Abstract
Although the original model of expatriate adjustment proposed by Black and colleagues has received substantial empirical support, it has come under increased academic scrutiny, due to both the conceptual overlap among its dimensions and its limited applicability for global professionals who interact with individuals from diverse cultures. Drawing on role theory, we conceptualize and develop a multidimensional scale of the work- and family-role adjustment of global professionals. We assess this scale through five interlocking studies using data from a total of 1231 corporate and self-initiated expatriates, international business travelers, and global domestics. After confirming the scale’s dimensionality, we provide evidence for convergent, discriminant, nomological, and predictive validity. We also demonstrate differences in levels of adjustment and in relationships between work and family demands and resources and their respective forms of adjustment across various types of global professionals. We contribute to international business research, and the organizational behavior and work–family literatures, by offering a theoretically based scale that assesses adjustment to both work and family roles for a wide range of global employees. Our scale further lends itself as a diagnostic tool during the selection, training, and support of global professionals and their families.
Abstract
Même si le modèle original d’ajustement des expatriés proposé par Black et al. a reçu une importante validation empirique, il fait l’objet d’une interrogation académique croissante, en raison d’un chevauchement conceptuel de ses dimensions et de son applicabilité limitée pour des professionnels globaux qui interagissent avec des individus de cultures différentes. En nous appuyant sur la théorie des rôles, nous conceptualisons et développons une échelle multi-dimensionnelle de l’ajustement des rôles au travail et au sein de la famille pour les professionnels globaux. Nous évaluons cette échelle par cinq études encastrées en utilisant des données concernant un total de 1231 expatriés d’entreprise et auto-initiés, de voyageurs d’affaires internationaux et de salariés globaux travaillant dans leur pays d’origine. Après avoir confirmé la dimensionnalité de l’échelle, nous prouvons sa validité convergente, discriminante, nomologique et prédictive. Nous montrons aussi des différences dans les niveaux d’ajustement et dans les relations entre les demandes et les ressources au travail et au sein de la famille ainsi que leurs formes respectives d’ajustement selon les différents types de professionnels globaux. Nous contribuons à la recherche en international business et à la littérature sur le comportement organisationnel et la relation entre le travail et la famille, en offrant une échelle fondée sur une théorie qui évalue l’ajustement aux rôles au travail et au sein de la famille pour une grande variété de salariés globaux. Notre échelle peut aussi être utilisée comme un outil de diagnostic durant la sélection, la formation et le soutien accordé aux professionnels globaux et à leurs familles.
Abstract
Aunque el modelo original de ajuste de expatriados de Black y sus colegas ha recibido un importante apoyo empírico, ha sido objeto de un mayor escrutinio académico, debido tanto a la trasposición conceptual entre sus dimensiones y su limitada aplicabilidad para los profesionales globales que interactúan con individuos de diversas culturas. Sobre la base de la teoría de rol, conceptualizamos y desarrollamos una escala multidimensional del ajuste de los roles trabajo-familia de los profesionales globales. Evaluamos esta escala mediante cinco estudios entrelazados usando datos de un total de 1231 expatriados corporativos y expatriados por iniciativa propia, viajeros por negocios internacionales, y domésticos globales. Después de confirmar la dimensionalidad de la escala aportamos evidencias para validez convergente, discriminante, nomológica y predictiva. Adicionalmente demostramos diferencias en los niveles de ajuste y en las relaciones entre las demandas de trabajo y de familia, y de los recursos y de las respectivas formas de ajuste entre varios tipos de profesionales globales. Contribuimos a la investigación de negocios internacionales y de comportamiento organizacional y la literatura de trabajo-familia ofreciendo una escala basada en teoría que valora el ajuste tanto a los roles en el trabajo como en la familia para una amplia gama de empleados globales. Nuestra escala además se presta como una herramienta de diagnóstico durante la selección, el entrenamiento, y el apoyo a profesionales globales y sus familias.
Abstract
Embora o modelo original de adaptação do expatriado proposto por Black e seus colegas tenha recebido apoio empírico substancial, ele veio sob maior escrutínio acadêmico, devido tanto à sobreposição conceitual das suas dimensões, quanto a sua aplicabilidade limitada para profissionais globais que interagem com pessoas de diversas culturas. Com base na teoria dos papéis, nós conceituamos e desenvolvemos uma escala multidimensional da adaptação de profissionais globais nos papéis do trabalho e da família. Nós avaliamos esta escala por meio de cinco estudos interrelacionados usando dados de um total de 1231 expatriados corporativos e autônomos, viajantes de negócios internacionais e profissionais globais domésticos. Após a confirmação da dimensionalidade da escala, nós fornecemos evidências para validade convergente, discriminante e preditiva. Nós também demonstramos as diferenças entre os níveis de adaptação e nas relações entre as demandas e recursos de trabalho e família e suas respectivas formas de adaptação em vários tipos de profissionais globais. Nós contribuímos para a pesquisa em negócios internacionais, bem como para a literatura sobre comportamento organizacional e sobre trabalho-família através da oferta de uma escala teórica que avalia a adaptação de uma ampla gama de funcionários globais em ambos os papéis profissional e familiar. Nossa escala ainda pode ser usada como uma ferramenta de diagnóstico durante a seleção, treinamento e suporte de profissionais globais e suas famílias.
Abstract
虽然由Black及其同事提出的外派人士适应的原始模型已经受到了大量的实证支持, 但是由于该模型维度之间概念重叠, 且对与来自不同文化的个体互动的全球专业人士的适用性有限, 所以它受到越来越多的学术审视。借鉴角色理论, 我们概念化并开发了关于全球专业人士工作和家庭角色适应的多维度量表。我们利用总共来自1231个企业和自发的外派人员、国际商务旅客、及全球家佣的样本数据, 通过五个连锁研究来评估这一量表。经过证实量表的维度后, 我们为量表的收敛、判别、法理及预测效度提供了证据。我们也证明了不同水平适应的差异性, 以及工作与家庭需求和资源与各种类型全球专业人士他们各自适应模式之间关系的差异性。通过提供一个基于理论的用来评估广范围全球雇员工作与家庭角色适应性的量表, 我们对国际商务研究以及组织行为和工作-家庭文献做出了贡献。我们的量表进一步可作为一个选择、培训、支持全球专业人士及其家庭的诊断工具。
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Further details provided from the corresponding author.
Further details provided from the corresponding author.
We conducted a test of measurement invariance of the second-order factor structure of work- and family-role adjustment comparing all the English language samples we use in this article (pooled together) to the French language sample. We conducted the test based on Chen, Sousa, and West’s (2005) guidelines for measuring invariance of higher-order factors. The measure demonstrated configural invariance (d.f.=98, χ2=488.22, CFI=0.973). Factorial and strong invariance (i.e., invariance of intercepts) will be achieved if there is no significant difference in χ2 from one nested model to another or the change in CFI is less than 0.005 (Chen, 2007). Both the first-order factor loadings (Δχ2=4.80>0.05, Δd.f.=8; CFI=0.973) and the second-order factor loadings (Δχ2=6.23>0.05, Δd.f.=4; CFI= 0.973) demonstrated invariance. In terms of strong invariance, our measure demonstrated invariance of intercepts of the measured variables/items (Δχ2=35.99<0.05, Δd.f.=8, CFI=0.971; ΔCFI=0.002) and invariance of intercepts of the first-order factors (Δχ2=43.11<0.05, Δd.f.=4, CFI=0.969; ΔCFI=0.002).
References
Al Ariss, A., & Özbilgin, M. 2010. Understanding self-initiated expatriates: Career experiences of Lebanese self-initiated expatriates in France. Thunderbird International Business Review, 52 (4): 275–285.
Andresen, M., Bergdolt, F., Margenfeld, J., & Dickmann, M. 2014. Addressing international mobility confusion – Developing definitions and differentiations for self-initiated and assigned expatriates as well as migrants. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25 (16): 2295–2318.
Ashforth, B. E. 2001. Role transitions in organizational life: An identity-based perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Ashforth, B. E., Kreiner, G. E., & Fugate, M. 2000. All in a day’s work: Boundaries and micro role transitions. Academy of Management Review, 25 (3): 472–491.
Aycan, Z. 1997. Expatriate adjustment as a multifaceted phenomenon: Individual and organizational level predictors. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 8 (4): 434–456.
Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Euwema, M. C. 2005. Job resources buffer the impact of job demands on burnout. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 10 (2): 170–180.
Bandura, A. 1986. Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Baruch, Y., Dickmann, M., Altman, Y., & Bournois, F. 2013. Exploring international work: Types and dimensions of global careers. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24 (12): 2369–2393.
Bauer, T.N., Bodner, T., Erdogan, B., Truxillo, D.M., & Tucker, J.S. 2007. Newcomer adjustment during organizational socialization: A meta-analytic review of antecedents, outcomes, and methods. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92 (3): 707–721.
Bhaskar-Shrinivas, P., Harrison, D. A., Shaffer, M. A., & Luk, D. M. 2005. Input-based and time-based models of international adjustment: Meta-analytic evidence and theoretical extensions. Academy of Management Journal, 48 (2): 257–281.
Biddle, B. J. 1986. Recent development in role theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 12: 67–92.
Black, J. S. 1988. Work role transitions: A study of American expatriate managers in Japan. Journal of International Business Studies, 19 (2): 277–294.
Black, J. S., & Gregersen, H. B. 1991a. Antecedents to cross-cultural adjustment for expatriates in Pacific Rim assignments. Human Relations, 44 (5): 497–515.
Black, J. S., & Gregersen, H. B. 1991b. The other half of the picture: Antecedents of spouse cross-cultural adjustment. Journal of International Business Studies, 22 (3): 461–477.
Black, J. S., & Stephens, G. K. 1989. The influence of the spouse on American expatriate adjustment and intent to stay in Pacific Rim overseas assignments. Journal of Management, 15 (4): 529–544.
Black, J. S., Mendenhall, M., & Oddou, G. 1991. Toward a comprehensive model of international adjustment: An integration of multiple theoretical perspectives. Academy of Management Review, 16 (2): 291–317.
Bolino, M. C., & Turnley, W. H. 2005. The personal costs of citizenship behavior: The relationship between individual initiative and role overload, job stress, and work–family conflict. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90 (4): 740–748.
Brookfield Global Relocation Services. 2013. Global relocation trends survey report. Woodridge, IL: Brookfield Global Relocation Services.
Caligiuri, P. M. 1997. Assessing expatriate success: Beyond just being there. In Z. Aycan (Ed), New approaches to employee management: Expatriate management theory and research 117–140. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Caligiuri, P. M., Hyland, M. A. M., Joshi, A., & Bross, A. S. 1998. Testing a theoretical model for examining the relationship between family adjustment and expatriates’ work adjustment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83 (4): 598–614.
Campbell, D.T., & Fiske, D.W. 1959. Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait–multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56 (2): 81–105.
Cerdin, J. L., & Selmer, J. 2014. Who is a self-initiated expatriate? Towards conceptual clarity of a common notion. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25 (9): 1281–1301.
Chen, F. F. 2007. Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14 (3): 464–504.
Chen, F. F., Sousa, K. H., & West, S. G. 2005. Teacher’s corner: Testing measurement invariance of second-order factor models. Structural Equation Modeling, 12 (3): 471–492.
Chen, G., Gully, S. M., & Eden, D. 2001. Validation of a new general self-efficacy scale. Organizational Research Methods, 4 (1): 62–83.
Chen, Y. P., Shaffer, M.A., Westman, M., Chen, S., Lazarova, M., & Reiche, S. 2014. Family role performance: Scale development and validation. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 63 (1): 190–218.
Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Nachreiner, F., & Schaufeli, W. B. 2001. The job demands–resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86 (3): 499–512.
DeVellis, R.F. 2012. Scale development: Theory and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Doehrman, S.R. 1984. Stress, strain, and social support during a role transition. In V. L. Allen, & E. van de Vliert (Eds), Role transitions: Explorations and explanations 253–262. New York: Plenum Press.
Doherty, N. 2013. Understanding the self-initiated expatriate: A review and directions for future research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15 (4): 447–469.
Dragoni, L., Oh, I. S., Tesluk, P. E., Moore, O. A., VanKatwyk, P., & Hazucha, J. 2014. Developing leaders’ strategic thinking through global work experience: The moderating role of cultural distance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99 (5): 867–882.
Ferris, D. L., Brown, D. J., Berry, J. W., & Lian, H. 2008. The development and validation of the workplace ostracism scale. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93 (6): 1348–1366.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (1): 39–50.
Froese, F. J., & Peltokorpi, V. 2013. Organizational expatriates and self-initiated expatriates: Differences in cross-cultural adjustment and job satisfaction. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24 (10): 1953–1967.
Gist, M.E., & Mitchell, T.R. 1992. Self-efficacy: A theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. Academy of Management Review, 17 (2): 183–211.
Gorsuch, R. L. 1983. Factor analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Greenhaus, J. H., & Powell, G. N. 2006. When work and family are allies: A theory of work–family enrichment. Academy of Management Review, 31 (1): 72–92.
Hall, E. 1959. The silent language. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
Harrison, D.A., Shaffer, M.A., & Bhaskar-Shrinivas, P. 2004. Going places: Roads more and less traveled in research on expatriate experiences. In J.J. Martocchio (Ed), Research in personnel and human resources management 199–247. Oxford: Elsevier.
Haslberger, A., Brewster, C., & Hippler, T. 2013. The dimensions of expatriate adjustment. Human Resource Management, 52 (3): 333–351.
Hinds, P., Liu, L., & Lyon, J. 2011. Putting the global in global work: An intercultural lens on the practice of cross-national collaboration. The Academy of Management Annals, 5 (1): 135–188.
Hinkin, T. R. 1998. A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires. Organizational Research Methods, 1 (1): 104–121.
Hippler, T., & Caligiuri, P.M. 2009. Revisiting the construct of expatriate adjustment: Implications for theory and measurement. Paper presented at the 2009 International Human Resource Management Conference; 21–24 June, Santa Fe, NM.
Hippler, T., Caligiuri, P. M., Johnson, J. E., & Baytalskaya, N. 2014. The development and validation of a theory-based expatriate adjustment scale. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25 (14): 1938–1959.
House, J.S. 1981. Work stress and social support. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Huitt, W. 1999. Conation as an important factor of mind. Educational Psychology Interactive. Valdosta, GA: Valdosta State University, http://www.edpsycinteractive.org/topics/conation/conation.html, accessed 13 August 2014.
Kahn, R. L., Wolfe, D. M., Quinn, R. P., Snoek, J. D., & Rosenthal, R.A. 1964. Organizational stress: Studies in role conflict and ambiguity. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Kahn, W.A. 1990. Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33 (4): 692–724.
Katz, D., & Kahn, R.L. 1978. The social psychology of organizations. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Kline, R. B. 2005. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.
Lazarova, M. B., & Thomas, D. C. 2012. Expatriate adjustment and performance revisited. In G. Stahl, I. Björkman, & S. Morris (Eds), Handbook of research in international human resource management, 2nd edn, 271–292. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Lazarova, M. B., Westman, M., & Shaffer, M.A. 2010. Elucidating the positive side of the work–family interface on international assignments: A model of expatriate work and family performance. Academy of Management Review, 35 (1): 93–117.
Lindell, M. K., & Whitney, D. J. 2001. Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86 (1): 114–121.
Lobel, S. A., & St. Clair, L. 1992. Effects of family responsibilities, gender, and career identity salience on performance outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 35 (5): 1057–1069.
Mayerhofer, H., Hartmann, L. C., & Herbert, A. 2004. Career management issues for flexpatriate international staff. Thunderbird International Business Review, 46 (6): 647–666.
Mezias, J. M., & Scandura, T. A. 2005. A needs-driven approach to expatriate adjustment and career development: A multiple mentoring perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 36 (5): 519–538.
Michie, S., Johnston, M., Francis, J., Hardeman, W., & Eccles, M. 2008. From theory to intervention: Mapping theoretically derived behavioral determinants to behavior change techniques. Applied Psychology, 57 (4): 660–680.
Montes, S. D., & Zweig, D. 2009. Do promises matter? An exploration of the role of promises in psychological contract breach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94 (5): 1243–1260.
Nicholson, N. 1984. A theory of work role transitions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29 (2): 172–191.
Nunnally, J. C. 1978. Psychometric theory, 2nd edn. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Peltokorpi, V., & Froese, F. J. 2009. Organizational expatriates and self-initiated expatriates: Who adjusts better to work and life in Japan? The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 20 (5): 1096–1112.
Punnett, B.J. 1997. Towards effective management of expatriate spouses. Journal of World Business, 32 (3): 243–257.
Rothausen, T. J. 1999. “Family” in organizational research: A review and comparison of definitions and measures. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20 (6): 817–836.
Rothausen, T. J. 2011. Unpacking work–family: Core overarching but underidentified issues. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 4 (3): 379–384.
Rothbard, N.P. 2001. Enriching or depleting? The dynamics of engagement in work and family roles. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46 (4): 655–684.
Searle, W., & Ward, C. 1990. The prediction of psychological and sociocultural adjustment during cross-cultural transitions. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 14 (4): 449–464.
Shaffer, M. A., & Harrison, D. A. 1998. Expatriates’ psychological withdrawal from international assignments: Work, nonwork, and family influences. Personnel Psychology, 51 (1): 87–118.
Shaffer, M. A., & Harrison, D. A. 2001. Forgotten partners of international assignments: Development and test of a model of spouse adjustment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86 (2): 238–254.
Shaffer, M. A., Harrison, D.A., & Gilley, K. M. 1999. Dimensions, determinants, and differences in the expatriate adjustment process. Journal of International Business Studies, 30 (3): 557–581.
Shaffer, M. A., Kraimer, M. L., Chen, Y. P., & Bolino, M. C. 2012. Choices, challenges, and career consequences of global work experiences a review and future agenda. Journal of Management, 38 (4): 1282–1327.
Shay, J. P., & Baack, S. A. 2004. Expatriate assignment, adjustment and effectiveness: An empirical examination of the big picture. Journal of International Business Studies, 35 (3): 216–232.
Sieber, S. D. 1974. Toward a theory of role accumulation. American Sociological Review, 39 (4): 567–578.
Sluss, D. M., & Ashforth, B. E. 2007. Relational identity and identification: Defining ourselves through work relationships. Academy of Management Review, 32 (1): 9–32.
Spector, P. E. 1994. Using self-report questionnaires in OB research: A comment on the use of a controversial method. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15 (5): 385–392.
Suutari, V., & Brewster, C. 2000. Making their own way: International experience through self-initiated foreign assignments. Journal of World Business, 35 (4): 417–436.
Takeuchi, R. 2010. A critical review of expatriate adjustment research through a multiple stakeholder view: Progress, emerging trends, and prospects. Journal of Management, 36 (4): 1040–1064.
ten Brummelhuis, L. L. 2014. Does family life impede or improve performance at work? Short-term and long-term effects of family demands and resources on work performance. Paper presented at the 2014 Work and Family Researchers Network Conference; 19–21 June, New York.
ten Brummelhuis, L. L., ter Hoeven, C. L., de Jong, M. D. T., & Peper, B. 2013. Exploring the linkage between the home domain and absence from work: Health, motivation, or both? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34 (3): 273–290.
Tharenou, P. 2013. Self-initiated expatriates: An alternative to company-assigned expatriates? Journal of Global Mobility, 1 (3): 336–356.
Thomas, D. C. et al. 2015. Cultural intelligence: A theory-based, short form measure. Journal of International Business Studies, advance online publication January 29, 2015. doi:10.1057/jibs.2014.67.
Van der Zee, K. I., Ali, A. J., & Salomé, E. 2005. Role interference and subjective well-being among expatriate families. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 14 (3): 239–262.
Van Veldhoven, M., & Meijman, T. 1994. Het meten van Psychosociale arbeidsbelasting (The measurement of psychosocial job demands). Amsterdam: NIA.
von Borell de Araujo, B. F., Teixeira, M. L. M., da Cruz, P. B., & Malini, E. 2014. Understanding the adaptation of organisational and self-initiated expatriates in the context of Brazilian culture. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25 (18): 2489–2509.
Ward, C., & Chang, W. C. 1997. “Cultural fit”: A new perspective on personality and sojourner adjustment. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 21 (4): 525–533.
Ward, C., & Kennedy, A. 1992. Locus of control, mood disturbance, and social difficulty during cross-cultural transitions. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 16 (2): 175–194.
Ward, C., & Kennedy, A. 1999. The measurement of sociocultural adaptation. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 23 (4): 659–677.
Welbourne, T. M., Johnson, D. E., & Erez, A. 1998. The role-based performance scale: Validity analysis of a theory-based measure. Academy of Management Journal, 41 (5): 540–555.
Welch, D. E., & Worm, V. 2006. International business travelers: A challenge for IHRM. In G. K. Stahl, & I. Björkman (Eds), Handbook of research in international human resource management 283–301. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Welch, D. E., Welch, L. S., & Worm, V. 2007. The international business traveller: A neglected but strategic human resource. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18 (2): 173–183.
Westman, M. 2001. Stress and strain crossover. Human Relations, 54 (6): 717–751.
Westman, M., Etzion, D., & Gattenio, E. 2008. International business travels and the work–family interface: A longitudinal study. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 81 (3): 459–480.
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by a grant from the US–Israel Bi-national Science Foundation (BSF), number 2009106, by funding from the Ministry of Economy and Competiveness of Spain (Project No. ECO2012-33544), and by funding from the Canada Research Chairs program. An earlier version of this article was presented at the 2013 AIB conference. The authors would like to thank the two anonymous reviewers and JIBS area editor Mary Zellmer-Bruhn for their insightful comments and guidance.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Accepted by Mary Zellmer-Bruhn, Area Editor, 14 July 2015. This article has been with the authors for three revisions.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shaffer, M., Sebastian Reiche, B., Dimitrova, M. et al. Work- and family-role adjustment of different types of global professionals: Scale development and validation. J Int Bus Stud 47, 113–139 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2015.26
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2015.26