IMF Staff Papers

, Volume 55, Issue 3, pp 511–540 | Cite as

Global Rebalancing with Gravity: Measuring the Burden of Adjustment

  • Robert Dekle
  • Jonathan Eaton
  • Samuel Kortum
Article

Abstract

This paper uses a 42-country model of production and trade to assess the implications of eliminating current account imbalances for relative wages, relative GDPs, real wages, and real absorption. How much relative GDPs need to change depends on flexibility of two forms: factor mobility and adjustment in sourcing of imports, with more flexibility requiring less change. At the extreme, U.S. GDP falls by 30 percent relative to the world's. Because of the pervasiveness of nontraded goods, however, most domestic prices move in parallel with relative GDP, so that changes in real GDP are small.

JEL Classifications

F30 F31 F12 

References

  1. Alvarez, Fernando, and Robert E. Lucas, 2007, “General Equilibrium Analysis of the Eaton-Kortum Model of International Trade,” Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 54, No. 6, pp. 726–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bernard, Andrew B., Jonathan Eaton, J. Bradford Jensen, and Samuel Kortum, 2003, “Plants and Productivity in International Trade,” American Economic Review, Vol. 93, No. 4, pp. 1268–1290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chaney, Thomas, forthcoming, “Distorted Gravity: Heterogeneous Firms, Market Structure, and the Geography of International Trade,” American Economic Review.Google Scholar
  4. Corsetti, Giancarlo, Philippe Martin, and Paolo Pesenti, 2007, “Varieties and the Transfer Problem: The Extensive Margin of Current Account Adjustment” (unpublished; Federal Reserve Bank of New York).Google Scholar
  5. Dekle, Robert, Jonathan Eaton, and Samuel Kortum, 2007, “Unbalanced Trade,” American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, Vol. 97, No. 3, pp. 351–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dornbusch, Rudiger, Stanley Fisher, and Paul Samuelson, 1977, “Comparative Advantage, Trade, and Payments in a Ricardian Model with a Continuum of Goods,” American Economic Review, Vol. 67, No. 4, pp. 823–829.Google Scholar
  7. Eaton, Jonathan, and Samuel Kortum, 2002, “Technology, Geography, and Trade,” Econometrica, Vol. 70, No. 5, pp. 1741–1780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eaton, Jonathan, Samuel Kortum, and Francis Kramarz, 2008, “An Anatomy of International Trade: Evidence from French Firms” (unpublished; CREST-INSEE, New York University, University of Chicago).Google Scholar
  9. International Monetary Fund (IMF), 2006, International Financial Statistics Yearbook (Washington, IMF).Google Scholar
  10. Melitz, Marc, 2003, “The Impact of Trade on Aggregate Industry Productivity and Intra-Industry Reallocations,” Econometrica, Vol. 71, No. 6, pp. 1625–1695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Obstfeld, Maurice, and Kenneth Rogoff, 2005, “Global Current Account Imbalances and Exchange Rate Adjustments,” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 67–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, 2007, “Structural Analysis Database,” Available on the Internet: www.oecd.org/document/15/0,2340,en_2649_201185_1895503_1_1_1_1,00.html.
  13. Ruhl, Kim, 2005, “The Elasticity Puzzle in International Economics” (unpublished; University of Texas at Austin).Google Scholar
  14. United Nations Industrial Development Organization, 2006 Industrial Statistics Database Available on the Internet: www.unido.org/index.php.
  15. United Nations Statistics Division, 2006 United Nations Commodity Trade Database Available on the Internet: http://comtrade.un.org/.
  16. United Nations Statistical Division, 2007 National Accounts Available on the Internet: http://unstats.un.org/unsd/snaama.

Copyright information

© International Monetary Fund 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert Dekle
  • Jonathan Eaton
  • Samuel Kortum

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations