Journal of International Business Studies

, Volume 44, Issue 4, pp 334–362 | Cite as

Consequences of cultural practices for entrepreneurial behaviors

  • Erkko Autio
  • Saurav Pathak
  • Karl Wennberg
Article

Abstract

Although national culture is an important regulator of entrepreneurship, there is a dearth of studies that: (1) explore the effects of national cultural practices on entrepreneurial behaviors by individuals; (2) use appropriate multilevel research designs; (3) consider the effects of culture on different entrepreneurial behaviors, such as entry and post-entry growth aspirations. We combined Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) and Global Leadership and Organizational Behavior Effectiveness (GLOBE) data from 42 countries for 2005–2008 to address these gaps, using a multilevel design. We found societal institutional collectivism practices negatively associated with entrepreneurial entry, but positively associated with entrepreneurial growth aspirations. Uncertainty avoidance practices were negatively associated with entry but not with growth aspirations, and performance orientation practices were positively associated with entry. Our analysis highlights the differential effects of cultural practices on entrepreneurial entry and growth aspirations, and demonstrates the value of multilevel techniques in analyzing the effect of culture on entrepreneurship.

Keywords

cross-cultural research/measurement issues multilevel analysis local entrepreneurial behaviors 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank the seminar participants at the Stockholm School of Economics, the 4th Global Entrepreneurship Research Conference held at Imperial College Business School, Patric Andersson, and Emre Yildiz for their comments and suggestions. We are especially grateful for the thoughtful and thorough comments provided by the special issue associate editor Mark F. Peterson and the three anonymous referees. Financial support from QinetiQ, EPSRC, and the Swedish Research Council is also gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. Acs, Z.J., Autio, E., & Szerb, L. 2012. National systems of entrepreneurship: Measurement issues and policy implications. SSRN eLibrary, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2008160.
  2. Ajzen, I. 1991. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50 (2): 179–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aldrich, H. E. 2009. Lost in space, out of time: How and why we should study organizations comparatively. In B. King, T. Felin, & D. Whetten (Eds), Studying differences between organizations: Comparative approaches to organizational research, Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 26, 21–44. Bingley: Emerald Group.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ambos, B., & Schlegelmilch, B. 2008. Innovation in multinational firms: Does cultural fit enhance performance? Management International Review, 48 (2): 189–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arenius, P., & Minniti, M. 2005. Perceptual variables and nascent entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 24 (3): 233–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Autio, E. 2007. Global entrepreneurship monitor: 2007 global report on high-growth entrepreneurship. London: GERA.Google Scholar
  7. Autio, E., & Acs, Z. 2010. Intellectual property protection and the formation of entrepreneurial growth aspirations. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 4 (3): 234–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baker, T., Gedajlovic, T., & Lubatkin, M. 2005. A framework for comparing entrepreneurship processes across nations. Journal of International Business Studies, 36 (5): 492–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bandura, A. 1986. Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  10. Baumol, W. J. 1990. Entrepreneurship: Productive, unproductive, and destructive. Journal of Political Economy, 98 (5): 893–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Begley, T. M., & Tan, W. L. 2001. The socio-cultural environment for entrepreneurship: A comparison between East Asian and Anglo-Saxon countries. Journal of International Business Studies, 32 (3): 537–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bosma, N., Acs, Z. J., Autio, E., Coduras, A., & Levie, J. 2009. Global entrepreneurship monitor 2008: Executive report. London: GERA.Google Scholar
  13. Bowen, H. P., & De Clercq, D. 2008. Institutional context and the allocation of entrepreneurial effort. Journal of International Business Studies, 39 (4): 747–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brewer, M. B., & Chen, Y.-R. 2007. Where (who) are collectives in collectivism? Toward conceptual clarification of individualism and collectivism. Psychological Review, 114 (1): 133–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Busenitz, L., West, G., Shepherd, D., Nelson, T., Chandler, G., & Zacharakis, A. 2003. Entrepreneurship research in emergence: Past trends and future directions. Journal of Management, 29 (3): 285–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cassar, G. 2006. Entrepreneur opportunity costs and intended venture growth. Journal of Business Venturing, 21 (5): 610–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cassar, G. 2007. Money, money, money? A longitudinal investigation of entrepreneur career reasons, growth preferences and achieved growth. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 19 (1): 89–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cliff, J. 1998. Does one size fit all? Exploring the relationship between attitudes towards growth, gender, and business size. Journal of Business Venturing, 13 (6): 523–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cullen, J. B., & Gordon, R. H. 2007. Taxes and entrepreneurial risk-taking: Theory and evidence for the US. Journal of Public Economics, 91 (7–8): 1479–1505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Davidsson, P. 1991. Continued entrepreneurship: Ability, need, and opportunity as determinants of small firm growth. Journal of Business Venturing, 6 (6): 405–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Davidsson, P., & Wiklund, J. 2001. Levels of analysis in entrepreneurship research: Current practice and suggestions for the future. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25 (4): 81–99.Google Scholar
  22. De Clercq, D., Danis, W. M., & Dakhli, M. 2010. The moderating effect of institutional context on the relationship between associational activity and new business activity in emerging economies. International Business Review, 19 (1): 85–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Delmar, F., & Wennberg, K. 2010. The birth, growth, and demise of entrepreneurial firms in the knowledge intensive economy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Delmar, F., & Wiklund, J. 2008. The effect of small business managers’ growth motivation on firm growth: A longitudinal study. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32 (3): 437–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Evesey, D., & Musgrave, R. A. 1944. Proportional income taxation and risk-taking. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 58 (3): 388–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fairlie, R. W. 2002. Drug dealing and legitimate self-employment. Journal of Labor Economics, 20 (3): 538–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Freytag, A., & Thurik, R. 2007. Entrepreneurship and its determinants in a cross-country setting. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 17 (2): 117–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Greif, A. 2001. Cultural beliefs and the organization of society. In A.C. Brinton & V. Nee (Eds), The new institutionalism in sociology: 77–104. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. 2006. Does culture affect economic outcomes? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20 (2): 23–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hanges, P. J., & Dickson, M. W. 2004. The development and validation of the GLOBE culture and leadership scales. In R. J. House, P. J. Hanges, M. Javidan, P. W. Dorfman, & V. Gupta (Eds), Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies: 122–151. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  31. Hansen, J., Deitz, G., Tokman, M., Marino, L., & Weaver, K. 2009. Cross-national invariance of the entrepreneurial orientation scale. Journal of Business Venturing, 26 (1): 61–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hayton, J. C., George, G., & Zahra, S. A. 2002. National culture and entrepreneurship: A review of behavioral research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 26 (4): 33–52.Google Scholar
  33. Henrekson, M. 2005. Entrepreneurship: A weak link in the welfare state? Industrial and Corporate Change, 14 (3): 437–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hofmann, D. A., Griffin, M. A., & Gavin, M. B. 2000. The application of hierarchical linear modeling to organizational research. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions: 467–511. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  35. Hofstede, F. T., Wedel, M., & Steenkamp, J. B. E. M. 2002. Identifying spatial segments in international markets. Marketing Science, 21 (2): 160–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hofstede, G. 2001. Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  37. Hofstede, G. 2006. What did GLOBE really measure? Researchers’ minds versus respondents’ minds. Journal of International Business Studies, 37 (6): 882–896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hofstede, G., & Peterson, M. F. 2000. National culture and organizational culture. In N. Ashkanasy, C. Wilderom, & M. F. Peterson (Eds), Handbook of organizational culture and climate: 401–415. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  39. House, R. J., & Javidan, M. 2004. Overview of GLOBE. In R. J. House, P. J. Hanges, M. Javidan, P. W. Dorfman, & V. Gupta (Eds), Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  40. House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (Eds) 2004. Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  41. Javidan, M. 2004. Performance orientation. In R. J. House, P. J. Hanges, M. Javidan, P. W. Dorfman, & V. Gupta (Eds), Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies: 235–281. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  42. Javidan, M., House, R. J., Dorfman, P. W., Hanges, P. J., & De Luque, M. S. 2006. Conceptualizing and measuring cultures and their consequences: A comparative review of GLOBE's and Hofstede's approaches. Journal of International Business Studies, 37 (6): 897–914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Johnson, J. P., & Lenartowicz, T. 1998. Culture, freedom and economic growth: Do cultural values explain economic growth? Journal of World Business, 33 (4): 332–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kim, P. H., & Li, M. 2013. Seeking assurances when taking action: Legal systems, social trust, and starting businesses in emerging economies. Organization Studies, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  45. Kim, P. H., Lee, C., & Reynolds, P. D. 2012. Backed by the state: Social protection and starting businesses in knowledge-intensive industries. In J. Katz & A. C. Corbett (Eds), Advances in entrepreneurship, firm emergence and growth, Vol. 14, 25–62. Bingley: Emerald Group.Google Scholar
  46. Kirzner, I. M. 1997. Entrepreneurial discovery and the competitive market process: An Austrian approach. Journal of Economic Literature, 35 (1): 60–85.Google Scholar
  47. Knight, F. H. 2002. Risk, uncertainty and profit. Washington, DC: Beard Books.Google Scholar
  48. Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Klein, K. J. 2000. A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent issues. In S. W. J. Kozlowski & K. J. Klein (Eds), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions: 3–91. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  49. Kreiser, P. M., Marino, L. D., Dickson, P., & Weaver, K. M. 2010. Cultural influences on entrepreneurial orientation: The impact of national culture on risk taking and proactiveness in SMEs. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34 (5): 959–983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kwok, C. C. Y., & Tadesse, S. 2006. National culture and financial systems. Journal of International Business Studies, 37 (2): 227–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Landier, A. 2005. Entrepreneurship and the stigma of failure. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=850446.
  52. Lee, S. M., & Peterson, S. J. 2000. Culture, entrepreneurial orientation, and global competitiveness. Journal of World Business, 35 (4): 401–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Lumpkin, G., & Dess, G. 1996. Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21 (1): 135–172.Google Scholar
  54. Martin, K. D., Cullen, J. B., & Johnson, J. L. 2007. Deciding to bribe: A cross-level analysis of firm and home country influences on bribery activity. Academy of Management Journal, 50 (6): 1401–1422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Maseland, R., & Van Hoorn, A. 2009. Explaining the negative correlation between values and practices: A note on the Hofstede–GLOBE debate. Journal of International Business Studies, 40 (3): 527–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. McGrath, R. G., MacMillan, I. C., Yang, E. A.-Y., & Tsai, W. 1992. Does culture endure or is it malleable? Issues for entrepreneurial economic development. Journal of Business Venturing, 7 (6): 441–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. McMullen, J. S., & Shepherd, D. A. 2006. Entrepreneurial action and the role of uncertainty in the theory of the entrepreneur. Academy of Management Review, 31 (1): 132–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Merton, R. K. 1936. The unanticipated consequences of purposive social action. American Sociological Review, 1 (6): 894–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Mueller, S. L., & Thomas, A. S. 2001. Culture and entrepreneurial potential: A nine country study of locus of control and innovativeness. Journal of Business Venturing, 16 (1): 51–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Nanda, R., & Sørensen, J. 2010. Workplace peers and entrepreneurship. Management Science, 56 (7): 1116–1126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Oyserman, D., & Lee, S. W. S. 2008. Does culture influence what and how we think? Effects of priming individualism and collectivism. Psychological Bulletin, 134 (2): 311–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Oyserman, D., Coon, H. M., & Kemmelmeier, M. 2002. Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128 (1): 3–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Peterson, M. F., & Castro, S. L. 2006. Measurement metrics at aggregate levels of analysis: Implications for organization culture research and the GLOBE project. The Leadership Quarterly, 17 (5): 506–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Peterson, M. F., Arregle, J.-L., & Xavier, M. 2012. Multilevel models in international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 43 (5): 451–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Phan, P. 2004. Entrepreneurship theory: possibilities and future directions. Journal of Business Venturing, 19 (5): 617–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Podolny, J. M. 2005. Status signals: A sociological study of market competition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  67. Rauch, A., & Frese, M. 2007. Let's put the person back into entrepreneurship research: A meta-analysis on the relationship between business owners’ personality traits, business creation, and success. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 16 (4): 353–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Rauch, A., Wiklund, J., Lumpkin, G., & Frese, M. 2009. Entrepreneurial orientation and business performance: An assessment of past research and suggestions for the future. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33 (3): 761–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Raudenbush, S. W. 1988. Educational applications of hierarchical linear models: A review. Journal of Educational Statistics, 13 (2): 85–116.Google Scholar
  70. Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. 2008. HLM 6 hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling software. Lincolnwood, IL: SSI Scientific Software International.Google Scholar
  71. Reynolds, P. D. 2007. New firm creation in the United States: A PSED I overview. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 3 (1): 1–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Reynolds, P., Bosma, N., Autio, E., Hunt, S., deBono, N., Servais, I., Lopez-Garcia, P., & Chin, N. 2005. Global entrepreneurship monitor: Data collection design and implementation 1998–2003. Small Business Economics, 24 (3): 205–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Robinson, W. S. 1950. Ecological correlations and the behavior of individuals. American Sociological Review, 15 (3): 351–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Sagie, A., & Elizur, D. 1999. Achievement motive and entrepreneurial orientation: A structural analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20 (3): 375–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Schumpeter, J. A. 1934. The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  76. Segall, M. H., Lonner, W. J., & Berry, J. W. 1998. Cross-cultural psychology as a scholarly discipline: On the flowering of culture in behavioral research. American Psychologist, 53 (10): 1101–1110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Seligson, M. A. 2002. The renaissance of political culture or the renaissance of the ecological fallacy? Comparative Politics, 34 (3): 273–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Shane, S. 1993. Cultural influences on national rates of innovation. Journal of Business Venturing, 8 (1): 59–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Shepherd, D. A., McMullen, J. S., & Jennings, P. D. 2007. The formation of opportunity beliefs: Overcoming ignorance and reducing doubt. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1 (1–2): 75–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Smith, P. B., Peterson, M. F., & Thomason, S. P. & the Event Meaning Management Research Group 2011. National culture as moderator of the relationship between leaders’ use of guidance sources and how well work events are handled. Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 42 (6): 1103–1123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J. 2004. Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  82. Steensma, H. K., Marino, L., & Weaver, K. M. 2000. Attitudes toward cooperative strategies: A cross-cultural analysis of entrepreneurs. Journal of International Business Studies, 31 (4): 591–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Stel, A., Carree, M., & Thurik, R. 2005. The effect of entrepreneurial activity on national economic growth. Small Business Economics, 24 (3): 311–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Stephan, U., & Uhlaner, L. 2008. Societal legitimation: Cultural practices and entrepreneurship in 35 countries. International Journal of Psychology, 43 (3–4): 561–561.Google Scholar
  85. Stephan, U., & Uhlaner, L. M. 2010. Performance-based vs socially supportive culture: A cross-national study of descriptive norms and entrepreneurship. Journal of International Business Studies, 41 (8): 1347–1364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Stevenson, H. H., & Jarillo, J. C. 1990. A paradigm of entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial management. Strategic Management Journal, 11 (Special Issue): 17–27.Google Scholar
  87. Stinchcombe, A. L. 1965. Social structure and organizations. In J. G. March (Ed.), Handbook of organizations: 142–193. Chicago: Rand MacNally.Google Scholar
  88. Taras, V., Rowney, J., & Steel, P. 2009. Half a century of measuring culture: Review of approaches, challenges, and limitations based on the analysis of 121 instruments for quantifying culture. Journal of International Management, 15 (4): 357–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Terjesen, S., Hessels, J., & Li, D. 2013. Comparative international entrepreneurship research: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  90. Thelen, K. A. 2004. How institutions evolve: The political economy of skills in Germany, Britain, the United States, and Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Thomas, A. S., & Mueller, S. L. 2000. A case for comparative entrepreneurship: Assessing the relevance of culture. Journal of International Business Studies, 31 (2): 287–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Tiessen, J. H. 1997. Individualism, collectivism, and entrepreneurship: A framework for international comparative research. Journal of Business Venturing, 12 (5): 367–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Uhlaner, L., & Thurik, R. 2007. Postmaterialism influencing total entrepreneurial activity across nations. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 17 (2): 161–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Venaik, S., & Brewer, P. 2010. Avoiding uncertainty in Hofstede and GLOBE. Journal of International Business Studies, 41 (8): 1294–1315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Wagner, J., & Sternberg, R. 2004. Start-up activities, individual characteristics, and the regional milieu: Lessons for entrepreneurship support policies from German micro data. Annals of Regional Science, 38 (2): 219–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Wennberg, K., Pathak, S., & Autio, E. 2013. How culture moulds the effects of self-efficacy and fear of failure for entrepreneurship, Working paper, Imperial College Business School.Google Scholar
  97. Wennekers, S., Thurik, R., Van Stel, A., & Noorderhaven, N. 2007. Uncertainty avoidance and the rate of business ownership across 21 OECD countries, 1976–2004. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 17 (2): 133–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Witt, M. A., & Redding, G. 2008. Culture, meaning, and institutions: Executive rationale in Germany and Japan. Journal of International Business Studies, 40 (45): 859–885.Google Scholar
  99. Zhang, Z., & Arvey, R. D. 2009. Rule breaking in adolescence and entrepreneurial status: An empirical investigation. Journal of Business Venturing, 24 (5): 436–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Zhao, H., Seibert, S., & Hills, G. 2005. The mediating role of self-efficacy in the development of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90 (6): 1265–1272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Academy of International Business 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Erkko Autio
    • 1
  • Saurav Pathak
    • 2
  • Karl Wennberg
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Imperial College Business SchoolLondonUK
  2. 2.School of Business and Economics, Michigan Technological UniversityHoughtonUSA
  3. 3.Stockholm School of EconomicsStockholmSweden
  4. 4.The Ratio InstituteStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations