mandviwalla, M. (2010). Network Externalities and Technology Use: A quantitative analysis of intraorganizational blogs, Journal of Management Information Systems 27 (1): 145–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Yoshioka, T., Herman, G., Yates, J. and Orlikowski, W. (2001). Genre Taxonomy: A knowledge repository of communicative actions, ACM Transactions on Information Systems 19 (4): 431–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Zhao, B. and Olivera, F. (2006). Error Reporting in Organizations, Academy of Management Review 31 (4): 1012–1030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Information Technology Trust 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty for Business Administration and Economics, Heinrich Heine University DuesseldorfDuesseldorfGermany

Personalised recommendations