Journal of Information Technology

, Volume 27, Issue 4, pp 321–323 | Cite as

IS research stakeholders and cyborgs: an opportunity to revisit the normative IS agenda

  • Nancy Pouloudi
Commentary

References

  1. Adam, A. (2012). IS and Its Agenda, Journal of Information Technology 27 (2): 102–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beauchamp, T.L., Bowie, N.E. and Arnold, D.G. (eds.) (2009). Ethical Theory and Business, 8th edn Upper Saddle River: Pearson.Google Scholar
  3. Bryant, A., Land, F. and King, J.L. (2009). Editors’ Introduction, Journal of the Association for Information Systems 10 (11): 782–786.Google Scholar
  4. Constantinides, P., Chiasson, M.W. and Introna, L. (2012). The Ends of Information Systems Research: A pragmatic framework, MIS Quarterly 36 (1): 1–19.Google Scholar
  5. Donaldson, T. and Preston, L.E. (1995). The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications, Academy of Management Review 20 (1): 65–91.Google Scholar
  6. Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Lyytinen, K. and Yoo, Y. (2010). Social Networks and Information Systems: Ongoing and future research streams, Journal of the Association for Information Systems 11 (2): 61–68.Google Scholar
  7. Pouloudi, A. (1999). Aspects of the Stakeholder Concept and Their Implications for Information Systems Development, Proceedings of the Thirtieth-second Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences (HICSS-32), 5–8 January, Maui, Hawaii, IEEE Computer Society Press, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  8. Pouloudi, A. and Whitley, E.A. (1997). Stakeholder Identification in Interorganizational Systems: Gaining insights for drug use management systems, European Journal of Information Systems 6 (1): 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Pouloudi, A. and Whitley, E.A. (2000). Representing Human and Non-Human Stakeholders: On speaking with authority, in R. Baskerville, J. Stage and J.I. DeGross (eds.) Organizational and Social Perspectives on Information Technology, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 340–354.Google Scholar
  10. Sawyer, S., Griffiths, M., Light, B. and Lincoln, S. (2011). Constructing, Deconstructing and Negotiating the Boundaries of Digital Cultures, IT & People 24 (1): 5–9.Google Scholar
  11. Schultze, U. (2000). A Confessional Account of an Ethnography about Knowledge Work, MIS Quarterly 24 (1): 3–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Schultze, U. and Mason, R.O. (2012). Studying Cyborgs: Re-examining internet studies as human subjects research, Journal of Information Technology 27, This issue.Google Scholar
  13. Stahl, B.C. (2012a). Responsible Research and Innovation in Information Systems, European Journal of Information Systems 21 (3): 207–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Stahl, B.C. (2012b). Morality, Ethics, and Reflection: A categorization of normative IS research, Journal of the Association for Information Systems 13 (8): 636–656.Google Scholar
  15. Stahl, B.C., Tremblay, M.C. and LeRouge, C.M. (2011). Focus Groups and Critical Social IS Research: How the choice of method can promote emancipation of respondents and researchers, European Journal of Information Systems 20 (4): 378–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Walsham, G. (1997). Actor-Network Theory and IS Research: Current status and future prospects, in A.S. Lee, J. Liebenau and J.I. DeGross (eds.) London: Chapman & Hall, pp. 466–480.Google Scholar
  17. Walsham, G. (2012). Are We Making a Better World with ICTs? Reflections on a Future Agenda for the IS Field, Journal of Information Technology 27 (2): 87–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Information Technology Trust 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nancy Pouloudi
    • 1
  1. 1.Athens University of Economics and BusinessAthensGreece

Personalised recommendations