IS research stakeholders and cyborgs: an opportunity to revisit the normative IS agenda
Commentary
First Online:
- 27 Downloads
- 1 Citations
References
- Adam, A. (2012). IS and Its Agenda, Journal of Information Technology 27 (2): 102–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Beauchamp, T.L., Bowie, N.E. and Arnold, D.G. (eds.) (2009). Ethical Theory and Business, 8th edn Upper Saddle River: Pearson.Google Scholar
- Bryant, A., Land, F. and King, J.L. (2009). Editors’ Introduction, Journal of the Association for Information Systems 10 (11): 782–786.Google Scholar
- Constantinides, P., Chiasson, M.W. and Introna, L. (2012). The Ends of Information Systems Research: A pragmatic framework, MIS Quarterly 36 (1): 1–19.Google Scholar
- Donaldson, T. and Preston, L.E. (1995). The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications, Academy of Management Review 20 (1): 65–91.Google Scholar
- Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Lyytinen, K. and Yoo, Y. (2010). Social Networks and Information Systems: Ongoing and future research streams, Journal of the Association for Information Systems 11 (2): 61–68.Google Scholar
- Pouloudi, A. (1999). Aspects of the Stakeholder Concept and Their Implications for Information Systems Development, Proceedings of the Thirtieth-second Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences (HICSS-32), 5–8 January, Maui, Hawaii, IEEE Computer Society Press, Washington DC.Google Scholar
- Pouloudi, A. and Whitley, E.A. (1997). Stakeholder Identification in Interorganizational Systems: Gaining insights for drug use management systems, European Journal of Information Systems 6 (1): 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pouloudi, A. and Whitley, E.A. (2000). Representing Human and Non-Human Stakeholders: On speaking with authority, in R. Baskerville, J. Stage and J.I. DeGross (eds.) Organizational and Social Perspectives on Information Technology, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 340–354.Google Scholar
- Sawyer, S., Griffiths, M., Light, B. and Lincoln, S. (2011). Constructing, Deconstructing and Negotiating the Boundaries of Digital Cultures, IT & People 24 (1): 5–9.Google Scholar
- Schultze, U. (2000). A Confessional Account of an Ethnography about Knowledge Work, MIS Quarterly 24 (1): 3–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Schultze, U. and Mason, R.O. (2012). Studying Cyborgs: Re-examining internet studies as human subjects research, Journal of Information Technology 27, This issue.Google Scholar
- Stahl, B.C. (2012a). Responsible Research and Innovation in Information Systems, European Journal of Information Systems 21 (3): 207–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Stahl, B.C. (2012b). Morality, Ethics, and Reflection: A categorization of normative IS research, Journal of the Association for Information Systems 13 (8): 636–656.Google Scholar
- Stahl, B.C., Tremblay, M.C. and LeRouge, C.M. (2011). Focus Groups and Critical Social IS Research: How the choice of method can promote emancipation of respondents and researchers, European Journal of Information Systems 20 (4): 378–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Walsham, G. (1997). Actor-Network Theory and IS Research: Current status and future prospects, in A.S. Lee, J. Liebenau and J.I. DeGross (eds.) London: Chapman & Hall, pp. 466–480.Google Scholar
- Walsham, G. (2012). Are We Making a Better World with ICTs? Reflections on a Future Agenda for the IS Field, Journal of Information Technology 27 (2): 87–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copyright information
© Association for Information Technology Trust 2012