Advertisement

Journal of International Business Studies

, Volume 40, Issue 5, pp 762–778 | Cite as

Institutional differences and the development of entrepreneurial ventures: A comparison of the venture capital industries in Latin America and Asia

  • Garry D Bruton
  • David Ahlstrom
  • Tomas Puky
Article

Abstract

This paper examines how differences in distinct institutional clusters of countries impact on the vital entrepreneurial activity of venture capital, and how individuals, organizations, and their collective action in turn shape those institutions. The focus on venture capital offers researchers the opportunity to view an industry that comes from a common root, with strong and consistent traditions, in which to examine how the differing institutional settings impact on behaviors in different markets, and how the institutions themselves may change in these settings. We also focus on emerging economies, since such economies offer a natural laboratory to study the impact of institutional change. Specifically, this paper employs an institutional theory perspective to examine venture capital in two regions of the world that form institutional clusters of countries – Latin America and Asia. It is found that the venture capital industry exhibits a strong consistency across many dimensions; yet institutions in these two distinct settings result in significant differences in industry practice. Therefore this research is able to contribute to both empirical and theoretical understanding of emerging economies, institutions in those environments, and venture capital.

Keywords

institutional theory institutional change venture capital emerging economies Asia Latin America 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This paper was previously presented to the Society for Entrepreneurial Scholars. Thanks are expressed to Michael Lubatkin, Tom Lee, and David Deeds for earlier comments on the manuscript, and to Marc Ahlstrom of Burlington County College for his research assistance.

References

  1. Ahlstrom, D., & Bruton, G. D. 2006. Venture capital in emerging economies: Networks and institutional change. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 30 (2): 299–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahlstrom, D., Young, M. N., & Nair, A. 2003. Navigating China's feudal governance structures: Some guidelines for foreign enterprises. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 68 (1): 4–13.Google Scholar
  3. Ahlstrom, D., Young, M. N., Chan, E. S., & Bruton, G. D. 2004. Facing constraints to growth? Overseas Chinese entrepreneurs and traditional business practices in East Asia. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 21 (3): 263–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Amit, R., Brander, J., & Zott, C. 1998. Why do venture capital firms exist? Theory and Canadian evidence. Journal of Business Venturing, 13 (6): 441–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Andrade, L. F., Barra, J. M., & Elstrodt, H. 2001. All in the familia. McKinsey Quarterly, 4 (1): 81–89.Google Scholar
  6. Asian Venture Capital Association. 1998. The guide to venture capital in Asia. Hong Kong: Asian Venture Capital Journal.Google Scholar
  7. Auerbach, C. F., & Silverstein, L. B. 2003. Qualitative data: An introduction to coding and analysis. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
  8. Backman, M. 1999. Asian eclipse: Exposing the dark side of business in Asia. Singapore: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  9. Baumol, W. J., Litan, R. E., & Schramm, C. J. 2007. Good capitalism, bad capitalism. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Bijker, W., Hughes, T. P., & Pinch, T. 1989. The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  11. Boisot, M. H., & Child, J. 1996. From fiefs to clans and network capitalism: Explaining China's emerging economic order. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41 (4): 600–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bruton, G., & Ahlstrom, D. 2003. An institutional view of China's venture capital industry: Explaining the differences between China and the West. Journal of Business Venturing, 18 (2): 233–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bruton, G. D., Fried, V., & Hisrich, R. D. 1998. Venture capitalist and CEO dismissal. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 21 (3): 41–54.Google Scholar
  14. Bruton, G. D., Ahlstrom, D., & Singh, K. 2002. The impact of the institutional environment on the venture capital industry in Singapore. Venture Capital: An International Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance, 4 (3): 197–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bruton, G. D., Fried, V., & Manigart, S. 2005. Institutional influences on the worldwide expansion of venture capital. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 29 (6): 737–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Busenitz, L. W., Gomez, C., & Spencer, J. W. 2000. Country institutional profiles: Unlocking entrepreneurial phenomena. Academy of Management Journal, 43 (5): 994–1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bygrave, W. D. 1987. Syndication investments by venture capital firms: A networking perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 2 (2): 139–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bygrave, W., & Timmons, J. 1992. Venture capital at the crossroads. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  19. Chen, M. 2001. Inside Chinese business: A guide for managers worldwide. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  20. Child, J. 2000. Theorizing about organization cross-nationality. In J. L. C. Cheng & R. B. Peterson (Eds), Advances in international comparative management, Vol. 13: 27–75. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  21. Chua, B.L., Au, K. & Thomas, H. 2005. Global enterpreneurship monitor: Hong Kong and Shenzhen. Hong Kong; Shenzhen, China: The Chinese University of Hong Kong; Shenzhen Shi She Hui Ke Xue Yuan.Google Scholar
  22. Daft, R. L., & Lewin, A. Y. 1990. Can organization studies begin to break out of the normal science straitjacket? Organization Science, 1 (1): 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. DiMaggio, P. J. 1988. Interest and agency in institutional theory. In L. Zucker (Ed.), Institutional patterns and organizations: 3–22. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.Google Scholar
  24. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. 1983. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48 (2): 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. 1991. Introduction. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis: 1–38. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  26. Dunning, J. H., & Lundan, S. M. 2008. Institutions and the OLI paradigm of the multinational enterprise. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 25 (4): 573–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14 (4): 532–550.Google Scholar
  28. Ernst & Young. 2006. Transition: Global venture capital insights report. London: Ernst & Young.Google Scholar
  29. Etzkowitz, H. 2005. The renewal of venture capital: Toward a counter-cyclical model. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 17 (1): 73–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fiet, J. O. 1995. Reliance upon informants in the venture capital industry. Journal of Business Venturing, 10 (3): 195–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Fligstein, N. 1997. Social skill and institutional theory. American Behavioral Scientist, 40 (4): 397–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Fried, V. H., & Hisrich, R. 1994. Towards a model of venture capital investment decision making. Financial Management, 23 (3): 28–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Fried, V. H., & Hisrich, R. D. 1995. The venture capitalist: A relationship investor. California Management Review, 37 (2): 101–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Fried, V. H., Bruton, G. D., & Hisrich, R. D. 1998. Strategy and the board of directors in venture capital-backed firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 13 (6): 493–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. 1967. The discovery of grounded theory. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  36. Gorman, M., & Sahlman, W. A. 1989. What do venture capitalists do? Journal of Business Venturing, 4 (4): 231–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gupta, U. 2000. Done deals: Venture capitalists tell their stories. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  38. He, Y., Tian, Z., & Chen, Y. 2007. Performance implications of nonmarket strategy in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 24 (2): 151–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hensley, T. R., & Griffin, G. W. 1986. Victims of groupthink: The Kent State University board of trustees and the 1977 gymnasium controversy. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 30 (3): 497–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hirsch, P. M., & Lounsbury, M. 1997. Ending the family quarrel: Toward a reconciliation of “old” and “new” institutionalisms. American Behavioral Scientist, 40 (4): 406–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hitt, M. A., Ahlstrom, D., Dacin, M. T., Levitas, E., & Svobodina, L. 2004. The institutional effects on strategic alliance partner selection in transition economies: China vs Russia. Organization Science, 15 (2): 173–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hitt, M. A., Holmes, R. M., Miller, T., & Salmador, M. P. 2006. Modelling country institutional profiles: The dimensions and dynamics of institutional environments. In J Gimeno, J Schaedler &, P. S. Ring (Eds), Strategy and governance in a world of institutional change. Paper presented at the Strategic Management Society Conference, 29–31 October, 2006, Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
  43. Hofstede, G. 1991. Cultures and organizations. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  44. Huberman, M., & Miles, M. B. (Eds) 2002. The qualitative researcher's companion. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. James, H. 2006. Family capitalism: Wendels, Haniels, Falcks, and the continental European model. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Jepperson, R. 1991. Institutions, institutional effects, and institutionalism. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis: 143–163. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  47. Kenney, M., Han, K., & Tanaka, S. 2004. Venture capital industries in East Asia. In S. Yusuf, M. Altaf & K. Nabeshima (Eds), Global change and East Asian policy initiatives: 391–427. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  48. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. 1998. Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy, 106 (6): 1113–1155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. 2000. Investor protection and corporate governance. Journal of Financial Economics, 58 (1–2): 3–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lau, C. M., Tse, D. K., & Zhou, N. 2002. Institutional forces and organizational culture in China: Effects on change schemas, firm commitment and job satisfaction. Journal of International Business Studies, 33 (3): 533–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lee, T. W. 1999. Using qualitative methods in organizational research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  52. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, G. G. 1985. Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  53. Lounsbury, M., & Crumley, E. T. 2007. New practice creation: An institutional perspective on innovation. Organization Studies, 28 (7): 993–1012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lowe, S. 1998. Culture and network institutions in Hong Kong: A hierarchy of perspectives. A response to Wilkinson: “Culture, institutions and business in East Asia”. Organization Studies, 19 (2): 321–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. McClelland, D. C. 1999. The achieving society. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  56. McGrath, R. G. 1997. A real options logic for initiating technology positioning investments. Academy of Management Review, 22 (4): 974–996.Google Scholar
  57. Newman, K. L. 2000. Organizational transformation during institutional upheaval. Academy of Management Review, 25 (3): 602–619.Google Scholar
  58. North, D. 1990. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Oliver, C. 1991. Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16 (1): 145–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Olson, M. 1965. The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Orru, M., Biggart, N. W., & Hamilton, G. G. 1997. The economic organization of East Asian capitalism. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  62. Oviatt, B. M., McDougall, P. P., & Haeberle, W. L. (Eds) 2007. International entrepreneurship. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  63. Peng, M. W. 2000. Business strategies in transition economies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  64. Peng, M. W. 2006. Global strategy. Mason, OH: Thomson/South-Western.Google Scholar
  65. Peng, M. W., & Heath, P. S. 1996. The growth of the firm in planned economies in transition: Institutions, organizations, and strategic choice. Academy of Management Review, 21 (2): 492–528.Google Scholar
  66. Perkmann, M., & Spicer, A. 2007. Healing the scars of history: Projects, skills and field strategies in institutional entrepreneurship. Organization Studies, 28 (7): 1101–1122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Rease, R., & Johnson, H. 2000/2001. Latin American Private Equity Review and Outlook. Wellesley, MA: Asset Alternatives, Inc.Google Scholar
  68. Ronen, S., & Shenkar, O. 1985. Clustering countries on attitudinal dimensions: A review and synthesis. Academy of Management Review, 10 (3): 435–454.Google Scholar
  69. Sachs, J. D. 1993. Poland's jump to a market economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  70. Sahlman, W. A. 1988. Aspects of financial contracting in venture capital. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 1 (2): 23–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Sapienza, H. 1992. When do venture capitalists add value? Journal of Business Venturing, 7 (1): 9–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Sapienza, H., & Gupta, A. K. 1994. Impact of agency risks and task uncertainty on venture capitalist–CEO interactions. Academy of Management Journal, 37 (6): 1618–1632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Sapienza, H., Manigart, S., & Vermeir, W. 1996. Venture capitalist governance and value added in four countries. Journal of Business Venturing, 11 (6): 439–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Scott, W. R. 1995. Introduction: Institutional theory and organizations. In W. R. Scott & S. Christensen (Eds), The institutional construction of organizations: xi–xxiii. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  75. Scott, W. R. 2001. Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  76. Scott, W. R. 2002. The changing world of Chinese enterprise: An institutional perspective. In A. S. Tsui & C. M. Lau (Eds), The management of enterprises in the People's Republic of China: 59–78. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Shleifer, A., & Treisman, D. 2001. Without a map: Political tactics and economic reform in Russia. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  78. Soto, H. D. 2000. The mystery of capital: Why capitalism triumphs in the West and fails everywhere else. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  79. Strauss, A. L. 1987. Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. 1990. Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  81. Suchman, M. C. 1995. Localism and globalism in institutional analysis: The emergence of contractual norms in venture finance. In W. R. Scott & S. Christensen (Eds), The institutional construction of organizations: 39–66. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  82. Tsoukas, H. 1989. The validity of idiographic research explanations. Academy of Management Review, 14 (4): 551–561.Google Scholar
  83. Tung, R. L. 2002. Building effective networks. Journal of Management Inquiry, 11 (2): 94–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Tung, R. L., & Worm, V. 2001. Network capitalism: The role of human resources in penetrating the China market. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 12 (4): 517–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Tyebjee, T. T., & Bruno, A. V. 1984. A model of venture capital investment activity. Management Science, 30 (9): 1051–1066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Weidenbaum, M., & Hughes, S. 1996. The bamboo network: How expatriate Chinese entrepreneurs are creating a new superpower in Asia. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  87. Wright, M., Thompson, S., & Robbie, K. 1992. Venture capital and management-led leveraged buy-outs: A European perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 7 (1): 47–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Wright, M., Filatotchev, I., Buck, T., & Bishop, K. 2002. Foreign partners in the former Soviet Union. Journal of Management Studies, 37 (3): 165–179.Google Scholar
  89. Yang, N. 2000. Cultural relativity of employee motivation: When West meets East. In C. M. Lau, K. K. S. Law, D. K. Tse & C. S. Wong (Eds), Asian management matters: 47–58. London: Imperial College Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Yeung, H. W. C. 2002. Entrepreneurship and the internationalisation of Asian firms: An institutional perspective. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Yin, R. K. 2003. Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  92. Young, M. N., Ahlstrom, D., Bruton, G. D., & Chan, E. S. 2001. The resource dependence, service and control functions of boards of directors in Hong Kong and Taiwanese firms. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 18 (2): 223–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Zhang, K. H. 2001. Does foreign direct investment promote economic growth? Evidence from East Asia and Latin America. Contemporary Economic Policy, 19 (2): 175–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Zider, B. 1998. How venture capital works. Harvard Business Review, 76 (6): 131–139.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Academy of International Business 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.M J Neeley School of Business, Texas Christian UniversityFort WorthUSA
  2. 2.Department of The Chinese University of Hong KongShatinHong Kong
  3. 3.VA Tech Hydro Corporation, University Research ParkCharlotteUSA

Personalised recommendations