Advertisement

Journal of Information Technology

, Volume 25, Issue 4, pp 434–449 | Cite as

Embodiment and presence in virtual worlds: a review

  • Ulrike Schultze
Research Article

Abstract

The multimodal, 3D-graphical communication platforms known as virtual worlds have their historical roots in multi-user domains/dungeons (MUDs) and virtual reality (VR). Given the extensive research on these technologies and the novelty of virtual worlds as a topic of study in information systems (IS), it behooves us to learn from the concepts, theories and insights generated primarily by other disciplines that have focused on these technologies. Because neither MUDs nor VR have significant organizational application, thus locating them outside of the IS discipline’s purview, very little of this literature has found its way into IS research thus far. This article reviews the extant literature on virtual environments and seeks to make its insights accessible to IS research on virtual worlds. In particular, this will focus on concepts, theories and insights regarding embodiment and presence, which are afforded by the avatar, a distinguishing technological artifact of virtual worlds.

Keywords

avatar virtual reality telepresence social presence co-presence self presence 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Funding from the National Science Foundation, Grant IIS-0848692, made this research possible. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. I would also like to thank Shauna Bowers, Chris Sauer and three anonymous reviewers for their comments on an earlier version of this paper.

References

  1. Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, D.R. and Archer, W. (2001). Assessing Teaching Presence in a Computer-Conferencing Context, Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 5 (1): 1–17.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, T.C (2000). The Body and Communities in Cyberspace: A Marcellian analysis, Ethics and Information Technology 2 (3): 153–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bailenson, J., Beall, A.C. and Blascovich, J. (2002). Gaze and Task Performance in Shared Virtual Environments, The Journal of Visualization and Computer Animation (13): 313–320.Google Scholar
  4. Bailenson, J., Yee, N., Merget, D. and Schroeder, R. (2006). The Effect of Behavioral Realism and Form Realism of Real-Time Avatar Faces on Verbal Disclosure, Nonverbal Disclosure, Emotion Recognition, and Copresence in Dyadic Interaction, Presence 15 (5): 359–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture 28 (3): 801–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Becker, B. and Mark, G. (2002). Social Conventions in Computer-Mediated Communication: A comparison of three online shared virtual environments, in R. Schroeder (ed.) The Social Life of Avatars, London: Springer, pp. 19–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bente, G., Rueggenberg, S., Kraemer, N.C. and Eschenburg, F. (2008). Avatar-Mediated Networking: Increasing social presence and interpersonal trust in net-based collaborations, Human Communication Research 34 (2): 287–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Biocca, F. (1997). The Cyborg's Dilemma: Progressive embodiment in virtual environments, Journal of Computer Mediated Communication 3 (2): 1–18.Google Scholar
  9. Biocca, F., Harms, C. and Burgoon, J.K. (2003). Toward a More Robust Theory and Measure of Social Presence: Review and suggested criteria, Presence 12 (5): 456–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Blascovich, J. (2002). Social Influence within Immersive Virtual Environments, in R. Schroeder (ed.) The Social Life of Avatars, London: Springer, pp. 127–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bystrom, K.-E., Barfield, W. and Hendrix, C. (1999). A Conceptual Model of the Sense of Presence in Virtual Environments, Presence 8 (2): 241–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carassa, A., Morganti, F. and Tirassa, M. (2005). A Situated Cognition Perspective on Presence, in B. Bara, L.W. Barsalou and M. Bucciarelli (eds.) XXVII Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Sheridan Printing, pp. 384–389.Google Scholar
  13. Cheng, L., Farnham, S. and Stone, L. (2002). Lessons Learned: Building and deploying shared virtual environments, in R. Schroeder (ed.) The Social Life of Avatars, London: Springer, pp. 90–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience, New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  15. Daft, R.L. and Lengel, R.H. (1984). Information Richness: A new approach to managerial behavior and organizational design, in L.L. Cummings and B.M. Staw (eds.) Research in Organizational Behavior, Homewood, IL: JAI Press, pp. 191–233.Google Scholar
  16. Damasio, A.R. (1994). Descartes’ Error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain, New York: Putnam.Google Scholar
  17. Damasio, A.R. (1999). The Feeling of What Happens: Body, emotion and the making of consciousness, San Diego: Hartcourt Press.Google Scholar
  18. Despres, D. (2009). Obama Healthcare Team and Second Life, in Science Roll: A Doctor's Journey in Genetics, PhD and Medicine Through Web 2.0. [www document] http://scienceroll.com/2009/01/10/obama-healthcare-team-and-second-life/.
  19. Donath, J., Karahalios, K. and Vigas, F. (1999). Visualizing Conversation, Journal of Computer Mediated Communication 4 (4): 1–17.Google Scholar
  20. Dreyfus, H.L. (2009). On the Internet, 2nd edn. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Ducheneaut, N., Yee, N., Nickell, E. and Moore, R. (2006). Alone Together? Exploring the social dynamics of massively multiplayer games, in conference proceedings on human factors in computing systems (CHI 2006). April 22–27, Montreal, Canada. 407–416.Google Scholar
  22. Durlach, N. and Slater, M. (2000). Presence in Shared Virtual Environments and Virtual Togetherness, Presence 9 (2): 214–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Eastwick, P.W. and Gardner, W.L. (2008). Is It a Game? Evidence for social influence in the virtual world, Social Influence 4 (1): 18–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Flach, J.M. and Holden, J.G. (1998). The Reality of Experience: Gibson's way, Presence 7 (1): 90–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Galanxhi, H. and Nah, F.F.-H. (2007). Deception in Cyberspace: A comparison of text-only vs Avatar-Supported Medium, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 65 (9): 770–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Garau, M. (2006). Selective Fidelity: Investigating priorities for the creation of expressive avatars, in R. Schroeder and A.-S. Axelsson (eds.) Avatars at Work and Play, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 17–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Garau, M., Friedman, D., Ritter Widenfeld, H., Antley, A., Brogni, A. and Slater, M. (2008). Temporal and Spatial Variations in Presence: Qualitative analysis in interviews from an experiment on breaks in presence, Presence 17 (3): 293–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Garrison, D.R., Anderson, T. and Archer, W. (2000). Critical Inquiry in a Text-Based Environment: Computer conferencing in higher education, The Internet and Higher Education 2 (2-3): 87–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gee, J.P. (2008). Video Games and Embodiment, Games and Culture 3 (3-4): 253–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gibson, J.J. (1979). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception, Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  31. Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life, Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  32. Harris, H., Bailenson, J., Nielsen, A. and Yee, N. (2009). The Evolution of Social Behavior over Time in Second Life, Presence 18 (6): 434–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Heeter, C. (1992). Being There: The subjective experience of presence, Presence 1 (2): 262–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Held, R.M. and Durlach, N.I. (1992). Telepresence, Presence 1 (1): 109–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hoffman, H.G., Prothero, J., Wells, M.J. and Groen, J. (1998). Virtual Chess: Meaning enhances users’ sense of presence in virtual environments, International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 10 (3): 251–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ihde, D. (2002). Bodies in Technology, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  37. Ijsselsteijn, W., Freeman, J. and De Ridder, H. (2001). Presence: Where are we? CyberPsychology & Behavior 4 (2): 179–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Jakobsson, M. (2002). Rest in Peace, Bill the Bot: Death and life in virtual worlds, in R. Schroeder (ed.) The Social Life of Avatars, London: Springer, pp. 63–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Jennings, C. (2008). A Second Life for Virtual Worlds? Computer Weekly: [www document] http://www.computerweekly.com/Articles/2008/12/03/233528/A-second-life-for-virtual-worlds.htm.
  40. Jin, S.-A.A. (2009). Avatars Mirroring the Actual Self Versus Proejcting the Ideal Self: The effects of self-priming on interactivity and immersion in an exergame, Wii Fit, CyberPsychology & Behavior 12 (6): 761–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kafai, Y.B., Fields, D.A. and Cook, M.S. (2010). Your Second Selves: Player-designed avatars, Games and Culture 5 (1): 23–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kang, H.-S. and Yang, H.-D. (2006). The Visual Characteristics of Avatars in Computer-Mediated Communication: Comparison of internet relay chat and instant messenger as of 2003, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies (64): 1173–1183.Google Scholar
  43. Kendall, L. (2002). Hanging out at the Virtual Pub: Masculinities and relationships online, Berkley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kim, T. and Biocca, F. (1997). Telepresence Via Television: Two dimensions of telepresence may have different connections to memory and persuasion, Journal of Computer Mediated Communication 3 (2): 1–26.Google Scholar
  45. Kolko, B.E. (1999). Representing Bodies in Virtual Space: The rhetoric of Avatar design, The Information Society 15 (2): 177–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  47. Lee, K.M. (2004). Presence, Explicated, Communication Theory 14 (1): 27–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. LeGoes, F. (2010). Digital Nation, PBS, Frontline, (February), [www document] http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/digitalnation/interviews/legoues.html.
  49. Lessiter, J., Freeman, J., Keogh, E. and Davidoff, J. (2001). A Cross-Media Presence Questionnaire: The ICT-Sense of presence inventory, Presence 10 (3): 282–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lok, B., Naik, S., Whitton, M. and Brooks Jr., F.P. (2003). Effects of Handling Real Objects and Self-Avatar Fidelity on Cognitive Task Performance and Sense of Presence in Virtual Environments, Presence 12 (6): 615–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lombard, M. and Ditton, T. (1997). At the Heart if it All: The concept of presence, Journal of Computer Mediated Communication 3 (2), [www document] http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol3/issue2/lombard.html.
  52. Loomis, J.M. (1992). Distal Attribution and Presence, Presence 1 (1): 113–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Loy, D. (2007). Cyberbabel? Ethics and Information Technology (9): 251–258.Google Scholar
  54. Martey, R.M. and Stromer-Galley, J. (2007). The Digital Doll-House: Context and social norms in the sims online, Games and Culture 2 (4): 314–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man, New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  56. Minsky, M. (1980). Telepresence, Omni (2): 45–51.Google Scholar
  57. Mokros, H.B. and Deetz, S.A. (1996). What Counts as Real?: A Constitutive view of communication and the disenfranchised in the context of health, in E.B. Ray (ed.) Communication & Disenfranchisement: Social health issues and implications, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum and Assoc., 29–44.Google Scholar
  58. Morrison, C. (2010). Who Do They Think They Are? Teenage Girls and Their Avatars in Spaces of Social Online Communication, New York: Peter Lang Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Nash, E.B., Edwards, G.W., Thompson, J.A. and Barfield, W. (2000). A Review of Presence and Performance in Virtual Environments, International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 12 (1): 1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Nilsson, A., Heldal, I., Axelsson, A.-S. and Schroeder, R. (2002). The Long-Term Uses of Shared Virtual Environments: An exploratory study, in R. Schroeder (ed.) The Social Life of Avatars, London: Springer, pp. 112–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Nowak, K.L. and Biocca, F. (2001). The Effect of the Agency and Anthropomorphism on Users’ Sense of Telepresence, Copresence, and Social Presence in Virtual Environments, Presence 12 (5): 481–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Nowak, K.L. and Rauh, C. (2005). The Influence of the Avatar on Online Perceptions of Anthropomorphism, Androgymy, Credibility, Homophily, and Attraction, Journal of Computer Mediated Communication 11 (1).Google Scholar
  63. Orlikowski, W.J. (2010). The Sociomateriality of Organizational Life: Considering Technology in Management Research, Cambridge Journal of Economics (34): 125–141.Google Scholar
  64. Orlikowski, W.J. and Scott, S.V. (2008). Sociomateriality: Challenging the separation of technology, work and organization, Annals of the Academy of Management 2 (1): 433–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Pena, J., Hancock, J.T. and Merola, N.A. (2009). The Priming Effects of Avatars in Virtual Settings, Communication Research 36 (6): 838–856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Ratan, R. and Hasler, B.S. (2010). Exploring Self-Presence in Collaborative Virtual Teams, PsychNology 8 (1): 11–31.Google Scholar
  67. Regenbrecht, H. and Schubert, T.W. (2002). Real and Illusory Interactions Enhance Presence in Virtual Environments, Presence 11 (4): 425–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Reiner, M. and Hecht, D. (2009). Behavioral Indications of Object-Presence in Haptic Virtual Environments, CyberPsychology & Behavior 12 (2): 183–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Riley, J. (2007). Virtual Worlds Are 2008's ‘Breakthrough Technology, Computer Weekly, 2nd November, [www document] http://www.computerweekly.com/Articles/2007/11/02/227900/virtual-worlds-are-2008s-breakthrough-technology.htm.
  70. Riva, G. (2002). The Sociocognitive Psychology of Computer-Mediated Communication: The present and future of technology-based interactions, CyberPsychology & Behavior 5 (6): 581–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Riva, G. (2009). Is Presence a Technology Issue? Some insights from cognitive science, Virtual Reality (13): 159–167.Google Scholar
  72. Riva, G., Mantovani, F. and Gaggioli, A. (2004a). Presnce and Rehabilitation: Toward second-generation virtual reality applications in neuropsychology, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 1 (9): 1–11.Google Scholar
  73. Riva, G. and Mantovani, G. (2000). The Need for a Socio-Cultural Perspective in the Implementation of Virtual Environments, Virtual Reality 5 (1): 32–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Riva, G. and Waterworth, J.A. (2003). Presence and the Self: A cognitive neuroscience approach, Presence-Connect, Vol 3, April issue, [www document] http://presence.cs.ucl.ac.uk/presenceconnect/.
  75. Riva, G., Mantovani, F. and Gaggioli, A. (2004a). Presence and Rehabilitation: Toward second-generation virtual reality applications in neuropsychology, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 1 (9): 1–11.Google Scholar
  76. Riva, G., Waterworth, J.A. and Waterworth, E.L. (2004b). The Layers of Presence: A bio-cultural approach to understanding presence in natural and mediated environments, CyberPsychology & Behavior 7 (4): 402–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Riva, G., Waterworth, J.A., Waterworth, E.L. and Mantovani, F. (2009). From Intention to Action: The role of presence, New Ideas in Psychology 11 (2): 1–14.Google Scholar
  78. Rosenthal, B.E. (2009). Ernst & Young Uses Avatars to Test the Use of Virtual Worlds as a Way to Enhance Training for New Auditors, Outsourcing Journal, (March), [www document] http://www.outsourcing-journal.com/mar2009-acs.html.
  79. Sallnas, E.-L. (2002). Collaboration in Multi-Modal Virtual Worlds: Comparing touch, text, voice and video, in R. Schroeder (ed.) The Social Life of Avatars, London: Springer, pp. 172–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Sanchez-Vives, M.V. and Slater, M. (2005). From Presence to Consciousness through Virtual Reality, Nature Reviews: Neuroscience 6: 332–339.Google Scholar
  81. Schloerb, D.W. (1995). A Quantitative Measure of Telepresence, Presence 4 (1): 64–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Schroeder, R. (2002). Social Interaction in Virtual Environments: Key issues, common themes, and a framework for research, in R. Schroeder (ed.) The Social Life of Avatars: Presence and interaction in shared virtual environments, London: Springer, pp. 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Schroeder, R. (2006). Being There Together and the Future of Connected Presence, Presence 15 (4): 438–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Schubert, T.W. (2009). A New Conception of Spatial Presence: Once again, with feeling, Communication Theory (19): 161–187.Google Scholar
  85. Schubert, T.W., Friedmann, F. and Regenbrecht, H. (2001). The Experience of Presence: Factor analytic insights, Presence 10 (3): 266–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Schultze, U. (2010). A Performative Perspective on Virtual Worlds: The dialectics of the avatar-self relationship, paper presented at Academy of Management. Montreal.Google Scholar
  87. Schultze, U., Hiltz, R., Nardi, B., Rennecker, J. and Stucky, S. (2008). Synthetic Worlds in Work and Learning, Communications of the AIS 22 (19): 351–370.Google Scholar
  88. Schultze, U. and Leahy, M.M. (2009). The Avatar-Self Relationship: Enacting presence in second life, International Conference on Information Systems, Phoenix, AZ: Association of Information Systems.Google Scholar
  89. Schultze, U. and Rennecker, J. (2007). Reframing Online Games: Synthetic worlds as media for organizational communication, in K. Crowston, S. Sieber and E. Wynn (eds.) Virtuality and Virtualization, Boston, MA: Springer, pp. 335–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Shiano, D.J. (1999). Lessons from Lambdamoo: A social, text-based virtual environment, Presence 8 (2): 127–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Short, J., Williams, E. and Christie, B. (1976). The Social Psychology of Telecommunications, London: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  92. Slater, M. (1999). Measuring Presence: A response to the Witmer and Singer presence questionnaire, Presence (8): 560–565.Google Scholar
  93. Slater, M. (2003). A Note on Presence Terminology, Presence-Connect 3 (January) [www document] http://presence.cs.ucl.ac.uk/presenceconnect/.
  94. Slater, M. and Steed, A. (2002). Meeting People Virtually: Experiments in Shared Virtual Environments, in R. Schroeder (ed.) The Social Life of Avatars, London: Springer, pp. 146–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Slater, M. and Wilbur, S. (1997). A Framework for Immersive Virtual Environments (Five): Speculations on the role of presence in virtual environments, Presence 6 (6): 603–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Soukup, C. (2004). Multimedia Performance in a Computer-Mediated Community: Communication as a virtual drama, Journal of Computer Mediated Communication 9 (4): 1–30.Google Scholar
  97. Spagnolli, A., Varotto, D. and Mantovani, G. (2003). An Ethnographic, Action-Based Approach to Human Experience in Virtual Environments, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies (59): 797–822.Google Scholar
  98. Suchman, L.A. (2007). Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and situated action, 2nd edn, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  99. Suler, J. (2004). The Online Disinhibition Effect. CyberPsychology & Behavior 7 (3): 321–326.Google Scholar
  100. Tanis, M. and Postmes, T. (2007). Two Faces of Anonymity: Paradoxical effects of cues to identity in CMC, Computers in Human Behavior (23): 955–970.Google Scholar
  101. Taylor, T.L. (2002). Living Digitally: Embodiment in virtual worlds, in R. Schroeder (ed.) The Social Life of Avatars: Presence and interaction in shared virtual environments, London: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
  102. Tims, A. (2010). L’oréal Hopes Recruitment Game Will Attract Top Graduates, The Guardian, 12th June, [www document] http://www.guardian.co.uk/money/2010/jun/12/loreal-recruitment-game-top-graduates.
  103. Tracy, S.J. and Trethewey, A. (2005). Fracturing the Real-Self 〈-〉 Fake-Self Dichotomy: Moving toward ‘crystalized’ organizational discourses and identities, Communication Theory 15 (2): 168–195.Google Scholar
  104. Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the Screen: Identity in the life of the internet, New York: NY: Simon & Shuster.Google Scholar
  105. Vasalou, A., Joinson, A., Banziger, T., Goldie, P. and Pitt, J. (2008). Avatars in Social Media: Balancing accuracy, playfulness and embodied messages, Human-Computer Studies (66): 801–811.Google Scholar
  106. Walther, J.B. (1992). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective. Communication Research 19 (1): 52–90.Google Scholar
  107. Walther, J.B. (1996). Computer-Mediated Communication: Impersonal, interpersonal and hyperpersonal interaction, Communication Research 23 (1): 3–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Waterworth, E.L. and Waterworth, J.A. (2001). Focus, Locus, and Sensus: The three dimensions of virtual experience, CyberPsychology & Behavior 4 (2): 203–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Waterworth, J.A. and Waterworth, E.L. (2003). The Meaning of Presence, Presence-Connect 3 (February) [www document] http://presence.cs.ucl.ac.uk/presenceconnect/.
  110. Waterworth, J.A. and Waterworth, E.L. (2006). Presence as a dimension of communication: Context of use and the person, in G. Riva, M.T. Anguera, B.K. Wiederhold and F. Mantovani (eds.) From Communication to Presence: Cognition, emotions and culture toward the ultimate communicative Experience, Amsterdam: IOS Press, pp. 81–96.Google Scholar
  111. Witmer, B.G. and Singer, M.J. (2002 [1998]). Measuring Presence in Virtual Environments: A presence questionnaire, Presence 7 (3): 225–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Wolfendale, J. (2007). My Avatar, My Self: Virtual harm and attachment, Ethics and Information Technology 9 (2): 111–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Yee, N. (2006). The Psychology of Massively Multi-User Online Role-Playing Games: Motivations, emotional investment. Relationships and problematic usage, in R. Schroeder and A.-S. Axelsson (eds.) Avatars at Work and Play, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 187–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Yee, N. and Bailenson, J. (2007). The Proteus Effect: The effect of transformed self-representation on behavior, Human Communication Research 33 (3): 271–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Yee, N., Bailenson, J. and Ducheneaut, N. (2009). The Proteus Effect: Implications of transformed digital self-representation on online and offline behavior, Communication Research 36 (2): 285–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Information Technology Trust 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ulrike Schultze
    • 1
  1. 1.Southern Methodist UniversityDallasUSA

Personalised recommendations