Journal of Asset Management

, Volume 11, Issue 6, pp 417–434 | Cite as

Style-neutral funds of funds: Diversification or deadweight?

Original Article

Abstract

This article aims to determine whether style-neutral portfolios built out of value and growth equity/mutual funds deliver benefits in terms of returns and diversification or whether they result in costly benchmark tracking products. We analyze style-neutral portfolios by building synthetic funds of funds (FoFs) out of both value- and growth-oriented equity funds and contrast their properties with the applicable benchmark and with style FoFs. Although a beneficial effect with respect to diversification and a resulting reduction in return dispersion can be seen, the simulated FoFs do not deliver a general risk-adjusted outperformance against the benchmark or the better performing style of a period. The variety of results indicates that FoFs may indeed benefit from investing in a style-neutral portfolio of growth and value funds, but only given that FoF managers are able to select the well-performing funds of the respective styles. In addition, we find that being able to shift between styles over time may lead to better results than locking FoFs into being style neutral.

Keywords

style neutral value and growth funds of funds R ratio portfolio deadweight diversification 

References

  1. Ahmed, P., Lockwood, L. and Nanda, S. (2002) Multistyle rotation strategies. Journal of Portfolio Management 28: 17–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amenc, N., Malaise, P., Martellini, L. and Sfeir, D. (2003) Tactical style allocation – A new form of market neutral strategy. Journal of Alternative Investments 6: 8–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Biglova, A., Ortobelli, S., Rachev, S.T. and Stoyanov, S. (2004) Different approaches to risk estimation in portfolio theory. Journal of Portfolio Management 31: 103–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brands, S. and Gallagher, D.R. (2005) Portfolio selection, diversification and fund-of-funds: A note. Accounting & Finance 45: 185–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown, S.J., Goetzmann, W.N. and Liang, B. (2004) Fees on fees in funds of funds. Journal of Investment Management 2: 39–56.Google Scholar
  6. Carhart, M.M. (1997) On persistence in mutual fund performance. Journal of Finance 52: 57–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chan, K., Covrig, V. and Ng, L. (2005) What determines the domestic bias and foreign bias? Evidence from mutual fund equity allocations worldwide. Journal of Finance 60: 1495–1534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Connelly, T.J. (1997) Multi-fund diversification issues. Journal of Financial Planning 10: 34–37.Google Scholar
  9. DiBartolomeo, D. (1999) A Radical Proposal for the Operation of Multi-Manager Investment Funds. working paper. Northfield Information Services.Google Scholar
  10. Fama, E.F. and French, K.R. (1992) The cross-section of expected stock returns. Journal of Finance 47: 427–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fama, E.F. and French, K.R. (1993) Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. Journal of Financial Economics 33: 3–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fama, E.F. and French, K.R. (1998) Value versus growth: The international evidence. Journal of Finance 53: 1975–2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fan, S. (1995) Equity style timing and allocation. In: R. Klein and J. Lederman (eds.) Equity Style Management. Chicago, IL: Irwin.Google Scholar
  14. Farinelli, S., Ferreira, M., Rossello, D., Thoeny, M. and Tibiletti, L. (2009) Optimal asset allocation aid system: From one-size versus tailor-made performance ratio. European Journal of Operational Research 192: 209–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gallagher, D.R. and Gardner, P. (2006) The implications of blending specialist active equity fund management. Journal of Asset Management 7: 31–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gerber, G. (1994) Equity style allocations: Timing between growth and value. In: J. Jederman and R. Klein (eds.) Global Asset Allocation: Techniques for Optimizing Portfolio Management. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  17. Graham, B. and Dodd, D. (1934) Security Analysis. New York and London: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  18. Graham, B. and Dodd, D. (1949) The Intelligent Investor. New York and London: Collins.Google Scholar
  19. Haugen, R. and Baker, N. (1996) Commonality in the determinants of expected stock returns. Journal of Financial Economics 41: 401–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lhabitant, F. and Learned, M. (2003) Hedge fund diversification: How much is enough? Journal of Alternative Investments 5: 49.Google Scholar
  21. Okuyama, N. and Francis, G. (2007) Quantifying the information content of investment decisions in a multiple partial moment framework: Formal definition and applications of generalized conditional risk attribution. Journal of Behavioral Finance 3: 121–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. O'Neal, E.S. (1997) How many mutual funds constitute a diversified mutual fund portfolio? Financial Analysts Journal 53 (2): 37–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Park, J. and Staum, J. (1998) Fund of funds diversification: How much is enough? Journal of Alternative Investments 1: 39–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rachev, S., Menn, C. and Fabozzi, F. (2005) Fat-Tailed and Skewed Asset Return Distributions: Implications for Risk Management, Portfolio Selection, and Option Pricing. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  25. Rachev, S., Ortobelli, S., Stoyanov, S., Fabozzi, F. and Biglova, A. (2008) Desirable properties of an ideal risk measure in portfolio theory. International Journal of Theoretical & Applied Finance 11: 19–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sorensen, E. and Lazzara, C. (1995) Equity style management: The case of growth and value. In: R. Klein and J. Lederman (eds.) Equity Style Management. Chicago, IL: Irwin.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.KIT Karlsruhe Institute of Technology Chair of Statistics, Econometrics & Mathematical FinanceKarlsruheGermany

Personalised recommendations