Journal of International Business Studies

, Volume 43, Issue 3, pp 264–284 | Cite as

State ownership effect on firms' FDI ownership decisions under institutional pressure: a study of Chinese outward-investing firms

Article

Abstract

This study investigates the effect of state ownership on Chinese firms’ foreign direct investment (FDI) ownership decisions. It adopts a political perspective to extend the application of institutional theory in international business research. Specifically, it examines firms’ heterogeneous responses to external institutional processes during foreign market entry, while taking into consideration the political affiliation of firms with the external institutions. We argue that state ownership creates the political affiliation of a firm with its home-country government, which increases the firm's resource dependence on home-country institutions, while at the same time influencing its image as perceived by host-country institutional constituents. Such resource dependence and political perception increase firms’ tendency to conform to, rather than resist, isomorphic institutional pressures. We tested our hypotheses using primary data for 132 FDI entries made by Chinese firms during 2000–2006, and we found that the effects of home regulatory, host regulatory and host normative pressures on a firm to choose a joint ownership structure were stronger when the share of equity held by state entities in the firm was high.

Keywords

state ownership Chinese outward FDI subsidiary ownership institutional theory 

References

  1. Agarwal, S., & Ramaswami, S. N. 1992. Choice of foreign market entry mode: Impact of ownership, location and internalization factors. Journal of International Business Studies, 23 (1): 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmed, Z. U., Mohamad, O., Tan, B., & Johnson, J. P. 2002. International risk perceptions and mode of entry: A case study of Malaysian multinational firms. Journal of Business Research, 55 (10): 805–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, E., & Coughlan, A. T. 1987. International market entry and expansion via independent or integrated channels of distribution. Journal of Marketing, 51 (1): 71–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson, E., & Gatignon, H. 1986. Modes of foreign entry: A transaction cost analysis and propositions. Journal of International Business Studies, 17 (3): 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. 1977. Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14 (3): 396–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bell, J. H. J. 1996. Single or joint venturing? A comprehensive approach to foreign entry mode choice. Hampshire: Avebury.Google Scholar
  7. Brouthers, K. D. 2002. Institutional, cultural and transaction cost influences on entry mode choice and performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 33 (2): 203–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brouthers, K. D., & Hennart, J.-F. 2007. Boundaries of the firm: Insights from international entry mode research. Journal of Management, 33 (3): 395–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Buckley, P. J., Clegg, L. J., Cross, A. R., Liu, X., Voss, H., & Zheng, P. 2007. The determinants of Chinese outward foreign direct investment. Journal of International Business Studies, 38 (4): 499–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Buckley, P. J., Cross, A. R., Tan, H., Xin, L., & Voss, H. 2008. Historic and emergent trends in Chinese outward direct investment. Management International Review, 48 (6): 715–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cai, K. G. 1999. Outward foreign direct investment: A novel dimension of China's integration into the regional and global economy. The China Quarterly, 160: 856–880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chan, C. M., & Makino, S. 2007. Legitimacy and multi-level institutional environments: Implications for foreign subsidiary ownership structure. Journal of International Business Studies, 38 (4): 621–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chen, G., Firth, M., & Xu, L. 2009. Does the type of ownership control matter? Evidence from China's listed companies. Journal of Banking & Finance, 33 (1): 171–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chen, Y., & Young, M. 2010. Cross-border mergers and acquisitions by Chinese listed companies: A principal–principal perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 27 (3): 523–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Child, J., & Rodrigues, S. B. 2005. The internationalization of Chinese firms: A case for theoretical extension? Management and Organization Review, 1 (3): 381–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Collinson, S., & Morgan, G. 2009. Images of the multinational firm. Chichester: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  17. Cui, L., & Jiang, F. 2010. Behind ownership decision of Chinese outward FDI: Resources and institutions. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 27 (4): 751–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Davis, P. S., Desai, A. B., & Francis, J. D. 2000. Mode of international entry: An isomorphism perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 31 (2): 239–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Delios, A., Wu, Z. J., & Zhou, N. 2006. A new perspective on ownership identities in China's listed companies. Management and Organization Review, 2 (3): 319–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Deng, P. 2004. Outward investment by Chinese MNCs: Motivations and implications. Business Horizons, 47 (3): 8–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Deng, P. 2009. Why do Chinese firms tend to acquire strategic assets in international expansion? Journal of World Business, 44 (1): 74–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. DiMaggio, P. J. 1988. Interest and agency in institutional theory. In L. G. Zucker (Ed.), Institutional patterns and organizations: Culture and environment: 3–21. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.Google Scholar
  23. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. 1983. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48 (2): 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ding, Y., Zhang, H., & Zhang, J. X. 2007. Private vs state ownership and earnings management: Evidence from Chinese listed companies. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15 (2): 223–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Doz, Y. 2011. Qualitative research for international business. Journal of International Business Studies, 42 (5): 582–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ekeledo, I., & Sivakumar, K. 2004. International market entry mode strategies of manufacturing firms and service firms: A resource-based perspective. International Marketing Review, 21 (1): 68–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Firth, M., Fung, P. M. Y., & Rui, O. M. 2007. How ownership and corporate governance influence chief executive pay in China's listed firms. Journal of Business Research, 60 (7): 776–785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Francis, J., Zheng, C., & Mukherji, A. 2009. An institutional perspective on foreign direct investment. Management International Review, 49 (5): 565–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gatignon, H., & Anderson, E. 1988. The multinational corporation's degree of control over foreign subsidiaries: An empirical test of a transaction cost explanation. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 4 (2): 305–336.Google Scholar
  30. Ghemawat, P. 2001. Distance still matters: The hard reality of global expansion. Harvard Business Review, 79 (8): 137–147.Google Scholar
  31. Globerman, S., & Shapiro, D. 2009. Economic and strategic considerations surrounding Chinese FDI in the United States. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 26 (1): 163–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gomes-Casseres, B. 1990. Firm ownership preferences and host government restrictions: An integrated approach. Journal of International Business Studies, 21 (1): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Goodrick, E., & Salancik, G. R. 1996. Organizational discretion in responding to institutional practices: Hospitals and cesarean birth. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41 (1): 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. He, W., & Lyles, M. A. 2008. China's outward foreign direct investment. Business Horizons, 51 (6): 485–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Henisz, W. J. 2000. The institutional environment for economic growth. Economics and Politics, 12 (1): 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hennart, J.-F. 1991. The transaction costs theory of joint ventures: An empirical study of Japanese subsidiaries in the United States. Management Science, 37 (4): 483–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hennart, J.-F., & Larimo, J. 1998. The impact of culture on the strategy of multinational enterprises: Does national origin affect ownership decisions? Journal of International Business Studies, 29 (3): 515–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hope, O. K., Thomas, W., & Vyas, D. 2011. The cost of pride: Why do firms from developing countries bid higher? Journal of International Business Studies, 42 (1): 128–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kim, W. C., & Hwang, P. 1992. Global strategy and multinationals’ entry mode choice. Journal of International Business Studies, 23 (1): 29–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kogut, B. 1991. Joint ventures and the option to expand and acquire. Management Science, 37 (1): 19–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kogut, B., & Singh, H. 1988. The effect of national culture on the choice of entry mode. Journal of International Business Studies, 19 (3): 411–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kostova, T., & Roth, K. 2002. Adoption of an organizational practice by subsidiaries of multinational corporations: Institutional and relational effects. Academy of Management Journal, 45 (1): 215–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kostova, T., & Zaheer, S. 1999. Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: The case of the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 24 (1): 64–81.Google Scholar
  44. Kostova, T., Roth, K., & Dacin, M. T. 2008. Institutional theory in the study of multinational corporations: A critique and new directions. Academy of Management Review, 33 (4): 994–1006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Li, J., & Rugman, A. M. 2007. Real options and the theory of foreign direct investment. International Business Review, 16 (6): 687–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Liu, X., Buck, T., & Shu, C. 2005. Chinese economic development, the next stage: Outward FDI? International Business Review, 14 (1): 97–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lu, J. W. 2002. Intra- and inter-organizational imitative behavior: Institutional influences on Japanese firms’ entry mode choice. Journal of International Business Studies, 33 (1): 19–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Luo, Y., & Rui, H. 2009. An ambidexterity perspective toward multinational enterprises from emerging economies. Academy of Management Perspectives, 23 (4): 49–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Luo, Y., Xue, Q., & Han, B. 2010. How emerging market governments promote outward FDI: Experience from China. Journal of World Business, 45 (1): 68–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Makino, S., & Neupert, K. E. 2000. National culture, transaction costs, and the choice between joint venture and wholly owned subsidiary. Journal of International Business Studies, 31 (4): 705–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Meyer, K. E. 2001. Institutions, transaction costs, and entry mode choice in Eastern Europe. Journal of International Business Studies, 32 (2): 357–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Meyer, K. E., Estrin, S., Bhaumik, S. K., & Peng, M. W. 2009. Institutions, resources, and entry strategies in emerging economies. Strategic Management Journal, 30 (1): 61–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Mezias, S. J., Chen, Y.-R., Murphy, P., Biaggio, A., Chuawanlee, W., Hui, H., Okumura, T., & Starr, S. 2002. National cultural distance as liability of foreignness: the issue of level of analysis. Journal of International Management, 8 (4): 407–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. MOFCOM. 2006. Statistical Bulletin of China's Outward Foreign Direct Investment. Beijing: Ministry of Commerce and National Bureau of Statistics.Google Scholar
  55. MOFCOM. 2009. Statistical Bulletin of China's Outward Foreign Direct Investment. Beijing: Ministry of Commerce and National Bureau of Statistics.Google Scholar
  56. Morck, R., Yeung, B., & Zhao, M. 2008. Perspectives on China's outward foreign direct investment. Journal of International Business Studies, 39 (3): 337–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. North, D. C. 1990. Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Oliver, C. 1991. Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16 (1): 145–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Padmanabhan, P., & Cho, K. R. 1996. Ownership strategy for a foreign affiliate: An empirical investigation of Japanese firms. Management International Review, 36 (1): 45–65.Google Scholar
  60. Peng, M. W., Tan, J., & Tong, T. W. 2004. Ownership types and strategic groups in an emerging economy. Journal of Management Studies, 41 (7): 1105–1129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Peng, M. W., Wang, D. Y., & Jiang, Y. 2008. An institution-based view of international business strategy: A focus on emerging economies. Journal of International Business Studies, 39 (5): 920–936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. 1978. The external control of organizations. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  63. Rosenzweig, P. M., & Singh, J. V. 1991. Organizational environments and the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 16 (2): 340–361.Google Scholar
  64. Rugman, A. M., & Li, J. 2007. Will China's multinationals succeed globally or regionally? European Management Journal, 25 (5): 333–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Rui, H., & Yip, G. S. 2008. Foreign acquisitions by Chinese firms: A strategic intent perspective. Journal of World Business, 43 (2): 213–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Santangelo, G. D., & Meyer, K. E. 2011. Extending the internationalization process model: Increases and decreases of MNE commitment in emerging economies. Journal of International Business Studies, 42 (7): 894–909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Scott, W. R. 1995. Institutions and organizations. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  68. Scott, W. R. 2002. The changing world of Chinese enterprises: An institutional perspective. In A. S. Tsui & C. M. Lau (Eds), Management of enterprises in the People's Republic of China: 59–78. Boston: Kluwer Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Scott, W. R. 2005. Institutional theory: Contributing to a theoretical research program. In K. G. Smith & M. A. Hitt (Eds), Great minds in management: The process of theory development: 460–484. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  70. Tan, J., & Li, M. 1996. Effects of ownership types on environment–strategy configuration in China's emerging transitional economy. Advances in International Comparative Management, 11: 217–250.Google Scholar
  71. Tan, J., & Tan, D. 2005. Environment-strategy co-evolution and co-alignment: A staged model of Chinese SOEs under transition. Strategic Management Journal, 26 (2): 141–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Taylor, R. 2002. Globalization strategies of Chinese companies: Current developments and future prospects. Asian Business & Management, 1 (2): 209–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. UNCTAD. 2005. Prospects for foreign direct investment and the strategies of transnational corporations, 2005–2008. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  74. Wang, M. Y. 2002. The motivations behind China's government-initiated industrial investments overseas. Pacific Affairs, 75 (2): 187–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Westney, D. E. 1993. Institutionalization theory and the multinational corporation. In S. Ghoshal & E. Westney (Eds), Organizational theory and the multinational corporations: 53–75. New York: St Martin's Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Wright, M., Filatotchev, I., Hoskisson, R. E., & Peng, M. W. 2005. Strategy research in emerging economies: Challenging the conventional wisdom. Journal of Management Studies, 42 (1): 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Xu, D., & Shenkar, O. 2002. Institutional distance and the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 27 (4): 608–618.Google Scholar
  78. Xu, E., & Zhang, H. 2008. The impact of state shares on corporate innovation strategy and performance in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 25 (3): 473–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Yamakawa, Y., Peng, M. W., & Deeds, D. L. 2008. What drives new ventures to internationalize from emerging to developed economies? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32 (1): 59–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Yiu, D., & Makino, S. 2002. The choice between joint venture and wholly owned subsidiary: An institutional perspective. Organization Science, 13 (6): 667–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Young, M. N., Peng, M. W., Ahlstrom, D., Bruton, G. D., & Jiang, Y. 2008. Corporate governance in emerging economies: A review of the principal-principal perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 45 (1): 196–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Zaheer, S. 1995. Overcoming the liability of foreignness. Academy of Management Journal, 38 (2): 341–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Zhan, J. X. 1995. Transnationalization of outward investment: The case of Chinese firms. Transnational Corporations, 4 (3): 61–93.Google Scholar
  84. Zhang, J., Zhou, C., & Ebbers, H. 2011. Completion of Chinese overseas acquisitions: Institutional perspectives and evidence. International Business Review, 20 (2): 226–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Zou, H., & Adams, M. B. 2008. Corporate ownership, equity risk and returns in the People's Republic of China. Journal of International Business Studies, 39 (7): 1149–1168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Academy of International Business 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research School of Management, ANU College of Business and Economics, The Australian National UniversityCanberraAustralia
  2. 2.School of Management, Curtin Business School, Curtin UniversityPerthAustralia

Personalised recommendations