Actor-networking the ‘failed state’ — an enquiry into the life of concepts

  • Christian Bueger
  • Felix Bethke
Article

Abstract

Concepts such as the ‘failed state’ are jointly produced by academics and political actors and hence connect academia and global politics. Little attention has been spent to study such concepts and the practices that create them and sustain their relevance. We develop an innovative framework for studying concepts. Relying on actor-network theory, we suggest studying concepts as effects of relations between different actors building an actor-network. We introduce actor-network theory and demonstrate its value for international relations (IR) research. Our empirical case study of the concept of failed states combines bibliometric analysis and qualitative text analysis. We show how various actors have brought the concept of failed states to life; analyse how actors transformed because of their participation; and investigate the persistent struggles to define and homogenise the concept. In summary, this is an article about the life of the failed state, the discipline of IR and its relations to other actors, and an introduction of the actor-network theory toolbox to the sociology of IR.

Keywords

actor-network theory bibliometry concept formation epistemic communities failed state practice theory 

Supplementary material

References

  1. Adler, Emanuel and Peter M. Haas (1992) ‘Conclusion: Epistemic Communities, World Order, and the Creation of a Reflective Research Program’, International Organization 46 (1): 367–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adler, Robert (2001) ‘The Crystal Ball of Chaos’, Nature 414 (6863): 480–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Antoniades, Andreas (2003) ‘Epistemic Communities, Epistemes and the Construction of (World) Politics’, Global Society 17 (1): 21–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. AusAID (2005) Fragile States: What is the International Experience Telling Us? Canberra: Australian Agency for International Development.Google Scholar
  5. Ayoob, Mohammed (1991) ‘The Security Problematic of the Third World’, World Politics 43 (2): 257–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barnett, Michael N., Hunjoon Kim, Madalene O’Donnell and Laura Sitea (2007) ‘Peacebuilding: What is in a Name?’, Global Governance 13 (1): 35–58.Google Scholar
  7. Bell, Duncan (2009) ‘Writing the World: Disciplinary History and Beyond’, International Affairs 85 (1): 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bienefeld, Manfred (1988) ‘Dependency Theory and the Political Economy of Africa's Crisis’, Review of African Political Economy 15 (43): 68–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bilgin, Pinar and Adam D. Morton (2004) ‘From “Rogue” to “Failed” States? The Fallacy of Short-Termism’, Politics 24 (3): 169–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. BMZ (2006) Observations on Service Delivery in Fragile States and Situations: The German Perspective, Bonn: Federal Ministry of Economic Cooperation and Development.Google Scholar
  11. BMZ (2007) Transforming Fragile States: Examples of Practical Experience, Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
  12. Brett, E.A. (1986) ‘State Power and Economic Inefficiency: Explaining Political Failure in Africa’, IDS Bulletin 17 (1): 22–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bueger, Christian (2007) ‘Paradigms, Cultures and Translations: Seven Ways of Studying the Discipline of International Relations’, Paper Prepared for Presentation at the 48th Annual Conference of the International Studies Association, 28 February–3 April, 2007, Chicago, USA.Google Scholar
  14. Bueger, Christian and Frank Gadinger (2007) ‘Reassembling and Dissecting: International Relations Practice from a Science Studies Perspective’, International Studies Perspectives 8 (1): 90–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bueger, Christian and Trine Villumsen (2007) ‘Beyond the Gap: Relevance, Fields of Practice and the Securitizing Consequences of (Democratic Peace) Research’, Journal of International Relations and Development 10 (4): 417–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Buzan, Barry (1983) People, States, and Fear, Hemel Hempstead: Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  17. Cabinet Office (2008) The National Security Strategy of the United Kingdom: Security in an Interdependent World, London: Cabinet Office.Google Scholar
  18. Call, Charles T. (2008) ‘The Fallacy of the “Failed State’’’, Third World Quarterly 29 (8): 1491–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Callon, Michel (1986a) ‘The Sociology of an Actor-Network: The Case of the Electric Vehicle’, in Michel Callon, John Law and Arie Rip, eds, Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology, 19–34, London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Callon, Michel (1986b) ‘Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay’, in John Law, ed. Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge? 196–234, London; Boston, MA; Henley: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  21. Callon, Michel (1998) The Laws of the Markets, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  22. Callon, Michel and John Law (1982) ‘On Interests and Their Transformation: Enrolement and Counter-Enrolement’, Social Studies of Science 12 (4): 615–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Callon, Michel, Jean Pierre Courtial and Francoise Laville (1991) ‘Co-Word Analysis as a Tool for Describing the Network of Interactions between Basic and Technological Research: The Case of Polymer Chemistry’, Scientometrics 22 (1): 155–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Carment, David, Stewart Prest and Yiagadeesen Samy (2009) Security, Development and the Fragile State — Bridging the Gap between Theory and Policy, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Chauvet, Lisa and Paul Collier (2008) ‘What are the Preconditions for Turnarounds in Failing States?’ Conflict Management and Peace Science 25 (4): 332–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Clarke, Walter and Jeffrey Herbst (1996) ‘Somalia and the Future of Humanitarian Intervention’, Foreign Affairs 75 (2): 70–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Crisis States Research Centre (2001) Concept and Research Agenda, London: London School of Economics.Google Scholar
  28. Crocker, Chester A. (2003) ‘Engaging Failed States’, Foreign Affairs 82 (5): 32–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Czarniawska, Barbara (2008) A Theory of Organizing, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  30. DFID (2005a) Drivers of Fragility: What Makes States Fragile? London: U.K. Department for International Development.Google Scholar
  31. DFID (2005b) Why We Need to Work More Effectively in Fragile States, London: U.K. Department for International Development.Google Scholar
  32. Dorff, Robert H. (2005) ‘Failed States After 9/11: What Did We Know and What Have We Learned?’, International Studies Perspectives 6 (1): 20–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Edwards, Adam and Pete Gill (2002) ‘The Politics of “Transnational Organized Crime”: Discourse, Reflexivity and the Narration of “Threat”’, The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 4 (2): 245–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Esty, Daniel C., Jack A. Goldstone, Ted R. Gurr, Pamela T. Surko and Alan N. Unger (1995) State Failure Task Force Report, McLean: Science Applications International Corporation.Google Scholar
  35. European Union (2003) ‘A Secure Europe in a Better World — The European Security Strategy’, Brussels, European Council.Google Scholar
  36. Francois, Monika and Inder Sud (2006) ‘Promoting Stability and Development in Fragile and Failed States’, Development Policy Review 24 (2): 141–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. French Ministry of Foreign and European Affairs (2007) ‘Fragile States and Situations of Fragility: France's Policy Paper’, Paris, French Ministry of Foreign and European Affairs.Google Scholar
  38. Fund for Peace (2009) ‘The Failed States Index 2009’, Foreign Policy 173: 80–83.Google Scholar
  39. Gad, Christopher and Casper Bruun Jensen (2009) ‘On the Consequences of Post-ANT’, Science, Technology and Human Values 35 (1): 55–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Gasper, Des (2005) ‘Securing Humanity: Situating ‘Human Security’ as Concept and Discourse’, Journal of Human Development 6 (2): 221–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. German Federal Ministry of Defence (2006) ‘White Paper 2006 on German Security Policy and the Future of the Bundeswehr’, Berlin, Federal Ministry of Defense.Google Scholar
  42. Ghani, Ashraf, Clare Lockhart and Michael Carnahan (2005) Closing the Sovereignty Gap: An Approach to State-Building, London: Overseas Development Institute.Google Scholar
  43. Gordon, Ruth E. (1995) ‘Some Legal Problems with Trusteeship’, Cornell International Law Journal 28 (2): 301–47.Google Scholar
  44. Gros, Jean-Germain (1996) ‘Towards a Taxonomy of Failed States in the New World Order: Decaying Somalia, Liberia, Rwanda and Haiti’, Third World Quarterly 17 (3): 455–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Habermas, Jürgen, ed. (1969) ‘Verwissenschaftlichte Politik und Öffentliche Meinung’, in Technik und Wissenschaft als Ideologie, 120–45, Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  46. Halfon, Saul (2006) ‘The Disunity of Consensus: International Population Policy Coordination as Socio-Technical Practice’, Social Studies of Science 36 (5): 783–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hameiri, Shahar (2007) ‘Failed States or a Failed Paradigm? State Capacity and Limits of Institutionalism’, Journal of International Relations and Development 10 (2): 122–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Hanlon, Joseph (2008) ‘Fixing Failed States: A Framework for Rebuilding a Fractured World’, Development and Change 39 (5): 868–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Hellmann, Gunther, Christian Weber, Frank Sauer and Sonja Schirmbeck (2007) ‘‘‘Selbstbewusst” und “stolz”.’ Das außenpolitische Vokabular der Berliner Republik als Fährte einer Neuorientierung’, Politische Vierteljahresschrift 48 (4): 650–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Helman, Gerald B. and Steven B. Ratner (1992) ‘Saving Failed States’, Foreign Policy 89: 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Herbst, Jeffrey (1997) ‘Responding to State Failure in Africa’, International Security 21 (3): 120–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Holm, Hans-Henrik (2002) ‘Failing Failed States: Who Forgets the Forgotten?’ Security Dialogue 33 (4): 457–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. IMF (2008) The Fund's Engagement in Fragile States and Post-Conflict Countries: A Review of Experience — Issues and Options, Washington DC: IMF.Google Scholar
  54. Iqbal, Zariab and Harry Starr (2008) ‘Bad Neighbors: Failed States and Their Consequences’, Conflict Management and Peace Science 25 (4): 315–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Jackson, Robert H. (1987) ‘Quasi-States, Dual Regimes, and Neoclassical Theory: International Jurisprudence and the Third World’, International Organization 41 (4): 519–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Jackson, Robert H. and Carl G. Rosberg (1982) ‘Why Africa's Weak States Persist: The Empirical and the Juridical in Statehood’, World Politics 35 (1): 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Jones, Branwen G. (2008) ‘The Global Political Economy of Social Crisis: Towards a Critique of the ‘Failed State’ Ideology’, Review of International Political Economy 15 (2): 180–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Kaplan, Seth D. (2007) Fixing Fragile States: A New Paradigm for Development, Westport: Praeger Security International.Google Scholar
  59. King, Gary and Langche Zeng (2001) ‘Improving Forecasts of State Failure’, World Politics 53 (4): 623–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Krasner, Stephen D. (2004) ‘Sharing Sovereignty: New Institutions for Collapsed and Failing States’, International Security 29 (2): 85–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Krasner, Stephen D. and Carlos Pascual (2005) ‘Addressing State Failure’, Foreign Affairs 84 (4): 153–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Lambach, Daniel (2006) ‘Security, Development and the Australian Security Discourse’, Australian Journal of Political Science 41 (3): 407–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Latour, Bruno (1988) The Pasteurization of France, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Latour, Bruno (2005) Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory, Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Latour, Bruno (2010) The Making of Law: An Ethnography of the Conseil d’Etat, Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  66. Latour, Bruno and Steven Woolgar (1979) Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts, Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  67. Law, John (1987) ‘On the Social Explanation of Technical Change: The Case of the Portuguese Maritime Expansion’, Technology and Culture 28 (2): 227–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Law, John (1994) Organizing Modernity, Oxford and Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  69. Law, John (2004) After Method: Mess in Social Science Research, London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  70. Law, John (2009) ‘Actor Network Theory and Material Semiotics’, in Bryan S. Turner, ed. The New Blackwell Companion to Social Theory, 141–58, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Lemarchand, René (1986) ‘Chad: The Misadventures of the North-South Dialectic’, African Studies Review 29 (3): 27–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Lidskog, Rolf and Goran Sundqvist (2002) ‘The Role of Science in Environmental Regimes: The Case of LRTAP’, European Journal of International Relations 8 (1): 77–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Lyman, Princeton N. and J. Stephen Morrison (2004) ‘The Terrorist Threat in Africa’, Foreign Affairs 83 (1): 75–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Mackay, Joseph (2007) ‘State Failure, Actor-Network Theory, and the Theorisation of Sovereignty’, BSIS Journal of International Studies 3 (September): 59–96.Google Scholar
  75. MacKenzie, Donald, Fabian Muniesa and Lucia Siu, eds (2007) Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Markets, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  76. Manjikian, M. (2008) ‘Diagnosis, Intervention, and Cure: The Illness Narrative in the Discourse of the Failed State’, Alternatives 33 (3): 335–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Mata, Javier Fabra and Sebastian Ziaja (2009) Users’ Guide on Measuring Fragility, Bonn and Oslo: German Development Institute and United Nations Development Programme.Google Scholar
  78. Migdal, Joel S. (1988) Strong Societies and Weak States: State-Society Relations and State Capabilities in the Third World, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  79. Mol, Annemarie (2002) The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice, Durham and London: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Mol, Annemarie (2010a) ‘Actor-Network Theory: Sensitive Terms and Enduring Tensions’, Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 50 (1): 253–69.Google Scholar
  81. Mol, Annemarie (2010b) ‘A Letter to Georg Kneer’, Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 50 (1): 279–82.Google Scholar
  82. Mutzel, Sophie (2009) ‘Networks as Culturally Constituted Processes: A Comparison of Relational Sociology and Actor-Network Theory’, Current Sociology 57 (6): 871–877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Neumann, Iver B. (2002) ‘Returning Practice to the Linguistic Turn: The Case of Diplomacy’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies 31 (3): 627–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Passoth, Jan-Hendrik and Nicholas J. Rowland (2010) ‘Actor-Network State: Integrating Actor-Network Theory and State Theory’, International Sociology 25 (6): 818–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Persson, Olle. (2006) ‘Bibexcel: A Tool-box Programme for Bibliometric Analysis’, http://www.umu.se/inforsk/Bibexcel/, (accessed 27 November, 2012).
  86. Piazza, James A. (2008) ‘Incubators of Terror: Do Failed and Failing States Promote Transnational Terrorism?’ International Studies Quarterly 52 (3): 469–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Prime Minister's Strategy Unit (2005) ‘Investing in Prevention: An International Strategy to Manage Risks of Instability and Improve Crisis Response. A Prime Minister's Strategy Unit Report to the Government’, February, Prime Minister's Strategy Unit, Cabinet Office, London.Google Scholar
  88. Rice, Susan E. (2003) The New National Security Strategy: Focus on Failed States, Washington DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  89. Rice, Susan E. and Stewart Patrick (2008) Index of State Weakness in the Developing World, Washington DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  90. Rotberg, Robert I. (2002) ‘Failed States in a World of Terror’, Foreign Affairs 81 (4): 127–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Rotberg, Robert I., ed. (2003) State Failure and State Weakness in a Time of Terror, Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  92. Rotberg, Robert I., ed. (2004) When States Fail: Causes and Consequences, Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Rotberg, Robert I. (2009) ‘ “Disorder in the Ranks”: A Different Take on Just What Makes a “Failing” State’, Foreign Policy 7 (173): 91.Google Scholar
  94. Rothchild, Donald and Naomi Chazan, eds (1988) The Precarious Balance: State and Society in Africa, Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
  95. Simpson, Gerry J. (1996) ‘The Diffusion of Sovereignty: Self-Determination in the Post-Colonial Age’, Stanford Journal of International Law 32 (2): 255–86.Google Scholar
  96. Smith, Steve (2004) ‘Singing Our World into Existence: International Relations Theory and September 11. Presidential Address to the International Studies Association, February 27, 2003, Portland, OR’, International Studies Quarterly 48 (3): 499–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Sørensen, Georg (2001) Changes in Statehood: The Transformation of International Relations, Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Spiegel, Gabrielle M., ed. (2005) ‘Introduction’, in Practicing History: New Directions in Historical Writing after the Linguistic Turn, 1–33, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  99. Srnicek, Nick (2010) ‘Conflict Networks: Collapsing the Global into the Local’, Journal of Critical Globalisation Studies 2 (2): 30–64.Google Scholar
  100. Straw, Jack (2001) ‘The Free World Will Emerge Stronger’, Statement to the House of Commons, 14 September, 2001.Google Scholar
  101. USAID (2005a) Fragile States Strategy, Washington DC: US Agency for International Development.Google Scholar
  102. USAID (2005b) Measuring Fragility: Indicators and Methods for Rating State Performance, Washington DC: US Agency for International Development.Google Scholar
  103. Wæver, Ole (1998) ‘The Sociology of a Not So International Discipline: American and European Developments in International Relations’, International Organization 52 (4): 687–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Waever, Ole and Arlene B. Tickner, eds (2009) Global Scholarship in International Relations: Worlding Beyond the West, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  105. Walker, R.B.J. (1995) ‘International Relations and the Concept of the Political’, in Kenneth Booth and Steve Smith, eds, International Relations Theory Today, 306–27, University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  106. Walters, William (2002) ‘The Power of Inscription: Beyond Social Construction and Deconstruction in European Integration Studies’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies 31 (1): 83–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Weinstein, Jeremy M., John Edward Porter and Stuart E. Eizenstat (2004) On the Brink: Weak States and US National Security, Washington DC: Center for Global Development.Google Scholar
  108. Weiss, Thomas G. (1994) ‘The United Nations and Civil Wars’, Washington Quarterly 17 (4): 139–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. White House (1997) National Security Strategy of the United States of America, Washington DC, http://nssarchive.us, (accessed 27 November, 2012).
  110. White House (2002) National Security Strategy of the United States of America, Washington DC, http://nssarchive.us, (accessed 27 November, 2012).
  111. World Bank (2002) ‘World Bank Group Work in Low-Income Countries Under Stress: A Task Force Report, http://go.worldbank.org/JHPKRCXS40, (accessed 27 November, 2012).Google Scholar
  112. World Bank (2004) World Development Indicators 2004, Washington DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  113. Zartman, I.William, ed. (1995) Collapsed States: The Disintegration and Restoration of Legitimate Authority, Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christian Bueger
    • 1
  • Felix Bethke
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PoliticsCardiff UniversityCardiffUK
  2. 2.Institute for Politics and Communication Science, University of GreifswaldGreifswaldGermany

Personalised recommendations