Journal of Information Technology

, Volume 24, Issue 4, pp 320–331

Conceptions of control and IT artefacts: an institutional account of the Amazon rainforest monitoring system

Research Article

Abstract

Based on Fligstein's (1990) work on ‘conceptions of control’ (broad managerial paradigms), this paper provides an analysis of the ways in which information technology (IT) artefacts shape and are shaped by institutional contexts. Specifically, we report on primary and secondary empirical data that spans a 44-year period pertaining to the uses made of the Amazon rainforest monitoring system (a set of satellite-based geographic information systems). This paper argues that: (1) the process of institutional change is conflictual, emergent and contested; (2) the design and use of IT artefacts tend to reflect the currently dominant conceptions of control; (3) that IT artefacts that emerge within a specific conception of control can be later reconfigured to serve the interests of other conceptions of control; (4) and finally, IT artefacts might unintentionally reinforce alternate conceptions of control and lead to institutional change.

Keywords

institutional theory conceptions of control institutional change geographic information systems globalization Amazon rainforest 

References

  1. Abrucio, F.L. (2007). Trajetória recente da gestão pública brasileira: Um balanço crítico e a renovação da agenda de reformas, Revista de Adminstração Pública 41 (1): 67–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adler, P.S. (2005). The Evolving Object of Software Development, Organization 12 (3): 401–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Akrich, M. (1992). The De-Scription of Technical Objects, in W. Bijker and J. Law (eds.) Shaping Technology, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 205–224.Google Scholar
  4. Avgerou, C. (2000). IT and Organizational Change: An institutionalist perspective, Information Technology & People 13 (4): 234–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Avgerou, C. (2003). IT as an Institutional Actor in Developing Countries, in S. Madon and S. Krishna (eds.) The Digital Challenge: Information technology in the development context, Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  6. Barley, S.R. (1986). Technology as an Occasion for Structuring: Evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments, Administrative Science Quarterly 31 (1): 78–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barley, S.R. and Tolbert, P.S. (1997). Institutionalization and Structuration: Studying the links between action and institution, Organization Studies 18 (1): 93–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barrett, M. and Walsham, G. (1999). Electronic trading and work transformation in the London insurance market, Information Systems Research 10 (1): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Barrett, M., Sahay, S. and Walsham, G. (2001). Information Technology and Social Transformation: GIS for forestry management in India, The Information Society 17 (1): 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Beck, U. (1992). Risk Society: Towards a new modernity, London: Sage.Google Scholar
  11. Berger, P.L. and Luckmann, T. (1967). The Social Construction of Reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge, London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  12. Blackler, F. and Regan, S. (2006). Institutional Reform and the Reorganization of Family Support Services, Organization Studies 27 (12): 1843–1861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Butler, T. (2003). An Institutional Perspective on Developing and Implementing Intranet- and Internet-Based Information Systems, Information Systems Journal 13 (3): 209–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chatterjee, D., Grewal, R. and Sambamurthy, V. (2002). Shaping up for E-commerce: Institutional enablers of the organizational assimilation of web technologies, MIS Quarterly 26 (2): 65–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Choo, C.W. (1996). The Knowing Organization: How organizations use information to construct meaning, create knowledge and make decisions, International Journal of Information Management 16 (5): 329–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ciborra, C.U. (2000). A Critical Review of the Literature on the Management of Corporate Information Infrastructure, in C.U. Ciborra (ed.) From Control to Drift: The dynamics of corporate information infrastructures, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 15–40.Google Scholar
  17. Currie, W.L. (2004). The Organizing Vision of Application Service Provision: A process-oriented analysis, Information & Organization 14 (4): 237–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Currie, W.L. and Guah, M.W. (2007). Conflicting Institutional Logics: A national programme for IT in the organisational field of healthcare, Journal of Information Technology 22 (3): 235–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Czarniawska, B. (2004). Narratives in Social Science Research, London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dacin, M.T., Goodstein, J. and Scott, W.R. (2002). Institutional Theory and Institutional Change: Introduction to the special research forum, Academy of Management Journal 45 (1): 45–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. DiMaggio, P.J. and Powell, W.W. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields, American Sociological Review 48 (2): 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fearnside, P.M. (1982). Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon: How fast is it occurring? Interciencia 7 (2): 82–85.Google Scholar
  23. Fearnside, P.M. (2003). Deforestation Control in Mato Grosso: A new model for slowing the loss of Brazil's Amazon forest, AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment 32 (5): 343–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fearnside, P.M. (2005). Deforestation in Brazilian Amazonia: History, rates, and consequences, Conservation Biology 19 (3): 680–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fligstein, N. (1990). The Transformation of Corporate Control, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Fligstein, N. (2001). Social Skill and the Theory of Fields, Sociological Theory 19: 105–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fligstein, N. and Brantley, P. (1992). Bank Control, Owner Control, or Organizational Dynamics: Who controls the large modern corporation? The American Journal of Sociology 98 (2): 280–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fountain, J.E. (2001). Building the Virtual State: Information technology and institutional change, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  29. Fountain, J.E. (2006). Central Issues in the Political Development of the Virtual State, in M. Castells and G. Cardoso (eds.) The Network Society: From knowledge to policy, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, pp. 149–181.Google Scholar
  30. Friedland, R. and Alford, R.R. (1991). Bringing Society Back, in W.W. Powell and P.J. DiMaggio (eds.) The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  31. Giddens, A. (1986). The Constitution of Society: Outline of the theory of structuration, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  32. Giddens, A. (1990). The Consequences of Modernity, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Gosain, S. (2004). Enterprise Information Systems as Objects and Carriers of Institutional Forces: The new iron cage? Journal of the Association for Information Systems 5 (4): 151–182.Google Scholar
  34. Greenpeace (2008). Desmatamento na Amazônia: o leão acordou, São Paulo: Greenpeace Brasil.Google Scholar
  35. Greenwood, R. and Suddaby, R. (2006). Institutional Entrepreneurship in Mature Fields: The big five accounting firms, Academy of Management Journal 59 (1): 27–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Guha, R. (2000). Environmentalism: A global history, New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  37. Hasselbladh, H. and Kallinikos, J. (2000). The Project of Rationalization: A critique and reappraisal of neo-institutionalism in organization studies, Organization Studies 21 (4): 697–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hayes, N. (2008). Institutionalising Change in a High-Technology Optronics Company: The role of information and communication technologies, Human Relations 61 (2): 245–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kallinikos, J. (2004). The Social Foundations of the Bureaucratic Order, Organization 11 (1): 13–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kallinikos, J. (2006). The Consequences of Information: Institutional implications of technological change, Cheltenham, UK: Elgar Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Keck, M.E. (2001). Dilemmas for Conservation in the Brazilian Amazon, Environmental Change and Security Program Report 7: 32–46.Google Scholar
  42. King, J.L., Gurbaxani, V., Kraemer, K.L., McFarlan, F.W., Raman, K.S. and Yap, C.S. (1994). Institutional Factors in Information Technology Innovation, Information Systems Research 5 (2): 139–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kling, R. and Iacono, C.S. (1989). The Institutional Character of Computerized Information Systems, Office: Technology and People 5 (1): 7–28.Google Scholar
  44. Kolk, A. (1998). From Conflict to Cooperation: International policies to protect the Brazilian Amazon, World Development 26 (8): 1481–1493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lamb, R. and Kling, R. (2003). Reconceptualizing Users as Social Actors in Information Systems Research, MIS Quarterly 27 (2): 197–235.Google Scholar
  46. Laurance, W.F., Fearnside, P.M., Albernaz, A.K.M., Vasconcelos, H.L. and Ferreira, L.V. (2004). Deforestation in Amazonia, Science 304 (5674): 1109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. McNeill, J.R. (2000). Something New Under the Sun: An environmental history of the twentieth-century world, New York: Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  48. Meyer, J.W. and Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized Organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony, The American Journal of Sociology 83 (2): 340–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Nicolaou, A. (1999). Social Control in Information Systems Development, Information Technology & People 12 (2): 130–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Noir, C. and Walsham, G. (2007). The Great Legitimizer: ICT as myth and ceremony in the Indian healthcare sector, Information Technology & People 20 (4): 313–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Orlikowski, W.J. and Barley, S.R. (2001). Technology and Institutions: What can research on information technology and research on organizations learn from each other? MIS Quarterly 25 (2): 145–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Orlikowski, W.J. and Iacono, C.S. (2001). Research Commentary: Desperately seeking the ‘IT’ in IT research – a call to theorizing the IT artifact, Information Systems Research 12 (2): 121–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Orlikowski, W.J. and Robey, D. (1991). Information Technology and the Structuring of Organizations, Information Systems Research 2 (2): 143–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Page, E.A. and Redclift, M.R. (2002). Human Security and the Environment: International comparisons, Northampton, MA.: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Powell, W.W. and DiMaggio, P.J. (eds.) (1991). The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  56. Rajão, R.G.L. and Hayes, N. (2007). Sistema de monitoramento da Amazônia: questão de segurança nacional, in A.J. Balloni (ed.) Por que GESITI? Segurança, Inovação e Sociedade, Campinas, Brazil: Komedi, pp. 53–86.Google Scholar
  57. Reis, A.C.F. (1965). A Amazônia e a cobiça internacional, Rio de Janeiro: Edinova Limitada.Google Scholar
  58. Robey, D. and Boudreau, M.-C. (1999). Accounting for the Contradictory Organizational Consequences of Information Technology: Theoretical directions and methodological implications, Information Systems Research 10 (2): 167–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Robey, D. and Holmstrom, J. (2001). Transforming Municipal Governance in Global Context: A case study of the dialectics of social change, Journal of Global Information Technology Management 4 (4): 19–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Scott, W.R. (1995). Institutions and Organizations, Thousand Oak, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  61. Scott, W.R. (2001). Institutions and Organizations, Thousand Oak, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  62. Scott, W.R. (2003). Institutional Carriers: Reviewing modes of transporting ideas over time and space and considering their consequences, Industrial and Corporate Change 12 (4): 879–894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Seo, M.-G. and Creed, W.E.D. (2002). Institutional Contradictions, Praxis, and Institutional Change: A dialectical perspective, Academy of Management Review 27 (2): 222–247.Google Scholar
  64. Shrivastava, P. (1995). Ecocentric Management for a Risk Society, The Academy of Management Review 20 (1): 118–137.Google Scholar
  65. Silva, L. and Figueroa, E.B. (2002). Institutional Intervention and the Expansion of ICTs in Latin America: The case of chile, Information Technology & People 15 (1): 8–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Suddaby, R. and Greenwood, R. (2009). Methodological Issues in Researching Institutions and Institutional Change, in D. Buchanan and A. Bryman (eds.) Handbook of Organizational Research Methods, London: Sage, pp. 176–195.Google Scholar
  67. Swanson, E.B. and Ramiller, N.C. (1997). The Organizing Vision in Information Systems Innovation, Organization Science 8 (5): 458–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Tsoukas, H. and Papoulias, D.B. (2005). Managing Third-order Change: The case of the public power corporation in Greece, Long Range Planning 38 (1): 79–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Walsham, G. (1993). Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations, New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  70. Walsham, G. (2006). Doing Interpretive Research, European Journal of Information Systems 15 (3): 320–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Walsham, G. and Sahay, S. (1999). GIS for District-Level Administration in India: Problems and opportunities, MIS Quarterly 23 (1): 39–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Zuboff, S. (1988). In the Age of the Smart Machine: The future of work and power, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  73. Zucker, L.G. (1977). The Role of Institutionalization in Cultural Persistence, American Sociological Review 42 (5): 726–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Information Technology Trust 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of OrganisationWork and Technology, Lancaster University Management School, BailriggLancasterUK

Personalised recommendations