Journal of International Business Studies

, Volume 45, Issue 8, pp 1044–1060 | Cite as

State-owned MNCs and host country expropriation risk: The role of home state soft power and economic gunboat diplomacy

Article

Abstract

Expropriation risk has a binding effect on foreign direct investment (FDI). However, state-owned multinational corporations may counter the monopoly power of the host state by leveraging the political influence of their home government. The magnitude of this counter force, we argue, may vary, depending on the strength of political relations between the home and host state, and the level of economic dependence of the host country on the home market. We find supporting evidence of our hypotheses using Chinese firm-level FDI information between 2003 and 2010.

Keywords

foreign direct investment (FDI) expropriation risk state-owned enterprises political relationships economic diplomacy 

References

  1. Acemoglu, D. 2003. Why not a political Coase theorem? Social conflict, commitment and politics. Journal of Comparative Economics, 31 (4): 620–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Acemoglu, D., & Johnson, S. 2005. Unbundling institutions. Journal of Political Economics, 113 (5): 949–995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aidt, T. S., & Gassebner, M. 2010. Do autocratic states trade less? World Bank Economic Review, 24 (1): 38–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Asiedu, E., & Esfahani, E. H. 2001. Ownership structure in foreign direct investment projects. Review of Economics and Statistics, 83 (4): 647–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Asiedu, E., Jin, Y., & Nandwa, B. 2009. Does foreign aid mitigate the adverse effect of expropriation risk on foreign direct investment? Journal of International Economics, 78 (2): 268–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Askari, H., Forrer, J., Yang, J., & Hachem, T. 2005. Measuring vulnerability to US foreign economic sanctions. Business and Economics, 40 (2): 41–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Basile, R., Castellani, D., & Zanfei, A. 2008. Location choices of multinational firms in Europe: The role of EU cohesion policy. Journal of International Economics, 74 (2): 328–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. BBC News. 2012. Falklands dispute: Argentina “urges UK import ban”, 29 February, http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-latin-america-17200528, accessed 11 April 2014.
  9. Berger, D., Easterly, W., Nunn, N., & Satyanath, S. 2013. Commercial imperialism? Political influence and trade during the Cold War. American Economic Review, 103 (2): 863–896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Berk, R. A. 1983. An introduction to sample selection bias in sociological data. American Sociological Review, 48 (3): 386–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Beron, K. J., Murdoch, J. C., & Vijverberg, W. P. M. 2003. Why cooperate? Public goods, economic power, and the Montreal Protocol. Review of Economics and Statistics, 85 (2): 286–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bhaumik, S., Driffield, N., & Pal, S. 2010. Does ownership structure of emerging-market firms affect their outward FDI? The case of the Indian automotive and pharmaceutical sectors. Journal of International Business Studies, 41 (3): 437–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Biglaiser, G., & DeRouen, Jr., K. 2007. Following the flag: Troop deployment and US foreign direct investment. International Study Quarterly, 51 (4): 835–854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Biglaiser, G., & Lektzian, D. 2011. The effect of sanctions on United States foreign direct investment. International Organization, 65 (3): 531–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Boehmer, C., Gartzke, E. A., & Li, Q. 2001. Investing in the peace: Economic interdependence and international conflict. International Organization, 55 (2): 391–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Buch, C., Kleinert, J., Lipponer, A., & Toubal, F. 2005. Determinants and effects of foreign direct investment: Evidence from German firm-level data. Economic Policy, 20 (41): 51–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bucheli, M., & Aguilera, R. 2010. Political survival, energy policies, and multinational corporations: A historical study for Standard Oil of New Jersey in Colombia, Mexico, and Venezuela in the twentieth century. Management International Review, 50 (3): 347–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bull, C. 1987. The existence of self-enforcing implicit contracts. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 102 (1): 147–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Caprio, L., Faccio, M., & McConnell, J. 2013. Sheltering corporate assets from political extraction. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 29 (2): 332–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Carr, D. L., Markusen, J. R., & Maskus, K. E. 2001. Estimating the knowledge-capital model of the multinational enterprise. American Economic Review, 91 (3): 693–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Chakrabarti, A. 2001. The determinants of foreign direct investments: Sensitivity analyses of cross-country regressions. KYKLOS, 54 (1): 89–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Chen, S. 2008. China’s outward FDI and energy security. Working Paper No. 143. East Asian Institution, National University of Singapore, Singapore.Google Scholar
  23. Clarke, D. 2003. Corporate governance in China: An overview. China Economic Review, 14 (4): 494–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Cole, H. L., & English, W. 1992. Two-sided expropriation and international equity contracts. Journal of International Economics, 33 (1–2): 77–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Cushman, D. 1985. Real exchange rate risk: Expectations, and the level of direct investment. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 67 (2): 297–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Davis, C. L. 2009. Linkage diplomacy. Economic and security bargaining in the Anglo–Japanese alliance, 1902–23. International Security, 33 (3): 143–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. De Beule, F., & Duanmu, J.-L. 2012. Locational determinants of internationalization: A firm-level analysis of Chinese and Indian acquisitions. European Management Journal, 30 (3): 264–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Delios, A., & Henisz, W. 2003. Political hazards, experience, and sequential entry strategies: The international expansion of Japanese firms, 1980–1998. Strategic Management Journal, 24 (22): 1153–1164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. De Long, J. B., & Shleifer, A. 1993. Princes and merchants: European city growth before the industrial revolution. Journal of Law and Economics, 36 (October): 671–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Dewenter, K., & Malatesta, P. 2001. State-owned and privately owned firms: An empirical analysis of profitability, leverage and labor intensity. The American Economic Review, 91 (1): 320–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Dixit, A. 2005. Lawlessness and economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Djankov, S., McLiesh, C., Nenova, T., & Shleifer, A. 2003. Who owns the media? Journal of Law and Economics, 46 (2): 341–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Downs, E. 2007. The fact and fiction of Sino-African energy relations. China Security, 3 (3): 42–86.Google Scholar
  34. Drezner, D. 2003. The hidden hand of economic coercion. International Organization, 57 (3): 643–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Dunning, J. 2006. Towards a new paradigm of development: Implications for the determinants of international business activity. Transnational Corporations, 15 (1): 173–228.Google Scholar
  36. Eaton, J. 1999. Sanctions: Some simple analytics. American Economic Review, 98 (2): 409–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Eaton, J., & Engers, M. 1992. Sanctions. Journal of Political Economy, 100 (5): 899–928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Eaton, J., & Gersovitz, M. 1984. A theory of expropriation and deviations from perfect capital mobility. The Economic Journal, 94 (1): 16–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. The Economist. 2010. Chinese acquisitions: China buys up the world, 11 November. Accessed in? at: http://www.economist.com/node/17463473, accessed October 2013.
  40. The Economist. 2012. New masters of the universe: How state enterprise is spreading, 21 January, http://www.economist.com/node/21542925, accessed October 2013.
  41. Ellis, R. V. 2011. Chinese soft power in Latin America: A case study. National Defense University, 60 (1): 89–90.Google Scholar
  42. Ellstrand, A., Tihanyi, L., & Johnson, J. 2002. Board structure and international political risk. Academy of Management Journal, 45 (4): 769–777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Farmer, R. 2000. Costs of economic sanctions to the sender. World Economy, 23 (1): 93–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Fernández, Z., & Nieto, M. J. 2006. Impact of ownership on the international involvement of SMEs. Journal of International Business Studies, 37 (3): 340–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Filatotchev, I., Strange, R., Piesse, J., & Lien, Y.-C. 2007. FDI by firms from newly industrialized economies in emerging markets: Corporate governance, entry mode and location. Journal of International Business Studies, 38 (4): 556–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Filatotchev, I., Stephan, J., & Jindra, B. 2008. Ownership structure, strategic controls and export intensity of foreign-invested firms in transition economies. Journal of International Business Studies, 39 (7): 1133–1148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Findlay, R., & O’Rourke, K. H. 2007. Power and plenty: Trade, war, and the world economy in the second millennium. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Fu, C. 2008. Sinopec confirms state subsidy for third year. Shanghai Daily News, 21 March.Google Scholar
  49. Fuchs, A., & Klann, N. 2013. Paying a visit: The Dalai Lama effect on international trade. Journal of International Economics, 91 (1): 164–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Gartzke, E. 2008. The affinity of nations: Similarity of state voting positions in the UNGA – Data updated to 2008, http://dss.ucsd.edu/~egartzke/htmlpages/data.html, accessed November 2011.
  51. Gill, B., & Reilly, J. 2007. The tenuous hold of China Inc. in Africa. The Washington Quarterly, 30 (3): 37–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Global Insight. 2006. China: Going outside, round-tripping and dollar diplomacy: An introduction to Chinese outward investment. Englewood, CO: Global Insight Group.Google Scholar
  53. Gonzalez-Vicente, R. 2011. The internationalization of the Chinese state. Political Geography, 30 (7): 402–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Haass, R. 1997. Sanctioning madness. Foreign Affairs, 76 (6): 74–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Heckman, J. J. 1976. Common structure of statistical-models of truncation, sample selection and limited dependent variables and a simple estimator for such models. Annals of Economic and Social Measurement, 5 (4): 475–492.Google Scholar
  56. Hellman, J. S., Jones, G., & Kaufmann, D. 2003. Seize the state, seize the day: State capture and influence in transition economies. Journal of Comparative Economics, 31 (4): 751–773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Holburn, G., & Zelner, B. 2010. Political capabilities, policy risk, and international investment strategy: Evidence from the global electric power generation industry. Strategic Management Journal, 31 (12): 1290–1351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Javorcik, B. K., & Spatareanu, M. 2005. Do foreign investors care about labor market regulations? Review of World Economics, 141 (3): 375–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3 (4): 305–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Jones, E. L. 1981. The European miracle: Environments, economics and geopolitics in the history of Europe and Asia. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Kesternich, I., & Schnitzer, M. 2010. Who is afraid of political risk? Multinational firms and their choice of capital structure. Journal of International Economics, 82 (2): 208–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Knill, A., Lee, B.-S., & Mauck, N. 2012. Bilateral political relations and sovereign wealth fund investment. Journal of Corporate Finance, 18 (1): 108–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Knutsen, C., Rygh, A., & Hveem, H. 2011. Does state ownership matter? Institutions’ effect on foreign direct investment revisited. Business and Politics, 13 (1): article 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Levin, J. 2003. Relational incentive contracts. American Economic Review, 93 (3): 835–857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Li, Q. 2009. Democracy, autocracy, and expropriation of foreign direct investment. Comparative Political Studies, 42 (8): 1098–1127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Li, Q., & Vashchilko, T. 2010. Dyadic military conflict, security alliances, and bilateral FDI flows. Journal of International Business Studies, 41 (5): 765–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Lien, Y.-C., Piesse, J., Strange, R., & Filatotchev, I. 2005. The role of corporate governance in FDI decisions: Evidence from Taiwan. International Business Review, 14 (6): 739–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Lukas, A., & Griswold, D. 2003. Trade sanctions, Cato handbook for congress. Washington, DC: Cato Institute.Google Scholar
  69. Morrow, J., Silverson, R., & Tabares, T. 1998. The political determinants of international trade: The major powers, 1907–90. American Political Science Review, 92 (September): 649–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Murtha, T., & Lenway, S. 1994. Country capabilities and the strategic state: How national political institutions affect multinational corporations’ strategies. Strategic Management Journal, 15 (2): 113–129.Google Scholar
  71. Nigh, D. 1985. The effect of political events on United States direct foreign investment: A pooled time-series cross-sectional analysis. Journal of International Business Studies, 16 (1): 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. North, D. C. 1981. Structure and change in economic history. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  73. North, D. C., & Thomas, R. P. 1973. The rise of the western world: A new economic history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. North, D. C., & Weingast, B. R. 1989. Constitutions and commitment: The evolution of institutions governing public choice in seventeenth-century England. The Journal of Economic History, 49 (4): 803–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Olson, M. 2000. Power and prosperity: Outgoing communist and capitalist dictatorships. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  76. Opp, M. M. 2012. Expropriation risk and technology. Journal of Financial Economics, 103 (1): 113–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Overholt, W. H. 1982. Political risk. London: Euromoney Publications.Google Scholar
  78. Pargendler, M. 2012. The unintended consequences of state ownership: The Brazilian experience. Theoretical Inquiries in Laws, 13 (2): 503–524.Google Scholar
  79. Pollins, B. 1989. Does trade still follow the flag? American Political Science Review, 83 (June): 465–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Reilly, J. 2012. China’s unilateral sanctions. The Washington Quarterly, 35 (4): 121–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Rosen, D., & Hanemann, T. 2009. China’s changing outbound foreign direct investment profile: Drivers and policy implications. Peterson Institute for International Economics, Policy Brief Number PR09-14, http://www.iie.com/publications/pb/pb09-14.pdf, accessed October 2013.
  82. Schelling, T. C. 1960. The strategy of conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  83. Schularick, M., & Steger, T. 2008. The Lucas Paradox and the quality of institutions: Then and now. Working Paper. 2008/3, The Open Access Publication of the ZBW – Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, Free University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany.Google Scholar
  84. Shirley, M., & Walsh, P. 2001. Public versus private ownership: The current state of the debate. Working Paper No. 2420, World Bank Policy Research.Google Scholar
  85. Skalnes, L. 2000. Politics, markets and grand strategy: Foreign economic policies as strategic instruments. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Shon, J. 2011. Economic sanctions and the source country: How economic sanctions imposed on China affect the US. Global Journal of Business Researcher, 5 (5): 1–10.Google Scholar
  87. South China Morning Post. 2013. Did China snub Norway in revenge over Liu Xiaobo Nobel Peace Prize? http://www.scmp.com/news/china/article/1099809/did-china-snub-norway-revenge-over-liu-xiaobo-nobel-peace-prize, accessed October 2013.
  88. Taylor, I. 2006. China’s oil diplomacy in Africa. International Affairs, 82 (5): 37–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Tomz, M. 1997. Do international agreements make reforms more credible? The impact of NAFTA on Mexican stock prices. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  90. Wang, C., Hong, J., Kafouros, M., & Wright, M. 2012. Exploring the role of government involvement in outward FDI from emerging economies. Journal of International Business Studies, 43 (7): 655–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Wooldridge, A. 2012. The visible hand. The Economist, 21 January.Google Scholar
  92. World Bank. 2008. Strengthening MENA’s trade and investments links with China and India, http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTMENA/Resources/MENA_China_India_Sept08.pdf, accessed October 2013.
  93. World Bank. 2009. World investment and political risk. Washington, DC: World Bank Group – Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Academy of International Business 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Surrey Business School, Faculty of Business, Law, and Economics, University of SurreySurreyUK

Personalised recommendations