Advertisement

Journal of International Business Studies

, Volume 41, Issue 1, pp 123–141 | Cite as

A cross-country study on the effects of national culture on earnings management

  • Sam Han
  • Tony Kang
  • Stephen Salter
  • Yong Keun Yoo
Article

Abstract

This study hypothesizes and tests whether the degree to which managers exercise earnings discretion relates to their value system (i.e., culture) as well as the institutional features (i.e., legal environment) of their country. We find that uncertainty avoidance and individualism dimensions of national culture explain managers' earnings discretion across countries, and that this association varies with the strength of investor protection. This study extends prior literature by documenting that both national culture and institutional structure are important factors that explain corporate managers' earnings discretion practices around the world, and that the influences of these factors on earnings discretion are conditional on each other.

Keywords

cross-cultural management cultural frameworks international financial reporting earnings management national culture investor protection disclosure 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank anonymous reviewers, Lee Radebaugh (the editor), and seminar participants at the 2007 American Accounting Association Midyear and Annual Meetings, and the 2007 European Accounting Association Annual Congress, for helpful comments.

References

  1. Ball, R. 2001. Infrastructure requirements for an economically efficient system of public financial reporting and disclosure. In R. E. Litan & R. Herring (Eds), Brookings–Wharton papers on financial services: 127–182. Washington DC: Brookings Institute Press.Google Scholar
  2. Ball, R., & Brown, P. 1968. An empirical evaluation of accounting income numbers. Journal of Accounting Research, 6 (2): 159–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ball, R., Kothari, S. P., & Robin, A. 2000. The effect of international institutional factors on properties of accounting earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 29 (1): 1–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boyacigiller, N., & Adler, N. 1991. The parochial dinosaur: Organizational science in a global context. Academy of Management Review, 16 (2): 262–290.Google Scholar
  5. Brown, L. B., & Caylor, M. L. 2005. A temporal analysis of quarterly earnings thresholds: Propensities and valuation consequences. The Accounting Review, 80 (2): 423–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burgstahler, D., & Dichev, I. 1997. Earnings management to avoid earnings decreases and losses. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 24 (1): 99–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chenhall, R. H. 2003. Management control systems design within its organizational context: Findings from contingency-based research and directions for the future. Accounting, Organizations, and Society, 28 (2): 127–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chui, A., Lloyd, A., & Kwok, C. 2002. The determination of capital structure: Is national culture a missing piece to the puzzle? Journal of International Business Studies, 33 (1): 99–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dechow, P., Sloan, R. G., & Sweeney, A. P. 1996. Causes and consequences of earnings manipulation: An analysis of firms subject to enforcement actions by the SEC. Contemporary Accounting Research, 13 (1): 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. DeFond, M., Hung, M., & Trezevant, R. 2007. Investor protection and the information content of annual earnings announcements: International evidence. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 43 (1): 37–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Degeorge, F., Patel, J., & Zeckhauser, R. 1999. Earnings management to exceed thresholds. Journal of Business, 72 (1): 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Doupnik, T., & Tsakumis, G. 2004. A critical review of tests of Gray's theory of cultural relevance and suggestions for future research. Journal of Accounting Literature, 23: 1–48.Google Scholar
  13. Driscoll, J., & Kraay, A. C. 1998. Consistent covariance matrix estimation with spatially dependent panel data. Review of Economics and Statistics, 80 (4): 549–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dyck, A., & Zingales, L. 2004. Private benefits of control: An international comparison. Journal of Finance, 59 (2): 537–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Elliott, J., & Shaw, W. 1988. Write-offs as accounting procedures to manage perceptions. Journal of Accounting Research, 26 (Suppl.): 91–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. 1993. Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. Journal of Financial Economics, 33 (1): 3–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fields, T. D., Lys, T. Z., & Vincent, L. 2001. Empirical research on accounting choice. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31 (1–3): 255–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Francis, J., LaFond, R., Olsson, P., & Schipper, K. 2004. Costs of equity and earnings attributes. The Accounting Review, 79 (4): 967–1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gray, S. J. 1988. Towards a theory of cultural influence on the development of accounting systems internationally. Abacus, 24 (1): 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gray, S. J., & Vint, H. 1995. The impact of culture on accounting disclosures: Some international evidence. Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting, 2 (December): 33–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Guan, L., Pourjalali, H., Sengupta, P., & Teruya, J. 2006. Effect of cultural environment and accounting regulation on earnings manipulation: A five Asian-Pacific country analysis. Multinational Business Review, 13 (2): 1–20.Google Scholar
  22. Harrison, G., & McKinnon, J. 1999. Cross-cultural research in management control systems design: A review of the current state. Accounting, Organizations, and Society, 24 (5–6): 483–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Healy, P., & Wahlen, J. 1999. A review of the earnings management literature and its implications for standard setting. Accounting Horizons, 13 (4): 365–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hofstede, G. 1980. Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  25. Hope, O. K. 2003. Firm-level disclosures and the relative roles of culture and legal origin. Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting, 14 (3): 218–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hope, O. K., Kang, T., Thomas, W., & Yoo, Y. K. 2007. Impact of excess auditor remuneration on cost of equity capital around the world. Working paper, University of Toronto, Florida Atlantic University, University of Oklahoma, and Korea University.Google Scholar
  27. House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. 2004. Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  28. Hung, M. 2001. Accounting standards and value relevance of financial statements: An international analysis. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 30 (3): 401–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jaggi, B., & Low, P. Y. 2000. Impact of culture, market forces, and legal systems on financial disclosures. International Journal of Accounting, 35 (4): 495–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kinney, M., & Trezevant, R. 1997. The use of special items to manage earnings and perceptions. Journal of Financial Statement Analysis, 3 (1): 45–53.Google Scholar
  31. Kirkman, B., Lowe, K., & Gibson, C. 2006. A quarter century of Culture's Consequences: A review of empirical research incorporating Hofstede's cultural values framework. Journal of International Business Studies, 37 (3): 285–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kirschenheiter, M., & Melumad, N. D. 2002. Can “big bath” and earnings smoothing co-exist as equilibrium financial reporting strategies? Journal of Accounting Research, 40 (3): 761–796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kothari, S. P. 2001. Capital markets research in accounting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31 (1–3): 105–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kwok, C. Y., & Tadesse, S. 2006. National culture and financial systems. Journal of International Business Studies, 37 (2): 227–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Schleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. 1998. Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy, 106 (6): 1113–1155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Schleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. 2000. Investor protection and corporate governance. Journal of Financial Economics, 58 (1–2): 3–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Leung, K., Bhagat, R., Buchan, N., Erez, M., & Gibson, C. 2005. Culture and international business: Recent advances and their implications for future research. Journal of International Business Studies, 36 (4): 357–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Leuz, C., Nanda, D., & Wysocki, P. D. 2003. Earnings management and investor protection: An international comparison. Journal of Financial Economics, 69 (3): 505–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lewis, P., & Salter, S. 2006. Europe and America – Together or apart: An empirical test of differences in actual reported results. In J. T. Sale (Ed.), Advances in international accounting, Vol. 19: 221–243. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  40. Lopez, T., & Rees, L. 2002. The effect of beating and missing analysts' forecasts on the information content of unexpected earnings. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 17 (2): 155–184.Google Scholar
  41. Radebaugh, L., Gray, S., & Black, E. 2006. International accounting and multinational enterprises, (6th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  42. Salter, S. B., & Niswander, F. 1995. Cultural influence on the development of accounting systems internationally: A test of Gray's (1988) theory. Journal of International Business Studies, 26 (2): 379–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. 1997. A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance, 52 (2): 737–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Strong, J., & Meyer, J. 1987. Asset write-downs: Managerial incentives and security returns. Journal of Finance, 42 (3): 643–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tucker, J., & Zarowin, P. 2006. Does income smoothing improve earnings informativeness? The Accounting Review, 81 (1): 252–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. White, H. 1980. A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica, 48 (4): 817–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Xie, H. 2001. The mispricing of abnormal accruals. The Accounting Review, 76 (3): 357–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Zarzeski, M. T. 1996. Spontaneous harmonization effects of culture and market forces on accounting disclosure practices. Accounting Horizon, 10 (1): 18–37.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Academy of International Business 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sam Han
    • 1
  • Tony Kang
    • 2
  • Stephen Salter
    • 3
  • Yong Keun Yoo
    • 4
  1. 1.Singapore Management UniversitySingaporeSingapore
  2. 2.Florida Atlantic UniversityDavieUSA
  3. 3.University of Texas at El PasoEl PasoUSA
  4. 4.Korea UniversitySeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations