Contested regional orders and institutional balancing in the Asia Pacific
- 184 Downloads
The rise of the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa) is gradually transforming the international system from a unipolar world toward multipolarity. China’s ascent not only challenges US domination, but also intensifies the institutionalization of security in the Asia Pacific. On the basis of institutional balancing theory, I argue that (i) China’s rise has led to a competition among different regional orders, that is, the US-led bilateralism versus ASEAN-centered and China-supported multilateralism. However, conflicts or wars are not inevitable since the contested regional orders can coexist in the Asia Pacific. (ii) The deepening economic interdependence has encouraged regional powers, including the United States, China and ASEAN, to rely on different institutional balancing strategies to pursue security after the Cold War.
KeywordsASEAN BRICS China US hegemony institutional balancing
- Alagappa, M. (ed.) (2003) The study of international order: An analytical framework. In: Asian Security Order: Instrumental and Normative Features. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 33–69.Google Scholar
- ASEAN (2002) Declaration on the conduct of parties in the South China Sea, http://www.asean.org/asean/external-relations/china/item/declaration-on-the-conduct-of-parties-in-the-south-china-sea, accessed 6 June 2012.
- Asian Development Bank (2008) Emerging Asian Regionalism. Manila, the Philippines: Asian Development Bank.Google Scholar
- Bhadrakumar, M. (2006) China, Russia welcome Iran into the fold. Asian Times 18 April, http://www.atimes.com/atimes/China/HD18Ad02.html, accessed 8 August 2008.
- Bhagwati, J. (2006) Why Asia must opt for open regionalism on trade. Financial Times 3 November, http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/9ba8569c-6ae0-11db-83d9-0000779e2340.html#axzz2mWPgOuqs, accessed 6 June 2012.
- Das, S. (2013) The Trans-Pacific Partnership as a tool to contain China: Myth or reality? East Asia Forum, http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2013/06/08/the-trans-pacific-partnership-as-a-tool-to-contain-china-myth-or-reality/, accessed 7 July 2013.
- He, K. (2009) Institutional Balancing in the Asia-Pacific: Economic Interdependence and China’s Rise. London; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Hiebert, M. and Hanlon, L. (2012) ASEAN and partners launch regional comprehensive economic partnership. Critical Questions, 7 December, http://csis.org/publication/asean-and-partners-launch-regional-comprehensive-economic-partnership, accessed 5 May 2013.
- Ikenberry, G.J. (2008) The rise of China and the future of the West: Can the liberal system survive? Foreign Affairs 87 (1): 23–35.Google Scholar
- Johnston, A. (2008) Social States: China in International Institutions 1980–2000. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Kennedy, P. (1987) The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
- Lee, S. (2012) The Evolutionary Dynamics of Institutional Balancing in East Asia. EAI Working Paper no. 21, Seoul, South Korea.Google Scholar
- Lo, B. (2009) Axis of Convenience: Moscow, Beijing, and the New Geopolitics. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
- Organski, A. (1958) World Politics. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
- Sutter, R. and Huang, C. (2013) China gains and advances in South China Sea. Comparative Connections, January, http://csis.org/files/publication/1203qchina_seasia.pdf, accessed 7 July 2013.
- Tasker, R. (1992) Facing up to security. Far Eastern Economic Review 6 August, p. 9.Google Scholar
- Xinhua News (2013) Chinese FM: Confrontation not conducive to solving South China Sea issues, http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/china/2013-06/27/c_132492885.htm, accessed 7 July 2013.
- Zhu, R. (2001) Strengthening East Asian cooperation and promoting common development, statement by Premier Zhu Rongji of China at the 5th 10+3 Summit, Bandar Seri Begawan, http://www.fmprc.gov.cn, accessed 6 June 2006.