Journal of International Business Studies

, Volume 41, Issue 9, pp 1550–1571 | Cite as

Flexibility versus commitment: MNEs’ ownership strategy in China

Article

Abstract

We investigate the following important questions in international business. How do multinational enterprises (MNEs) choose ownership strategies when facing strong uncertainty in foreign market entries? How are the choices affected by industry contingencies? Following the key tenets of real options theory, we propose that, under a high level of market uncertainty, MNEs choose more flexible (rather than more committed) ownership strategies that allow adjustment of investment decisions in future. We further suggest that using flexible strategies in response to uncertainty becomes less valuable for MNEs when the industry they enter in the host country enjoys strong sales growth potential, requires less irreversible investments, and has intense competition. Empirically, we analyze the ownership strategies (ownership structure and equity share) of over 5000 new foreign investments in manufacturing industries in China during 2000–2006. We find qualified support for our hypotheses, and discuss the industry boundary conditions of adopting flexible ownership strategies in foreign market entries.

Keywords

uncertainty ownership strategy real options flexibility commitment China 

References

  1. Abel, A. B., & Eberly, J. C. 1996. Optimal investment with costly reversibility. Review of Economic Studies, 63 (4): 581–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abel, A. B., Dixit, A. K., Eberly, J. C., & Pindyck, R. S. 1996. Options, the value of capital, and investment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 111 (3): 753–777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Akerlof, G. A. 1970. The market for “lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84 (November): 488–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Allison, P. D. 1999. Comparing logit and probit coefficients across groups. Sociological Methods and Research, 28 (2): 186–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Amemiya, T. 1981. Qualitative response models: A survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 19 (4): 1483–1536.Google Scholar
  6. Anderson, E., & Gatignon, H. 1986. Modes of foreign entry: A transaction cost analysis and propositions. Journal of International Business Studies, 17 (3): 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Axarlogiou, K., & Kouvelis, P. 2007. Hysteresis in adjusting the ownership structure of foreign subsidiaries. International Business Review, 16 (4): 494–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Belderbos, R., & Sleuwaegen, L. 2005. Competitive drivers and international plant configuration strategies: A product-level test. Strategic Management Journal, 26 (6): 577–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Belderbos, R., & Zou, J. L. 2007. On the growth of foreign affiliates: Multinational plant networks, joint ventures, and flexibility. Journal of International Business Studies, 38 (7): 1095–1112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Belderbos, R., & Zou, J. L. 2009. Real options and foreign affiliate divestments: A portfolio perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 40 (4): 600–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brouthers, K. D. 2002. Institutional, cultural and transaction cost influences on entry mode choice and performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 33 (2): 203–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brouthers, K. D., Brouthers, L. E., & Werner, S. 2008. Real options, international entry mode choice and performance. Journal of Management Studies, 45 (5): 936–960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Buckley, P. J., & Casson, M. C. 1998. Models of the multinational enterprise. Journal of International Business Studies, 29 (1): 21–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Buckley, P. J., Clegg, J., & Wang, C. Q. 2002. The impact of inward FDI on the performance of Chinese manufacturing firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 33 (4): 637–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Campa, J. M. 1993. Entry by foreign firms in the United States under exchange-rate uncertainty. Review of Economics and Statistics, 75 (4): 614–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Carruth, A., Dickerson, A., & Henley, A. 2000. What do we know about investment under uncertainty? Journal of Economic Survey, 14 (2): 119–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chan, C. M., & Makino, S. 2007. Legitimacy and multi-level institutional environments: Implications for foreign subsidiary ownership structure. Journal of International Business Studies, 38 (4): 621–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chi, T. 2000. Option to acquire or divest a joint venture. Strategic Management Journal, 21 (6): 665–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chi, T., & McGuire, D. J. 1996. Collaborative ventures and value of learning: Integrating the transaction cost and strategic option perspectives on the choice of market entry modes. Journal of International Business Studies, 27 (2): 285–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chi, T., & Seth, A. 2009. A dynamic model of the choice of mode for exploiting complementary capabilities. Journal of International Business Studies, 40 (3): 365–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cuypers, I. R. P., & Martin, X. 2007. Joint ventures and real options: An extended perspective. Advances in Strategic Management, 24: 107–148.Google Scholar
  22. Cuypers, I. R. P., & Martin, X. 2010. What makes and what does not make a real option? A study of equity shares in international joint ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 41 (1): 47–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Davidson, W. H., & McFetridge, D. G. 1985. Key characteristics in the choice of international technology transfer mode. Journal of International Business Studies, 16 (2): 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Delios, A., & Beamish, P. W. 1999. Ownership strategy of Japanese firms: Transactional, institutional, and experience influences. Strategic Management Journal, 20 (10): 915–933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dixit, A. K., & Pindyck, R. S. 1994. Investment under uncertainty. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Dixit, A. K., & Pindyck, R. S. 2000. Expandability, reversibility, and optimal capacity choice. In M. J. Brennan & L. G. Trigeorgis (Eds), Project flexibility, agency, and competition: New developments in the theory and application of real options: 50–70. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Driver, C., & Whelan, B. 2001. The effect of business risk on manufacturing investment: Sectoral survey evidence from Ireland. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 44 (4): 403–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Driver, C., Temple, P., & Urga, G. 2006. Contrasts between types of assets in fixed investment equations as a way of testing real options theory. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 24 (4): 432–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Economist Intelligence Unit. 2005. China country commerce. London: Economist Intelligence Unit.Google Scholar
  30. Favero, C. A., Pesaran, M. H., & Sharma, S. 1994. A duration model of irreversible oil investment: Theory and empirical evidence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 9: S95–S112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ferderer, J. P. 1993. The impact of uncertainty on aggregate investment spending: An empirical analysis. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 25 (1): 30–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Folta, T. B., & O’Brien, J. P. 2004. Entry in the presence of dueling options. Strategic Management Journal, 25 (2): 121–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Folta, T. B., Johnson, D. R., & O’Brien, J. 2006. Uncertainty, irreversibility, and the likelihood of entry: An empirical assessment of the option to defer. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 61 (3): 432–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Furman, J. L., Porter, M. E., & Stern, S. 2002. The determinants of national innovative capacity. Research Policy, 31 (6): 899–933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ghosal, V., & Loungani, P. 2000. The differential impact of uncertainty on investment in small and large businesses. Review of Economics and Statistics, 82 (2): 338–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gomes-Casseres, B. 1989. Ownership structures of foreign subsidiaries: Theory and evidence. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 11 (1): 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gomes-Casseres, B. 1990. Firm ownership preferences and host government restrictions: An integrated approach. Journal of International Business Studies, 21 (1): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Guiso, L., & Parigi, G. 1999. Investment and demand uncertainty. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114 (1): 185–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Henley, A., Carruth, A., & Dickerson, A. 2003. Industry-wide versus firm-specific uncertainty and investment: British company panel data evidence. Economics Letters, 78 (1): 87–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hennart, J.-F. 1988. A transaction costs theory of equity joint ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 9 (4): 361–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hennart, J.-F. 1991. The transaction costs theory of joint ventures: An empirical study of Japanese subsidiaries in the United States. Management Science, 37 (4): 483–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hill, C. W. L., Hwang, P., & Kim, W. C. 1990. An eclectic theory of the choice of international entry mode. Strategic Management Journal, 11 (2): 117–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hoetker, G. 2007. The use of logit and probit models in strategic management research: Critical issues. Strategic Management Journal, 28 (4): 331–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hurn, A. S., & Wright, R. E. 1994. Geology or economics? Testing models of irreversible investment using North Sea oil data. Economic Journal, 104 (March): 363–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J.-E. 1977. The internationalization process of the firm: A model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. Journal of International Business Studies, 8 (1): 23–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kester, W. C. 1984. Today's options for tomorrow's growth. Harvard Business Review, 62 (2): 153–160.Google Scholar
  47. Kogut, B. 1991. Joint ventures and the option to expand and acquire. Management Science, 37 (1): 19–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kogut, B., & Kulatilaka, N. 1994. Operating flexibility, global manufacturing, and the option value of a multinational network. Management Science, 40 (1): 123–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kouvelis, P., Axarloglou, K., & Sinha, V. 2001. Exchange rates and the choice of ownership structure of production facilities. Management Science, 47 (8): 1063–1080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kulatilaka, N., & Perotti, E. C. 1998. Strategic growth options. Management Science, 44 (8): 1021–1031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lee, T. 2004. Determinants of the foreign equity share of international joint ventures. Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control, 28 (11): 2261–2275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Li, J. 2007. Real options theory and international strategy: A critical review. Advances in Strategic Management, 24: 67–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Li, Y., James, B., Madhavan, R., & Mahoney, J. T. 2007. Real options: Taking stock and looking ahead. Advances in Strategic Management, 24: 31–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Long, J. S., & Freese, J. 2006. Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press.Google Scholar
  55. Luo, Y. D. 2005. Transactional characteristics, institutional environment and joint venture contracts. Journal of International Business Studies, 36 (2): 209–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Luo, Y. D. 2007. From foreign investors to strategic insiders: Shifting parameters, prescriptions and paradigms for MNCs in China. Journal of World Business, 42 (1): 14–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Mason, S., & Merton, R. C. 1985. The role of contingent claims analysis in corporate finance. In E. Altman & M. Subrahmanyam (Eds), Recent advances in corporate finance: 7–54. Homewood, IL: Richard D Irwin.Google Scholar
  58. McDonald, R. L., & Siegel, D. 1986. The value of waiting to invest. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 101 (4): 707–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. McFadden, D. 1973. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In P. Zarembka (Ed.), Frontiers of econometrics: 105–142. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  60. Nanda, A., & Williamson, P. J. 1995. Use joint ventures to ease the pain of restructuring. Harvard Business Review, 73 (6): 119–128.Google Scholar
  61. Pennings, E., & Sleuwaegen, L. 2004. The choice and timing of foreign direct investment under uncertainty. Economic Modelling, 21 (6): 1101–1115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Puck, J. F., Holtbrugge, D., & Mohr, A. T. 2009. Beyond entry mode choice: Explaining the conversion of joint ventures into wholly owned subsidiaries in the People's Republic of China. Journal of International Business Studies, 40 (3): 388–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Reuer, J. J., & Tong, T. W. 2005. Real options in international joint ventures. Journal of Management, 31 (3): 403–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Rivoli, P., & Salorio, E. 1996. Foreign direct investment and investment under uncertainty. Journal of International Business Studies, 27 (2): 335–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Seth, A., & Chi, T. L. 2005. What does a real options perspective add to the understanding of strategic alliances? In J. Reuer & O. Shenkar (Eds), Handbook for strategic alliances: 101–116. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  66. Smit, H. T. J., & Ankum, L. A. 1993. A real options and game-theoretic approach to corporate-investment strategy under competition. Financial Management, 22 (3): 241–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Smit, H. T. J., & Trigeorgis, L. G. 2004. Strategic investment: Real options and games. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  68. Teng, B.-S. 2004. The WTO and entry modes in China. Thunderbird International Business Review, 46 (4): 381–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Tong, T. W., & Reuer, J. J. 2007. Real options in multinational corporations: Organizational challenges and risk implications. Journal of International Business Studies, 38 (2): 215–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Tong, T. W., Reuer, J. J., & Peng, M. W. 2008. International joint ventures and the value of growth options. Academy of Management Journal, 51 (5): 1014–1029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Trigeorgis, L. 1988. A conceptual options framework for capital budgeting. Advances in Futures and Options Research, 3: 145–167.Google Scholar
  72. Trigeorgis, L. 1996. Real options: Managerial flexibility and strategy in resource allocation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  73. Williamson, O. E. 1985. The economic institutions of capitalism. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  74. Wooldridge, J. M. 2002. Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  75. Xia, J., Tan, J., & Tan, D. 2008. Mimetic entry and bandwagon effect: The rise and decline of international equity joint venture in China. Strategic Management Journal, 29 (2): 195–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Xu, D., & Shenkar, O. 2002. Institutional distance and the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 27 (4): 608–618.Google Scholar
  77. Xu, D., Zhou, C., & Phan, P. 2010. A real options perspective on sequential acquisitions in China. Journal of International Business Studies, 41 (1): 166–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Yiu, D., & Makino, S. 2002. The choice between joint venture and wholly owned subsidiary: An institutional perspective. Organization Science, 13 (6): 667–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Zhou, C., & Li, J. 2008. Product innovation in emerging market-based international joint ventures: An organizational ecology perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 39 (7): 1114–1132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Academy of International Business 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Business Administration, Simon Fraser UniversityBurnabyCanada
  2. 2.School of Management, State University of New York at BuffaloAmherstUSA

Personalised recommendations