Advertisement

Aid allocation of the emerging Central and Eastern European donors

  • Balázs Szent-Iványi
Article

Abstract

This paper examines the main characteristics of the (re-)emerging foreign aid policies of the Visegrád countries (the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Slovakia), concentrating on the allocation of their aid resources. I adopt an econometric approach, similar to the ones used in the literature, for analysing the aid allocation of the OECD DAC donors. Using this approach, I examine the various factors that influence aid allocation of the Visegrád countries, using data for the years between 2001 and 2008. The most important conclusion is that the amount of aid a partner country gets from the four emerging donors is not influenced by the level of poverty or the previous performance of the recipients (measured by the level of economic growth or the quality of institutions). The main determining factor seems to be geographic proximity, as countries in the Western Balkans and the Post-Soviet region receive much more aid from the Visegrád countries than other recipients. Historical ties (pre-1989 development relations) and international obligations in the cases of Afghanistan and Iraq are also found to be significant explanatory factors. This allocation is in line with the foreign political and economic interests of these new donors. Although there are clear similarities between the four donors, this paper also identifies some individual country characteristics.

Keywords

aid allocation emerging donors foreign aid Visegrád countries 

References

  1. Alesina, Alberto and Beatrice Weder (2002) ‘Do Corrupt Governments Receive Less Foreign Aid?’ American Economic Review 92 (4): 1126–1137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alesina, Alberto and David Dollar (2000) ‘Who Gives Foreign Aid to Whom and Why?’ Journal of Economic Growth 5 (1): 33–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baginski, Pavel (2002) ‘Poland’, in Michael Dauderstädt, ed., EU Eastern Enlargement and Development Cooperation, Bonn: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.Google Scholar
  4. Bandyopadhyay, Subhayu and Howard J. Wall (2006) ‘The Determinants of Aid in the Post-Cold War Era’, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Working Paper, No. 2006-021B.Google Scholar
  5. Berthélemy, Jean-Claude (2006) ‘Bilateral Donors’ Interest vs Recipients’ Development Motives in Aid Allocation: Do All Donors Behave the Same?’ Review of Development Economics 10 (2): 179–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brainad, Lael, ed. (2003) The Other War: Global Poverty and the Millennium Challenge Account, Washington DC: Brookings Institute Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bucar, Maja and Mojmir Mrak (2007) ‘Challenges of Development Cooperation for EU New Member States’, Paper presented at the ABCDE World Bank Conference, 17–18 May, Bled, Slovenia.Google Scholar
  8. Burnell, Peter (2005) ‘Foreign Aid Resurgent: New Spirit Or Old Hangover?’, in Tony Addison and George Mavrotas, eds, Building the New International Financial Architecture: Issues, Challenges and Agendas, London and Helsinki: Palgrave-Macmillan/UNU-WIDER.Google Scholar
  9. Carbone, Maurizio (2004) ‘Development Policy’, in Neill Nugent, ed., EU Enlargement, Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  10. Collier, Paul and David Dollar (2002) ‘Aid Allocation and Poverty Reduction’, European Economic Review 46 (3): 1475–1500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Collier, Paul, V.L. Elliott, Havard Hegre, Anke Hoeffler, Marta Reynal-Querol and Nicholas Sambanis (2003) Breaking the Conflict Trap: Civil War and Development Policy, Washington DC: World Bank and Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. CONCORD (2009) Lighten the Load: In a Time of Crisis, European Aid has Never Been More Important, Brussels: CONCORD.Google Scholar
  13. Dangerfield, Martin (2009) ‘The Contribution of the Visegrád Group to the European Union's “Eastern” Policy: Rhetoric or Reality?’ Europe-Asia Studies 61 (10): 1735–1755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Danielson, Anders and Lennart Wohlgemuth (2005) ‘Swedish Development Co-Operation in Perspective’, in Paul Hoebink and Olav Stokke, eds, Perspectives on European Development Cooperation, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Dollar, David and Victoria Levin (2006) ‘The Increasing Selectivity of Foreign Aid, 1984–2003’, World Development 34 (12): 2034–2046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Drozd, Maciej (2007) ‘The New Face of Solidarity: A Brief Survey of Polish Aid, http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm/SSRN_ID1132246_code948600.pdf?abstractid=1132246&mirid=2, (accessed 21 May, 2009).
  17. Eurobarometer (2007) ‘Europeans and Development Aid’, Special Eurobarometer 280 http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_280_en.pdf, (accessed 1 April, 2009).
  18. European Consensus (2006) ‘Joint Statement by the Council and the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States Meeting within the Council, the European Parliament and the Commission on European Union Development Policy: “The European Consensus”’, Official Journal C (46): 1–18.Google Scholar
  19. European Council (2002) ‘Presidency Conclusions: Barcelona European Council, 15–16 May 2002, http://www.consilium.europa.eu/ueDocs/cms_Data/docs/pressData/en/ec/71025.pdf (accessed 5 June, 2010).
  20. Gounder, Rukmani (1994) ‘Empirical Results of Aid Motivations: Australia's Bilateral Aid Program’, World Development 22 (1): 99–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Harmer, Adele and Lin Cotterrell (2005) ‘Diversity in Donorship: The Changing Landscape of Official Humanitarian Aid: Aid Donorship in Central Europe’, London: Overseas Development Institute. HPG Research Report 20.Google Scholar
  22. HUN-IDA (2004) A magyar műszaki-tudományos együttműködés és segítségnyújtás négy évtizedének rövid áttekintése napjainkig [A Short History of the Four Decades of Hungarian Technical and Scientific Cooperation and Assistance], Budapest: HUN-IDA Kht.Google Scholar
  23. Isopi, Alessia and George Mavrotas (2006) ‘Aid Allocation and Aid Effectiveness: An Empirical Analysis’, UNU-WIDER Research Paper, No. 2006/07.Google Scholar
  24. Kiss, Judit (2007) A magyar nemzetközi fejlesztéspolitika a számok tükrében [Hungary's International Development Policy in Numbers], Budapest: HAND Aid Watch Working Group.Google Scholar
  25. Lightfoot, Simon (2008) ‘Enlargement and the Challenge of EU Development Policy’, Perspectives on European Politics and Society 9 (2): 128–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lightfoot, Simon (2010) ‘The Europeanisation of International Development Policies: The Case of Central and Eastern European States’, Europe-Asia Studies 62 (2): 329–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lister, Marjorie and Maurizio Carbone, eds (2006) New Pathways in International Development: Gender and Civil Society in EU Policy, Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  28. Maizels, Alfred and Machiko K. Nissanke (1984) ‘Motivations for Aid to Developing Countries’, World Development 12 (9): 879–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Manning, Richard (2007) Development Co-operation Report 2007, Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  30. McGillivray, Mark (2003) ‘Modeling Aid Allocation: Issues, Approaches and Results’, UNU-WIDER Research Paper, No. 2003/49.Google Scholar
  31. McGillivray, Mark, Simon Feeney, Niels Hermes and Robert Lensink (2006) ‘It Works; It Doesn’t; It Can, But That Depends … 50 Years of Controversy Over the Macroeconomic Impact of Development Aid’, Journal of International Development 18 (7): 1031–1050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McKinley, Robert D. and Richard Little (1979) ‘The U.S. Aid Relationship: A Test of the Recipient Need and the Donor Interest Models’, Political Studies 27 (2): 236–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Michaux, Valérie (2002) ‘EU Enlargement: A Brake of Development Cooperation?’, The ACP-EU Courier No. 193, July–August.Google Scholar
  34. Morgenthau, Hans (1962) ‘A Political Theory of Foreign Aid’, The American Political Science Review 56 (2): 301–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Neumayer, Eric (2003) ‘Do Human Rights Matter in Bilateral Aid Allocation? A Quantitative Analysis of 21 Donor Countries’, Social Science Quarterly 84 (3): 650–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. OECD (2007a) Development Co-operation Report Statistical Annex, Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  37. OECD (2007b) Development Cooperation of the Czech Republic. DAC Special Review, Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  38. OECD (2008) Development Co-operation Report Statistical Annex, Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  39. OECD (2009) Development Co-operation Report Statistical Annex, Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  40. OECD (2010) Development Co-operation Report Statistical Annex, Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  41. Radelet, Steven (2003) ‘Bush and Foreign Aid’, Foreign Affairs 85 (5): 104–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Roodman, David (2007) ‘Macro Aid Effectiveness: A Guide for the Perplexed’, Center for Global Development Working Paper, No. 134.Google Scholar
  43. Rotberg, Robert I. (2002) ‘The New Nature of Nation-State Failure’, The Washington Quarterly 25 (3): 85–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schraeder, Peter J., Steven W. Hook and Bruce Taylor (1998) ‘Clarifying the Foreign Aid Puzzle: A Comparison of American, Japanese, French, and Swedish Aid Flows’, World Politics 50 (2): 294–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Stojanos, Robert (2006) ‘Official Development Assistance and Debt Relief in Central Europe: Case Study of the Czech Republic, http://projects.osu.eu/igeography/docs/ODA_and_Debt_Relief_case_study_CR.pdf (accessed 6 April, 2010).
  46. Szentes, Tamás (1994) ‘Aid and Trade Relations between the South and the East European Countries’, Presented at the United Nations University, WIDER Workshop on Reorienting International Development Cooperation for Sustained Growth, Equity, and Human Development, 28 February–1 March, Helsinki, Finland.Google Scholar
  47. Szent-Iványi, Balázs and András Tétényi (2008) ‘Transition and Foreign Aid Policies in the Visegrád Countries: A Path Dependant Approach’, Transition Studies Review 15 (3): 573–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tálas, Péter (2007) ‘A nemzetközi terrorizmus és a szervezett bűnözés hatása a nemzetközi biztonságra és Magyarország biztonságára [The Effects of International Terrorism and Organized Crime on Global Security and Hungary's Security]’, http://www.mtaki.hu/docs/all_in_one/talas_peter_nemzetkozi_terrorizmus.pdf (accessed 15 May, 2009).
  49. Trumbull, William N. and Howard J. Wall (1994) ‘Estimating Aid-Allocation Criteria with Panel Data’, The Economic Journal 104 (425): 876–882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. UNHCR (2010) ‘UNHCR Statistical Online Population Database’, http://apps.who.int/globalatlas/dataQuery/default.asp (accessed 20 August, 2010).
  51. Weissman, Stephen R. (1997) ‘Addicted to Mobutu: Why America Can’t Learn from its Foreign Policy Mistakes’, Washington Monthly 29 (9): 24–28.Google Scholar
  52. World Bank (2007) ‘The Czech ODA Program in the Current Aid Paradigm: Challenges and Opportunities for a More Efficient Aid’, Presentation for the Ministry of Finance, 22 February, Prague, http://www.mfcr.cz/cps/rde/xbcr/mfcr/Czech__ODA__program_-_challenges__and_opportunities.ppt (accessed 30 September, 2008).
  53. World Bank (2009a) World Development Report 2010: Development and Climate Change, Washington DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  54. World Bank (2009b) ‘Governance Matters 2009 Brochure’, http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/pdf/WBI_GovInd.pdf (accessed 14 June, 2009).
  55. Younas, Javed (2008) ‘Motivation for Bilateral Aid Allocation: Altruism or Trade Benefits’, European Journal of Political Economy 24 (3): 661–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zagranica Group (2007) ‘Polish Development Assistance: Independent Research Conducted by Non-Governmental Organizations’, Warsaw: Zagranica Group http://www.zagranica.org.pl/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_view&gid=37&Itemid=138 (accessed 21 May, 2009).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Balázs Szent-Iványi
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Economics, Corvinus University of BudapestBudapestHungary

Personalised recommendations