Advertisement

Journal of Information Technology

, Volume 30, Issue 2, pp 177–179 | Cite as

On systematic reviews for evidence-based practice

  • Briony J Oates
Commentary

Boell and Cecez-Kecmanovic’s paper has two parts: it compares systematic literature reviews (SLRs, often shortened to ‘systematic reviews’) with ‘traditional narrative literary reviews’, and then critically evaluates some IS papers whose authors claim they had undertaken an SLR or systematic review.

SLRs are an important tool for evidence-based practice (EBP). When researchers produce an SLR they search for all the previous relevant and sound research on their topic of interest, and synthesise the findings from the many studies unearthed, in order to inform the decision making of practitioners and other stakeholders. EBP and the use of SLRs is well developed in the health-care field. One definition from that field is (Sackett et al, 2000) ‘Evidence-based medicine (EBM) is the integration of best research evidence with clinical expertise and patient values’. It combines relevant research that has been conducted using sound methodology with clinical experience, education and skills and...

Notes

Acknowledgements

I gratefully acknowledge the help of Dr. Sue Childs, Northumbria University, for her useful material on the development of evidence-based practice in medicine and other disciplines.

References

  1. Atkins, C. and Louw, G. (2000). Reclaiming Knowledge: A Case for Evidence Based Information Systems. In Proceedings of ECIS 2000. Paper 28.Google Scholar
  2. Campbell Collaboration (2001). Guidelines for preparation of review protocols [www document] http://www.campbellcollaboration.org/artman2/uploads/1/C2_Protocols_guidelines_v1.pdf accessed 31 December 2014.
  3. Cochrane Collaboration (2013). Improving the science of systematic reviews, Cochrane20 video series, 14 [WWW document] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YdpdVuJitTs&index=14&list=PLCo8P5_ppmQjkzvR1fzJebaBdWycQFrXl (accessed 31 December 2014).
  4. Edwards, H., Childs, S., Oates, B.J. and Wainwright, D. (2014). Yet another journal! Is there any need? Inaugural Editorial, Evidence Based Information Systems Journal, 1 [WWW document] http://www.ebisjournal.co.uk/article/view/4/1 (accessed 31 December 2014).
  5. Gagnon, M.P., Légaré, F., Labrecque, M., Frémont, P., Pluye, P., Gagnon, J., Car, J., Pagliari, C., Desmartis, M., Turcot, L. and Gravel, K. (2009). Interventions for Promoting Information and Communication Technologies Adoption in Healthcare Professionals, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (1): CD006093.Google Scholar
  6. Oates, B.J., Edwards, H.M. and Wainwright, D.W. (2012). A Model-Driven Method for the Systematic Literature Review of Qualitative Empirical Research, ICIS 2012, Thirty Third International Conference on Information Systems, (Orlando, Florida).Google Scholar
  7. Parmelli, E., Flodgren, G., Schaafsma, M.E., Baillie, N., Beyer, F.R. and Eccles, M.P. (2011). The Effectiveness of Strategies to Change Organisational Culture to Improve Healthcare Performance, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (1): CD008315.Google Scholar
  8. Pawson, R. (2006). Evidence-Based Policy. A realist perspective, London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Rigby, M., Ammenwerth, E., Beuscart-Zephir, M.-C., Brender, J., Hypponen, H., Melia, S., Nykanen, P., Talmon, J. and de Keizer, N. (2013). Evidence Based Health Informatics: 10 years of efforts to promote the principle. Joint contribution of IMIA WG EVAL and EFMI WG EVAL, Yearbook of Medical Informatics 8 (1): 34–46.Google Scholar
  10. Sackett, D.L., Straus, S.E., Richardson, W.S., Rosenberg, W. and Haynes, R.B. (2000). Evidence-based medicine: How to practice and teach EBM (2nd ed.). Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.Google Scholar

Resource list – URLs for cited evidence-based practice collaborations and networks:

  1. Alliance for Useful Evidence: [WWW document] http://www.alliance4usefulevidence.org/.
  2. Campbell Collaboration: [WWW document] http://WWW.campbellcollaboration.org/.
  3. Center for Evidence-Based Management (CEBMa): [www document] http://www.cebma.org/.
  4. Evidence Based Software Engineering (EBSE): [WWW document] http://community.dur.ac.uk/ebse/.
  5. Evidence for Policy and Practice Information and Co-ordinating Centre (EPPI-Centre): [WWW document] http://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/.
  6. UK Government ‘What Works Network’: [WWW document] https://www.gov.uk/what-works-network).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Information Technology Trust 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Briony J Oates
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Computing, Teesside UniversityMiddlesbroughUK

Personalised recommendations