Is theory king?: questioning the theory fetish in information systems
- 475 Downloads
This paper suggests that there is too much emphasis on the requirement for theory use and theory building in qualitative research published in our leading journals. We discuss six concerns that we have that relate to this high status of theory in such papers. We argue for what we refer to as ‘theory light’ papers where theory plays no significant part in the paper and the contribution lies elsewhere, for example, new arguments, facts, patterns or relationships. Some examples of theory light papers (and research) are provided from other disciplines and one exemplar information systems paper is studied in depth. We see these papers as equally worthy as those which demonstrate the applicability and predictive qualities of theory use as well as the potential of theory building. We propose a list of 10 questions that authors and reviewers might ask themselves when writing or reviewing such theory light papers. The more demanding role of the reader is also discussed along with the requirement for editorial teams to adapt. We suggest that the requirement for a contribution to theory would be replaced with the requirement that any journal paper has a high potential for stimulating research that will impact on information systems theory and/or practice.
Keywordstheory theory light qualitative research journals author editor reader
We are very grateful to Leslie Willcocks and Chris Sauer for guidance on how best to focus the paper, among other excellent advice. We are also grateful to reviewers of an earlier and very different paper for a number of very valid criticisms, which have given us important pointers towards this piece. Don Hambrick and Connie Helfat kindly responded to our emails and were very helpful and supportive and we thank our colleagues from another discipline. We also thank Frank Chan, our colleague at ESSEC, for helpful discussions. Finally we are grateful to Guy Fitzgerald, Nathalie Mitev and François-Xavier de Vaujany who commented on a chapter of Julien Malaurent’s Ph.D. thesis in 2011 which represented the end of the beginning of this voyage of discovery.
- Agarwal, R. and Lucas, Jr H. C. (2005). The Information Systems Identity Crisis: Focusing on high-visibility and high-impact research, MIS Quarterly 29 (3): 381–398.Google Scholar
- AIS (2014). Senior Scholars’ Basket of Journals [WWW document] http://aisnet.org/?page=SeniorScholarBasket&hhSearchTerms=%22basket%22 (accessed 2 March 2014).
- Alvesson, M. and Sköldberg, K. (2009). Reflexive Methodology: New vistas for qualitative research, London: Sage.Google Scholar
- AMD (2014). AMD Founding Editorial Team Round Table Discussion [WWW document] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kBCdL2TULGo&feature=share&list=PLU-uzN0D6ikzDJIsuzzNRJ4uV9dJcQxYy (accessed 2 March 2014).Google Scholar
- AOM (living). Academy of Management Discoveries [WWW document] http://aom.org/amd/ (accessed 2 March 2014).
- Avison, D. and Wood-Harper, A. (1990). Multiview: An exploration in information systems development, Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Avital, M., Mathiassen, L. and Schultze, U. (2012). Call for Papers: European Journal of Information Systems Special Issue on Alternative Genres [WWW document] http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ejis/ejis_cfp_alternative_genres.pdf (accessed 14 April 2013).
- Baskerville, R. and Myers, M. D. (2009). Fashion waves in information systems research and practice, MIS Quarterly 33 (4): 647–662.Google Scholar
- Becker, H. S. (1996). The epistemology of qualitative research, in R. Jessor, A. Colby and R. A. Shweder (eds.) Ethnography and Human Development: Context and Meaning in Social Inquiry, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 53–71.Google Scholar
- Behar, R. (1996). The Vulnerable Observer: Anthropology that breaks your heart, Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
- Benbasat, I. and Zmud, R. W. (2003). The identity crisis within the IS discipline: Defining and communicating the discipline’s core properties, MIS Quarterly 27 (2): 183–194.Google Scholar
- Blake, W. (1982). Annotations to Sir Joshua Reynolds’s disclosures (Original work published 1808), in D. Erdman (ed.) The Complete Poetry and Prose of William Blake, Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Cecez-Kecmanovic, D., Galliers, R. D., Henfridsson, O., Newell, S. and Vidgen, R. (2011). Call for Papers MISQ Special Issue on Sociomateriality of Information Systems and Organizing [WWW document] http://www.misq.org/skin/frontend/default/misq/pdf/CurrentCalls/SI_Sociomateriality.pdf (accessed 14 April 2013).
- Eco, U. (1984). The Role of the Reader: Explorations in the semiotics of texts, Indiana: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
- Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research, Academy of Management Review 14 (4): 532–550.Google Scholar
- Feyerabend, P. K. (1993). Against Method, New York, NY: Verso.Google Scholar
- Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society: Outline of the theory of structuration, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
- Glaser, B. G. and Strauss, A. L. (2009). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for qualitative research, Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
- Goffman, E. (1968). Asylums: Essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates, New Brunswick, NJ: Aldine Transaction.Google Scholar
- Goffman, E. (2009). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity, New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
- Gregor, S. (2006). The nature of theory in information systems, MIS Quarterly 30 (3): 611–642.Google Scholar
- Hughes, R. (2000). Shock of the New. Television Series: BBC/Time-Life.Google Scholar
- JAIS (2012). CFP JAIS Theory Development Workshop ICIS 2012 [WWW document] http://www.aisnet.org/ais_lists/public_lists_archive/2012-July/006947.html (accessed 14 November 2013).
- Jones, M. R. and Karsten, H. (2008). Giddens’s structuration theory and information systems research, MIS Quarterly 32 (1): 127–157.Google Scholar
- King, J. L. and Lyytinen, K. (2006). Information Systems: The state of the field, Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Klein, H. K. and Rowe, F. (2008). Marshaling the Professional Experience of Doctoral Students: A contribution to the practical relevance debate, MIS Quarterly 32 (4): 675–686.Google Scholar
- Lee, A. S., Myers, M., Paré, G. and Urquhart, C. U. (2000). Three perspectives: If Markus’ 1983 classic study, “power, politics, and MIS implementation,” were being reviewed today, in Proceedings of International Conference in Information Systems (Brisbane), Atlanta, GA: AIS.Google Scholar
- Myers, M. D. and Klein, H. K. (2011). A set of principles for conducting critical research in information systems, MIS Quarterly 35 (1): 17–36.Google Scholar
- Stake, R. (2000). Case studies, in N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (eds.) Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 435–454.Google Scholar
- Stake, R. E. (1995). The Art of Case Study Research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Straub, D. (2012). Editor’s comments: Does MIS have native theories? MIS Quarterly 36 (2): iii–xii.Google Scholar
- Straub, D. and Ang, S. (2011). Editor’s comments: Rigor and relevance in IS research: Redefining the debate and a call for future research, MIS Quarterly 35 (1): iii–xi.Google Scholar
- Straub, D. W. (2008). Editor’s comments: Type II reviewing errors and the search for exciting papers, MIS Quarterly 32 (2): v–vii.Google Scholar
- Straub, D. W. (2009). Editor's Comments: Why top journals accept your paper, MIS Quarterly 33 (3): iii–ix.Google Scholar
- Truex, D., Holmström, J. and Keil, M. (2006). Theorizing in information systems research: A reflexive analysis of the adaptation of theory in information systems research, Journal of the Association for Information Systems 7 (12): 797–821.Google Scholar
- Van Maanen, J. (ed.) (1995). An end to innocence: The ethnography of ethnography, in Representation in Ethnography, Thousand Oaks: Sage, pp. 1–35.Google Scholar
- Venkatesh, V., Brown, S. A. and Bala, H. (2013). Bridging the qualitative-quantitative divide: Guidelines for conducting mixed methods research in information systems, MIS Quarterly 37 (1): 21–54.Google Scholar
- Weber, M. (1946). Essays in Sociology, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Weber, R. (2003). Editor’s comment: Still desperately seeking the IT artifact, MIS Quarterly 27 (2): iii–xi.Google Scholar
- Weick, K. E. (1989). Theory construction as disciplined imagination, Academy of Management Review 14 (4): 516–531.Google Scholar
- Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in Organizations, Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Wynn, D. and Williams, C. K. (2012). Principles for conducting critical realist case study research in information systems, MIS Quarterly 36 (3): 787–810.Google Scholar