Advertisement

Journal of International Business Studies

, Volume 44, Issue 5, pp 521–544 | Cite as

The hassle factor: An explanation for managerial location shunning

  • Andreas Schotter
  • Paul W Beamish
Article

Abstract

This study investigates the widely overlooked phenomenon of multinational enterprise (MNE) location avoidance, utilizing a multi-method research design and data on 131 foreign investment locations. It complements economic-choice-based location research by adding contextual dimensions at the country level that matter to managers personally, and affect decisions at the firm level. We provide a connection between international business research, the behavioral stream in economic geography, and the microfoundations stream in the strategic management literature. The results suggest that, in addition to traditional location choice criteria (including investment potential, internationalization strategy, and various geographic and psychic distances), foreign location decisions in MNEs are influenced by how troublesome it is for managers to travel to or live in certain places. An 11-item measure composed of travel inconveniences shows a significant negative moderating effect on the relationship between foreign direct investment potential and investment intensity. The effect is stronger for non-resource-seeking industries. We call this phenomenon the “hassle factor”.

Keywords

theory of FDI and the MNE (ownership–location–internationalization) foreign location choice behavioral geography multi-methods microfoundations hassle factor 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (grant #411-98-0393). We thank Nathaniel Lupton and Vanessa Hasse for their support during various stages of this research. In addition, we thank the discussants, commentators, and participants of the JIBS special issue conference at Temple University in Philadelphia and the anonymous reviewers for the valuable comments and suggestions. Finally, we gratefully acknowledge the continuous, encouraging support and insightful feedback of the special issue editors Ram Mudambi and Sjoerd Beugelsdijk, and JIBS editor John Cantwell.

References

  1. Aharoni, Y. 1966. How to market a country. Columbia Journal of World Business, 1 (2): 41–49.Google Scholar
  2. Aharoni, Y. 2010. Behavioral elements in foreign direct investment decisions. In T. Devinney, T. Pederson, & L. Tihanyi (Eds), The past, present and future of international business and management, Advances in International Management, Vol. 23, 72–112. Bingley: Emerald Group.Google Scholar
  3. Aiken, L., & West, S. 1991. Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  4. Anderson, J., & Gerbing, D. 1988. Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103 (3): 411–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barclay, D., Higgins, C., & Thompson, R. 1995. The partial least squares (PLS) approach to causal modeling: Personal computer adoption and use as an illustration. Technology Studies, 2 (2): 285–309.Google Scholar
  6. Barnes, T., & Sheppard, E. 1992. Is there a place for the rational actor? A geographical critique of the rational choice paradigm. Economic Geography, 68 (1): 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bathelt, H., Malmberg, A., & Maskell, P. 2004. Clusters and knowledge: Local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Progress in Human Geography, 28 (1): 31–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beckerman, W. 1956. Distance and the pattern of intra-European trade. Review of Economics and Statistics, 38 (1): 31–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Beugelsdijk, S., McCann, P., & Mudambi, R. 2010. Introduction: Place, space and organization – economic geography and the multinational enterprise. Journal of Economic Geography, 10 (4): 485–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Birkinshaw, J., Morrison, A., & Hulland, J. 1995. Structural and competitive determinants of a global integration strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 16 (8): 637–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Blonigen, B. 2005. A review of the empirical literature on FDI determinants. Atlantic Economic Journal, 33 (4): 383–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Boeh, K., & Beamish, P. 2012. Travel time and the liability of distance in foreign direct investment: Location choice and entry mode. Journal of International Business Studies, 43 (5): 525–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brouthers, L., Brouthers, K., & Werner, S. 1999. Is Dunning's eclectic framework descriptive or normative? Journal of International Business Studies, 30 (4): 831–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Buckley, P., & Casson, M. 1976. The future of the multinational enterprise. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Buckley, P., Devinney, T., & Louviere, J. 2007. Do managers behave the way theory suggests? A choice-theoretic examination of foreign direct investment location decision-making. Journal of International Business Studies, 38 (7): 1069–1094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Central Intelligence Agency. 2008. The world factbook. http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/index.html, accessed 1 March 2008.
  17. Child, J. 2000. Theorizing about organization cross-nationally. In J.L.C. Cheng & R.B. Peterson (Eds), Advances in International Comparative Management, Vol. 13. Stamford, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  18. Child, J. 2009. Context, comparison, and methodology in Chinese management research. Management and Organization Review, 5 (1): 57–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Clark, G., & Strauss, K. 2007. Human nature, the context of decision-making, and the methods of a new economic geography. American Association of Geographers. Version 5, http://www.geog.ox.ac.uk/research/transformations/wpapers/wpg07-07.pdf, accessed 21 March 2013.
  20. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. 2003. Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  21. Collier, P., & Hoeffler, A. 2005. Resource rents, governance, and conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 49 (4): 625–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Curry, J., & Dalpino, N. 2008. Global road warrior, (4th edn). Petaluma, CA: World Trade Press.Google Scholar
  23. Dai, L., Eden, L., & Beamish, P. W. 2013. Place, space and geographical exposure: Foreign subsidiary survival in conflict zones. Journal of International Business Studies, advance online publication, 18 April; doi: 10.1057/jibs.2013.12.Google Scholar
  24. DeFrank, R. S., Konopaske, R., & Ivancevich, J. M. 2000. Executive travel stress: Perils of the road warrior. Academy of Management Executive, 14 (2): 278–293.Google Scholar
  25. Delios, A., & Beamish, P. 1999. Geographic scope, product diversification, and the corporate performance of Japanese firms. Strategic Management Journal, 20 (8): 711–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Devinney, T., Midgley, D., & Venaik, S. 2003. Managerial beliefs, market contestability and dominant strategic orientation in the eclectic paradigm. In R. Narula & J. Cantwell (Eds), International business and the eclectic paradigm. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Dunning, J. 1988. The eclectic paradigm of international production: A restatement and some possible extensions. Journal of International Business Studies, 19 (1): 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dunning, J. 1998. Location and the multinational enterprise: A neglected factor? Journal of International Business Studies, 29 (1): 45–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Dunning, J. 2000. The eclectic paradigm as an envelope for economic and business theories of MNE activity. International Business Review, 9 (2): 163–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Dunning, J. 2009. Location and the multinational enterprise: John Dunning's thoughts on receiving the Journal of International Business Studies 2008 Decade Award. Journal of International Business Studies, 40 (1): 20–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Eden, L., & Miller, S. 2004. Distance matters: Liability of foreignness, institutional distance, and ownership strategy. In M.A. Hitt & J.L.C. Cheng (Eds), Theories of the multinational enterprise: Diversity, complexity and relevance (Advances in International Management, Vol. 16): 187–221. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Erez, M., & Earley, P. 1993. Culture, self-identity and work. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Eisenhardt, K. 1989. Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14 (1): 57–74.Google Scholar
  34. Felin, T., & Foss, N. 2005. Strategic organization: A field in search of micro-foundations. Strategic Organization, 3 (4): 441–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (1): 39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Galan, J., & Gonzalez-Benito, J. 2006. Distinctive determinant factors of Spanish foreign direct investment in Latin America. Journal of World Business, 41 (2): 171–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Galan, J., Gonzalez-Benito, J., & Zuñiga-Vincente, J. 2007. Factors determining the location decisions of Spanish MNEs: An analysis based on the investment development path. Journal of International Business Studies, 38 (6): 975–997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Garnaut, R., & Ross, A. C. 1975. Uncertainty, risk aversion and the taxing of natural resource projects. The Economic Journal, 85 (338): 272–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gaur, A., Delios, A., & Singh, K. 2007. Institutional environments, staffing strategies, and subsidiary performance. Journal of Management, 33 (4): 611–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ghemawat, P. 2001. Distance still matters: The hard reality of global expansion. Harvard Business Review, 79 (8): 137–147.Google Scholar
  41. Gong, Y. 2003. Subsidiary staffing in multinational enterprises: Agency, resources, and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 46 (6): 728–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hakanson, L., & Ambos, B. 2010. The antecedents of psychic distance. Journal of International Management, 16 (2): 195–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hambrick, D., & Mason, P. 1984. Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9 (2): 193–206.Google Scholar
  44. Hanson, S. 2006. Thinking back, thinking ahead: Some questions for economic geographers. In S. Bagchi-Sen & H. Lawton Smith (Eds), Economic geography: Past, present and future. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  45. Henisz, W. 2000. The institutional environment for economic growth. Economics and Politics, 12 (1): 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Heritage Foundation. 2012. Index of economic freedom, http://www.heritage.org/index, accessed 13 July 2012.
  47. Herrmann, P., & Datta, D. 2006. CEO experiences: Effects on the choice of FDI entry mode. Journal of Management Studies, 43 (4): 755–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Hitt, M. A., Beamish, P. W., Jackson, S. E., & Mathieu, J. 2007. Building theoretical and empirical bridges across levels: Multilevel research in management. Academy of Management Journal, 50 (6): 1385–1399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Hofstede, G. 1983. The cultural relativity of organizational practices and theories. Journal of International Business Studies, 14 (2): 75–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Holstein, J., & Gubrium, J. 1995. The active interview. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Hoskisson, R., Hitt, M., Johnson, R., & Moesel, D. 1993. Construct validity of an objective (entropy) categorical measure of diversification strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 14 (3): 215–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Hosseini, H. 2005. An economic theory of FDI: A behavioral economics and historical approach. Journal of Socio-Economics, 34 (4): 528–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Hsu, S., Chen, W., & Hsieh, M. 2006. Robustness testing of PLS, LISREL, EQS and ANN-based SEM for measuring customer satisfaction. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, 17 (3): 355–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Hulland, J. 1999. Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: A review of four recent studies. Strategic Management Journal, 20 (2): 195–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Hymer, S. 1960. The international operations of national firms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  56. Japanese Ministry of Finance. 2007. Foreign direct investment, http://www.mof.go.jp/english/international_policy/reference/itn_transactions_in_securities/fdi/index.htm, accessed 25 May 2008.
  57. Jarzabkowski, P. 2004. Strategy as practice: Recursiveness, adaptation and practices-in-use. Organization Studies, 25 (4): 529–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J. 1977. The internationalization process of the firm: A model of knowledge development and increasing foreign markets commitments. Journal of International Business Studies, 8 (1): 23–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J. 2009. The Uppsala internationalization process revisited: From liability of foreignness to liability of outsidership. Journal of International Business Studies, 40 (9): 1411–1431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Johanson, J., & Wiedersheim-Paul, F. 1975. The internationalization of the firm: Four Swedish cases. Journal of Management Studies, 12 (3): 305–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Kahneman, D. 2003. Maps of bounded rationality: Psychology for behavioral economics. American Economic Review, 93 (5): 1449–1475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Kahneman, D., Schwartz, A., Thaler, R., & Tversky, A. 1997. The effect of myopia and loss aversion on risk taking: An experimental test. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112 (2): 647–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Kogut, B., & Singh, H. 1988. The effect of national culture on the choice of entry mode. Journal of International Business Studies, 19 (3): 411–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Kostova, T. 1996. Success of the transnational transfer of organizational practices within multinational companies, Unpublished PhD Dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minnesota, MN.Google Scholar
  65. Lewis, M. 1998. Iterative triangulation: A theory development process using existing case studies. Journal of Operations Management, 16 (4): 455–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Lorenzen, M., & Mudambi, R. 2012. Clusters, connectivity and catch-up: Bollywood and Bangalore in the global economy. Journal of Economic Geography, Advance access 25 July. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbs017.Google Scholar
  67. McCormack, M. 1996. What they don’t teach you at Harvard Business School about executive travel. West Hollywood: Dove Books.Google Scholar
  68. McElroy, J., Tarlow, P., & Carlisle, K. 2007. Tourist harassment: Review of the literature and destination responses. International Journal of Culture, Tourism and Hospitality Research, 1 (4): 305–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Mehlum, H., Moene, K., & Torvik, R. 2006. Cursed by resources or institutions? The World Economy, 29 (8): 1117–1131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Merchant International Group. 2008. Strategic research and corporate intelligence. http://www.merchant-international.co.uk, accessed 21 March 2013.
  71. Miller, B. 1992. Collective action and rational choice: Place, community, and the limits to individual self-interest. Economic Geography, 68 (1): 10–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Mudambi, R. 1995. The MNE investment location decision: Some empirical evidence. Managerial and Decision Economics, 16 (3): 249–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Mudambi, R., & Navarra, P. 2003. Political tradition, political risk and foreign direct investment in Italy. Management International Review, 43 (3): 247–265.Google Scholar
  74. Nachum, L., & Zaheer, S. 2005. The persistence of distance? The impact of technology on MNE motivations for foreign investment. Strategic Management Journal, 26 (8): 747–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Narula, R. 1996. Multinational investment and economic structure. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  76. Nebus, J., & Chai, K. 2013. Putting the “psychic” back in psychic distance: Awareness, perceptions, and understanding as dimensions of psychic distance. Journal of International Management, in press; doi: 10.1016/j.intman.2013.01.001.Google Scholar
  77. Nielsen, B., & Nielsen, S. 2011. The role of top management team international orientation in international strategic decision-making: The choice of foreign entry mode. Journal of World Business, 46 (2): 185–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. OAG (Official Airline Guide). 2008. http://oag.com. accessed 5 March 2008.
  79. OECD. 2008. For a better world economy. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.Google Scholar
  80. Pouder, R., & St John, C. H. 1996. Hot spots and blind spots: Geographical clusters of firms and innovation. Academy of Management Review, 21 (4): 1192–1225.Google Scholar
  81. Powell, T., Lovallo, D., & Fox, C. 2011. Behavioral strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 32 (13): 1369–1386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Pred, A. 1967. Behavior and location: Foundations for a geographic and dynamic location theory. Lund: C.W.K Gleerup.Google Scholar
  83. Punnett, B., & Shenkar, O. 2004. Handbook for international management research. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  84. Rabin, M. 1998. Psychology and economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 36 (1): 11–46.Google Scholar
  85. Raturi, A., & Jack, E. 2006. Lessons learned from methodological triangulation in management research. Management Research News, 29 (6): 345–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Reiljan, J., Reiljan, E., & Andresson, K. 2001. Attractiveness of central and Eastern European countries for foreign direct investment in the context of European integration: The case of Estonia. Paper presented at 41st ERSA Congress, Zagreb.Google Scholar
  87. Ringle, C., Wende, S., & Will, A. 2005. SmartPLS. 2.0 (beta) ed. Hamburg: University of Hamburg.Google Scholar
  88. Rodriguez, C., Gomez, C., & Ferreiro, J. 2009. A proposal to improve the UNCTAD's inward FDI potential index. Transnational Corporations, 18 (3): 85–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Rousseau, D. M. 1985. Issues of level in organizational research: Multi-level and cross-level perspectives. In L.L. Cummings & B.M. Staw (Eds), Research in organizational behavior, Vol. 7. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  90. Sachwald, F. 1995. Japanese firms in Europe. Luxembourg: Harwood Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  91. Samuelson, W., & Zeckhauser, R. 1988. Status quo bias in decision making. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1 (1): 7–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Scandura, T., & Williams, E. 2000. Research methodology in management: Current practices, trends, and implications for future research. Academy of Management Journal, 43 (6): 1248–1264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Schotter, A., & Beamish, P. W. 2011. Performance effects of MNC headquarters–subsidiary conflict and the role of boundary spanners: The case of headquarter initiative rejection. Journal of International Management, 17 (3): 243–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Simon, H. 1956. Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychology Review, 63 (2): 129–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Slangen, A., & Beugelsdijk, S. 2010. The impact of institutional hazards on foreign multinational activity: A contingency perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 41 (6): 980–995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Smith, G. 2007. Travelindependent. http://www.travelindependent.info, accessed 5 December 2007.
  97. Strauss, K. 2008. Re-engaging with rationality in economic geography: Behavioural approaches and the importance of context in decision-making. Journal of Economic Geography, 8 (2): 137–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Tenenhaus, M., Vinzi, V., Chatelin, Y., & Lauro, C. 2005. PLS path modeling. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 48 (1): 159–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Toyo Keizai. 2007. Kaigai Shinshutsu Kigyo Souran-kuni Betsu. Tokyo: Toyo Keizai.Google Scholar
  100. Transparency International. 2012. Corruption perception index. http://www.transparency.org/cpi2011, accessed 21 March 2013.
  101. Tsang, E. 2002. Sharing international joint venturing experience: A study of some key determinants. Management International Review, 42 (2): 183–206.Google Scholar
  102. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. 1991. Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference dependent model. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106 (4): 1039–1061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. UNCTAD. 2007. Inward FDI potential index 2002–2004. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  104. Van de Laar, M., & de Neubourg, C. 2006. Emotions and foreign direct investment: A theoretical and empirical exploration. Management International Review, 46 (2): 207–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Venaik, S., Midgley, D., & Devinney, T. 2005. Dual paths to performance: The impact of global pressures on MNC subsidiary conduct and performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 36 (6): 655–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Venkatraman, N., & Grant, J. 1986. Construct measurement in organizational strategy research: A critique and proposal. Academy of Management Review, 11 (1): 71–87.Google Scholar
  107. Vernon, R. 1966. International investment and international trade in the product cycle. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80 (2): 190–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Wells, L., & Mint, A. 2000. Marketing a country: Promotion as a tool for attracting foreign investment, (revised edn). Foreign Investment Advisory Service – Occasional papers, 13.Google Scholar
  109. Williamson, O. E. 1981. The economics of organization: A transaction cost approach. American Journal of Sociology, 87 (3): 548–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. World Bank. 1994. Expanding the measure of wealth: Indicators of environmentally sustainable development, Environmentally Sustainable Development Studies and Monographs Series No. 7, World Bank, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  111. World Economic Forum. 2007. The global competitiveness index 2004–2005. Geneva: World Economic Forum.Google Scholar
  112. World Health Organization. 2008. WHO statistical information system. http://www.who.int/whosis/en/index.html, accessed 5 March 2008.
  113. Yung, K. 2002. Value of multinationality: Internalization, managerial self-interest, and managerial compensation. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 29 (1–2): 55–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Academy of International Business 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andreas Schotter
    • 1
  • Paul W Beamish
    • 2
  1. 1.Thunderbird School of Global ManagementGlendaleUSA
  2. 2.Ivey Business School, Western UniversityCanada

Personalised recommendations