Journal of Information Technology

, Volume 25, Issue 2, pp 244–257 | Cite as

Conviviality of Internet social networks: An exploratory study of Internet campaigns in Iran

  • Aghil Ameripour
  • Brian Nicholson
  • Michael Newman
Research Article


In this study, we focus on the relationship between Internet social networks and societal change by examining case studies of the impact of Internet-based campaigns in Iran. Ivan Illich's theory of ‘Conviviality of Tools’ enables an analysis of the conviviality of the Internet. Subsequently, this conceptual lens is used to examine empirical data from two Internet-based campaigns. The paper contributes theoretical and practical implications regarding conviviality of Internet social networks and the accomplishment of conviviality in society. Our findings show that Internet conviviality cannot be treated as an independent variable with deterministic outcomes on society, but as a technology that is shaped by ongoing economic and political forces. The Iranian Internet social networks are not universally accessible, frequently induce fragmented, nonsensical, and enraged discussion and its potential as a tool of liberation is tempered by the Iranian government adaption of systems of surveillance and censorship. We argue that the findings of this study have some general implications of value to researchers studying computerisation movements and Internet social networks in other countries.


internet social networks computerisation movements Iran conviviality Ivan Illich 


  1. Alavi, N. (2006). We are Iran, London: Portobello.Google Scholar
  2. Amir-Ebrahimi, M. (2009). Performance in everyday life the rediscovery of the ‘self’ in Iranian weblogs, [www document] (accessed 4th November 2009).
  3. Berglund, N. (2009). Norway blasts stoning in Iran, [www document] (accessed 4th November 2009).
  4. Breslow, H. (1997). Civil Society Political Economy, and the Internet, in S. Jones (ed.) Virtual Culture: Identity and communication in cyber society, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 236–257.Google Scholar
  5. Castells, M. (2001). The Internet Galaxy: Reflections on the internet, business and society, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Diani, M. (2003). Networks and Social Movements: A research paradigm, in M. Diani and D. McAdam (eds.) Social Movements and Networks: Relational approaches to collective action, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 299–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. DiMaggio, P., Hargittai, E., Neuman, W.R. and Robinson, J.P. (2001). Social Implications of the Internet, Annual Review of Sociology 27: 307–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ehn, P. (1990). Work-oriented Design of Computer Artifacts, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  9. Elliott, M. and Kraemer, K.L. (2008). Computerization Movements and Technology Diffusion: From mainframes to ubiquitous computing, Medford, NJ: Information Today.Google Scholar
  10. Garcia, A., Standlee, A., Bechkoff, J. and Cui, Y. (2009). Ethnographic Approaches to the Internet and Computer-mediated Communication, Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 38: 52–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hague, B.N. and Loader, B. (1999). Digital Democracy: Discourse and decision making in the information age, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Hammersley, B. (2002). Iran nets another revolt, The Guardian [www document] (accessed 8th November 2009).
  13. Hine, C. (2000). Virtual Ethnography, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hofheinz, A. (2005). The Internet in the Arab world: Playground for political liberalization, International Politics and Society 3: 78–96.Google Scholar
  15. Hunt, N. and McHale, S. (2007). A Practical Guide to the e-mail Interview, Qualitative Health Research 17 (10): 1415–1421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Iacono, S. and Kling, R. (2001). Computerization Movements: The rise of the internet and distant forms of work, in J. Yates and V.J. Maanen (eds.) Information Technology and Organizational Transformation: History, rhetoric, and practice, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 93–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Illich, I. (1973). Tools for Conviviality, New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  18. Kahn, R. and Kellner, D. (2004). New Media and Internet Activism: From the ‘battle of Seattle’ to blogging, New Media & Society 6: 87–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kamarck, E. and Nye, J. (1999). Governance in a Networked World, Hollis, NH: Hollis Publishing.Google Scholar
  20. King, J.L., Iacono, S. and Grudin, J. (2007). Going Critical: Perspective and proportion in the epistemology of Rob Kling, Information Society 23 (4): 251–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kling, R. and Dutton, W. (1982). The Computer Package, Dynamic Complexity, in J.N. Danziger, W.H. Dutton, R. Kling and K.L. Kraemer (eds.) Computers and Politics: High technology in American local governments, New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 22–50.Google Scholar
  22. Kling, R. and Iacono, S. (1988). The Mobilization of Support for Computerization: The role of computerization movements, Social Problems 35 (3): 226–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kling, R. and Scacchi, W. (1982). The Web of Computing: Computer technology as social organization, Advances in Computers 21: 1–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lim, M. (2003). The Internet, Social Networks and Reform in Indonesia, in N. Couldry and J. Curran (eds.) Contesting Media Power: Alternative media in a networked world, Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield, pp. 273–285.Google Scholar
  25. Loewenstein, A. (2008). The Blogging Revolution, Melbourne: Melbourne University Publishing.Google Scholar
  26. Macintyre, B. (2005). Mullahs versus the bloggers, The Times [www document] (accessed 8th December 2009).
  27. Orlikowski, W. and Iacono, C. (2001). Desperately Seeking the ‘IT’ in IT Research – a call to theorizing the IT artifact, Information Systems Research 12 (2): 121–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Osanloo, A. (2009). The Politics of Women's Rights in Iran, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Papacharissi, Z. (2002). The Virtual Sphere: The internet as the public sphere, New Media & Society 4 (1): 5–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pavlik, J.V. (1994). Citizen Access, Involvement, and Freedom of Expression in an Electronic Environment, in F. Williams and J.V. Pavlik (eds.) The People's Right to Know: Media, democracy, and the information highway, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 139–162.Google Scholar
  31. Rahimi, B. (2003). Cyberdissent: The internet in revolutionary Iran, Middle Eastern Review of International Affairs 7 (3): 101–115.Google Scholar
  32. Reuters (2008). Iran steps up policing of Islamic dress, [www document] (accessed 24th September 2008).
  33. Rheingold, H. (1993). The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier, Reading: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  34. Rheingold, H. (2002). Smart Mobs: The next social revolution, Cambridge, MA: Perseus Publishing.Google Scholar
  35. Ruhleder, K. (2000). The Virtual Ethnographer: Fieldwork in distributed electronic environments, Field Methods 12 (1): 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Stebbins, R. (2001). Exploratory Research in the Social Sciences, London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tapscott, D. and Williams, A.D. (2008). Wikinomics: How mass collaboration changes everything, New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  38. Toffler, A. (1991). Power Shift: Knowledge, wealth, and violence at the edge of the 21st century, New York: Bantam.Google Scholar
  39. United Nations (2009). United Nations press release, [www document] (accessed June 2009).
  40. Walsham, G. (1995). Interpretive Case Studies in IS Research: Nature and method, European Journal Of Information Systems 4 (2): 74–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wastell, D., Kawalek, P., Langmead-Jones, P. and Ormerod, R. (2004). Information Systems and Partnership in Multi-agency Networks: An action research project in crime reduction, Information and Organization 14: 189–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. World Bank (2007). ICT at a glance: Iran, [www document] (accessed July 2007).
  43. World Bank (2008). World development indicators database, [www document] (accessed September 2008).

Copyright information

© Association for Information Technology Trust 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aghil Ameripour
    • 1
  • Brian Nicholson
    • 1
  • Michael Newman
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Manchester Business SchoolManchesterUK
  2. 2.Norwegian School of Economics and Business AdministrationBergenNorway

Personalised recommendations