Advertisement

Interest Groups & Advocacy

, Volume 3, Issue 1, pp 79–98 | Cite as

It’s not all about the money: Explaining varying policy portfolios of regional representations in Brussels

  • Tom Donas
  • Bert Fraussen
  • Jan BeyersEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

The literature on territorial lobbying in the European Union (EU) has paid much attention to the interaction between regional representations in Brussels and the member-state central governments, and the relations of these representations with the European institutions. Surprisingly, far less systematic research has been conducted on the policies that regional representations prioritize when they lobby in Brussels. In this article, we focus on the policy portfolios of these organizations and analyze variation concerning the domains and issues these regional representations prioritize. Empirically, we demonstrate that the size and the nature of a policy portfolio is not primarily affected by the capabilities of a regional representation, but rather results from structural ties of regional lobbyists with other public and private interests. This claim is corroborated by data collected through a telephone survey with 127 officials from regional offices and trans-regional associations.

Keywords

regional offices territorial lobbying policy portfolios organizational agenda’s European Union 

Notes

References

  1. Baumgartner, F.R. and Leech, B.L. (2001) Interest niches and policy bandwagons: Patterns of interest group involvement in national politics. Journal of Politics 63 (4): 1191–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berkhout, J. and Lowery, D. (2007) Counting organized interests in the EU: A comparison of data sources. Journal of European Public Policy 15 (3): 489–513.Google Scholar
  3. Borras, S. (1993) The ‘four motors for Europe’ and its promotion of R&D linkages. Regional and Federal Studies 3 (3): 163–176.Google Scholar
  4. Börzel, T.A. (2010) Why you don’t always get what you want: EU enlargement and civil society in central and Eastern Europe. Acta Politica 45 (1–2): 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Braun, C. (2012) The captive or the broker? Explaining public agency-interest group interactions. Governance 25 (2): 291–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Broscheid, A. and Coen, D. (2007) Lobbying activity and fora creation in the EU: Empirically exploring the nature of the policy good. Journal of European Public Policy 14 (3): 346–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Browne, W.P. (1990) Organized interests and their issue niches: A search for pluralism in a policy domain. The Journal of Politics 52 (2): 477–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cammisa, A.M. (1995) Governments as Interest Groups. Londen: Praeger.Google Scholar
  9. Coen, D. and Richardson, J. (2009) Lobbying in the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Criekemans, D. (2010) Regional sub-state diplomacy from a comparative perspective: Quebec, Scotland, Bavaria, Catalonia, Wallonia and Flanders. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 5 (1): 37–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Donas, T. and Beyers, J. (2013a) How regions assemble in Brussels: The organizational form of territorial representation in the European Union. Publius 43 (4): 527–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Donas, T. and Beyers, J. (2013b) Trans-regional networks in Brussels. Analyzing the information exchanges among regional offices. Paper Presented at the CES 20th International Conference of Europeanists. Amsterdam, 25–27 June.Google Scholar
  13. Fraussen, B. (2013) The visible hand of the state. On the organizational development of interest groups. Public Administration, doi:10.1111/padm.12056.Google Scholar
  14. Gray, V. and Lowery, D. (1996) A niche theory of interest representation. The Journal of Politics 58 (1): 91–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Green-Cowles, M. (2003) Non-state actors and false dichotomies: Reviewing IR/IPE approaches to European integration. Journal of European Public Policy 10 (1): 102–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Greenwood, J. (2003) Interest Representation in the European Union. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  17. Greenwood, J. (2011) Actors of the common interest? The Brussels offices of the regions. Journal of European Integration 33 (4): 437–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Haider, D.D. (1974) When Governments Come to Washington. London, Collier: Macmillan Publishers.Google Scholar
  19. Halpin, D.R. and Binderkrantz, A. (2009) Explaining breadth of policy engagement: Patterns of interest group mobilization in public policy. Journal of European Public Policy 18 (2): 201–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Halpin, D.R. and Jordan, G. (2011) The Scale of Interest Organization in Democratic Politics: Data and Research Methods. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  21. Halpin, D.R. and Thomas, H.F. (2011) Evaluating the breadth of policy engagement by organized interests. Public Administration 90 (3): 582–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Halpin, D. and Nownes, A. (2013) Interest Group ‘Policy Agendas’: What Are They? And How Might We Study Them? Working Paper, www.darrenhalpin.com, accessed 13 December 2013.
  23. Heaney, M.T. (2004) Outside the issue niche. The multidimensionality of interest group identity. American Politics Research 32 (6): 611–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Heaney, M.T. and Lorenz, J.M. (2013) Coalition portfolios and interest group influence over the policy process. Interest Groups & Advocacy 2 (3): 251–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hooghe, L. (1995) Subnational mobilisation in the European Union. West European Politics 18 (3): 175–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hooghe, L. and Marks, G. (1996) Europe with the regions: Channels of regional representation in the European Union. Publius 26 (1): 73–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hooghe, L., Marks, G. and Schakel, A.H. (2010) The Rise of Regional Authority: A Comparative Study of 42 Democracies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Huyssuenne, M. and Jans, T. (2008) Brussels as the capital of a Europe of the regions? Brussels Studies 16: 1–11, http://www.brusselsstudies.be.Google Scholar
  29. Jeffrey, C. (1997) The Regional Dimension of the European Union. London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
  30. Krackhardt, D. and Stern, R.N. (1988) Informal networks and organizational crises: An experimental simulation. Social Psychology Quarterly 51 (2): 123–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lowi, T. (1972) Four systems of policy, politics, and choice. Public Administration Review 32 (4): 298–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Marbach, J. and Leckrone, J. (2002) Intergovernmental lobbying for the passage of TEA-21. Publius 32 (1): 45–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Marks, G., Nielsen, F., Ray, L. and Salk, J.E. (1996) Competencies, cracks, and conflicts – Regional mobilization in the European Union. Comparative Political Studies 29 (2): 164–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Marks, G., Haesly, R. and Mbaye, H. (2002) What do subnational offices think they are doing in Brussels? Regional and Federal Studies 12 (3): 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Moe, T.M. (1980) The Organization of Interests. Incentives and the Internal Dynamics of Political Interest Groups. London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  36. Moore, C. (2006) Schloss Neuwahnstein? Why the Länder continue to strengthen their representations in Brussels. German Politics 15 (2): 192–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nielsen, F. and Salk, J. (1998) The ecology of collective action and regional representation in the EU. European Sociological Review 14 (3): 231–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pfeffer, J. and Salancik, G. (1978) The External Control of Organizations. A Resource Dependence Perspective. Stanford, CA: Stanford Business Classics.Google Scholar
  39. Rowe, C. (2011) Regional Representations in the EU: Between Diplomacy and Interest Mediation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Salisbury, R.H. (1983) Interest representation: The dominance of institutions. American Political Science Review 78 (1): 64–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schlozman, K.L. and Tierney, J.T. (1986) Organized Interest and American Democracy. New York: Harper & Row Publishers.Google Scholar
  42. Schmitter, P.C. and Streeck, W. (1999 [1982]) The Organization of Business Interest. Studying Associative Action of Business in Advanced Industrial Societies. Cologne, Germany: Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies. Discussion paper 99/1.Google Scholar
  43. Simon, H.A. (1985) Human nature in politics: The dialogue of psychology with political science. American Political Science Review 79 (2): 293–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sodupe, K. (1999) The European Union and inter-regional co-operation. Regional and Federal Studies 9 (1): 58–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Soule, S.A. and King, B.G. (2008) Competition and resource partitioning in three social movement industries. American Journal of Sociology 113 (6): 1568–1610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Strolovitch, D.Z. (2007) Affirmative Advocacy. Race, Class, and Gender in Interest Group Politics. London: Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Swenden, W., Brans, M. and De Winter, L. (2006) The politics of Belgium: Institutions and policy under bipolar and centrifugal federalism. West European Politics 29 (5): 863–873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tatham, M. (2008) Going solo: Direct regional representation in the European Union. Regional and Federal Studies 18 (5): 493–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Walker, E.T. and McCarthy, J.D. (2010) Legitimacy, strategy, and resources in the survival of community-based organizations. Social Problems 57 (3): 315–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Weynand, S. (1996) Inter-regional associations and the European integration process. Regional and Federal Studies 6 (2): 166–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceACIM – Antwerp Centre for Institutions and Multilevel Politics, Universiteit AntwerpenAntwerpBelgium

Personalised recommendations