Advertisement

Journal of International Business Studies

, Volume 40, Issue 1, pp 108–131 | Cite as

International attention and multinational enterprise performance

  • Cyril BouquetEmail author
  • Allen Morrison
  • Julian Birkinshaw
Article

Abstract

This study examines the performance consequences of international attention, defined as the extent to which headquarters executives in the multinational enterprise (MNE) invest time and effort in activities, communications, and discussions aimed at improving their understanding of the global marketplace. Using detailed questionnaire and archival data on 135 MNEs, our analysis revealed three significant findings. First, international attention can be operationalized as a meta-construct that consists of three interrelated and reinforcing dimensions. Second, international attention has a curvilinear (inverted U-shape) relationship with MNE performance. Third, the performance benefits of international attention increase with three categories of moderating factors: the international assignment experience of top executives, the independence of value-adding activities across country locations, and the degree of industry dynamism.

Keywords

cognition attention management internationalization executive skills international experience multinational performance 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Anne-Wil Harzing, the Departmental Editor, and three anonymous JIBS reviewers, for their help and guidance as we revised our paper. The work presented here extends the PhD dissertation of the first author (2004 Richard N. Farmer Award for best PhD dissertation at the Academy of International Business). Support from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (Grant #410–2005–2079) is greatly appreciated. We are also thankful to Majid Abdi for his valuable assistance with data collection.

References

  1. Abrahamson, E., & Hambrick, D. C. 1997. Attentional homogeneity in industries: The effect of discretion. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18 (S1): 513–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adler, N. J., & Bartholomew, S. 1992. Managing globally competent people. Academy of Management Executive, 6 (3): 52–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. 1991. Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting regressions. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  4. Athanassiou, N., & Nigh, D. 1999. The impact of US company internationalization on top management team advice networks: A tacit knowledge perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 20 (1): 83–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Athanassiou, N., & Nigh, D. 2000. Internationalization, tacit knowledge, and the top management teams of MNCs. Journal of International Business Studies, 31 (3): 471–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bartlett, C. A., & Ghoshal, S. 1989. Managing across borders: The transnational solution. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bartunek, J. M., Gordon, J. R., & Weathersby, R. P. 1983. Developing “complicated” understanding in administrators. Academy of Management Review, 8 (2): 273–284.Google Scholar
  8. Baum, J. R., & Wally, S. 2003. Strategic decision speed and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 24 (11): 1107–1129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bevan, K. 1999. Bad head for heights, business travel migraines: The stresses and strains of air travel are a common cause of migraines. Financial Times, 28 June: 16.Google Scholar
  10. Birkinshaw, J. 2000. Entrepreneurship in the global firm. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  11. Birkinshaw, J., Morrison, A., & Hulland, J. 1995. Structural and competitive determinants of a global integration strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 16 (8): 637–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Birkinshaw, J., Bouquet, C., & Ambos, T. C. 2007. Managing executive attention in the global company. MIT Sloan Management Review, 48 (4): 39–45.Google Scholar
  13. Björkman, I., Fey, C. F., & Park, H. J. 2007. Institutional theory and MNC subsidiary HRM practices: Evidence from a three-country study. Journal of International Business Studies, 38 (3): 430–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Blaine, M. 1994. Comparing the profitability of firms in Germany, Japan and the US. Management International Review, 34 (2): 125–148.Google Scholar
  15. Bollen, K. A. 1989. Structural equations with latent variables. New York: John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bouquet, C. 2005. Building global mindsets: An attention perspective. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bouquet, C., & Birkinshaw, J. 2008. Weight versus voice: How foreign subsidiaries gain attention from corporate headquarters. Academy of Management Journal, 51 (3): 577–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bourgeois, L. J., & Eisenhardt, K. M. 1988. Strategic decision-processes in high-velocity environments: Four cases in the microcomputer industry. Management Science, 34 (7): 816–835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Breene, R. T. S., Nunes, P. F., & Shill, W. E. 2007. The chief strategy officer. Harvard Business Review, 85 (10): 84–94.Google Scholar
  20. Butterfield, K. D., Trevino, L. K., & Ball, G. A. 1996. Punishment from the manager's perspective: A grounded investigation and inductive model. Academy of Management Journal, 39 (6): 1479–1512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Calori, R., Johnson, G., & Sarnin, P. 1994. CEOs' cognitive maps and the scope of the organization. Strategic Management Journal, 15 (6): 437–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Carpenter, M. A. 2002. The implications of strategy and social context for the relationship between top management team heterogeneity and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 23 (3): 275–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Carpenter, M. A., & Fredrickson, J. W. 2001. Top management teams, global strategic posture, and the moderating role of uncertainty. Academy of Management Journal, 44 (3): 533–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Carpenter, M. A., Sanders, W. G., & Gregersen, H. B. 2001. Bundling human capital with organizational context: The impact of international assignment experience on multinational firm performance and CEO pay. Academy of Management Journal, 44 (3): 493–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Caves, R. E. 1996. Multinational enterprise and economic analysis, (2nd ed.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Chandler, A. D. 1991. The functions of the HQ unit in the multibusiness firm. Strategic Management Journal, 12 (S2): 31–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Chandler, A. D. 1977. The visible hand: The managerial revolution in American business. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
  28. Chia, R. 2004. Strategy-as-practice: Reflections on the research agenda. European Management Review, 1 (1): 29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Cho, T. S., & Hambrick, D. C. 2006. Attention as the mediator between top management team characteristics and strategic change: The case of airline deregulation. Organization Science, 17 (4): 453–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. 1983. Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.) Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  31. Contractor, F. J. 2007. Is international business good for companies? The evolutionary or multi-stage theory of internationalization vs. the transaction cost perspective. Management International Review, 47 (3): 453–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Cowan, D. A. 1986. Developing a process model of problem recognition. Academy of Management Review, 11 (4): 763–776.Google Scholar
  33. Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. 1963. A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  34. Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. 1986. Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32 (5): 554–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Daft, R. L., & Weick, K. E. 1984. Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems. Academy of Management Review, 9 (2): 284–295.Google Scholar
  36. Daft, R. L., Sormunen, J., & Parks, D. 1988. Chief executive scanning, environmental characteristics and company performance: An empirical study. Strategic Management Journal, 9 (2): 123–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Daily, C. M., Certo, S. T., & Dalton, D. R. 2000. International experience in the executive suite: The path to prosperity? Strategic Management Journal, 21 (4): 515–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Davidson, W. H. 1991. The role of global scanning in business planning. Organizational Dynamics, 19 (3): 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. DeFrank, R. S., Konopaske, R., & Ivancevich, J. M. 2000. Executive travel stress: Perils of the road warrior. Academy of Management Executive, 14 (2): 58–71.Google Scholar
  40. Dess, G., & Robinson, R. 1984. Measuring organizational performance in the absence of objective measures: The case of the privately-held firm and conglomerate business unit. Strategic Management Journal, 5 (3): 265–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Doz, Y. L., Santos, J., & Williamson, P. 2001. From global to metanational: How companies win in the knowledge economy. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  42. Dunning, J. H. 1996. The geographical sources of competitiveness of firms: Some results from a new survey. Transnational Corporations, 5 (3): 1–30.Google Scholar
  43. Dutton, J. E., & Duncan, R. B. 1987. The creation of momentum for change through the process of strategic issue diagnosis. Strategic Management Journal, 8 (3): 279–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Dutton, J. E., Fahey, L., & Narayanan, V. K. 1983. Toward understanding strategic issue diagnosis. Strategic Management Journal, 4 (4): 307–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. Making fast strategic decisions in high velocity environments. Academy of Management Journal, 32 (3): 543–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. 2000. Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21 (10–11): 1105–1121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ellis, P. D. 2007. Distance, dependence and diversity of markets: Effects on market orientation. Journal of International Business Studies, 38 (3): 374–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Elsbach, K. D., Barr, P. S., & Hargadon, A. B. 2005. Identifying situated cognition in organizations. Organization Science, 16 (4): 422–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Fleiss, J. L. 1981. Statistical methods for rates and proportions (2nd ed.) New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  50. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (1): 39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Forsgren, M. A., & Pedersen, T. 2000. Subsidiary influence and corporate learning: Centers of excellence in Danish foreign-owned firms. In U. Holm & T. Pedersen (Eds), The emergence and impact of MNC centers of excellence: 67–78. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  52. Frost, T., Birkinshaw, J. M., & Ensign, S. 2002. Centers of excellence in multinational corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 23 (11): 997–1018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Garg, V. K., Walters, B. A., & Priem, R. L. 2003. Chief executive scanning emphases, environmental dynamism, and manufacturing firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 24 (8): 725–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Gavetti, G. 2005. Cognition and hierarchy: Rethinking the microfoundations of capabilities' development. Organization Science, 16 (6): 599–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Ghoshal, S., & Bartlett, C. A. 1988. Creation, adoption and diffusion of innovations by subsidiaries of multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies, 19 (3): 365–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Ghoshal, S., & Bartlett, C. A. 1990. The multinational corporation as an interorganizational network. Academy of Management Review, 15 (4): 603–625.Google Scholar
  57. Ghoshal, S., & Gratton, L. 2002. Integrating the enterprise. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44 (1): 31–38.Google Scholar
  58. Ghoshal, S., & Kim, S. K. 1986. Building effective intelligence systems for competitive advantage. Sloan Management Review, 28 (1): 49–58.Google Scholar
  59. Ghoshal, S., & Westney, D. E. 1991. Organizing competitor analysis systems. Strategic Management Journal, 12 (1): 17–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Ghoshal, S., Korine, H., & Szulanski, G. 1994. Interunit communication in multinational corporations. Management Science, 40 (1): 96–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. 1967. The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  62. Govindarajan, V., & Gupta, A. K. 2001. The quest for global dominance: Transforming global presence into global competitive advantage. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  63. Grant, R. M. 1996. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17 (Winter Special Issue): 109–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Gratton, L., & Ghoshal, S. 2005. Beyond best practice. MIT Sloan Management Review, 46 (3): 49–57.Google Scholar
  65. Gregersen, H. B., Morrison, A. J., & Black, J. S. 1998. Developing leaders for the global frontier. Sloan Management Review, 40 (1): 21–32.Google Scholar
  66. Gupta, A. K., & Govindarajan, V. 1986. Resource-sharing among SBUs: Strategic antecedents and administrative implications. Academy of Management Journal, 29 (4): 695–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Hambrick, D. C. 1982. Environmental scanning and organizational strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 3 (2): 159–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Hambrick, D. C., & Cannella, A. A. 2004. CEOs who have COOs: Contingency analysis of an unexplored structural form. Strategic Management Journal, 25 (10): 959–979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Hannerz, U. 1996. Cosmopolitans and locals in world culture. In U. Hannerz (Ed.), Transnational connections: Culture, people, places: 102–111. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  70. Hansen, M. T., & Haas, M. R. 2001. Competing for attention in knowledge markets: Electronic document dissemination in a management consulting company. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46 (1): 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Harzing, A.-W. 2000. Cross national industrial mail surveys: Why do response rates differ between countries? Industrial Marketing Management, 29 (3): 243–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Harzing, A.-W., & Noorderhaven, N. 2006. Geographical distance and the role and management of subsidiaries: The case of subsidiaries down-under. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23 (2): 167–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Hennart, J.-F. 2007. The theoretical rationale for a multinationality–performance relationship. Management International Review, 47 (3): 423–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Hout, T., Porter, M. E., & Rudden, E. 1982. How global companies win out. Harvard Business Review, 60 (5): 98–108.Google Scholar
  75. Hu, Y. S. 1995. The international transferability of the firm's advantages. California Management Review, 37 (4): 73–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Huff, A. S. 1988. Politics and argument as a means of coping with ambiguity and change. In L. R. Pondy Jr, R. J. Boland & H. Thomas (Eds), Managing ambiguity and change: 79–90. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  77. Huff, A. S. 1990. Mapping strategic thought. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  78. James, W. 1890. The principles of psychology. New York: Dover Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Jarzabkowski, P. 2004. Strategy as practice: Recursiveness, adaptation, and practices-in-use. Organization Studies, 25 (4): 529–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Jarzabkowski, P., Balogun, J., & Seidl, D. 2007. Strategizing: The challenges of a practice perspective. Human Relations, 60 (1): 5–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Kanter, R. M. 1995. World class: Thriving locally in the global economy. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  82. Khan, A. M., & Manopichetwattana, V. 1989. Innovative and noninnovative small firms: Types and characteristics. Management Science, 35 (5): 597–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Kiesler, S., & Sproull, L. 1982. Managerial response to changing environments: Perspectives on problem sensing from social cognition. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27 (4): 548–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. A. 1993. Effectively conceiving and executing multinationals' worldwide strategies. Journal of International Business Studies, 4 (3): 419–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Kline, R. B. 2005. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, (2nd ed.) New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  86. Kogut, B. 1989. A note on global strategies. Strategic Management Journal, 10 (4): 383–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Kogut, B., & Kulatilaka, N. 1994. Operating flexibility, global manufacturing, and the option value of a multinational network. Management Science, 40 (1): 123–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Kogut, B., & Zander, U. 1993. Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation. Journal of International Business Studies, 24 (4): 625–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Kumar, N., Stern, L. W., & Anderson, J. C. 1993. Conducting interorganizational research using key informants. Academy of Management Journal, 36 (6): 1633–1651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Law, K. S., Wong, C.-S., & Mobley, W. H. 1998. Toward a taxonomy of multidimensional constructs. Academy of Management Review, 23 (4): 741–755.Google Scholar
  91. Levinthal, D., & Rerup, C. 2006. Crossing an apparent chasm: Bridging mindful and less-mindful perspectives on organizational learning. Organization Science, 17 (4): 502–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Levinthal, D. A., & March, J. G. 1993. The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14 (S2): 95–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Levy, O. 2005. The influence of top management team attention patterns on global strategic posture of firms. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26 (7): 797–819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Levy, O., Beechler, S., Taylor, S., & Boyacigiller, N. A. 2007. What we talk about when we talk about “global mindset”: Managerial cognition in multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies, 38 (2): 231–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Lu, J. W., & Beamish, P. W. 2004. International diversification and firm performance: The S-CURVE hypothesis. Academy of Management Journal, 47 (4): 598–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. March, J. G. 1994. A primer on decision making: How decisions happen. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  97. March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. 1976. Ambiguity and choice in organizations. Bergen: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
  98. March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. 1958. Organizations. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  99. Miller, L. 1996. Life on the road: Why business travel is such hard work. Wall Street Journal, 30 October: B1.Google Scholar
  100. Mintzberg, H. 1973. The nature of managerial work. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  101. Mudambi, R., & Zahra, S. A. 2007. The survival of international new ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 38 (2): 333–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Murtha, T. P., Lenway, S. A., & Bagozzi, R. P. 1998. Global mindsets and cognitive shift in a complex multinational corporation. Strategic Management Journal, 19 (2): 97–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. 1982. An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  104. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. 1994. Psychometric theory, (3rd ed.) New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  105. Ocasio, W. 1997. Towards an attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 18 (Summer Special Issue): 187–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Ocasio, W., & Joseph, J. 2005. An attention-based theory of strategy formulation: Linking micro- and macro-perspectives in strategy processes. Strategy Process, 22: 39–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. O'Donnell, S. W. 2000. Managing foreign subsidiaries: Agents of headquarters, or an interdependent network? Strategic Management Journal, 21 (5): 525–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Palepu, K. 1985. Diversification strategy, profit performance and the entropy measure. Strategic Management Journal, 6 (3): 239–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Perlmutter, H. V. 1969. The tortuous evolution of the multinational corporation. Columbia Journal of World Business, 4 (1): 9–18.Google Scholar
  110. Pettigrew, A. 1992. On studying managerial elites. Strategic Management Journal, 13 (Winter Special Issue): 163–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. 1986. Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12 (4): 531–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. 2003. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88 (5): 879–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Porter, M. E. 1986. Competition in global industries. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  114. Prahalad, C. K. 1990. Globalization: The intellectual and managerial challenges. Human Resource Management, 29 (1): 27–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Robbins, B. 1992. Comparative cosmopolitanism. Social Text, 31/32: 169–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Rogers, H. L., & Reilly, S. M. 2000. Health problems associated with international business travel. AAOHN Journal, 48 (8): 376–384.Google Scholar
  117. Rosenzweig, P. M., & Singh, J. V. 1991. Organizational environments and the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 16 (2): 340–361.Google Scholar
  118. Roth, K. 1995. Managing international interdependence: CEO characteristics in a resource-based framework. Academy of Management Journal, 38 (1): 200–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Rugman, A. M., & Verbeke, A. 2001. Subsidiary-specific advantages in multinational enterprises. Strategic Management Journal, 22 (3): 237–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Rugman, A. M., & Verbeke, A. 2004. A perspective on regional and global strategies of multinational enterprises. Journal of International Business Studies, 35 (1): 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Schulz, M. 2001. The uncertain relevance of newness: Organizational learning and knowledge flows. Academy of Management Journal, 44 (4): 661–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Sharma, S. 2000. Managerial interpretations and organizational context as predictors of corporate choice of environmental strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 43 (4): 681–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Shattuck, L. G., & Miller, N. L. 2006. Extending naturalistic decision making to complex organizations: A dynamic model of situated cognition. Organization Studies, 27 (7): 989–1009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Simons, T., Pelled, L. H., & Smith, K. A. 1999. Making use of difference: Diversity, debate, and decision comprehensiveness in top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 42 (6): 662–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Sorenson, O. 2000. Letting the market work for you: An evolutionary perspective on product strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 21 (5): 577–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Striker, J., Dimberg, L., & Liese, B. H. 2000. Stress and business travel: Individual, managerial, and corporate concerns. National Productivity Review, 20 (1): 3–10.Google Scholar
  127. Sutcliffe, K. M., & Weber, K. 2003. The high cost of accurate knowledge. Harvard Business Review, 81 (5): 74–81.Google Scholar
  128. Takeuchi, R., Tesluk, P. E., & Yun, S. H. 2005. An integrative view of international experience. Academy of Management Journal, 48 (1): 85–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. 1997. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18 (7): 509–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Thornhill, S. 2006. Knowledge, innovation and firm performance in high- and low-technology regimes. Journal of Business Venturing, 21 (5): 687–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Venaik, S., Midgley, D. F., & Devinney, T. M. 2005. Dual paths to performance: The impact of global pressures on MNC subsidiary conduct and performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 36 (6): 655–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Vernon, R. 1979. The product cycle hypothesis in a new international environment. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 41 (4): 255–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Vertovec, S., & Cohen, R. 2002. Conceiving cosmopolitanism: Theory, context and practice. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  134. Weick, K. E., & Roberts, K. H. 1993. Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38 (3): 357–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Weick, K. E., & Sutcliffe, K. A. 2006. Mindfulness and the quality of organizational attention. Organization Science, 17 (4): 514–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Weick, K. E., & Van Orden, P. W. 1990. Organizing on a global scale: A research and teaching agenda. Human Resource Management, 29 (1): 49–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. West, C., & Schwenk, C. 1996. Top management team strategic consensus, demographic homogeneity and firm performance: A report of resounding nonfindings. Strategic Management Journal, 17 (7): 571–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. Wilson, D. C., & Jarzabkowski, P. 2004. Thinking and acting strategically: New challenges for interrogating strategy. European Management Review, 1 (1): 14–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. Yeh, W. C., & Barsalou, L. W. 2006. The situated nature of concepts. American Journal of Psychology, 119 (3): 349–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. Yip, G. S. 1995. Total global strategy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  141. Zack, M. H. 1999. Developing a knowledge strategy. California Management Review, 41 (3): 125–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. Zaheer, A., & Zaheer, S. 1997. Catching the wave: Alertness, responsiveness, and market influence in global electronic networks. Management Science, 43 (11): 1493–1509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Academy of International Business 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cyril Bouquet
    • 1
    Email author
  • Allen Morrison
    • 2
  • Julian Birkinshaw
    • 3
  1. 1.IMDLausanneSwitzerland
  2. 2.INSEADSingapore
  3. 3.London Business SchoolLondonUK

Personalised recommendations