International Politics

, Volume 49, Issue 2, pp 238–259 | Cite as

Re-thinking scales and culture: Rome and the city in and beyond IPE

  • Nana Rodaki
Original Article

Abstract

The article argues that critical International Political Economy can benefit from a trans-disciplinary approach to the role of cities as socio-economic actors in the global political economy. The constitution and exercise of agency is far from an automatic response to the global restructuring of capitalist social relations, but the product of historically and context-specific economic and extra-economic social processes and social struggles. Cities (re)emerge as subjects and objects of governance and intervention and seek to become (dis)embedded in multi-scalar networks of economic and symbolic power. In this process, they become active co-producers of the global political economy, in ways that cut across spatial scales and narrow geographical imaginations.

Keywords

IPE cities Robert Cox culture scalar power 

References

  1. Agnew, J. (1987) Place and Politics: The Geographical Mediation of State and Society. Boston, MA: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  2. Agnew, J. (1994) The territorial trap: The geographical assumptions of international relations theory. Review of International Political Economy 1 (1): 53–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Agnew, J. (1995) The hidden geographies of social science and the myth of the ‘Geographical Turn’. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 13 (4): 379–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Agnew, J. and Corbridge, S. (1995) Mastering Space: Hegemony, Territory and International Political Economy. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Amin, A. and Palan, R. (1996) The need to historicize IPE. RIPE 3 (2): 209–215.Google Scholar
  6. Amin, A. and Thrift, N. (2002) Cities: Reimagining the Urban. Oxford: Polity.Google Scholar
  7. Amin, A. and Thrift, N. (2004) The Blackwell Cultural Economy Reader. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Amoore, L., Dodgson, R., Germain, R.D., Gills, B.K., Langley, P. and Watson, I. (2000) Paths to a historicized international political economy. Review of International Political Economy 7 (1): 53–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ashley, R.K. (1983) Three modes of economism. International Studies Quarterly 27 (4): 463–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bagnasco, A. (1977) Tre Italie: La Problematica Territoriale dello Sviluppo Italiano. Bologna, Italy: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
  11. Barnett, C. (1998) The cultural turn: Fashion or progress in human geography? Antipode 30 (4): 379–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bartolini, F. (2006) Roma, Milano, Rivali d’Italia. Roma: Laterza.Google Scholar
  13. Bates, S.R. and Smith, N. (2008) Understanding change in political science: On the need to bring space into theoretical positions and empirical analyses. Political Studies Review 6 (2): 191–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bedani, G. and Haddock, B. (2000) The Politics of Italian National Identity. Cardiff, UK: University of Wales Press.Google Scholar
  15. Bernstein, B. (1990) The Structuring of Pedagogic Discourse. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Brenner, N. (1998) Global cities, glocal states: Global city formation and state territorial restructuring in contemporary Europe. Review of International Political Economy 5 (1): 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Brenner, N. (2001) The limits to scale? Methodological reflections on scalar structuration. Progress in Human Geography 25 (4): 591–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bryman, A. (2004) The Disneyization of Society. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  19. Caracciolo, A. (1999) Roma Capitale dal Risorgimento alla Crisi dello Stato Liberale. Roma: Editori Riuniti.Google Scholar
  20. Castells, M. (2000) Materials for an exploratory theory of the network society. British Journal of Sociology 51 (1): 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Charnock, G. (2010) The space of international political economy: On scale and its limits. Politics 30 (1): 79–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cianciullo, A. and Realacci, E. (2005) Soft Economy. Milano: RCS Libri, S.p.A.Google Scholar
  23. Collinge, C. (1999) Self-organisation of society by scale: A spatial reworking of regulation theory. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 17 (5): 557–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Costanzo, M. (2003) La Percezione di Roma. In: A. Aronica et al (eds.) Roma: Dieci Anni di una Capitale. Roma: Donzelli, pp. 131–134.Google Scholar
  25. Cox, K.R. (1991) Questions of abstraction in studies in the new urban politics. Journal of Urban Affairs 13 (3): 267–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Cox, K.R. (1993) The local and the global in the new urban politics: A critical view. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 11 (4): 433–448.Google Scholar
  27. Cox, K.R. and Mair, A. (1991) From localised social structures to localities as agents. Environment and Planning A 23 (2): 197–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Cox, R. (1981) Social forces, states and world orders: Beyond international relations. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 10 (2): 126–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Cox, R. (1989) Production, the state and change in world order. In: E.O. Czempiel and J.N. Rosenau (eds.) Approaches to World Politics for the 1990s. Toronto: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  30. Crang, P. (1997) Cultural turns and the (re)constitution of economic geography. In: R. Lee and J. Wills (eds.) Geographies of Economies. London: Arnold, pp. 3–15.Google Scholar
  31. d'Albergo, E. (2006) The glocal mayor. The politics of Rome's international and transnational agency. Quaderni di Ricerca del Dipartimento Innovazione e Società, Università di Roma ‘Sapienza’.Google Scholar
  32. Davis, J.A. (ed.) (1979) Gramsci and Italy's Passive Revolution. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
  33. Deleuze, G. and Guattari, F. (1987) A Thousand Plateaus, Translated by B. Massumi. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  34. De Muro, P., Monni, S. and Tridico, P. (2010) Knowledge-based economy and social exclusion: Shadows and lights in the Roman socio-economic model. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 35 (6): 1212–1238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Drainville, A.C. (2004) Contesting Globalization, Space and Place in the World Economy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. Elmhorn, C. (2001) Brussels, A Reflexive World City. Stockholm, Sweden: Almqvist and Wiksell International.Google Scholar
  37. Esser, J. and Hirsch, J. (1994) The crisis of Fordism and the dimensions of ‘Post-Fordist’ regional and urban structure. In: A. Amin (ed.) Post-Fordism: A Reader. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 71–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Fairclough, N. (1992) Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  39. Fitzgerald, F., Ely, J. and Cox, K. (1990) Urban economic development strategies in the USA. Local Economy 7 (4): 278–289.Google Scholar
  40. Florida, R. (2002) The Rise of the Creative Class: And How It's Transforming Work, Leisure, Community and Everyday Life. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  41. Foot, J. (2003) Modern Italy. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
  42. Fotia, C. (2006) Roma Città Futura: Come si è Trasformata la Capitale d’Italia. Lecce, Italy: Manni.Google Scholar
  43. Fraser, N. (2003) Social justice in the age of identity politics: Redistribution, recognition and participation. In: N. Fraser and A. Honneth (eds.) Redistribution or Recognition? A Political-philosophical Exchange. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  44. Friedmann, J. (1986) The world city hypothesis. Development and Change 17 (1): 69–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Friedmann, J. (1995) Where we stand: A decade of world city research. In: P. Knox and P. Taylor (eds.) World Cities in a World-System. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 21–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Gaffikin, F. and Warf, B. (1993) Urban policy and the post-Keynesian state in the United Kingdom and the United States. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 17 (1): 67–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Genieys, W., Ballart, X. and Valarié, P. (2004) From ‘Great’ leaders to building networks: The emergence of a new urban leadership in Southern Europe? International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 28 (1): 183–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Governa, F. and Salone, C. (2004) Territories in action, territories for action: The territorial dimension of Italian local development policies. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 28 (4): 796–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Gramsci, A. (1971) Selections from the Prison Notebooks. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
  50. Gramsci, A. (1995) The Southern Question. Toronto: Guernica Editions.Google Scholar
  51. Hall, T. and Hubbard, P. (1996) The entrepreneurial city: New urban politics, new urban geographies? Progress in Human Geography 20 (2): 153–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Hall, T. and Hubbard, P. (1998) The Entrepreneurial City: Geographies of Politics, Regime and Representation. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  53. Harvey, D. (1989a) From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: The transformation in urban governance in late capitalism, Geografiska Annaler. Series B, Human Geography 71 (1): 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Harvey, D. (1989b) The Urban Experience. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  55. Hospers, G.J. (2003) Creative cities: Breeding places in the knowledge economy. Knowledge, Technology & Policy 16 (3): 143–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Howitt, R. (1998) Scale as relation: Musical metaphors of geographical scale. Area 30 (1): 49–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Howitt, R. (2007) Scale. In: J. Agnew (ed.) A Companion to Political Geography. New Jersey: Wiley & Sons, pp. 138–157.Google Scholar
  58. Jameson, F. (1981) Postmodernism: Or the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. London: Verson.Google Scholar
  59. Jessop, B. (1997a) The entrepreneurial city: Re-imaging localities, redesigning economic governance, or restructuring capital? In: N. Jewson and S. Macgregor (eds.) Transforming Cities: Contested Governance and New Spatial Divisions. London Routledge, pp. 28–41.Google Scholar
  60. Jessop, B. (1997b) A neo-Gramscian approach to the regulation of urban regimes: Accumulation strategies, hegemonic projects and governance. In: M. Lauria (ed.) Reconstructing Urban Regime Theory: Regulating Urban Politics in a Global Economy. London: Sage, pp. 51–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Jessop, B. (1998) The narrative of enterprise and the enterprise of narrative: Place-marketing and the entrepreneurial city. In: T. Hall and P. Hubbard (eds.) The Entrepreneurial City. London: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 77–102.Google Scholar
  62. Jessop, B. (2009) Avoiding the traps, rescaling states, governing Europe. In: R. Keil and R. Mahon (eds.) Leviathan Undone? Towards a Political Economy of Scale. Vancouver: The University of British Columbia, pp. 87–104.Google Scholar
  63. Jessop, B., Brenner, N. and Jones, M. (2008) Theorizing socio-spatial relations. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 26 (3): 389–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Jessop, B. and Sum, N.L. (2000) An entrepreneurial city in action: Hong Kong's emerging strategies in and for (inter)urban competition. Urban Studies 37 (12): 2287–2313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Jessop, B. and Sum, N.L. (2001) Pre-disciplinary and post-disciplinary perspectives. New Political Economy 6 (1): 89–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Jessop, B. and Sum, N.L. (2006a) Towards a cultural international political economy: Poststructuralism and the Italian school. In: M. de Goede (ed.) International Political Economy and Poststructural Politics. Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 157–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Jessop, B. and Sum, N.L. (2006b) Beyond the Regulation Approach: Putting Capitalist Economies in their Place. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Jonas, A.E.G. and Wilson, D. (eds.) (1999) The city as a growth machine: Critical reflections two decades later. The Urban Growth Machine, Critical Perspectives Two Decades Later. New York: State University of NY Press, pp. 3–18.Google Scholar
  69. Jouve, B. (2007) Urban societies and dominant political coalitions in the internationalization of the cities. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 25 (3): 374–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Judd, D. and Ready, R. (1986) Entrepreneurial cities and the new politics of economic development. In: G.E. Peterson and C.W. Lewis (eds.) Reagan and the Cities. Washington DC: The Urban Institute, pp. 209–217.Google Scholar
  71. Kirlin, J.J. and Marshall, D.R. (1988) Urban governance and the new politics of entrepreneurship. In: M. McGeary and L. Lynn (eds.) Urban Change and Poverty. Washington DC: National Academic Press, pp. 348–373.Google Scholar
  72. Knox, P.L. (1995) World cities in a world system. In: P.L. Knox and P.J. Taylor (eds.) World Cities in a World System. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Lacher, H. (2008) History, structure and world orders: On the (cross-)purposes of neo-Gramscian theory. In: A.J. Ayers (ed.) Gramsci, Political Economy and International Relations Theory: Modern Princes and Naked Emperors. New York: Palgrave MacMillan, pp. 45–65.Google Scholar
  74. Langley, P. (2002) World Financial Orders: An Historical International Political Economy. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Lash, S. (1990) Postmoderinist Sociology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  76. Lash, S. and Urry, J. (1994) Economies of Signs and Space. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  77. Law, J. (1999) After ANT: Complexity, naming and topology. In: J. Law and J. Hassard (eds.) Actor Network Theory and After. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 1–15.Google Scholar
  78. Leitner, H. (1990) Cities in pursuit of economic growth: The local state as entrepreneur. Political Geography Quarterly 9 (2): 146–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Leontidou, L. (1996) Alternative to modernism in (southern) urban theory: Exploring in-between spaces. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 20 (2): 178–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Lipietz, A. (1993) The local and the global: Regional individuality or interregionalism, transactions. Institute of British Geographers 18 (1): 8–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Lipietz, A. (2003) The national and the regional: Their autonomy vis-à-vis the capitalist world crisis. In: N. Brenner and B. Jessop (eds.) State/Space: A Reader. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 239–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Longhurst, R. (2000) Bodies: Exploring Fluid Boundaries. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  83. Marcuse, P. (2005) ‘The City’ as perverse metaphor. City 9 (2): 247–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Massey, D. (1985) Spatial Divisions of Labor. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  85. Massey, D. (1993) Power-geometry and a progressive sense of place. In: J. Bird, B. Curtis, T. Putman, G. Robertson and L. Tickner (eds.) Mapping the Futures: Local Cultures, Global Change. London: Routledge, pp. 59–69.Google Scholar
  86. Mayer, M. (1994) Post-Fordist city politics. In: A. Amin (ed.) Post-Fordism: A Reader. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 316–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. McCann, E.J. (2002) The urban as an object of study in global cities literatures: Representational practices and conceptions of place and scale. In: A. Herod and M. Wright (eds.) Geographies of Power. London: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 61–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. McCann, E.J. (2004) Urban political economy beyond the ‘Global City’. Urban Studies 41 (12): 2315–2333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. McNeill, D. (2001a) Embodying a Europe of the cities: The geographies of mayoral leadership. Area 33 (4): 353–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. McNeill, D. (2001b) Rutelli's Rome: Mayors and personality politics in Italy. European Urban and Regional Studies 8 (3): 253–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. McNeill, D. (2003) Rome, global city? Church, state and the jubilee 2000. Political Geography 22 (5): 535–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Mol, A. and Law, J. (1994) Regions, networks and fluids: Anaemia and social topology. Social Studies of Science 24 (4): 641–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Molotch, H. (1976) The city as a growth machine: Toward a political economy of place. American Journal of Sociology 82 (2): 309–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Morton, A.D. (2007) Unravelling Gramsci: Hegemony and Passive Revolution in the Global Political Economy. London: Pluto.Google Scholar
  95. Morton, A.D. (2010) The continuum of passive revolution. Capital & Class 34 (3): 315–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Murphy, A. (1999) Living together separately, thoughts on the relationship between political science and political geography. Political Geography 18 (8): 887–894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Oliver, M.J. (2009) Economic history and the international political economy. In: M. Blyth (ed.) Routledge Handbook of International Political Economy (IPE), IPE as a Global Conversation. London: Routledge, pp. 280–289.Google Scholar
  98. Pagnotta, G. (2006) Sindaci a Roma. Il Governo della Capitale dal Dopoguerra a Oggi. Roma: Donzelli.Google Scholar
  99. Paul, D.E. (2002) Re-scaling IPE: Subnational states and the regulation of the global political economy. Review of International Political Economy 9 (3): 465–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Paul, D.E. (2004) World cities as hegemonic projects: The politics of global imagineering in Montreal. Political Geography 23 (5): 571–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Paul, D.E. (2005) Rescaling International Political Economy, Subnational States and the Regulation of the Global Political Economy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  102. Picchio, N. (2006) L’‘Italian Concept’ a Palazzo Chigi. Il Sole 24 Ore, 5 May.Google Scholar
  103. Pine, J. and Gilmore, J. (1999) The Experience Economy, Work Is Theatre and Every Business a Stage. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Scholl Press.Google Scholar
  104. Porter, M. (1998) Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. New York: Free Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Ray, L. and Sayer, A. (eds.) (1999) Introduction. Culture and Economy after the Cultural Turn. London: Sage, pp. 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Robinson, J. (2002) Global and world cities: A view from off the map. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 26 (3): 531–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Sassen, S. (1991) The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  108. Sassen, S. (1996) Cities in a World Economy. London: Pine Forge Press.Google Scholar
  109. Sayer, A. (2000) Critical and uncritical cultural turns. In: I. Cook, D. Crouch, S. Naylor and J. Ryan (eds.) Cultural Turns/Geographical Turns. Harlow, UK: Prentice Hall, pp. 166–181.Google Scholar
  110. Sayer, A. (2001) For a critical cultural political economy. Antipode 33 (4): 687–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Shields, R. (1991) Places on the Margin: Alternative Geographies of Modernity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  112. Smith, N. (1984) Uneven Development. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  113. Soja, E. (1989) Postmodern Geographies: The Reassertion of Space in Critical Social Theory. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  114. Somers, M.R. (1999) The privatization of citizenship: How to unthink a knowledge culture. In: V.E. Bonnell and L. Hunt (eds.) Beyond the Cultural Turn: New Directions in the Study of Society and Culture. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, pp. 121–164.Google Scholar
  115. Stoker, G. (1995) Regime theory and urban politics. In: D. Judge, G. Stoker and H. Wolman (eds.) Theories of Urban Politics. London: Sage, pp. 54–71.Google Scholar
  116. Stone, C.N. (1989) Regime Politics: Governing Atlanta, 1946–1988. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
  117. Swanson, J. (2005) Recognition and redistribution: Rethinking culture and the economic. Theory, Culture and Society 22 (4): 87–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Swyngedouw, E. (1997) Neither global nor local: ‘Glocalization’ and the politics of scale. In: K. Cox (ed.) Spaces of Globalization: Reasserting the Power of the Local. New York: Guilford Press, pp. 137–166.Google Scholar
  119. Swyngedouw, E. (2005) Marxism, historical geographical materialism and the political-economy of capitalism. Demologos. (Development Models and Logics of SocioEconomic Organisation in Space) Research Project, http://demologos.ncl.ac.uk.
  120. Taylor, P.J. (1993) Political Geography: World Economy, Nation-state and Locality. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  121. Taylor, P.J. (2004) World City Network: A Global Urban Analysis. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  122. Thomas, P. (2003) The recontextualization of management: A discourse-based approach to analysing the development of management thinking. Journal of Management Studies 40 (4): 775–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. van der Wusten, H. (2004) The distribution of political centrality in the European state system. Political Geography 23 (6): 667–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. van der Wusten, H. (2007) Political world cities: Where flows through entwined multi-state and transnational networks meet places. In: P.J. Taylor, B. Derudder, P. Saey and F. Witlox (eds.) Cities in Globalization: Practices, Policies and Theories. London: Routledge, pp. 212–228.Google Scholar
  125. Veltroni, W. (2004) Rome a champion for peace and tolerance, http://www.worldmayor.com/manifestos05/rome_05.html, accessed 5 May 2010.
  126. Veltroni, W. (2006) Il ‘Modello Roma’. Italianieuropei 1/2006: 143–148.Google Scholar
  127. Vendittelli, M. (1984) Roma Capitale/Roma Comune, Sviluppo Economico e Crescita Urbana della Città. Roma: Gangemi.Google Scholar
  128. Watson, M. (2005) Foundations of International Political Economy. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  129. Wood, A. (1998) Making sense of urban entrepreneurialism. Scottish Geographical Review 114 (2): 120–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nana Rodaki
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PoliticsPhilosophy and Religion, Lancaster UniversityLancasterUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations