Gender differences in intentional social action: we-intention to engage in social network-facilitated team collaboration
- 134 Downloads
The growth and popularity of Web 2.0 applications help people to build and maintain their social networks online and further encourage social network-facilitated team collaboration. In this study, we conceptualized the use of instant messaging in social network-facilitated team collaboration as an intentional social action and further investigated the effect of gender differences in the development of we-intention (i.e. collective intention) to engage in such collaboration. A research model was developed and empirically tested with 482 university students in Mainland China. The results demonstrated that the effects of attitude, positive anticipated emotions, and group norms on we-intention were more important for men, whereas the effects of social identity and negative anticipated emotions were more significant for women to collectively participate in social network-facilitated team collaboration. We believe the implications of this study would shed considerable light on both research and practice.
Keywordswe-intention gender instant messaging social networking anticipated emotions social influence
The work described in this paper was partially supported by a grant from the Research Grant Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China (Project No. CityU 145907). The authors acknowledge with gratitude the generous support of the Hong Kong Baptist University for the project (FRG/08-09/II-58) without which the timely production of the current report/publication would not have been feasible.
- Ahuja, M.K. and Thatcher, J.B. (2005). Moving Beyond Intentions and Toward the Theory of Trying: Effects of work environment and gender on post-adoption information technology use, MIS Quarterly 29 (3): 427–459.Google Scholar
- Ajzen, I. and Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Arena, M. and Benjamin, S. (2009). Leading in a Hyper-Connected Society, Pegasus Communication 19 (9): 10–11.Google Scholar
- Bagozzi, R.P. (2007). The Legacy of the Technology Acceptance Model and a Proposal for a Paradigm Shift, Journal of the Association for Information Systems 8 (4): 244–254.Google Scholar
- Bratman, M.E. (1997). I Intend that We J, in G.H. Hintikka and R.T. Dordrecht (eds.) Contemporary Action Theory, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 49–63.Google Scholar
- Cheung, C.M.K., Lee, M.K.O. and Chiu, P. (2010). Online Social Networks: Why do we use facebook? Computers in Human Behavior, (in press).Google Scholar
- Cheung, C.M.K., Shen, A.X.L., Lee, M.K.O. and Wang, W.P. (2007). Let's Work Together! – We-intention to use instant messaging for e-collaboration, in H. Osterle, J. Schelp and R. Winter (eds.) Proceedings of the 15th European Conference on Information Systems (St. Gallen, Switzerland, June 2007); University of St. Gallen.Google Scholar
- Chin, W. (1998). The Partial Least Squares Approach to Structural Equation Modeling, in G.A. Marcoulides (ed.) Modern Methods for Business Research, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Cobbs, C. and Sentinel, O. (2005). Women narrow online gender divide, [WWW document] http://wvvw.pewinternet.org/Media-Mentions/2005/Women-narrow-online-gender-divide.aspx (accessed 30th October 2009).
- Fallows, D. (2005). How women and men use the internet, [WWW document] http://www.pewinternet.org/∼/media//Files/Reports/2005/PIP_Women_and_Men_online.pdf.pdf (accessed 30th October 2009).
- Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An introduction to theory and research, Reading, Ma: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
- French, D.P., Sutton, S., Hennings, S.J., Mitchell, J., Wareham, N.J., Griffin, S., Hardeman, W. and Kinmonth, A.L. (2005). The Importance of Affective Beliefs and Attitudes in the Theory of Planned Behavior: Predicting intention to increase physical activity, Journal of Applied Social Psychology 35 (9): 1824–1848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fujita, F., Diener, E. and Sandvik, E. (1991). Gender Differences in Negative Affect and Well-being: The case for emotional intensity, Personality Processes and Individual Differences 61: 427–434.Google Scholar
- Gilbert, M. (1989). On Social Facts, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Hair, J.F., Tatham, R.L., Anderson, R.E. and Black, W. (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Isaacs, E., Walendowski, A., Whittaker, S., Schiano, D.J. and Kamm, C. (2002). The Character, Functions, and Styles of Instant Messaging in the Workplace, in E.F. Churchill, J. McCarthy, C. Neuwirth and T. Rodden (eds.) Proceedings of the 2002 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, 16–20 November 2002); New Orleans, Louisiana, USA: ACM Press.Google Scholar
- Joreskog, K.G. and Wold, H. (1982). The ML and PLS Techniques for Modeling with Latent Variables: Historical and comparative aspects, in K.G. Joreskog and H. Wold (eds.) Systems Under Indirect Observation: Causality, structure, prediction (Vol. I), Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 263–270.Google Scholar
- Komiak, X. and Benbasat, I. (2006). The Effects of Personalization and Familiarity on Trust and Adoption of Recommendation Agents, MIS Quarterly 30 (4): 941.Google Scholar
- Kwong, T.C.H. and Lee, M.K.O. (2004). Understanding the Behavioral Intention to Digital Piracy in Virtual Communities – A propose model, in e-Technology, e-Commerce and e-Service, in K.-J. Lin and J. Ho (eds.) IEEE International Conference, (Taipei, Taiwan, 29–31 March 2004); Taipei: ACM Press, pp. 223–226.Google Scholar
- Lee, M.K.O. and Turban, E. (2001). A Trust Model for Consumer Internet Shopping, International Journal of Electronic Commerce 6 (1): 75–91.Google Scholar
- Lenhart, A. and Madden, M. (2007). Social networking websites and teens: An overview, [WWW document] http://www.pewinternet.org/∼/media//Files/Reports/2007/PIP_SNS_Data_Memo_Jan_2007.pdf.pdf (accessed 30th October 2009).
- Lenhart, A., Madden, M., Macgill, A.R. and Smith, A. (2007). Teens and social media, [WWW document] http://www.pewinternet.org/∼/media//Files/Reports/2007/PIP_Teens_Social_Media_Final.pdf.pdf (accessed 30th October 2009).
- Liu, Y. (2002). What Does Research Say About the Nature of Computer-Mediated Communication: Task-oriented, social-emotion-oriented, or both? Electronic Journal of Sociology 6 (1), [www document] http://www.sociology.org/content/vol006.001/liu.html (accessed 29th March 2010).
- Minton, H.L. and Schneider, F.W. (1980). Differential Psychology, Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.Google Scholar
- Osterman Research (2006). Instant messaging tough enough for business: No server required, [WWW document] http://www.webex.com/pdf/wp_instant_messaging.pdf (accessed 30th October 2009).
- Putrevu, S. (2001). Exploring the Origins and Information Processing Differences between Men and Women: Implications for advertisers, Academy of Marketing Science Review 10, [www document] http://www.amsreview.org/articles/putrevu10-2001.pdf (accessed 29th March 2010).
- Radicati Group Inc (2006). Instant Messaging Market: 2006–2010, Palo Alto, CA: The Radicati Group, Inc.Google Scholar
- Searle, J.R. (1990). Collective Intentions and Actions, in P. Cohen, J. Morgan and M. Pollack (eds.) Intentions in Communication, Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 401–415.Google Scholar
- Shen, A.X.L., Cheung, C.M.K., Lee, M.K.O. and Chen, H. (2010). How Social Influence Affects We-Intention to Use Instant Messaging: The moderating effect of usage experience, Information Systems Frontier, (in press).Google Scholar
- Tuomela, R. (1995). The Importance of Us: A philosophical study of basic social notions, Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Turner, J.C. (1987). Rediscovering the Social Group: A self-categorization theory, Oxford: B. Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B. and Davis, F.D. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a unified view, MIS Quarterly 27 (3): 425–478.Google Scholar
- Wold, H. (1989). Introduction to the Second Generation of Multivariate Analysis, in H. Wold (ed.) Theoretical Empiricism, New York: Paragon House.Google Scholar