Journal of Information Technology

, Volume 29, Issue 1, pp 97–110

Everything counts in large amounts: a critical realist case study on data-based production

Research Article

Abstract

Contemporary digital ecosystems produce vast amounts of data every day. The data are often no more than microscopic log entries generated by the elements of an information infrastructure or system. Although such records may represent a variety of things outside the system, their powers go beyond the capacity to carry semantic content. In this article, we harness critical realism to explain how such data come to matter in specific business operations. We analyse the production of an advertising audience from data tokens extracted from a telecommunications network. The research is based on an intensive case study of a mobile network operator that tries to turn its subscribers into an advertising audience. We identify three mechanisms that shape data-based production and three properties that characterize the underlying pool of data. The findings advance the understanding of many organizational settings that are centred on data processing.

Keywords

audience critical realism data-driven information actualization measurement mechanism 

References

  1. Aaltonen, A. (2012). The Beauty and Perils of Metrics, Mercury Magazine 1 (3): 56–59.Google Scholar
  2. Aaltonen, A. and Kallinikos, J. (2013). Coordination and Learning in Wikipedia: Revisiting the dynamics of exploitation and exploration, Research in the Sociology of Organizations 37: 161–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Archer, M.S. (1982). Morphogenesis Versus Structuration: On combining structure and action, The British Journal of Sociology 33 (4): 455–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Archer, M.S. (1998). Introduction: Realism in the social sciences, in M. Archer, R. Bhaskar, A. Collier, T. Lawson and A. Norrie (eds.) Critical Realism: Essential Readings, New York: Routledge, pp. 189–205.Google Scholar
  5. Baskerville, R.L. and Myers, M.D. (2002). Information Systems as a Reference Discipline, MIS Quarterly 26 (1): 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bateson, G. (2000). Steps to an Ecology of Mind, Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Becker, H.S. (2007). Writing for Social Scientists: How to Start and Finish Your Thesis, Book, or Article, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Benbasat, I. and Zmud, R.W. (2003). The Identity Crisis within the IS Discipline: Defining and communicating the discipline’s core properties, MIS Quarterly 27 (2): 183–194.Google Scholar
  9. Benkler, Y. (2006). The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Bermejo, F. (2009). Audience Manufacture in Historical Perspective: From broadcasting to Google, New Media & Society 11 (1/2): 133–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bhaskar, R. (1998). Philosophy and Scientific Realism, in M. Archer, R. Bhaskar, A. Collier, T. Lawson and A. Norrie (eds.) Critical Realism: Essential Readings, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Bhaskar, R. (2008). A Realist Theory of Science, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Boyd, D. and Crawford, K. (2012). Critical Questions for Big Data. Provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon, Information, Communication & Society 15 (5): 662–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bratich, J.Z. (2005). Amassing the Multitude: Revisiting early audience studies, Communication Theory 15 (3): 242–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brewer, J.D. (2000). Ethnography, Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Bygstad, B. (2010). Generative Mechanisms for Innovation in Information Infrastructures, Information and Organization 20 (3-4): 156–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Carr, N.G. (2008). The Big Switch, New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  18. Cohen, C.M. (2012). Aristotle’s Metaphysics, in E.N. Zalta (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2012 Edition) [WWW document] http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2012/entries/aristotle-metaphysics/ (accessed 11 December 2013).
  19. Crotty, M. (1998). The Foundations of Social Research: Meaning and Perspective in the Research Process, London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  20. Day, G.S. (2003). Creating a Superior Customer-Relating Capability, MIT Sloan Management Review 44 (3): 77–82.Google Scholar
  21. Dourish, P. (2001). Where the Action Is, London: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  22. Easton, G. (2010). Critical Realism in Case Study Research, Industrial Marketing Management 39 (1): 118–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ekbia, H.R. (2009). Digital Artifacts as Quasi-Objects: Qualification, mediation, and materiality, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60 (12): 2554–2566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Elder-Vass, D. (2005). Emergence and the Realist Account of Cause, Journal of Critical Realism 4 (2): 315–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Elder-Vass, D. (2007). For Emergence: Refining Archer’s account of social structure, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 37 (1): 25–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ettema, J.S. and Whitney, D.C. (1994). The Money Arrow: An introduction to audiencemaking, in audiencemaking: How the media create the audience, in J.S. Ettema and D.C. Whitney (eds.) Sage Annual Reviews of Communication Research, London: SAGE Publications, pp. 1–18.Google Scholar
  27. Faulkner, P. and Runde, J. (2009). On the Identity of Technological Objects and User Innovations in Function, Academy of Management Review 34 (3): 442–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Faulkner, P. and Runde, J. (2010). The Social, the Material, and the Ontology of Non-Material Objects, in Judge Us Seminar, University of Cambridge, UK, (Unpublished manuscript).Google Scholar
  29. Faulkner, P. and Runde, J. (2013). Technological Objects, Social Positions, and the Transformational Model of Social Activity, MIS Quarterly 37 (3): 803–818.Google Scholar
  30. Flick, U. (2004). Triangulation in Qualitative Research, in U. Flick, E. von Kardoff and I. Steinke (eds.) A Companion to Qualitative Research, London: SAGE Publications, pp. 178–183.Google Scholar
  31. Kallinikos, J. (1999). Computer-Based Technology and the Constitution of Work: A study on the cognitive foundations of work, Accounting, Management & Information Technology 9 (4): 261–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kallinikos, J. (2006). The Consequences of Information: Institutional Implications of Technological Change, Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kallinikos, J. (2012). The Allure of Big Data, ParisTech REVIEW 16.11.2012 [WWW document] http://www.paristechreview.com/2012/11/16/allure-big-data (accessed 11 December 2013).
  34. Kallinikos, J., Aaltonen, A. and Marton, A. (2013). The Ambivalent Ontology of Digital Artifacts, MIS Quarterly 37 (2): 357–370.Google Scholar
  35. Langley, A. (1999). Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data, Academy of Management Review 24 (4): 691–710.Google Scholar
  36. Latour, B. (1999). Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Lee, A.S. (2010). Retrospect and Prospect: Information systems research in the last and next twenty-five years, Journal of Information Technology 25 (4): 336–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Leonardi, P.M. (2010). Digital Materiality? How artifacts without matter, matter, First Monday (15:6) [WWW document] http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/viewArticle/3036/2567, (accessed 11 December 2013).
  39. Leonardi, P.M., Nardi, B.A. and Kallinikos, J. (2012). Materiality and Organizing: Social Interaction in a Technological World, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lyytinen, K. and Yoo, Y. (2002). The Next Wave of Nomadic Computing, Information Systems Research 13 (4): 377–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. McKinney, E.H. and Yoos, C.J. (2010). Information about Information: A taxonomy of views, MIS Quarterly 34 (2): 329–344.Google Scholar
  42. Mingers, J. (2004). Realizing Information Systems: Critical realism as an underpinning philosophy for information systems, Information and Organization 14 (2): 87–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Morley, D. (2006). Unanswered Questions in Audience Research, The Communication Review 9 (2): 101–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mutch, A. (2010). Technology, Organization and Structure – A morphogenetic approach, Organization Science 21 (2): 507–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Napoli, P.M. (2003). Audience Economics: Media Institutions and the Audience Marketplace, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Orlikowski, W.J. (2007). Sociomaterial Practices: Exploring technology at work, Organization Studies 28 (9): 1435–1448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Orlikowski, W.J. and Barley, S.R. (2001). Technology and Institutions: What can research on information technology and research on organizations learn from each other? MIS Quarterly 25 (2): 145–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Redman, T.C. (2008). Data Driven, Boston: Harvard Business Press.Google Scholar
  49. Runde, J. (1998). Assessing Causal Economic Explanations, Oxford Economic Papers 50 (2): 151–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Runde, J., Jones, M., Munir, K. and Nikolychuk, L. (2009). On Technological Objects and the Adoption of Technological Product Innovations: Rules, routines and the transition from analogue photography to digital imaging, Cambridge Journal of Economics 33 (1): 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Russell, B. (1994). History of Western Philosophy, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  52. Sayer, A.R. (2000). Realism and Social Science, London: SAGE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sismondo, S. (1993). Some Social Constructions, Social Studies of Science 23 (3): 515–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Simon, H.A. (1996). The Sciences of the Artificial, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  55. Walsh, D. (1998). Doing Ethnography, in C. Seale (ed.) Researching Society and Culture, London: SAGE Publications, pp. 217–232.Google Scholar
  56. Weick, K.E. (1995). What Theory Is Not, Theorizing Is, Administrative Science Quarterly 40 (3): 385–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wynn, D. and Williams, C.K. (2012). Principles for Conducting Critical Realist Case Study Research in Information Systems, MIS Quarterly 36 (3): 787–810.Google Scholar
  58. Yin, R.K. (2003). Case Study Research: Design and Methods, London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  59. Yoo, Y. (2010). Computing in Everyday Life: A call for research on experiential computing, MIS Quarterly 34 (2): 213–231.Google Scholar
  60. Yoo, Y., Boland Jr. R.J., Lyytinen, K. and Majchrzak, A. (2012). Organizing for Innovation in the Digitized World, Organization Science 23 (5): 1398–1408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Yoo, Y., Henfridsson, O. and Lyytinen, K. (2010). The New Organizing Logic of Digital Innovation: An agenda for information systems research, Information Systems Research 21 (4): 724–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Zuboff, S. (1988). In the Age of The Smart Machine: The Future of Work and Power, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Information Technology Trust 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The London School of Economics and Political ScienceLondonUK

Personalised recommendations