Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Political Science and the American Empire: A Disciplinary History of the ‘Politics’ Section and the Discourse of Imperialism and Colonialism

  • International Relations Before Carr
  • Published:
International Politics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The article reconstructs the early 20th century conversation among American political scientists about colonialism, imperialism, and empire. This account of the early disciplinary history of the sub-field of International Relations challenges the conventional claims that the field was not established until the end of World War I and that the subsequent period was characterized by idealism. The principal focus is on the contributions of Paul S. Reinsch who was a central figure in carving out a discrete discourse about international politics. Reinsch's work is a testimony to vibrant conversation about international politics that was taking place well before the conclusion of the Great War. This conversation focused on the topics of imperialism and colonialism, and formed the nucleus of the Politics section of the American Political Science Association.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bartelson, J. (2001) The Critique of the State, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, J.W. (1934) The Reminiscences of an American Scholar, New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, M. (2004) ‘Empire, Imperialism and the Bush Doctrine’, Review of International Studies 30 (4): 585–608.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dryzek, J.S. and Leonard, S.T. (1988) ‘History and Discipline in Political Science’, American Political Science Review 82 (4): 1245–1260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farr, J. (1993) ‘Political Science and the State’, in J. Farr and R. Seidelman (eds.) Discipline and History: Political Science in the United States, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gettell, R.G. (1910) Introduction to Political Science, New York: Ginn and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddings, F.H. (1898) ‘Imperialism?’ Political Science Quarterly 13 (4): 585–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunnell, J.G. (1993) The Descent of Political Theory: The Genealogy of an American Vocation, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ireland, A. (1906) ‘On the Need for a Scientific Study of Colonial Administration’, Proceedings of the American Political Science Association 3: 210–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judis, J.B. (2004) ‘Imperial Amnesia’, Foreign Policy 143: 50–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahler, M. (1997) ‘Inventing International Relations: International Relations Theory After 1945’, in M. Doyle and G.J. Ikenberry (eds.) New Thinking in International Relations Theory, Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leacock, S. (1906) Elements of Political Science, Boston: Houghton, Mifflin and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippmann, W. (1915) The Stakes of Diplomacy, New York: Henry Holt and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, D. and Schmidt, B.C. (eds.) (2005) Imperialism and Internationalism in the Discipline of International Relations, Albany, NY: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, H.C. (1904) ‘Discussion’, Proceedings of the American Political Science Association 1: 139–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, H.C. (1906) ‘Some Effects of Outlying Dependencies Upon the People of the United States’, Proceedings of the American Political Science Association 3: 194–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moses, B. (1906) ‘The Control of the Dependencies Inhabited by the Less Developed Races’, in H.J. Rogers (ed.) Congress of Arts and Sciences, Vol. 7, Boston: Houghton, Mifflin and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, W.C. and Groom, A.J.R. (1991) International Relations Then & Now: Origins and Trends in Interpretation, London: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osiander, A. (1998) ‘Rereading Early Twentieth-Century IR Theory: Idealism Revisited’, International Studies Quarterly 42 (3): 409–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pugach, N.H. (1970) Paul S. Reinsch: Open Door Diplomat in Action, Millwood, NY: KTO Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinsch, P.S. (1900) World Politics at the End of the Nineteenth Century as Influenced by the Oriental Situation, New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinsch, P.S. (1902) Colonial Government, New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinsch, P.S. (1903) ‘Review of Imperialism: A Study, by J.A. Hobson’, Political Science Quarterly 18 (3): 531–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinsch, P.S. (1904a) ‘Colonial Autonomy, With Special Reference to the Government of the Philippine Islands’, Proceedings of the American Political Science Association 1: 116–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinsch, P.S. (1904b) ‘The American Political Science Association’, Iowa Journal of History and Politics 2: 155–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinsch, P.S. (1905) Colonial Administration, New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinsch, P.S. (1906) ‘The Problems of Colonial Administration’, in H.J. Rogers (ed.) Congress of Arts and Sciences, Vol. 7, Boston: Houghton, Mifflin and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinsch, P.S. (1911) Public International Unions Their Work and Organization: A Study in International Administrative Law, Boston: Ginn and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, B.C. (1998a) ‘Lessons from the Past: Reassessing the Interwar Disciplinary History of International Relations’, International Studies Quarterly 42 (3): 433–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, B.C. (1998b) The Political Discourse of Anarchy: A Disciplinary History of International Relations, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, A.H. (1902) The Administration of Dependencies: A Study of the Evolution of the Federal Empire, With Special Reference to American Colonial Problems, New York: G.P. Putnam's Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, A.H. (1908) ‘Neutralization Versus Imperialism’, American Journal of International Law 2 (3): 562–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theis, C.G. (2002) ‘Progress, History, and Identity in International Relations Theory: The Case of the Idealist-Realist Debate’, European Journal of International Relations 8 (2): 147–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vasquez, J.A. (1998) The Power of Power Politics: From Classical Realism to Neotraditionalism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitalis, R. (2005) ‘Birth of a Discipline’, in D. Long and B.C. Schmidt (eds.) Imperialism and Internationalism in the Discipline of International Relations, Albany, NY: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waever, O. (1998) ‘The Sociology of a not so International Discipline: American and European Developments in International Relations’, International Organization 52 (4): 687–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willoughby, W.W. (1918) ‘The Juristic Conception of the State’, American Political Science Review 12 (2): 192–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, P. (1998) ‘The Myth of the “First Great Debate”’, Review of International Studies 24 (special issue): 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, W. (1887) ‘The Study of Administration’, Political Science Quarterly 2 (2): 202–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

An initial version of this article was presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC, September 1–4, 2005. I thank John G. Gunnell for his comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Political Science, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, Ontario, K1S 5B6, Canada

    Brian C Schmidt

Authors
  1. Brian C Schmidt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brian C Schmidt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schmidt, B. Political Science and the American Empire: A Disciplinary History of the ‘Politics’ Section and the Discourse of Imperialism and Colonialism. Int Polit 45, 675–687 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2008.29

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2008.29

Keywords

Search

Navigation