Advertisement

Journal of International Business Studies

, Volume 43, Issue 8, pp 772–782 | Cite as

Collectivist orientation and the psychological contract: Mediating effects of creditor exchange ideology

  • Elizabeth C RavlinEmail author
  • Yuan Liao
  • Daniel L Morrell
  • Kevin Au
  • David C Thomas
Research Note

Abstract

As organizations globalize, culturally based variation in the ways employees conceptualize their relationships with their employers increases in importance. In the competition for talent, organizations must understand employee preferences and expectations regarding their treatment by the firm. Recently, culture's influence on the psychological contract (individual perceptions of employer obligations) has been noted with regard to the extent that employees perceive their psychological contracts as relational or transactional. We provide results from a survey conducted in a multinational corporation (MNC) indicating that the cultural value of collectivist orientation likely has its effect on the psychological contract through beliefs about the nature of social exchange. Data were consistent with creditor exchange ideology (appropriateness of giving more than has been received) mediating the relationship between collectivist orientation and perceptions of a relational psychological contract. By examining this relationship empirically, we go beyond the demonstration of cultural effects to describe an intermediate mechanism through which culture operates. Exchange norms are likely to play a mediating role in a variety of cross-cultural relationships, and may be used by managers as a lever to improve relationships with employees, as opposed to engaging in attempts to change individual cultural orientation.

Keywords

culture organizational behavior intercultural work relationship 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by a grant from the Social Science and Humanities Research Council of Canada.

References

  1. Bontempo, R., & Rivero, J. C. 1992. Cultural variation in cognition: The role of self-concept in the attitude behavior link. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Las Vegas, August.Google Scholar
  2. Boyacigiller, N. A., & Adler, N. J. 1991. The parochial dinosaur: Organizational science in a global context. Academy of Management Review, 16 (2): 262–290.Google Scholar
  3. Brockner, J., Chen, Y. R., Mannix, E. A., Leung, K., & Skarlicki, D. P. 2000. Cultural and procedural fairness: When the effects of what you do depend on how you do it. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45 (1): 138–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cronbach, L. J., & Gleser, G. C. 1965. Psychological tests and personnel decisions. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  5. De Vos, A., Buyens, D., & Schalk, R. 2003. Psychological contract development during organizational socialization: Adaptation to reality and the role of reciprocity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24 (5): 537–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Eisenberger, R., Cotterell, N., & Marvel, J. 1987. Reciprocation ideology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53 (4): 743–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Evans, P., Doz, Y., & Laurent, A. 1989. Human resource management in international firms. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  8. Fischer, R., & Mansell, A. 2009. Commitment across cultures: A meta-analytical approach. Journal of International Business Studies, 40 (8): 1339–1358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fiske, A. P. 1991. Structures of social life: The four elementary forms of human relations. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  10. Fock, H., Hui, M. K., Au, K. Y., & Bond, M. H. 2012. Moderation effects of power distance on the relationship between types of empowerment and employee satisfaction. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, advance online publication 3 May; doi: 10.1177/0022022112443415.Google Scholar
  11. Goodwin, R., & Tang, D. 1991. Preferences for friends and close relationships partners: A cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Social Psychology, 131 (4): 579–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Horwitz, F. M., Chan, T. H., & Quazi, H. A. 2003. Finders, keepers? Attracting, motivating, and retaining knowledge workers. Human Resource Management Journal, 13 (4): 23–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hui, C., Lee, C., & Rousseau, D. M. 2004. Psychological contract and organizational citizenship behavior in China: Investigating generalizability and instrumentality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89 (2): 311–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kickul, J., & Lester, S. W. 2001. Broken promises: Equity sensitivity as a moderator between psychological contract breach and employee attitudes and behavior. Journal of Business and Psychology, 16 (2): 191–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kickul, J., Lester, S. W., & Belgio, E. 2004. Attitudinal and behavioral outcomes of psychological contract breach: A cross-cultural comparison of the United States and Hong Kong Chinese. International Journal of Cross-Cultural Management, 4 (2): 229–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kim, K. I., Park, H. J., & Suzuki, N. 1990. Reward allocations in the United States, Japan, and Korea: A comparison of individualistic and collectivistic cultures. Academy of Management Journal, 33 (1): 188–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. King, W. C., & Miles, E. W. 1994. The measurement of equity sensitivity. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 67 (2): 133–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kirkman, B. L., & Shapiro, D. L. 2001. The impact of cultural values on job satisfaction and organizational commitment in self-managing work teams: The mediating role of employee resistance. Academy of Management Journal, 44 (3): 557–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Levinson, H., Price, C. R., Munden, K. J., Mandl, H. J., & Solley, C. M. 1963. Men, management and mental health. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Luo, Y. 2002. Building trust in cross-cultural collaborations: Toward a contingency perspective. Journal of Management, 28 (5): 669–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. 1991. Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98 (2): 224–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Oyserman, D., Coon, H. M., & Kemmelmeier, M. 2002. Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128 (1): 3–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Parks, J. M., & Schmedemann, D. A. 1994. When promises become contracts: Implied contracts and handbook provisions on job security. Human Resource Management, 33 (3): 403–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Parzefall, M.-R. 2008. Psychological contracts and reciprocity: A study in a Finnish context. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19 (9): 1703–1719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Podsakoff, P. M., & Todor, W. D. 1985. Relationships between leader reward and punishment behavior and group processes and productivity. Journal of Management, 11 (1): 55–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. 2003. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88 (5): 879–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. 2008. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40 (3): 879–891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Putnam, R. D. 2007. E pluribus unum: Diversity and community in the twenty-first century: The 2006 Johan Skytte prize lecture. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30 (2): 137–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ralston, D. A., Lee, C. H., Perrewe, P. L., Van Deusen, C., Vollmer, G. R., Maignan, I., Tang, M., Wan, P., & Rossi, A. M. 2010. A multi-society examination of the impact of psychological resources on stressor-strain relationships. Journal of International Business Studies, 41 (4): 652–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Restubog, S. L. D., Bordia, P., & Tang, R. L. 2007. Behavioral outcomes of psychological contract breach in a non-Western culture: The moderating effect of equity sensitivity. British Journal of Management, 18 (4): 376–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ritter, B. A., & Lord, R. G. 2007. The impact of previous leaders on the evaluation of new leaders: An alternative to prototype matching. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92 (6): 1683–1695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rousseau, D. M. 1995. Psychological contracts in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  33. Rousseau, D. M., & Schalk, R. (Eds) 2000. Psychological contracts in employment: Cross-national perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  34. Sanchez-Burks, J., Nisbett, R. E., & Ybarra, O. 2000. Cultural styles, relationship schemas and prejudice against out-groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79 (2): 174–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Song, L. J., Tsui, A. S., & Law, K. S. 2009. Unpacking employee responses to organizational exchange mechanisms: The role of social and economic exchange perceptions. Journal of Management, 35 (1): 56–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Spencer, S. J., Zanna, M. P., & Fong, G. T. 2005. Establishing a causal chain: Why experiments are often more effective than mediational analyses in examining psychological processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89 (6): 845–851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Suchman, M. C. 1995. Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20 (3): 571–610.Google Scholar
  38. Thomas, D. C., & Au, K. 2002. The effect of cultural differences on the behavioral response to low job satisfaction. Journal of International Business Studies, 33 (2): 309–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Thomas, D. C., Au, K., & Ravlin, E. C. 2003. Cultural variation and the psychological contract. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24 (5): 451–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Triandis, H. C. 1995. Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
  41. Triandis, H. C., & Suh, E. M. 2002. Cultural influences on personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 53 (1): 133–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Triandis, H. C., Bontempo, R., Villareal, M. J., Asai, M., & Lucca, N. 1988. Individualism and collectivism: Cross-cultural perspectives on self-ingroup relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54 (2): 323–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tse, D. K., Lee, K., Vertinsky, I., & Wehrung, D. A. 1988. Does culture matter? A cross-cultural study of executives' choice, decisiveness, and risk adjustment in international marketing. Journal of Marketing, 52 (4): 81–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Yang, L.-Q. et al. 2012. Individualism-collectivism as a moderator of the work demands-strains relationship: A cross-level and cross-national examination. Journal of International Business Studies, 43 (4): 424–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zhao, H., Wayne, S. J., Glibkowski, B. C., & Bravo, J. 2007. The impact of psychological breach on work-related outcomes: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 60 (3): 647–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Academy of International Business 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elizabeth C Ravlin
    • 1
    Email author
  • Yuan Liao
    • 2
  • Daniel L Morrell
    • 3
  • Kevin Au
    • 4
  • David C Thomas
    • 5
  1. 1.Moore School of Business, University of South CarolinaColumbiaUSA
  2. 2.Beedie School of Business, Simon Fraser UniversityVancouverCanada
  3. 3.Department of Management and MarketingMiddle Tennessee State UniversityMurfreesboroUSA
  4. 4.Department of ManagementThe Chinese University of Hong KongHong KongChina
  5. 5.School of Management, Australian School of Business, University of New South WalesSydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations