Journal of Information Technology

, Volume 25, Issue 2, pp 137–151 | Cite as

Exploring temporal coordination of events with

  • Zuhair Khan
  • Sirkka L Jarvenpaa
Research Article


The coordination of a social event requires a number of time-bounded tasks (exact time, location, activities of the event) to be determined prior to the event. On university campuses, Facebook is increasingly used to organize ad hoc physical gatherings within social groups. The coordination takes place via Facebook event pages and a ‘wall’ that represent online, shared, interactive spaces. This paper explores how such online interactive spaces facilitate the temporal coordination of social events. We content analyze Facebook's event pages and walls to understand how social group behavior is different from prevailing theories of group task progress and media use. The results suggest that, similar to many work groups, social groups exhibit differential interactive behaviors before and after the midpoint of when the event is created on Facebook and when the offline activity is going to happen. However, the results differ in the sense that the interactive behavior is highest before rather than after the midpoint. We also found that the involvement of the creator of the event pages is associated with higher interactive behavior of the social group. We discuss the findings and derive implications for the design of online tools for social event management.


social networking technologies time event management temporal coordination group behavior content analysis 


  1. Arguello, J., Butler, B.S., Joyce, E., Kraut, R., Ling, K.S., Rose, C. and Wang, X. (2006). Talk to me: Foundations for successful individual-group interactions in online communities. Proceedings of Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal, Canada, 2006): 959–968.Google Scholar
  2. Bell, B.S. and Kozlowski, S.W.J. (2002). A Typology of Virtual Teams: Implications for Effective Leadership, Group and Organization Management 27 (1): 14–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bock, G.-W., Ng, W.-L. and Shin, Y. (2008). The Effect of a Perceived Leader's Influence on the Motivation of the Members of Nonwork Related Virtual Communities, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 35 (2): 292–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Booher, J.M., Chennupati, B., Onesti, N. and Royer, D.P. (2007). Facebook Ride Connect: Share. Ride. Socialize. Proceedings of Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, USA, 2007); New York:Association for Computing Machinery, 2043–2048.Google Scholar
  5. Boyd, D. and Ellison, N. (2007). Social Network Sites: Definition, history and scholarship, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13 (1).Google Scholar
  6. Butler, B., Joyce, E. and Pike, J. (2008). Don’t Look Now, But We’ve created a Bureaucracy: The nature and roles of policies and rules in Wikipedia. Proceedings of the 26th annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Florence, Italy, 2008); New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 1101–1110.Google Scholar
  7. Butler, B., Sproull, L., Kiesler, S. and Kraut, R. (2007). Community Effort in Online Groups: Who does the work and why? in S. Weisband and L. Atwater (eds.) Leadership at a Distance, Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  8. Carte, T. and Chidambaran, L. (2004). A Capabilities-Based Theory of Technology Deployment in Diverse Teams: Leapfrogging the pitfalls of diversity and leveraging its potential with collaborative technology, Journal of the Association for Information Systems 5 (11–12): 448–471.Google Scholar
  9. Cha, M., Kwak, H., Rodriguez, P., Yong-Yeol, A. and Moon, S. (2007). I Tube, You Tube, Everybody Tubes: Analyzing the world's largest user generated content video system, Internet Measurement Conference (San Diego, USA, 2007); 1–14.Google Scholar
  10. Chang, A., Duck, J. and Bordia, P. (2006). Understanding the Multidimensionality of Group Development, Small Group Research 37 (4): 327–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chidambaram, L. (1996). Relational Development in Computer-Supported Groups, MIS Quarterly 20 (2): 143–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dennis, A.R., Fuller, R.M. and Valacich, J.S. (2008). Media, Tasks, and Communication Processes: A theory of media synchronicity, MIS Quarterly 32 (3): 575–600.Google Scholar
  13. DiMicco, J.M. and Millen, D.R. (2007). Identity Management: Multiple presentations of self in Facebook. Proceedings of Conference on Supporting Group Work (Sanibel Island, USA, 2007); New York: Association of Computing Machinery, 383–386.Google Scholar
  14. Dwyer, C., Hiltz, S.R. and Passerini, K. (2007). Trust and Privacy Concern Within Social networking Sites: A comparison of Facebook and Myspace, Proceedings of the Thirteenth Americas Conference on Information Systems (Keystone, USA, 2007).Google Scholar
  15. Ellison, N., Steinfield, C. and Lampe, C. (2007). The Benefits of Facebook “Friends”: Exploring the relationship between college students’ use of online social networks and social capital, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 12 (3): 1.Google Scholar
  16. Gersick, C.J. (1988). Time and Transition in Work Teams: Toward a new model of group development, Academy of Management Journal 31 (1): 1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gersick, C.J. (1989). Marking Time: Predictable transitions in task groups, Academy of Management Journal 32 (2): 274–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Golder, S.A., Wilkinson, D. and Huberman, B.A. (2007). Rhythms of Social Interaction: Messaging within a massive online network, in Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Communities and Technology, East Lansing, USA; London: Springer-Verlag, 41–66.Google Scholar
  19. Gross, R. and Acquisti, A. (2005). Information Revelation and Privacy in Online Social Networks, Workshop on Privacy in the Electronic Society (Alexandria, USA, 2005).Google Scholar
  20. Horowitz, A.S. (2005). Social Software: Corporate and web-based networking software helps people make critical business connections, [www document]
  21. Herring, S.C. (1999). Interactional Coherence in CMC, Journal of Computer Mediated Communication 4 (4).Google Scholar
  22. Jarvenpaa, S.L., Shaw, T. and Staples, S. (2004). Toward Contextualized Theories of Trust: Role of initial trust in global virtual teams, Information Systems Research 15 (3): 250–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Joinson, A.N. (2008). ‘Looking at’, ‘Looking Up’, ‘Keeping up with People’? Motives and Uses of Facebook, Proceedings of the 26th annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Florence, Italy, 2008); New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 1027–1036.Google Scholar
  24. Jones, H. and Soltren, J.H. (2005). Facebook: Threats to privacy, Working Paper, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
  25. Jones, Q., Ravid, G. and Rafaeli, S. (2004). Information Overload and the Message Dynamics of Online Interaction Spaces: A theoretical model and empirical exploration, Information Systems Research 15 (2): 194–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kalman, Y.M. and Rafaeli, S. (2005). Email Chronemics: Unobstrusive profling of response times, Proceedings of the 28th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (Big Island, USA, 2005); Washington DC: IEEE Computer Society Press, 108–118.Google Scholar
  27. Kalman, Y.M., Ravid, G., Raban, D.R. and Rafaeli, S. (2006). Pauses and Response Latencies: A chronemic analysis of asynchronous CMC, Journal of Computer Mediated Communication 12 (1), article 1.Google Scholar
  28. Kane, G.C. and Alavi, M. (2008). Casting the Net: Testing a multimodal network perspective on knowledge sharing, Information Systems Research 19 (3): 353–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kayworth, T.R. and Leidner, D.E. (2002). Leadership Effectiveness in Global Virtual Teams, Journal of Management Information Systems 18 (3): 7–40.Google Scholar
  30. Korat, O. and Shamir, A. (2004). Do Hebrew Electronic Books Differ from Dutch Electronic Books? A Replication of a Dutch Content Analysis, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 20 (4): 257–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kowitz, B., Darrow, A., Khalsa, H. and Zimmerman, J. (2005). Gather: Design for impromptu activity support utilizing social networks [WWW document] (accessed 5th November 2009).Google Scholar
  32. Lampe, C., Ellison, N. and Steinfield, C. (2006). A Face(book) in the Crowd: Social searching vs. social browsing, Proceedings of Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work 2006 (New York, USA, 2006); ACM Press. 167–170.Google Scholar
  33. Lee, H. and Liebenau, J. (1999). Time in Organizational Studies: Towards a new research direction, Organization Studies 20 (6): 1035–1058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lee, H. and Liebenau, J. (2000). Temporal Effects of Information Systems on Business Processes: Focusing on the dimensions of temporality, Accounting Management and Information Technology 10 (3): 157–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lee, H. and Whitley, E.A. (2002). Time and information technology: Temporal impacts on individuals, organizations, and society, Information Society 18 (4): 235–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lewis, K., Kaufman, J., Gonzales, M., Wimmer, A. and Christakis, N. (2008). Taste, Ties, and Time: A new social network dataset using, Social Networks 30 (4): 330–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lim, M. and Murnighan, J.K. (1994). Phases, Deadlines, and the Bargaining Process, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 58 (2): 153–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Massey, A.P. and Montoya-Weiss, M.M. (2006). Unraveling the Temporal Fabric of Knowledge Conversion: A model of media selection and use, MIS Quarterly 30 (1): 99–114.Google Scholar
  39. Mayer, A. and Puller, S.L. (2008). The Old Boy (and Girl) Network: Social network formation on university campuses, Journal of Public Economics 92 (1–2): 329–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. McGrath, J.E. (1984). Groups: Interaction and Performance, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  41. McGrath, J.E. (1991). Time, Interaction, and Performance (TIP): A theory of groups, Small Group Research 22 (2): 147–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. McGrath, J.E. and Hollingshead, A.B. (1994). Groups Interacting with Technology, Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  43. Michinov, E. and Michinov, N. (2007). Identifying a Transition Period at the Midpoint of an Online Collaborative Activity: A study among adult learners, Computers in Human Behaviour 23 (3): 1355–1371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Montoya-Weiss, M.M., Massey, A.P. and Song, M. (2001). Getting it Together: Temporal coordination and conflict management in global virtual teams, Academy of Management Journal 44 (6): 1251–1262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ng, J., Terleski, J. and Hong, J. (2006). Whisper: Analysis and design for a community event service, in Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2006 (Quebec, Montreal, 2006); New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 1151–1156.Google Scholar
  46. Orlikowski, W.J. and Iacono, C.S. (2001). Research Commentary: Desperately seeking the ‘IT’ in IT research – A call to theorizing the IT artifact, Information Systems Research 12 (2): 121–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pew Internet & American Life Project (2007). Social Networking Websites and Teens: An overview [www document] (accessed 18th March 2010).
  48. Reeves, B., Malone, T.W. and O’Driscoll, T. (2008). Leadership's Online Labs, Harvard Business Review 86: 59–66.Google Scholar
  49. Rintel, E.S. and Pittam, J. (1997). Strangers in a Strange Land: Interaction management on internet relay chat, Human Communication Research 23 (4): 507–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ross, C., Orr, E.S., Sisic, M., Arseneault, J.M., Simmering, M.G. and Orr, R.R. (2009). Personality and Motivation Associated with Facebook Use, Computers in Human Behavior 25 (2): 578–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Schultz, T. (1999). Temporal, Interactive Options in Online Journalism: A content analysis of 100 U.S. newspapers, Journal of Computer Mediated Communication 5 (1).Google Scholar
  52. Seers, A. and Woodruff, S. (1997). Temporal Pacing in Task Forces: Group Development or Deadline Pressure, Journal of Management 23 (2): 169–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Shen, Z., Yoo, Y. and Lyytinen, K. (2005). Temporal Implications of Information Technology to Work Practices: Organizing in and for time in an emergency department, Spouts: Working Papers on Information Systems, 5 (18): 88–101.Google Scholar
  54. Stutzman, F. (2006). An Evaluation of Identity-Sharing Behavior in Social Network Communities, iDMAa Journal 3 (1): 1–7.Google Scholar
  55. Thurman, N. (2008). Forums for Citizen Journalists? Adoption of user generated content initiatives by online news media, New Media & Society 10 (1): 139–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Trammell, K.D., Tarkowski, A., Hofmokl, J. and Sapp, A.M. (2006). Rzeczpospolita blogow [Republic of Blog]: Examining Polish bloggers through content analysis, Journal of Computer Mediated Communication 11 (3): 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Waller, M.J., Zellmer-Bruhn, M. and Giambatista, R.C. (2002). Watching the Clock: Group pacing behavior under dynamic deadlines, Academy of Management Journal 45 (5): 1046–1055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Walther, J.B. (1992). Interpersonal Effects in Computer-Mediated Communication: A relational perspective, Communication Research 19 (1): 52–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Walther, J.B. (2006). Nonverbal Dynamics in Computer-Mediated Communication, or ☹ and the Net ☹'.s with You, ☺ and You ☺ Alone, in V. Manusov and M.L. Patterson (eds.) Handbook of Nonverbal Communication, Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 461–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Walther, J.B. and Bunz, U. (2005). The Rules of Virtual Groups: Trust, liking, and performance in computer mediated communication, Journal of Communication 55 (4): 828–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Walther, J.B. and Tidwell, L.C. (1995). Nonverbal Cues in Computer-Mediated Communication, and the Effect of Chronemics on Relational Communication, Journal of Organizational Computing 5 (4): 355–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Walther, J.B., Van Der Heide, B., Hamel, L.M. and Shulman, H.C. (2009). Self-Generated Versus Other-Generated Statements and Impressions in Computer-Mediated Communication: A test of warranting theory using Facebook, Communication Research 36 (2): 229–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Walther, J.B., Van Der Heide, B., Kim, S.Y. and Westerman, D. (2008). The Role of Friends’ Appearance and Behavior on Evaluations of Individuals on Facebook: Are we known by the company we keep? Human Communication Research 34 (1): 28–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Watson-Manheim, M.B. and Bélanger, F. (2007). Communication Media Repertoires: Dealing with the multiplicity of media choices, MIS Quarterly 31 (2): 267–293.Google Scholar
  65. Weisband, S. (2008). Leadership at a Distance: Research in Technologically Supported Work, New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  66. Wilson, J.M., Straus, S.G. and McEvily, B. (2006). All in Due Time: The development of trust in computer-mediated and face-to-face teams, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 99 (1): 16–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Yakura, E.K. (2002). Charting Time: Timelines as Temporal Boundary Objects, Academy of Management Journal 45 (5): 956–970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Zaheer, S., Albert, S. and Zaheer, A. (1999). Time Scales and Organizational Theory, Academy of Management Review 24 (4): 725–741.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Information Technology Trust 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Business, Technology, and Law, McCombs School of Business, University of Texas at AustinAustinUSA

Personalised recommendations