Journal of International Business Studies

, Volume 39, Issue 8, pp 1343–1358

Cross-cultural variations in climate for autonomy, stress and organizational productivity relationships: A comparison of Chinese and UK manufacturing organizations

  • Giles Hirst
  • Pawan Budhwar
  • Brian K Cooper
  • Michael West
  • Chen Long
  • Xu Chongyuan
  • Helen Shipton
Article

Abstract

Cross-cultural researchers have questioned the extent to which European–American management practices can be transported to major markets in Asia, such as the People's Republic of China. Applying employee involvement theory, we examined the relationships between climate for autonomy, work demands climate, employee stress and organizational productivity in a cross-national study of 51 UK and 104 Chinese manufacturing organizations. We predicted and found that climate for autonomy was positively and negatively related to stress in the Chinese and UK contexts, respectively. The interaction of climate for autonomy and work demands climate was significant: climate for autonomy was positively related to organizational productivity only when work demands climate was low.

Keywords

cross-cultural research/measurement issues Asia multilevel analysis productivity organizational climate 

References

  1. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. 1991. Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Ashkanasy, N. M. 2002. Leadership in the Asian century: Lessons from GLOBE. International Journal of Organisational Behaviour, 5 (3): 150–163.Google Scholar
  3. Aycan, Z., Kanungo, R. N., Mendonca, M., Yu, K., Deller, J., Stahl, G., & Kurshid, A. 2000. Impact of culture on human resource management practices: A 10-country comparison. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49 (1): 192–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brislin, R. W. 1980. Translation and content analysis of oral and written materials. In H. C. Triandis & W. W. Lambert (eds), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology, Vol. 2. 349–444. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  5. Chan, D. 1998. Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83 (2): 234–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen, X. P., & Li, S. 2005. Cross-national differences in cooperative decision-making in mixed-motive business contexts: The mediating and moderating effects of vertical and horizontal individualism. Journal of International Business Studies, 36 (6): 622–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen, G., Kirkman, K. L., Kanfer, R., Allen, D., & Rosen, B. 2007. A multilevel study of leadership, empowerment, and performance in teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92 (2): 331–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Child, J. 1991. A foreign perspective on the management of people in China. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 2 (1): 93–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Nachreiner, F., & Schaufeli, W. B. 2001. The job demands-resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86 (3): 499–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Denison, D. 1996. Corporate culture and organizational effectiveness. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  11. Foley, S., Hang-Yue, N., & Lui, S. 2005. The effects of work stressors, perceived organizational support, and gender on work-family conflict in Hong Kong. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 22 (3): 237–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Forrester, R. 2000. Empowerment: Rejuvenating a potent idea. Academy of Management Executive, 14 (3): 67–80.Google Scholar
  13. Goldberg, D. P. 1972. The detection of minor psychiatric illness by questionnaire. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. 1980. Work redesign. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  15. Haire, M., Ghiselli, E. F., & Porter, L. W. 1966. Managerial thinking: An international study. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  16. Hardy, G. E., Shapiro, D. A., Haynes, C. E., & Rick, J. E. 1999. Validation of the general health questionnaire–12 using a sample of employees from England's health care services. Psychological Assessment, 11 (2): 159–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hobfoll, S. E. 1989. Conservation of resources. A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44 (3): 513–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hofmann, D. A., & Gavin, M. B. 1998. Centering decisions in hierarchical linear models: Implications for research in organizations. Journal of Management, 24 (5): 623–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Ruiz-Quintanilla, S. A., Dorfman, P. W., Javidan, M., Dickson, M. W., & Gupta, V. associates. 1999. Cultural influences on leadership and organizations: Project GLOBE. In W. H. Mobley, M. J. Gessner, & V. Arnold (eds), Advances in global leadership, Vol. 1. 171–233. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  20. Hui, M. K., Kevin, Y. A., & Fock, H. 2004. Empowerment effects across cultures. Journal of International Business Studies, 35 (1): 46–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Iyengar, S. S., & Lepper, M. R. 2000. When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 7 (6): 995–1006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. 1984. Estimating within group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69 (1): 85–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. James, L. R., Joyce, W. F., & Slocum, J. W. 1988. Comment: Organizations do not cognize. Academy of Management Review, 13 (1): 129–132.Google Scholar
  24. Javidan, M., & House, R. J. 2001. Cultural acumen for the global manager: Lessons from Project GLOBE. Organizational Dynamics, 29 (4): 289–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jones, E., Chonko, L., Rangarajan, D., & Roberts, J. 2007. The role of overload on job attitudes, turnover intentions, and salesperson performance. Journal of Business Research, 60 (7): 663–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Karasek, R. A. 1979. Job decision latitude, job demands and mental strain: Implications for job redesign. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24 (2): 285–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kerr, C., Dunlop, J. T., Harbison, F. H., & Myers, C. A. 1971. Postscript to “Industrialism and industrial man”. International Labour Review, 103 (6): 519–540.Google Scholar
  28. Kirkman, B. L., & Shapiro, D. L. 2001. The impact of team members' cultural values on productivity, cooperation, and empowerment in self-managing work teams. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32 (5): 597–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Klein, K. J. 2000. A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (eds), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: 512–556. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  30. Lam, S. S. K., Chen, X. P., & Schaubroeck, J. 2002. Participative decision making and employee performance in different cultures: The moderating effects of allocentrism/idiocentrism and efficacy. Academy of Management Journal, 45 (5): 905–914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Langfred, C. W. 2004. Too much of a good thing? Negative effects of high trust and individual autonomy in self-managing teams. Academy of Management Journal, 47 (3): 385–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Langfred, C. W., & Moye, N. A. 2004. Effects of task autonomy on performance: An extended model considering motivational, informational and structural mechanisms. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89 (6): 934–945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Liu, C., Spector, P. E., & Shi, L. 2007. Cross-national job stress: A quantitative and qualitative study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28 (2): 209–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Man, D. C., & Lam, S. K. 2003. The effects of job complexity and autonomy on cohesiveness in collectivistic and individualistic work groups: A cross-cultural analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24 (8): 979–1001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McClelland, G. H., & Judd, C. M. 1993. Statistical difficulties of detecting interactions and moderator effects. Psychological Bulletin, 114 (2): 376–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mullen, M. R. 1995. Diagnosing measurement equivalence in cross-national research. Journal of International Business Studies, 26 (3): 573–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Neal, A., West, M. A., & Patterson, M. G. 2005. Do organizational climate and strategic orientation moderate the relationship between human resource management practices and productivity? Journal of Management, 31 (4): 492–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Newburry, W., & Yakova, N. 2006. Standardization preferences: A function of national culture, work interdependence and local embeddedness. Journal of International Business Studies, 37 (1): 44–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Newman, K. L., & Nollen, S. D. 1996. Culture and congruence: The fit between management practices and national culture. Journal of International Business Studies, 27 (4): 753–779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ostroff, C., Kinicki, A. J., & Clark, M. A. 2002. Substantive and operational issues of response bias across levels of analysis: An example of climate–satisfaction relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87 (2): 355–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Parker, S. K. 2003. Longitudinal effects of lean production on employee outcomes and the mediating role of work characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88 (4): 620–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Patterson, M. G., Warr, P. B., & West, M. A. 2004. Organizational climate and company performance: The role of employee affect and employee level. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77 (2): 193–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Patterson, M. G., West, M. A., Shackleton, V., Dawson, J. F., Lawthom, R., Maitlis, S., Robinson, D. L., & Wallace, A. 2005. Validating the organizational climate measure: Links to managerial practices, productivity and innovation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26 (4): 379–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Peterson, M. F., et al. 1995. Role-conflict, ambiguity, and overload: A 21-nation study. Academy of Management Journal, 38 (2): 429–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ramudu, B., & Fish, A. 2004. An empirical investigation of job burnout among expatriates. Personnel Review, 35 (4): 449–468.Google Scholar
  46. Robert, C., Probst, T. M., Martocchio, J., Drasgow, F., & Lawler, J. 2000. Empowerment and continuous improvement in the United States, Mexico, Poland, and India: Predicting fit on the basis of the dimensions of power distance and individualism. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85 (5): 643–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rubinstein, J. S., Meyer, D. E., & Evans, J. E. 2001. Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27 (4): 763–797.Google Scholar
  48. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. 2000. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55 (1): 68–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Schaubroeck, J., & Fink, L. S. 1998. Facilitating and inhibiting effects of job control and social support on stress outcomes and role behavior: A contingency model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19 (2): 167–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Schaubroeck, J., Lam, S. K., & Xie, J. L. 2000. Collective efficacy versus self-efficacy in coping responses to stressors and control: A cross-cultural study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85 (4): 512–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Schwartz, S. H. 1999. A theory of cultural values and some implications for work. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 48 (1): 23–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Smith, P. B., Peterson, M. F., & Wang, Z. M. 1996. The manager as mediator of alternative meaning: A pilot study from China, the USA and UK. Journal of International Business Studies, 27 (1): 115–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Smith, P. B., Peterson, M. F., & Schwartz, S. H. 2002. Cultural values, sources of guidance, and their relevance to managerial behavior: A 47-nation study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33 (2): 188–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Spector, P. E. 1986. Perceived control by employees: A meta-analysis of studies concerning autonomy and participation at work. Human Relations, 39 (11): 1005–1016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Spector, P. E., Cooper, C. L., Poelmans, S., Allen, T. D., O'Driscoll, M., Sanchez, J. J., Siu, O. L., Dewe, P., Hart, P., & Lu, L. 2004. A cross-national comparative study of work/family stressors, working hours, and well-being: China and Latin America vs. the Anglo world. Personnel Psychology, 57 (1): 119–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Steenkamp, J.- B. E. M., & Baumgartner, H. 1998. Assessing measurement invariance in cross-national consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 25 (1): 78–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Stevens, J. 1992. Applied multivariate statistics for social sciences. New York: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  58. Taguiri, R., & Litwin, G. H. (eds) 1968. Organizational climate. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Tannenbaum, A. S., Kavcic, B., Rosner, M., Vianello, M., & Wieser, G. 1974. Hierarchy in organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  60. Teo, C., & Waters, L. 2002. The role of human resource practices in reducing occupational stress and strain. International Journal of Stress Management, 9 (3): 207–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Triandis, H. C., & Gelfand, M. J. 1998. Converging measurement of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74 (1): 118–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Tung, R. L. 2008. The cross-cultural research imperative: The need to balance cross-national and intra-national diversity. Journal of International Business Studies, 39 (1): 41–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Vroom, V. H., & Jago, A. G. 1988. The new leadership: Managing participation in organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  64. Wagner III, J. A. 1994. Participation's effects on performance and satisfaction: A reconsideration of research evidence. Academy of Management Review, 19 (2): 312–330.Google Scholar
  65. Wagner III, J. A., & Gooding, R. Z. 1987. Shared influence and organizational behavior: A meta-analysis of situational variables expected to moderate participation-outcome relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 30 (3): 524–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wall, T. D., Jackson, P. R., Mullarkey, S., & Parker, S. K. 1996. The demands-control model of job strain: A more specific test. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 69 (2): 153–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Welsh, D. H. B., Luthans, F., & Sommer, S. M. 1993. Managing Russian factory workers: The impact of US based behavioral and participative techniques. Academy of Management Journal, 36 (1): 58–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Yongsun, P., & Tung, R. L. 1999. Negotiating with East Asians: How to attain “win–win” outcomes. Management International Review, 39 (2): 103–122.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Academy of International Business 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Giles Hirst
    • 1
  • Pawan Budhwar
    • 2
  • Brian K Cooper
    • 1
  • Michael West
    • 2
  • Chen Long
    • 3
  • Xu Chongyuan
    • 4
  • Helen Shipton
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of ManagementFaculty of Business Economics, Monash UniversityMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.Aston Business School, Aston UniversityBirminghamUK
  3. 3.Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  4. 4.Jiangsu Wuxi Economic Development ZoneWuxi New DistrictChina

Personalised recommendations