The impact of language barriers on trust formation in multinational teams
- 4k Downloads
This study systematically investigates how language barriers influence trust formation in multinational teams (MNTs). On the basis of 90 interviews with team members, team leaders and senior managers in 15 MNTs in 3 German automotive corporations, the authors show how MNT members’ cognitive and emotional reactions to language barriers influence their perceived trustworthiness and intention to trust, which in turn affect trust formation. The authors contribute to diversity research by distinguishing the exclusively negative language effects from the more ambivalent effects of other diversity dimensions. Their findings also illustrate how surface-level language diversity may create perceptions of deep-level diversity. Furthermore, their study advances MNT research by revealing the specific influences of language barriers on team trust, an important mediator between team inputs and performance outcomes. It thereby encourages the examination of other team processes through a language lens. Finally, their study suggests that multilingual settings necessitate a reexamination and modification of the seminal trust theories by Mayer, Davis and Schoorman, and by McAllister. In terms of practical implications, the authors outline how MNT leaders can manage their subordinates’ problematic reactions to language barriers, and how MNT members can enhance their perceived trustworthiness in multilingual settings.
Keywordsinterpersonal trust language multinational teams cognition emotion
We thank Sebastian Reiche for his helpful comments on an earlier draft of this manuscript. We are very grateful for the constructive and thoughtful guidance by special issue editors Rebecca Piekkari and Mary Yoko Brannen, as well as by three anonymous reviewers.
- Amadú, L. A., Esperanca, J. P., Pereira, I. N., & Amaral-Baptista, M. A. 2013. The ten most influential global languages: Exploring their effect on international trade. Paper presented at the 2013 Meeting of the Academy of Management, Orlando, FL.Google Scholar
- Barner-Rasmussen, W., & Björkman, I. 2005. Surmounting interunit barriers: Factors associated with interunit communication intensity in the multinational corporation. International Studies of Management and Organization, 35 (1): 28–46.Google Scholar
- Brannen, M. Y, Piekkari, R., & Tietze, S. 2012. Call for papers: The multifaceted role of language in international business: Unpacking the forms, functions and features of a critical challenge to MNC theory and performance. Available online: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/jibs/cfp_language_si.html, accessed 24 September 2013.
- Brett, J., Behfar, K., & Kern, M. 2006. Managing multicultural teams. Harvard Business Review, 84 (11): 84–90.Google Scholar
- Bryman, A., & Bell, E. 2007. Business research methods, (2nd edn). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Buckley, P., Carter, M. J., Clegg, J., & Tan, H. 2005. Language and social knowledge in foreign knowledge transfer to China. International Studies of Management and Organization, 35 (1): 47–65.Google Scholar
- Cascio, W. F. 2000. Managing a virtual workplace. Academy of Management Executive, 14 (3): 81–90.Google Scholar
- Cook, V. J. 1977. Cognitive processes in second language learning. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 5 (2–3): 161–170.Google Scholar
- Costa, A. C. 2003. Understanding the nature and the antecedents of trust within work teams. In B. Noteboom, & F. Six (Eds), The trust process in organizations: Empirical studies of the determinants and the process of trust development 105–124. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
- Creswell, J. W. 2003. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, (2nd edn). London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Daft, R. L., & Lewin, A. Y. 1993. Where are the theories for the “new” organizational forms? An editorial essay. Organization Science, 4 (4): i–vi.Google Scholar
- Earley, P. C., & Gibson, C. B. 2002. Multinational work teams: A new perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14 (4): 532–550.Google Scholar
- Flick, U. 2009. An introduction to qualitative research, (4th edn). London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Foddy, M., & Riches, P. 2000. The impact of task and categorical cues on social influence: Fluency and ethnic accent as cues to competence in task groups. In S. R. Thye, E. Lawler, M. W. Macy, & H. A. Walker (Eds), Advances in group processes. Vol. 17 103–130. Stamford, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
- Gass, S. M., & Selinker, L. 2008. Second language acquisition: An introductory course. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Gass, S. M., & Varonis, E. M. 1991. Miscommunication in nonnative speaker discourse. In N. Coupland, N. H. Giles, & J. M. Wiemann (Eds), “Miscommunication” and problematic talk 121–145. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Gibson, C., & Manuel, J. A. 2003. Building trust: Effective multicultural communication processes in virtual teams. In C. Gibson, & S. G. Cohen (Eds), Virtual teams that work: Creating conditions for virtual team effectiveness 59–86. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Glaser, B. G. 1978. Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.Google Scholar
- Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. 1967. The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
- Gumperz, J. J. 2009. The speech community. In A. Duranti (Ed), Linguistic anthropology: A reader 66–73. Chichester, UK: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
- Hall, E. T., & Hall, M. R. 1990. Understanding cultural differences: Germans, French and Americans. Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press.Google Scholar
- Hardin, R. 2002. (Ed), Trust and trustworthiness. New York: Sage.Google Scholar
- Hawley, A. H. 1950. Human ecology. New York: Ronald Press.Google Scholar
- Hofstede, G. 1991. Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Kassis Henderson, J. 2005. Language diversity in international management teams. International Studies of Management and Organization, 35 (1): 66–82.Google Scholar
- Kramer, R. M., & Cook, K. S. 2004. Trust and distrust in organizations: Dilemmas and approaches. In R. M. Kramer, & K. S. Cook (Eds), Trust and distrust in organizations 1–18. New York: Sage.Google Scholar
- Langley, A. 1999. Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review, 24 (4): 691–710.Google Scholar
- Locke, K. 2001. Grounded theory in management research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Marks, M., Mathieu, J., & Zaccaro, S. 2001. A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 26 (3): 356–376.Google Scholar
- Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. 1995. An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20 (3): 709–734.Google Scholar
- McKnight, H., Cummings, L. L., & Chervany, N. L. 1998. Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships. Academy of Management Review, 23 (3): 473–490.Google Scholar
- McLean, C. A. 2007. Establishing credibility in the multicultural classroom: When the instructor speaks with an accent. In K. G. Hendrix (Ed), New directions for teaching and learning, no. 110: Neither white nor male: Female faculty of color 15–24. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Merton, R. K. 1968. Social theory and social structure. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
- Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. 1994. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Mishra, N. 1996. Organizational responses to crisis: The centrality of trust. In R. M. Kramer, & T. R. Tyler (Eds), Trust in organizations 261–287. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Mockaitis, A. I., Rose, E. L., & Zettining, P. 2009. The determinants of trust in multicultural global virtual teams. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Annual Meeting, 7–11 August, Chicago.Google Scholar
- Morgan, G., & Smircich, L. 1980. The case for qualitative research. Academy of Management Review, 5 (4): 491–500.Google Scholar
- Mortensen, M., & Beyene, T. 2009. Firsthand experience and the subsequent role of reflected knowledge in cultivating trust in global collaboration. Harvard Business School Working Paper, No. 09-131. Available online: http://www.hbs.edu/research/pdf/09-131.pdf, accessed 24 September 2013.
- Myers, M. D. 2008. Qualitative research in business and management. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Patton, M. Q. 2002. Qualitative evaluation and research methods, (3rd edn). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. 2003. The external control of organisations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
- Piekkari, R. 2006. Language effects in multinational corporations: A review from an international human resource management perspective. In G. Stahl, & I. Björkman (Eds), Handbook of research in international human resource management 536–550. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
- Piekkari, R., & Zander, L. 2005. Language and communication in international management. International Studies of Management & Organization, 35 (1): 3–9.Google Scholar
- Pudelko, M. 2006. Cooperating and communicating across cultures: Americans and Germans working on a project in a team. Case Centre, ref. no. 406-034-1. Available online: http://www.thecasecentre.org/educators/products/view?id=68632, accessed 28 November 2013.
- Stewart, S., Williams, E. A., Castro, S. L., & Reus, T. 2011. Emotional capability in teams: Its influences on the development of team climate and outcomes. Paper presented at the Academy of Management 71st Annual Meeting, 12–16 August, San Antonio.Google Scholar
- Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. 1998. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, (2nd edn). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Thompson, J. D. 1967. Organisations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Tietze, S. 2007. Language and international management: Emergent themes and new perspectives. Bradford University School of Management, Working Paper No 07/35. Available online: http://www.brad.ac.uk/acad/management/external/pdf/workingpapers/2007/Booklet_07-35.pdf, accessed 24 September 2013.
- Tsalikis, J., DeShields, O. W., & LaTour, M. S. 1991. The role of accent on the credibility and effectiveness of the salesperson. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 11 (1): 31–41.Google Scholar
- von Glinow, M. A., Shapiro, D. L., & Brett, J. A. 2004. Can we talk, and should we? Managing emotional conflict in multicultural teams. Academy of Management Review, 29 (4): 578–592.Google Scholar
- Weiss, R. S. 1994. Learning from strangers: The art and method of qualitative interview studies. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
- Witzel, A. 2000. The problem-centered interview. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1 (1), Available online: http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1132/2521, accessed 28 November 2013.