Gift-giving as a conceptual framework: framing social behavior in online networks
- 239 Downloads
This paper explores the use of gift-giving as a theoretical and conceptual framework for analyzing social behavior in online networks and communities. Not only has gift-giving the potential to frame and explain much social media behavior, but reversely, and perhaps more importantly, mediated social behavior also has the potential to develop gift-giving theory. Information and communication technologies form joint sociotechnical systems where new practices emerge. The paper focuses on describing the academic background of the gifting framework to help develop a deeper, theory-based, understanding of these sociotechnical phenomena. Three themes are prevalent in the gifting literature: other-orientation, social bonding and generalized reciprocity. The paper gives examples of how these themes are enacted by end-users via the use of information and communication technologies. Finally, sociotechnically embedded economies, called gifting technologies, are identified and discussed.
Keywordsgift-giving gifting technologies social networks
- Barbrook, R. (1998). The Hi-Tech Gift Economy, First Monday 3 (12).Google Scholar
- Bays, H. and Mowbray, M. (1999). Cookies, Gift-Giving and the Internet, First Monday 4 (11).Google Scholar
- Berking, H. (1999). Sociology of Giving, London: SAGE.Google Scholar
- Bollier, D. (2001). The cornucopia of the commons, Yes! 6th July 2005 [www document] http://www.futurenet.org/issues/reclaiming-the-commons/the-cornucopia-of-the-commons (accessed 1st November 2009).
- Bordieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste, (R. Nice, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Damon, F.H. (1980). The Kula and Generalized Exchange: Considering some unconsidered aspects of the elementary structures of kinship, Man (new series) 15 (2): 267–293.Google Scholar
- Godbout, J. and Caillé, A. (1992). The World of the Gift, (D. Winkler, Trans.). Quebéc: McGill-Queen's University Press.Google Scholar
- Goffman, E. (1971). Relations in Public: Microstudies of the public order, London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
- Gupta, K.R., Svendsen, G.L.H. and Maiti, P. (eds.) (2008). Social Capital, Vol. 1. New Delhi: Atlantic Publishers & Distributors.Google Scholar
- Håkansson, M., Rost, M. and Holmquist, L.E. (2007). Gifts from Friends and Strangers: A study of mobile music sharing, in ECSCW’07 (Limerick, Ireland, 2007); London: Springer, 311–330.Google Scholar
- Ihde, D. (1993). Postphenomenology – Essays in the Postmodern Context, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Publishers.Google Scholar
- Iskold, A. (2008). The danger of free, [www Document] http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_danger_of_free.php (accessed 1st November 2009).
- Kaye, R. (2004). Next-generation file sharing with social networks, 3rd May [www document] http://www.openp2p.com/pub/a/p2p/2004/03/05/file_share.html (accessed 1st November 2009).
- Kelly, K. (2007). Technology wants to be free, The Technium [www document] http://www.kk.org/thetechnium/archives/2007/11/technology_want.php (accessed 1st November 2009).
- Klamer, A. (2003). Gift Economy, in R. Towse (ed.) A Handbook of Cultural Economics, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 241–247.Google Scholar
- Masnick, M. (2007). The grand unified theory on the economics of the free, [www document] http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20070503/012939.shtml (accessed 1st November 2009).
- McGee, K. and Skågeby, J. (2004). Gifting Technologies, First Monday 9 (12).Google Scholar
- Mello, J.P. (2004). Wirehog P2P melds social networks and file-sharing, 16th November [www document] http://www.technewsworld.com/story/38188.html (accessed 1st November 2009).
- Organ, D.W., Podsakoff, P.M. and Mackenzie, S.B. (2006). Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Its nature, antecedents, and consequences, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Osteen, M. (2003). Questions of the Gift, in M. Osteen (ed.) The Question of the Gift, London: Routledge, pp. 1–42.Google Scholar
- Pearson, E. (2006). Digital Gifts: Participation and gift exchange in LiveJournal communities, First Monday 12 (5).Google Scholar
- Piatek, M., Isdal, T., Anderson, T., Krishnamurthy, A. and Venkataramani, A. (2007). Do Incentives Build Robustness in BitTorrent? in NSDI’07 (Cambridge, MA, USA, 2007); Berkeley: USENIX, 1–14.Google Scholar
- Putnam, R.D. (1993). The Prosperous Community – Social capital and public life, The American Prospect 4 (13): 35–42, 21st March.Google Scholar
- Ripeanu, M., Mowbray, M., Andrade, N. and Lima, A. (2006). Gifting Technologies: A BitTorrent case study, First Monday 11 (11).Google Scholar
- Roush, W. (2005, Nov 18). Social Networking 3.0 – The third generation of social-networking technology has hit the Web, and it’s about content as much as contacts, Technology Review [www document] http://www.technologyreview.com/InfoTech-Networks/wtr_15908,258,p1.html (accessed 1st November 2009).
- Sahlins, M. (1972). Stone Age Economics, Chicago: Alding-Atherton.Google Scholar
- Shirky, C. (2003). File-sharing goes social, 12th October [www document] http://www.shirky.com/writings/file-sharing_social.html (accessed 1st November 2009).
- Skågeby, J. and Pargman, D. (2005). File-sharing Relationships – Conflicts of interest in online gift-giving, in Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Communities and Technologies (Milano, Italy, 2005); London: Springer, 111–128.Google Scholar
- Sproull, L., Conley, C. and Moon, J.Y. (2005). Prosocial Behavior on the Net, in Y. Amichai-Hamburger (ed.) The Social Net: Understanding Human Behavior in Cyberspace, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 139–162.Google Scholar
- Wu, H., Zubair, M. and Maly, K. (2006). Harvesting Social Knowledge from Folksonomies, in the Proceedings of the 17th Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia (Odense, Denmark, 2006); NewYork: ACM, 111–114.Google Scholar