Citizens of the (green) world? Cosmopolitan orientation and sustainability
Contemporary consumer markets are characterized by both a heightened need for sustainability and an increasingly cosmopolitan lifestyle. This article bridges these two trends and studies two untapped questions: (1) How do cosmopolitan consumers relate to sustainable behavior? and (2) How should environmental messages be framed to successfully target cosmopolitan consumers? Four studies in three countries show that high-cosmopolitan consumers demonstrate environmental concern and engage in sustainable behavior. To successfully target this promising segment with sustainable products or messages to promote sustainable behavior, marketers and public policymakers should highlight the benefit of these products/behaviors for the global (rather than the local) environment. However, the findings also show that high-cosmopolitan consumers can be successfully targeted to support local environmental initiatives when activating their local identification. The article offers implications for businesses, non-government organizations, and public policymakers in designing effective messages to promote sustainable behavior.
Keywordscosmopolitan orientation sustainability global/local framing market segmentation experiments
The authors would like to thank Oliver Buettner, Danit Ein-Gar, Ann Kronrod, and Yael Steinhart for their valuable input on this research. The authors thank Raz Shalev for designing the adverts used in Study 3 and Marco Meier for his methodological input.
- Alden, D., Steenkamp, E.M.J-B, & Batra, R. 1999. Brand positioning through advertising in Asia, North America, and Europe: The role of global consumer culture. The Journal of Marketing: 75–87.Google Scholar
- Bonnes, M., & Bonaiuto, M. 2002. Environmental psychology: From spatial-physical environment to sustainable development. In R. B. Bechtel, & A. Churchman (Eds), Handbook of environmental psychology: 28–47. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
- Chess, C., & Johnson, B. B. 2007. Information is not enough. In S. C. Moser, & L. Dilling (Eds), Creating a climate for change: Communicating climate change and facilitating social change: 153–166. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Clifford, S., & Martin, A. 2011. As consumers cut spending, “green” products lose allure. New York Times. 21 April, http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/22/business/energy-environment/22green.html?_r=2&hp&, accessed 22 July 2013.
- Johnson, P. O., & Neyman, J. 1936. Tests of certain linear hypotheses and their application to some educational problems. Statistical Research Memoirs, 1: 57–93.Google Scholar
- Leiserowitz, A. 2007. Communicating the risks of global warming: American risk perceptions, affective images, and interpretive communities. In S. C. Moser, & L. Dilling (Eds), Creating a climate for change: Communicating climate change and facilitating social change: 44–63. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. 1990. A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Rhinesmith, S. H. 1993. Globalization: Six keys to success in a changing world. Alexandria, VA: The American Society for Training and Development.Google Scholar
- Riefler, P. 2012. Segmentation strategies for cosmopolitan consumers. In M. Prince (Ed), Globalization and the cosmopolitan consumer: 143–162. New York: Business Expert Press.Google Scholar
- Smith, T.W., & Kim, S. 2005. National pride in comparative perspective: 1995/96 and 2003/04. GSS Cross-National Report No. 26, Chicago, US, University of Chicago’s National Opinion Research Center.Google Scholar
- Stewart, G. L., & Barrick, M. R. 2004. Four lessons learned from the person-situation debate: A review and research agenda. In B. Schneider, & D. B. Smith (Eds), Personality and organizations 61–85. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Tajfel, H. Y., & Turner, J. C. 1986. The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel, & W. G. Austin (Eds), Psychology of intergroup relations: 7–24. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar