Advertisement

Journal of Information Technology

, Volume 31, Issue 4, pp 358–381 | Cite as

Multiple interests or unified voice? Online communities as intermediary spaces for development

  • Julie E Ferguson
  • Maura Soekijad
Research Article

Abstract

While the uptake of online communities toward development purposes continues to grow, many are characterized by an unresolved tension. On the one hand, they benefit from participation of heterogeneous stakeholders in their efforts to strengthen their expertise. On the other hand, these stakeholders represent highly diverging interests, which makes collective strategic action very challenging. To understand how online communities cope with this tension, we conducted a longitudinal, mixed method case study of an online community focused on development transportation. We argue that online communities are uniquely equipped, through their fluidity and open-endedness, to enable knowledge creation and agenda-setting. In so doing, online communities afford an ‘intermediary space’ that simultaneously accommodates both convergence and divergence of interests. Our study strengthens the bridge between information systems research and development studies, by highlighting the potential of ICT uptake toward ‘remaking participation’ in development debate, while including the perspectives of heterogeneous interest groups.

Keywords

online communities development intermediary spaces interests ICT4D strategic framing 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge Marleen Huysman, Ed Sleebos, Wouter van Atteveldt, Tim Unwin, Shirin Madon and three anonymous reviewers, and of course, the research participants and ‘GRIT’ online community.

References

  1. Amin, A. and Cohendet, P. (2004). Architectures of Knowledge. Firms, Capabilities and Communities, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ashforth, B.E. and Mael, F. (1989). Social Identity Theory and the Organization, Academy of Management Review 14(1): 20–39.Google Scholar
  3. Avgerou, C. (2001). The Significance of Context in Information Systems and Organizational Change, Information Systems Journal 11(1): 43–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Avgerou, C. (2008). Discourses on Innovation and Development in Information Systems in Developing Countries’ Research, Journal of Information Technology 23(3): 133–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Avgerou, C. (2010a). Discourses on ICT and Development, Information Technologies and International Development 6(3): 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Avgerou, C. (2010b). Comments on Allen Lee’s Article ‘Retrospect and Prospect’: Information systems research in the last and next 25 years’ from a socio-theoretical IS research perspective, Journal of Information Technology 25(4): 355–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Banjo, G., Gordon, H. and Riverson, J. (2012). ‘Rural Transport: Improving its contribution to growth and poverty reduction in Sub-Saharan Africa,’ Africa Transport Policy Paper, Working paper No. 93. Available at: [WWW document] http://www.ssatp.org/en/publication/rural-transport-improving-its-contribution-growth-and-poverty-reduction-sub-saharan.
  8. Batagelj, V. and Mrvar, A. (2004). Pajek – Analysis and visualization of large networks, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Benford, R.D. and Snow, D.A. (2000). Framing Processes and Social Movements: An overview and assessment, Annual Review of Sociology 26(1): 611–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Blanchard, A.L. and Markus, M.L. (2004). The Experienced Sense of a Virtual Community: Characteristics and processes, ACM Sigmis Database 35(1): 64–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Borgatti, S.P., Brass, D.J. and Halgin, D.S. (2014). Social Network Research: Confusions, criticisms, and controversies, Research in the Sociology of Organizations 40: 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Braa, J., Monteiro, E. and Sahay, S. (2004). Networks of Action: Sustainable health information systems across developing countries, MIS Quarterly 28(3): 337–362.Google Scholar
  13. Buchanan, D. and Dawson, P. (2007). Discourse and Audience: Organizational change as multi-story process, Journal of Management Studies 44(5): 669–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Buckwalter, N.D. (2014). The Potential for Public Empowerment through Government‐organized Participation, Public Administration Review 74(5): 573–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Buliung, R.N., Shimi, A.C. and Mitra, R. (2014). Automobility and Non-motorized Transport in the Global South, in A. Walks (ed.) Driving Cities, Driving Inequality, Driving Politics: The urban political economy and ecology of automobility, New York: Routledge, pp. 152–168.Google Scholar
  16. Carlile, P.R. (2004). Transferring, Translating, and Transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries, Organization Science 15(5): 555–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Castells, M. (1996). The Information Age: Economy, society and culture: Vol. 1 (2nd edn,). The rise of the network society, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  18. Chigona, W., Beukes, D., Vally, J. and Tanner, M. (2009). Can Mobile Internet Help Alleviate Social Exclusion in Developing Countries?, The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries 36(7): 1–16.Google Scholar
  19. Contu, A. and Girei, E. (2014). NGOs Management and the Value of ‘Partnerships’ for Equality in International Development: What’s in a name?, Human Relations 67(2): 205–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cooke, B. and Kothari, U. (eds.) (2001). Participation: The new tyranny? London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  21. Cornelissen, J.P. and Werner, M.D. (2014). Putting Framing in Perspective: A review of framing and frame analysis across the management and organizational literature, The Academy of Management Annals 8(1): 181–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cornwall, A. (2004). Spaces for Transformation? Reflections on Issues of Power and Difference in Participation in Development, in S. Hickey and G. Mohan (eds.) Participation: From tyranny to transformation? Exploring new approaches to participation in development, London: Zed Books, pp. 75–91.Google Scholar
  23. Cornwall, A. (2008). Unpacking ‘Participation’: Models, meanings and practices, Community Development Journal 43(3): 269–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Cornwall, A. and Coelho, V.S. (eds.) (2007). Spaces for Change? The Politics of Citizen Participation in New Democratic Arenas, London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  25. Czarniawska, B. (2007). Shadowing, and Other Techniques for Doing Fieldwork in Modern Society, Malmö: Liber AB.Google Scholar
  26. Edmondson, A.C. and McManus, S.E. (2007). Methodological Fit in Management Field Research, Academy of Management Review 32(4): 1155–1179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Eisenhardt, K.M. and Graebner, M.E. (2007). Theory Building from Cases: Opportunities and challenges, Academy of Management Journal 50(1): 25–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Escobar, A. (2011). Encountering Development: The making and unmaking of the third world. [New in Paper] Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Eversole, R. (2010). Remaking Participation: Challenges for community development practice, Community Development Journal 47(1): 29–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Faraj, S., Jarvenpaa, S.L. and Majchrzak, A. (2011). Knowledge Collaboration in Online Communities, Organization Science 22(5): 1224–1239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ferguson, J.E. (forthcoming). Inclusive Perspectives or In-depth Learning? A longitudinal case study of past debates and future directions in knowledge management for development, Journal of Knowledge Management. in press.Google Scholar
  32. Ferguson, J.E., Huysman, M.H. and Soekijad, M. (2010). Knowledge Management in Practice: Pitfalls and potentials for development, World Development 38(12): 1797–1810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ferguson, J.E., Soekijad, M., Huysman, M.H. and Vaast, E. (2013). Blogging for ICT4D: Reflecting and engaging with peers to build development discourse, Information Systems Journal 23(4): 307–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Fiss, P.C. and Hirsch, P.M. (2005). The Discourse of Globalization: Framing and sensemaking of an emergent concept, American Sociological Review 70(1): 29–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five Misunderstandings about Case-study Research, Qualitative Inquiry 12(2): 219–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gaventa, J. (2004). Towards Participatory Governance: Assessing the transformative possibilities, in S. Hickey and G. Mohan (eds.) Participation: From tyranny to transformation, London: Zed Books, pp. 25–41.Google Scholar
  37. Gigler, B.S. (2014). Informational Capabilities: The missing link for understanding the impact of ICT on development, in B. Gigler (ed.) Closing the Feedback Loop, Can Technology Bridge the Accountability Gap? Washington DC: World Bank, pp. 17–42.Google Scholar
  38. Gioia, D.A., Corley, K.G. and Hamilton, A.L. (2013). Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research: Notes on the Gioia methodology, Organizational Research Methods 16(1): 15–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Goffman, E. (1974). Frame Analysis: An essay on the organization of experience, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Gough, C. and Shackley, S. (2001). The Respectable Politics of Climate Change: The epistemic communities and NGOs, International Affairs 77(2): 329–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Haas, E.B. (1990). When Knowledge Is Power, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  42. Haas, P. (2004). When Does Power Listen to Truth? A Constructivist Approach to the Policy Process, Journal of European Public Policy 11(4): 569–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Haas, P.M. (1992). Introduction: Epistemic communities and international policy coordination, International Organization 46(1): 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hayes, N. and Walsham, G. (2001). Participation in Groupware-mediated Communities of Practice: A socio-political analysis of knowledge working, Information and Organization 11(4): 263–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hayes, N. and Westrup, C. (2012). Context and the Processes of ICT for Development, Information and Organization 22(1): 23–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Heeks, R. (2002). Information Systems and Developing Countries: Failure, success, and local improvisations, The Information Society 18(2): 101–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Heeks, R. (2008). ICT4D 2.0: The next phase of applying ICT for international development, Computer 41(6): 26–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Heeks, R. (2010). Development 2.0: The IT-enabled transformation of international development, Communications of the ACM 53(4): 22–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Hickey, S. and Mohan, G. (2004). Participation: From tyranny to transformation, London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  50. Hine, C.E. (2005). Virtual Methods. Issues in Social Research on the Internet, Oxford/New York: Berg.Google Scholar
  51. Hinkin, T.R. (1998). A Brief Tutorial on the Development of Measures for Use in Survey Questionnaires, Organizational Research Methods 1(1): 104–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Howe, J. and Richards, P. (1984). Rural Roads and Poverty Alleviation, London: Intermediate Technology Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. International Monetary Fund (last updated 19th May 2015). Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers (PRSP) Available at: [WWW document] http://www.imf.org/external/np/prsp/prsp.aspx.
  54. Kane, G.C., Alavi, M., Labianca, J. and Borgatti, S. (2014). Integrating Social Networks and Information Systems: A review and framework for research, MIS Quarterly 38(1): 275–304.Google Scholar
  55. Kane, G.C., Majchrzak, A., Johnson, J. and Chenisern, L. (2009). A Longitudinal Model of Perspective Making and Perspective Taking Within Fluid Online Collectives, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), Paper 10: 1–17; Phoenix, Arizona.Google Scholar
  56. Langley, A., Smallman, C., Tsoukas, H. and Van de Ven, A.H. (2013). Process Studies of Change in Organization and Management: Unveiling temporality, activity, and flow, Academy of Management Journal 56(1): 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Leclercq-Vandelannoitte, A. (2011). Organizations as Discursive Constructions: A Foucauldian approach, Organization Studies 32(9): 1247–1271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Leydesdorff, L. (1995). The Challenge of Scientometrics: The development, measurement, and self-organization of scientific communications, Leiden: DSWO Press, Leiden University.Google Scholar
  59. Leydesdorff, L. and Welbers, K. (2011). The Semantic Mapping of Words and Co-words in Contexts, Journal of Informetrics 5(3): 469–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Madon, S. (2000). The Internet and Socio-economic Development: Exploring the interaction, Information Technology and People 13(2): 85–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Madon, S., Reinhard, N., Roode, D. and Walsham, G. (2009). Digital Inclusion Projects in Developing Countries: Processes of institutionalization, Information Technology for Development 15(2): 95–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Maitlis, S. and Lawrence, T.B. (2007). Triggers and Enablers of Sensegiving in Organizations, Academy of Management Journal 50(1): 57–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Marin, A. and Wellman, B. (2010). Social Network Analysis: An introduction, in J. Scott and P. Carrington (eds.) Handbook of Social Network Analysis, London: SAGE, pp. 1–8.Google Scholar
  64. McFarlane, C. (2006). Knowledge, Learning and Development: A post-rationalist approach, Progress in Development Studies 6(4): 287–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Merriam-Webster dictionary Available at [WWW document] http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary.
  66. Mitiku, T.N. (2009). A Framework for a Pro-Growth, Pro-Poor Transport Strategy: Guidance Note, Washington DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  67. Molla, A. and Heeks, R. (2007). Exploring e-Commerce Benefits for Businesses in a Developing Country, The Information Society 23(2): 95–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Mosse, E.L. and Sahay, S. (2003). Counter Networks, Communication and Health Information Systems, in M. Korpela, R. Montealegre and A. Poulymenakou (eds.) Organizational Information Ststems in the Context of Globalization, New York: Springer, pp. 35–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Multilateral Development Banks (MDBs) (2015). Progress Report (2013–2014) of the MDB Working Group on Sustainable Transport. African Development Bank (AfDB), Asian Development Bank (ADB), Development Bank of Latin America (CAF), European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), European Investment Bank (EIB), Inter-American Development Bank (IADB), Islamic Development Bank (IsDB), World Bank (WB). Available at: [WWW document] http://www.adb.org/documents/progress-report-2013-2014-mdb-working-group-sustainable-transport.
  70. Njoh, A.J. (2008). Implications of Africa’s Transportation Systems for Development in the Era of Globalization, The Review of Black Political Economy 35(4): 147–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. O’Mahony, S. and Bechky, B.A. (2008). Boundary Organizations: Enabling collaboration among unexpected allies, Administrative Science Quarterly 53(3): 422–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Orlikowski, W.J. (2002). Knowing in Practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing, Organization Science 13(3): 249–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Powell, M. (2006). Which Knowledge? Whose Reality? An Overview of Knowledge Used in the Development Sector, Development in Practice 16(6): 518–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Puri, S.K. (2007). Integrating Scientific with Indigenous Knowledge: Constructing knowledge alliances for land management in India, MIS Quarterly 31(2): 355–379.Google Scholar
  75. Roberts, J. (2006). Limits to Communities of Practice, Journal of Management Studies 43(3): 623–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Rossi, B. (2004). Revisiting Foucauldian Approaches: Power dynamics in development projects, Journal of Development Studies 40(6): 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Schreyögg, G. and Sydow, J. (2010). Crossroads. Organizing for Fluidity? Dilemmas of New Organizational Forms, Organization Science 21(6): 1251–1262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Sen, A. (1999). Development as Freedom, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  79. Smelser, N.J. and Marx, G.T. (2011). Theory of Collective Behavior, New Orleans, LA: Quid Pro, LLC.Google Scholar
  80. Taylor, M. (2007). Community Participation in the Real World: Opportunities and pitfalls in new governance spaces, Urban studies 44(2): 297–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Tolley, R.S. and Turton, B.J. (1995). Transport Systems, Policy and Planning: A geographical approach, Harlow: Longman group.Google Scholar
  82. Unwin, T. (2009). ICT4D, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  83. Van Eck, N. and Waltman, L. (2009). Software Survey: VOSviewer, A Computer Program for Bibliometric Mapping, Scientometrics 84(2): 523–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Vasconcellos, E.A. (2013). Urban Transport Environment and Equity: The case for developing countries, New York: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  85. Venkatesh, V., Brown, S.A. and Bala, H. (2013). Bridging the Qualitative-quantitative Divide: Guidelines for conducting mixed methods research in information systems, MIS Quarterly 37(1): 21–54.Google Scholar
  86. Venkatesh, V. and Sykes, T.A. (2013). Digital Divide Initiative Success in Developing Countries: A longitudinal field study in a village in India, Information Systems Research 24(2): 239–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Wagner, C., Cheung, K., Lee, F. and Ip, R. (2003). Enhancing e-Government in Developing Countries: Managing knowledge through virtual communities, The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries 14(4): 1–20.Google Scholar
  88. Walsham, G. (2006). Doing Interpretive Research, European Journal of Information Systems 15(3): 320–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Walsham, G. (2012). Are We Making a Better World with ICTs? Reflections on a Future Agenda for the IS Field, Journal of Information Technology 27(2): 87–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Walsham, G., Robey, D. and Sahay, S. (2007). Foreword: Special issue on information systems in developing countries, MIS Quarterly 31(2): 317–326.Google Scholar
  91. Wareham, J., Fox, P.B. and Cano Giner, J.L. (2014). Technology Ecosystem Governance, Organization Science 25(4): 1195–1215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Wasko, M.M. and Faraj, S. (2005). Why Should I Share? Examining Social Capital and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice, MIS Quarterly 29(1): 35–57.Google Scholar
  93. Waters, R.D., Burnett, E., Lamm, A. and Lucas, J. (2009). Engaging Stakeholders through Social Networking: How nonprofit organizations are using Facebook, Public Relations Review 35(2): 102–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Watkins, S.C., Swidler, A. and Hannan, T. (2012). Outsourcing Social Transformation: Development NGOs as organizations, Sociology 38: 285–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Watson-Manheim, M.B., Chudoba, K.M. and Crowston, K. (2012). Perceived Discontinuities and Constructed Continuities in Virtual Work, Information Systems Journal 22(1): 29–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Williams, G. (2004). Towards a Repoliticization of Participatory Development: Political capabilities and spaces of empowerment, in S. Hickey and G. Mohan (eds.) Participation: From tyranny to transformation, London: Zed Books, pp. 92–109.Google Scholar
  97. Zheng, Y. (2009). Different Spaces for e‐Development: What can we learn from the capability approach?, Information Technology for Development 15(2): 66–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Information Technology Trust 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Julie E Ferguson
    • 1
  • Maura Soekijad
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Organization Sciences, VU University AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of Information, Logistics and Innovation, VU University AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations