International Politics

, Volume 49, Issue 3, pp 297–317 | Cite as

Horsemen of the apocalypse? Jihadist strategy and nuclear instability in South Asia

  • Andrew Phillips
Original Article
First Online:

Abstract

Since 9/11, counter-terrorism officials have fretted over the possibility of jihadist terrorists obtaining and deploying a nuclear weapon. Although acknowledging that such anxieties are well grounded, I offer here a reconceptualisation of the jihadist terrorist nuclear threat that focuses alternatively upon the remote but real possibility that jihadist terrorists may seek to advance their goals by trying to provoke an Indo–Pakistani nuclear confrontation. Such a confrontation would serve jihadist goals by aggravating religious polarisation on the sub-continent while dramatically weakening the Pakistani state. The system-destabilising consequences of such a catastrophe would likely also offer the jihadists their best opportunity to revive their faltering movement, which otherwise appears fated to terminal decline. In the light of this assessment, I argue that a higher priority must be accorded towards strengthening Indo–Pakistani crisis stability and advancing regional reconciliation if the risk of a jihadist-provoked nuclear exchange is to be minimised.

Keywords

terrorism nuclear weapons jihadism South Asia international order 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Albright, D. (2010) Peddling Peril: How the Secret Nuclear Trade Arms America’s Enemies. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  2. Al-Fahd, Nb.H. (2003) A treatise on the legal status of using weapons of mass destruction against infidels, http://carnegieendowment.org/static/npp/fatwa.pdf, accessed 15 September 2010.
  3. Ayson, R. (2010) After a terrorist nuclear attack: Envisaging catalytic effects. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 33 (7): 571–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bergen, P. and Hoffman, B. (2010) Assessing the terrorist threat – A report of the bipartisan policy center's national security preparedness group, http://www.bipartisanpolicy.org/library/report/assessing-terrorist-threat, accessed 15 September 2010.
  5. Bunn, M. (2009) Reducing the greatest risks of nuclear theft and terrorism. Daedalus 138 (4): 112–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carranza, M.E. (2007) From non-proliferation to post-proliferation: Explaining the US–India nuclear deal. Contemporary Security Policy 28 (3): 464–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cronin, A.K. (2010) The evolution of counterterrorism: Will tactics trump strategy? International Affairs 86 (4): 837–856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Davis, Z. (2009) Stepping back from the brink: Avoiding a nuclear march of folly in South Asia. Arms Control Today 39 (1): 21–22.Google Scholar
  9. Director of National Intelligence. (2006) Declassified key judgements of the national intelligence estimate ‘Trends in Global Terrorism: Implications for the United States’ Dated April 2006, http://www.dni.gov/press_releases/Declassified_NIE_Key_Judgments.pdf, accessed 15 September 2010.
  10. Doran, M.S. (2002) Somebody else's civil war. Foreign Affairs 81 (1): 22–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fair, C.C. (2011) Lashkar-e-Tayiba and the Pakistani state. Survival 53 (4): 29–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fair, C.C. and Jones, S.G. (2009) Pakistan's war within. Survival 51 (6): 161–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fishman, B. (2008) Using the mistakes of Al Qaeda's franchises to undermine its strategies. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 618 (1): 46–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ganguly, S. and Kapur, S.P. (2010) The sorcerer's apprentice: Islamist militancy in South Asia. The Washington Quarterly 33 (1): 47–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gerges, F.A. (2005) The Far Enemy: Why Jihad Went Global. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Goldberg, E. (1991) Smashing idols and the state: The protestant ethic and Sunni radicalism. Comparative Studies in Society and History 33 (1): 3–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hathaway, R.M. (2008) Leverage and largesse: Pakistan's post-9/11 partnership with America. Contemporary South Asia 16 (1): 11–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hegghammer, T. (2006) Global Jihadism after the Iraq war. The Middle East Journal 60 (1): 11–32.Google Scholar
  19. Johnson, T.H. and Mason, C. (2008) No sign until the burst of fire: Understanding the Pakistan-Afghanistan frontier. International Security 32 (4): 41–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jones, S.G. (2008) The rise of Afghanistan's insurgency: State failure and Jihad. International Security 32 (4): 7–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kepel, G. (2003) The origins and development of the Jihadist movement: From anti-communism to terrorism. Asian Affairs XXXIV (II): 91–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kepel, G. (2006) Jihad – The Trail of Political Islam, 4th edn. London: I.B. Taurus.Google Scholar
  23. Krepon, M. (2009) Prospects for nuclear risk reduction in Southern Asia. Strategic Analysis 33 (3): 426–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ladwig III, W.C. (2007/08) A cold start for hot wars? The Indian army's new limited war doctrine. International Security 32 (3): 158–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lamb, C. (2010) Elite US troops ready to combat Pakistani nuclear hijacks. The Sunday Times 17 January 2010, http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/asia/article6991056.ece, accessed 15 September 2010.
  26. Levi, M.A. (2007) On Nuclear Terrorism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Lowenheim, O. and Steele, B.J. (2010) Institutions of violence, great power authority, and the war on terror. International Political Science Review 31 (1): 23–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mendelsohn, B. (2005) Sovereignty under attack: The international society meets the Al Qaeda network. Review of International Studies 31 (1): 45–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mendelsohn, B. (2009) Combating Jihadism: American Hegemony and Interstate Cooperation in the War on Terrorism. Chicago, IL; London: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Meyer, J. (1980) The world polity and the authority of the nation-state. In: A. Bergeson (ed.) Studies of the Modern World-System. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  31. Mueller, J. (2009) The atomic terrorist? Assessing the likelihood, http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/documents/MUELLER_atomicterrorist.pdf, accessed 15 September 2010.
  32. Mullick, H.A.H. (2010) The Pakistani surge – The way forward for counter-insurgency. Special Report 33. Canberra: Australian Strategic Policy Institute, http://www.aspi.org.au/publications/publication_details.aspx?ContentID=262, accessed 15 September 2010.
  33. O'Neil, A. (2003) Terrorist use of weapons of mass destruction: How serious is the threat? Australian Journal of International Affairs 57 (1): 99–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Phillips, A. (2009) How Al Qaeda lost Iraq. Australian Journal of International Affairs 63 (1): 64–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Phillips, A. (2010) The protestant ethic and the spirit of jihadism: Transnational religious insurgencies and the transformation of international orders. Review of International Studies 36 (02): 257–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Phillips, A. (2011) War, Religion and Empire: The Transformation of International Orders. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Reus-Smit, C. (1999) The Moral Purpose of the State: Culture, Social Identity, and Institutional Rationality in International Relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Riedel, B. (2008) Pakistan and terror: The eye of the storm. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 618 (1): 31–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Riedel, B. and Saab, B.Y. (2008) Al Qaeda's third front: Saudi Arabia. The Washington Quarterly 31 (2): 33–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rising extremism in South Asia. (2010) Strategic Comments 16 (1): 1–3.Google Scholar
  41. Romaniuk, P. (2010) Institutions as swords and shields: Multilateral counter-terrorism since 9/11. Review of International Studies 36 (03): 591–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rosand, E. (2007) The UN-led multilateral institutional response to jihadist terrorism: Is a global counter-terrorism body needed? Journal of Conflict and Security Law 11 (3): 399–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rubin, B.R. and Rashid, A. (2008) From great game to grand bargain. Foreign Affairs 87 (6): 30–44.Google Scholar
  44. Sageman, M. (2004) Understanding Terror Networks. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sageman, M. (2009) Confronting Al-Qaeda: Understanding the threat in Afghanistan and beyond – Testimony to the senate foreign relations committee. 7 October 2009, http://www.fpri.org/transcripts/20091007.Sageman.ConfrontingalQaeda.pdf, accessed 30 November 2011.
  46. Salama, S. and Hansell, L. (2005) Does intent equal capability? Al-Qaeda and weapons of mass destruction. The Nonproliferation Review 12 (3): 615–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Scheuer, M. (2006) Central Asia in Al Qaeda's vision of the Anti-American jihad. China and Eurasia Forum Quarterly 4 (2): 5–10.Google Scholar
  48. Suskind, R. (2006) The One Percent Doctrine: Deep Inside America's Pursuit of Its Enemies Since 9/11. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  49. Talmadge, C. (2007) Deterring a nuclear 9/11. The Washington Quarterly 30 (2): 21–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Taylor, C. (2002) Modern social imaginaries. Public Culture 14 (1): 91–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Thomson, J.E. (1994) Mercenaries, Pirates, and Sovereigns: State-building and Extraterritorial Violence in Early Modern Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Walker, W. (1998) International nuclear relations after the Indian and Pakistani test explosions. International Affairs 74 (3): 505–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Walker, W. (2011) A Perpetual Menace: Nuclear Weapons and International Order. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  54. Wright, T. and Gorman, S. (2010) Militants overtake India as top threat, says Pakistan’s ISI. The Wall Street Journal 16 August 2010, http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703908704575433433670192748.html, accessed 15 September 2010.
  55. Zahab, A.Z. and Roy, O. (2003) Islamist Networks – The Afghan-Pakistan Connection. London: C. Hurst & Co.Google Scholar
  56. Zimmerman, J.C. (2004) Sayyid Qutb's influence on the 11 September attacks. Terrorism and Political Violence 16 (2): 222–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zirulnick, A. (2011) Pakistani Minister – India-Pakistan ‘trust deficit’ is shrinking. Christian Science Monitor 9 November 2011, http://www.csmonitor.com/World/terrorism-security/2011/1109/Pakistani-minister-India-Pakistan-trust-deficit-is-shrinking, accessed 28 November 2011.

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrew Phillips
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Political Science and International Studies, University of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations