Advertisement

International Politics

, Volume 51, Issue 3, pp 334–349 | Cite as

Socialisation and the liberal order

  • Susan Park
Original Article

Abstract

Constructivists trace how ideas change state and non-state actor identities as a result of socialisation. Rationalists too use the concept of socialisation to explain change in actors’ behaviour. Studies of socialisation examine change through the states’ spreading ideas through pathways such as elite learning and upwards mobilisation from the masses as well as micro-processes of persuasion, social influence and coercion. This article analyses the literature on socialisation to make three claims: one, that contrary to its sociological origin the use of socialisation seems to focus primarily on change in international relations rather than stasis; two, that the focus on capturing change has zeroed in on the cause and extent of change, crossing but also reproducing the constructivist–rationalist divide; and finally, that the concentration of ‘socialisation studies’ on policy fields such as human rights may actually reflect not (only) a scholarly research bias but rather continuity and stasis of the liberal international order.

Keywords

socialisation constructivism rationalism change liberalism international order 

References

  1. Acharya, A. (2009) Whose Ideas Matter? Agency and Power in Asian Regionalism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Acharya, A. (2011) Norm subsidiarity and regional orders: Sovereignty, regionalism, and rule-making in the third world. International Studies Quarterly 55 (1): 95–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adler, E. (1998) Seeds of peaceful change: The OSCE’s community building model. In: E. Adler and M. Barnett (eds.) Security Communities. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 119–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alderson, K. (2001) Making sense of state socialisation. Review of International Studies 27 (3): 415–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Atkinson, C. (2006) Constructivist implications of material power: Military engagement and the socialisation of states, 1972–2000. International Studies Quarterly 50 (3): 509–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barkin, J.S. (2003) Realist-constructivism. International Studies Review 5 (3): 325–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barnes, J., Carter, M. and Skidmore, M. (1980) The World of Politics. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  8. Barnett, M. and Finnemore, M. (2005) The power of liberal international organizations. In: M. Barnett and R. Duvall (eds.) Power in Global Governance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 161–185.Google Scholar
  9. Bearce, D. and Bondanella, S. (2007) Intergovernmental organizations, socialisation and member-state interest convergence. International Organization 61 (4): 703–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Checkel, J. (1999a) Norms, institutions, and national identity in contemporary Europe. International Studies Quarterly 43 (1): 83–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Checkel, J. (1999b) Social construction and integration. Journal of European Public Policy 6 (4): 545–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Checkel, J. (2001) Why comply? Social learning and European identity change. International Organization 55 (3): 553–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Checkel, J. (2003) Going native in Europe? Theorizing social interaction in European institutions. Comparative Political Studies 36 (1/2): 209–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Checkel, J. (2005) International institutions and socialisation in Europe. International Organization 59 (4): 801–1079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Checkel, J. and Moravcsik, A. (2001) A constructivist research program in EU studies? European Union Politics 2 (2): 219–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Clausen, J. (1968) Socialisation and Society. Boston, MA: Little Brown.Google Scholar
  17. Epstein, C. (2012) Stop telling us how to behave: Socialisation or infantilisation. International Studies Perspective 13 (2): 135–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Finnemore, M. (1996) National Interests in International Society. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Finnemore, M. and Sikkink, K. (1998) International norm dynamics and political change. International Organization 52 (4): 887–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Flockhart, T. (2006) Complex socialisation: A framework for the study of state socialisation. European Journal of International Relations 12 (1): 89–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Greenhill, B. (2010) The company you keep: International socialisation and the diffusion of human rights norms. International Studies Quarterly 54 (1): 127–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Harrison, E. (2004) State socialisation, international norm dynamics and the liberal peace. International Politics 41 (4): 521–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hurd, I. (1999) Legitimacy and authority in international politics. International Organization 53 (2): 379–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ikenberry, J. and Kupchan, C. (1990) Socialisation and hegemonic power. International Organization 44 (3): 283–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. International Organization. (2005) Special edition on the internationalization of Europe, 59(4).Google Scholar
  26. Jacobson, H. (1984) Networks of Independence, 2nd edn. New York: Alfred A Knopf.Google Scholar
  27. Johnston, A. (2001) Treating international institutions as social environments. International Studies Quarterly 45 (4): 487–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Johnston, A. (2008) Social States: China in International Institutions 1980–2000. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Kantz, C. (2007) The power of socialisation: Engaging the diamond industry in the Kimberly process. Business and Politics 9 (3): 1–20.Google Scholar
  30. Keck, M. and Sikkink, K. (1998) Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Kelley, J. (2004) International actors on the domestic scene: Membership conditionality and socialisation by international institutions. International Organization 58 (3): 425–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kent, A. (2002) China’s international socialisation: The role of international organizations. Global Governance 8 (3): 343–364.Google Scholar
  33. Lewis, J. (2003) Institutional environments and everyday EU decision making: Rationalist or constructivist? Comparative Political Studies 36 (1/2): 97–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Linden, R. (ed.) (2002) Norms and Nannies: The Impact of International Organizations on the Central and East European States. Lanham, MD: Roman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  35. March, J. and Olsen, J. (1989) Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizations Basis of Politics. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  36. Park, S. (2010) The World Bank Group and Environmentalists: Changing International Organization Identities. London: Manchester University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Park, S. and Vetterlein, A. (2010) Owning Development: Creating Global Policy Norms in the IMF and the World Bank. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Risse, T., Ropp, S. and Sikkink, K. (eds.) (1999) The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ruggie, J.G. (1982) International regimes, transactions, and change: Embedded liberalism in the postwar economic order. International Organization 36 (2): 379–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schimmelfennig, F. (2000) International socialisation in the New Europe: Rational action in an institutional environment. European Journal of International Relations 6 (1): 109–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schimmelfennig, F. (2001) The community trap: Liberal norms, rhetorical action, and the Eastern enlargement of the European Union. International Organization 55 (1): 47–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schimmelfennig, F. (2003) Rules and Rhetoric: The EU, NATO and the Integration of Europe. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schimmelfennig, F. (2005) Strategic calculation and international socialisation: Membership incentives, party constellations, and sustained compliance in Central and Eastern Europe. International Organization 59 (4): 827–860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Steele, B. (2007) Liberal-idealism: A constructivist critique. International Studies Review 9 (1): 23–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sterling-Folker, J. (2000) Competing paradigms or birds of a feather? Constructivism and neoliberalism compared. International Studies Quarterly 44 (1): 97–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Thies, C. (2003) Sense and sensibility in the study of state socialisation: A reply to Kai Alderson. Review of International Studies 29 (4): 543–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. True, J. and Mintrom, M. (2001) Transnational networks and policy diffusion: The case of gender mainstreaming. International Studies Quarterly 45 (1): 27–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Waltz, K. (1979) Theory of International Politics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publications.Google Scholar
  49. Wang, Q. (2003) Hegemony and socialisation of the mass public: The case of postwar Japan’s cooperation with the United States on China policy. Review of International Studies 29 (1): 99–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wendt, A. (1999) Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Widmaier, W. and Park, S. (2012) Differences beyond theory: Structural, strategic, and sentimental approaches to normative change. International Studies Perspectives 13 (2): 123–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wiener, A. (2004) Contested compliance: Interventions on the normative structure of world politics. European Journal of International Relations 10 (2): 189–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wiener, A. (2008) The Invisible Constitution of Politics: Contested Norms and International Encounters. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Zurn, M. and Checkel, J. (2005) Getting socialized to build bridges: Constructivism, rationalism and the Nation-State. International Organization 59 (4): 1045–1079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Susan Park
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Government and International RelationsThe University of SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations