Advertisement

Journal of International Business Studies

, Volume 46, Issue 4, pp 415–428 | Cite as

Employees’ willingness to adopt a foreign functional language in multilingual organizations: The role of linguistic identity

  • Sarbari Bordia
  • Prashant Bordia
Article

Abstract

Language holds a central role in sustainable international expansion for multinationals. The choice of the functional language can facilitate or hinder communication between headquarters and subsidiary locations. In order to communicate effectively with the parent organization, host country employees often have to adopt a language that is not native to the subsidiary region. We take a subsidiary employee perspective in presenting an interdisciplinary theoretical model of host country employees’ willingness to adopt a foreign language in multinational organizations. The construct of linguistic identity, shaped by the linguistic landscape of the host location, is introduced as an important determinant in this process. Specifically, the foreign functional language may pose a threat to the employees’ existing linguistic identity; willingness to adopt the foreign functional language may depend upon the extent of this perceived threat. We incorporate the effects of foreign language proficiency and individuals’ motivation for enhancement in the theoretical model. Both high proficiency in a foreign language and need for social, economic, and career enhancements can increase individuals’ willingness to adopt the foreign functional language. Finally, we develop and present implications of the linguistic identity processes for entry mode, location, and language strategies.

Keywords

language (language design, silent language, translation) multilingual systems location strategy 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Guest Editor Rebecca Piekkari, the three anonymous reviewers, Alex Eapen, and Michael Milkovits for their comments on the article.

References

  1. Adler, N. J., Campbell, N., & Laurent, A. 1989. In search of appropriate methodology: From outside the people’s Republic of China looking in. Journal of International Business Studies, 20 (1): 6–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnett, J. J. 2002. The psychology of globalization. American Psychologist, 57 (10): 774–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. 1989. Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14 (1): 20–39.Google Scholar
  4. Backhaus, P. 2006. Multilingualism in Tokyo: A look into the linguistic landscape. International Journal of Multilingualism, 3 (1): 52–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Badea, C., Jetten, J., Iyer, A., & Er-Rafiy, A. 2011. Negotiating dual identities: The impact of group-based rejection on identification and acculturation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41 (5): 586–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barner-Rasmussen, W., & Aarnio, C. 2011. Shifting the faultlines of language: A quantitative functional-level exploration of language use in MNC subsidiaries. Journal of World Business, 46 (3): 288–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Benet-Martínez, V., Leu, J., Lee, F., & Morris, M. 2002. Negotiating biculturalism: Cultural frame-switching in biculturals with oppositional vs compatible identities. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33 (5): 492–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Benet-Martínez, V., Lee, F., & Leu, J. 2006. Biculturalism and cognitive complexity: Expertise in cultural representations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37 (1): 1–23.Google Scholar
  9. Bourdieu, P. 1984. Distinction: A social critic of the judgment of taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Brannen, M. Y. 1996. Ethnographic international management research. In B. J. Punnett, & O. Shenkar (Eds), Handbook of international management research 115–143. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  11. Brannen, M. Y. 2004. When Mickey loses face: Recontextualization, semantic fit, and the semiotics of foreignness. Academy of Management Review, 29 (4): 593–616.Google Scholar
  12. Brannen, M. Y., & Thomas, D. C. 2010. Bicultural individuals in organizations: Implications and opportunity. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 10 (1): 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brannen, M. Y., Piekkari, R., & Tietze, S. 2014. The multifaceted role of language in international business: Unpacking the forms, functions and features of a critical challenge to MNC theory and performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 45 (5): 495–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Caprar, D. V. 2011. Foreign locals: A cautionary tale on the culture of MNC local employees. Journal of International Business Studies, 42 (5): 608–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cecchini, S., & Scott, C. 2003. Can information and communications technology contribute to poverty reduction? Lessons from rural India. Information Technology for Development, 10 (1): 73–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cenoz, J., & Gorter, D. 2006. Linguistic landscape and minority languages. International Journal of Multilingualism, 3 (1): 67–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Charles, M., & Marschan-Piekkari, R. 2002. Language training for enhanced horizontal communication: A challenge for MNCs. Business Communication Quarterly, 65 (2): 9–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chattopadhyay, P., Tluchowska, M., & George, E. 2004. Identifying the ingroup: A closer look at the influence of demographic dissimilarity on employee social identity. Academy of Management Review, 29 (2): 180–202.Google Scholar
  19. Cheng, J. L. C., Birkinshaw, J., Lessard, D., & Thomas, D. C. 2012. Call for Papers for a special issue of the Journal of International Business Studies: Advancing interdisciplinary research in international business: Integrative knowledge and transformative theories, http://www.palgrave-journals.com/jibs/cfp_interdisciplinary_research_si.htm, accessed 22 March 2013.
  20. Clarke, J. E., Tamaschke, R., & Liesch, P. W. 2013. International experience in international business research: A conceptualization and exploration of key themes. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15 (3): 265–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Corley, K. G., & Gioia, D. A. 2011. Building theory about theory building: What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 36 (1): 21–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Davis, P. S., Desai, A. B., & Francis, J. D. 2000. Mode of international entry: An isomorphism perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 31 (2): 239–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Demirbag, M., Tatoglu, E., & Glaister, K. W. 2009. Equity-based entry modes of emerging country multinationals: Lessons from Turkey. Journal of World Business, 44 (4): 445–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dewaele, J. M. 2010. Multilingualism and affordances: Variation in self-perceived communicative competence and communicative anxiety in French L1, L2, L3 and L4. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 48 (2–3): 105–129.Google Scholar
  25. Dow, D., & Karunaratna, A. 2006. Developing a multidimensional instrument to measure psychic distance stimuli. Journal of International Business Studies, 37 (5): 578–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ely, R. 1994. The power in demography: Women’s social constructions of gender identity at work. Academy of Management Journal, 38 (3): 589–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Evans, C. 1996. Ethnolinguistic vitality, prejudice, and family language transmission. The Bilingual Research Journal, 20 (2): 177–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Feely, A. J., & Harzing, A. W. 2003. Language management in multinational companies. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, 10 (2): 37–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fredriksson, R., Barner-Rasmussen, W., & Piekkari, R. 2006. The multinational corporation as a multilingual organization: The notion of a common corporate language. Corporate Communication: An International Journal, 11 (4): 406–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gao, G., Schmidt, K., & Gudykunst, W. 1994. Strength of ethnic identity and perceptions of ethnolinguistic vitality among Mexican Americans. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 16 (3): 332–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Giles, H. 1977. Language, ethnicity and intergroup relations. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  32. Gould, R. V. 2002. The origins of status hierarchies: A formal theory and empirical test. American Journal of Sociology, 107 (5): 1143–1178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Harzing, A. W. 2001. Of bears, bumble-bees, and spiders: The role of expatriates in controlling foreign subsidiaries. Journal of World Business, 36 (4): 366–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Harzing, A. W., & Feely, A. J. 2008. The language barrier and its implications for HQ–subsidiary relationships. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, 15 (1): 49–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Harzing, A. W., & Pudelko, M. 2013a. Hablas vielleicht un peu la mia language? A comprehensive overview of the role of language differences in headquarters–subsidiary communication. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25 (5): 696–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Harzing, A. W., & Pudelko, M. 2013b. Language competencies, policies and practices in multinational corporations: A comprehensive review and comparison of Anglophone, Asian, Continental European and Nordic MNCs. Journal of World Business, 48 (1): 87–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Harzing, A. W., Köster, K., & Magner, U. 2011. Babel in business: The language barrier and its solutions in the HQ–subsidiary relationship. Journal of World Business, 46 (3): 279–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hill, C. W. L., Hwang, P., & Kim, W. C. 1990. An eclectic theory of the choice of international entry mode. Strategic Management Journal, 11 (2): 117–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hinds, P. J., Neeley, T. B., & Cramton, C. D. 2014. Language as a lightning rod: Power contests, emotion regulation, and subgroup dynamics in global teams. Journal of International Business Studies, 45 (5): 536–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hogg, M. A. 2001. A social identity theory of leadership. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5 (3): 184–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hogg, M., & Terry, D. 2000. Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Academy of Management Review, 25 (1): 121–140.Google Scholar
  42. Huebner, T. 2006. Bangkok’s linguistic landscapes: Environmental print, codemixing and language change. International Journal of Multilingualism, 3 (1): 31–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Janssens, M., & Steyaert, C. 2014. Re-considering language within a cosmopolitan understanding: Toward a multilingual franca approach in international business studies. Journal of International Business Studies, 45 (5): 623–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Janssens, M., Lambert, J., & Steyaert, C. 2004. Developing language strategies for international companies: The contribution of translation studies. Journal of World Business, 39 (4): 414–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Jessner, U. 1999. Metalinguistic awareness in multilinguals: Cognitive aspects of third language learning. Language Awareness, 8 (3–4): 201–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kanter, R. M. 1993. Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  47. Kassis Henderson, J. 2005. Language diversity in international management teams. International Studies of Organization & Management, 35 (1): 66–82.Google Scholar
  48. Kendron, A. 1995. Gestures as illocutionary and discourse structure markers in southern Italian conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 23 (3): 247–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kostova, T. 1999. Transnational transfer of strategic organizational practices: A contextual perspective. Academy of Management Review, 24 (2): 308–324.Google Scholar
  50. Kostova, T., & Roth, K. 2002. Adoption of an organizational practice by subsidiaries of multinational corporations: Institutional and relational effects. Academy of Management Journal, 45 (1): 215–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kostova, T., & Roth, K. 2003. Social capital in multinational corporations and a micro–macro model of its formation. Academy of Management Review, 28 (2): 297–317.Google Scholar
  52. Kuznetsov, A., & Kuznetsova, O. 2014. Building professional discourse in emerging markets: Language, context and the challenge of sensemaking. Journal of International Business Studies, 45 (5): 583–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Landry, R., & Bourhis, R. Y. 1997. Linguistic landscape and ethnolinguistic vitality: An empirical study. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 16 (1): 23–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lόpez-Duarte, C., & Vidal-Suárez, M. M. 2010. External uncertainty and entry mode choice: Cultural distance, political risk and language diversity. International Business Review, 19 (6): 575–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Luo, Y., & Shenkar, O. 2006. The multinational corporation as a multilingual community: Language and organization in a global context. Journal of International Business Studies, 37 (3): 321–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Magloire, J., & Green, K. P. 1999. A cross-language comparison of speaking rate effects on the production of voice onset time in English and Spanish. Phonetica, 56 (3–4): 158–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Marschan, R., Welch, L. S., & Welch, D. E. 1997. Language: The forgotten factor in multinational management. European Management Journal, 15 (5): 591–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Marschan-Piekkari, R., & Welch, C. (Eds) 2004. Handbook of qualitative research methods for international business. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Marschan-Piekkari, R., Welch, D. E., & Welch, L. S. 1999. In the shadow: The impact of language on structure, power and communication in the multinational. International Business Review, 8 (4): 421–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Neeley, T. 2013. Language matters: Status loss and achieved status distinctions in global organizations. Organization Science, 24 (2): 476–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Oswick, C., Fleming, P., & Hanlon, G. 2011. From borrowing to blending: Rethinking the processes of organizational theory-building. Academy of Management Review, 36 (2): 318–337.Google Scholar
  62. Otsuiji, E., & Pennycook, A. 2010. Metrolingualism: Fixity, fluidity and language in flux. International Journal of Multilingualism, 7 (3): 240–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Peltokorpi, V., & Vaara, E. 2012. Language policies and practices in wholly owned foreign subsidiaries: A recontextualization perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 43 (9): 808–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Petriglieri, J. 2011. Under threat: Responses to and the consequence of threat to individuals’ identity. Academy of Management Review, 36 (4): 641–662.Google Scholar
  65. Piekkari, R., Vaara, E., Tienari, J., & Säntti, R. 2005. Integration or disintegration? Human resource implications of a common corporate language decision in a cross border merger. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16 (3): 330–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Reiche, B. S., Kraimer, M., & Harzing, A. W. 2011. Why do international assignees stay? An organizational embeddedness perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 42 (5): 521–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Rodríguez, J. 2009. Interpreting the linguistic traits of linguistic landscapes as ethnolinguistic vitality: Methodological approach. Revista Electrónica de Lingüístical Aplicada, 8 (1): 1–15.Google Scholar
  68. Sapir, E. 1921. Language. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World.Google Scholar
  69. Shohamy, E., & Gorter, D. 2009. Linguistic landscape: Expanding the scenery. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  70. Singleton, D., & Aronin, L. 2007. Multiple language learning in the light of the theory of affordances. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1 (1): 83–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Sorokin, P. A. 1927. Social mobility. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  72. Sridhar, S. 1994. A reality check for SLA theories. TESOL Quarterly, 28 (4): 800–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Steyaert, C., Ostendorp, A., & Gaibrois, C. 2011. Multilingual organizations as “linguascapes”: Negotiating the position of English through discursive practices. Journal of World Business, 46 (3): 270–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Suddaby, R. 2010. Editor’s comments: Construct clarity in theories of management and organization. Academy of Management Review, 35 (3): 346–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Sutton, R., & Hargadon, A. 1996. Brainstorming groups in context: Effectiveness in a product design firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41 (4): 685–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Tajfel, H. 1974. Social identity and intergroup behaviour. Social Science Information, 13 (2): 65–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Tenzer, H., Pudelko, M., & Harzing, A. W. 2014. The impact of language barriers on trust formation in multinational teams. Journal of International Business Studies, 45 (5): 508–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Tietze, S. 2008. International management and language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  79. Tietze, S., Cohen, L., & Musson, G. 2003. Understanding organisations through language. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  80. Tse, D. K., Pan, Y., & Au, K. Y. 1997. How MNCs choose entry modes and form alliances: The China experience. Journal of International Business Studies, 28 (4): 779–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Tung, R. L. 1998. American expatriates abroad: From neophytes to cosmopolitans. Journal of World Business, 33 (2): 125–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Tung, R. L. 2005. New era, new realities: Musings on a new research agenda … from an old timer. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 22 (2): 143–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Tung, R. L. 2008. The cross-cultural research imperative: The need to balance cross-national and intra-national diversity. Journal of International Business Studies, 39 (1): 41–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Tung, R. L., & Lazarova, M. 2006. Brain drain versus brain gain: An exploratory study of ex-host country nationals in Central and East Europe. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17 (11): 1853–1872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Vaara, E., Tienari, J., Piekkari, R., & Säntti, R. 2005. Language and the circuits of power in a merging multinational corporation. Journal of Management Studies, 42 (3): 595–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. van Knippenberg, D., & Hogg, M. A. 2003. A social identity model of leadership effectiveness in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25: 243–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Welch, D. E., Welch, L. S., & Piekkari, R. 2005. Speaking in tongues: The importance of language in international management processes. International Studies of Management & Organization, 35 (1): 10–27.Google Scholar
  88. West, J., & Graham, J. L. 2004. A linguistic-based measure of cultural distance and its relationship to managerial values. Management International Review, 44 (3): 239–260.Google Scholar
  89. Whorf, B. L. 1940. Science and linguistics. Technology Review, 42 (6): 229–248.Google Scholar
  90. Zhao, H., Luo, Y., & Suh, T. 2004. Transaction cost determinants and ownership-based entry mode choice: A meta-analytic review. Journal of International Business Studies, 35 (6): 524–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Academy of International Business 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research School of Management, Australian National UniversityCanberraAustralia

Personalised recommendations