Advertisement

Health Systems

, Volume 6, Issue 2, pp 112–121 | Cite as

Using electronic health records and nursing assessment to redesign clinical early recognition systems

  • Muge CapanEmail author
  • Pan Wu
  • Michele Campbell
  • Susan Mascioli
  • Eric V Jackson
Original Article

Abstract

As health-care organizations transition from paper to electronic documentation systems, capturing the nursing assessment electronically can play a fundamental role in transforming health-care delivery. Especially in preventive health, electronic capture of nursing assessment, combined with vital sign-based monitoring, can support early detection of physiological deterioration of patients. While vital sign-based Early Warning Systems have the potential to detect signals of physiological deterioration, their clinical interpretation and integration into the workflow in hospital-based care setting remain a challenge. This study presents a clinical early recognition algorithm using electronic health records (EHRs) coupled with an electronic Nurse Screening Assessment (NSA) that targets various health assessment categories and its integration into the nursing workflow. Data was collected retrospectively from a single institution (N=2,405 visits). χ 2 tests showed significant differences between algorithms with and without NSA (P<0.01). This study provides a practical framework for facilitating the meaningful use of EHRs in hospitals.

Keywords

early warning system nurse assessment physiological deterioration 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was conducted collaboratively including the Value Institute (VI) Health Care Delivery Science (HCDS) Team and Christiana Early Warning System (CEWS) Team at Christiana Care Health System, Newark, DE.

References

  1. Aiken LH, Clarke SP, Sloane DM, Sochalski J and Silber JH (2002) Hospital nurse staffing and patient mortality, nurse burnout, and job dissatisfaction. Journal of the American Medical Association 288(16), 1987–1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bates DW et al (1998) Effect of computerized physician order entry and a team intervention on prevention of serious medication errors. Journal of the American Medical Association 280(15), 1311–1316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bergstrom N, Braden B, Kemp M, Champagne M and Ruby E (1998) Predicting pressure ulcer risk: a multisite study of the predictive validity of the braden scale. Nursing Research 47(5), 261–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bynd S, Sen A, Subbe C and Gemmell L (2004) Modified early warning score: one for all and A&E? British Journal of Anesthesia 92(4), 611P–612P.Google Scholar
  5. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) (2015) The official web site for the medicare and medicaid electronic health records (EHR) incentive programs. [WWW document] https://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Legislation/EHRIncentivePrograms/index.html?redirect=/ehrincentiveprograms (accessed 11 August 2015).
  6. Chaudhry B et al (2006) Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. Annals of Internal Medicine 144(10), 742–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Congressional Budget Office (2008) Evidence of the costs and benefits of health information technology. [WWW document] http://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/05-20-healthit.pdf (accessed 11 August 2015).
  8. Dykes PC, Kim HE, Goldsmith DM, Choi J, Esumi K and Goldberg HS (2009) The adequacy of ICNP version 1.0 as a representational model for electronic nursing assessment documentation. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 16(2), 238–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Friedman CP, Wong AK and Blumenthal D (2010) Achieving a nationwide learning health system. Science Translational Medicine 2(57), 57cm29.Google Scholar
  10. Gray L, Smyth K, Palmer R, Zhu X and Callahan J (2002) Heterogeneity in older people: examining physiologic failure, age, and comorbidity. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 50(12), 1955–1961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Henry SB and Mead CN (1997) Nursing classification systems. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 4(3), 222–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Institute of Medicine (IOM) (2011) The Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing Health. The National Academies Press, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  13. Jha AK et al (2009) Use of electronic health records in U.S. hospitals. New England Journal of Medicine 360(16), 1628–1638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kelley TF, Brandon DH and Docherty SL (2011) Electronic nursing documentation as a strategy to improve quality of patient care. Journal of Nursing Scholarship 43(2), 154–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kossman SP and Scheidenhelm SL (2008) Nurses’ perceptions of the impact of electronic health records on work and patient outcomes. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing 26(2), 69–77.Google Scholar
  16. Kyriacos U, Jelsma J and Jordan S (2011) Monitoring vital signs using early warning scoring systems: a review of the literature. Journal of Nursing Management 19(3), 311–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Leach LS and Mayo AM (2013) Rapid response teams: qualitative analysis of their effectiveness. AJCC 22(3), 198–209.Google Scholar
  18. Lewis SL, Dirksen SR, Heitkemper MM and Bucher L (2014) Medical-Surgical Nursing: Assessment and Management of Clinical Problems. Elsevier Health Sciences, St. Louis, MO.Google Scholar
  19. Ludikhuize J, Smorenburg SM, de Rooij SE and de Jonge E (2012) Identification of deteriorating patients on general wards; measurement of vital parameters and potential effectiveness of the modified early warning score. Journal of Critical Care 27(4), 424.e7–424.e13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Moody LE, Slocumb E, Berg B and Jackson D (2004) Electronic health records documentation in nursing: nurses’ perceptions, attitudes, and preferences. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing 22(6), 337–344.Google Scholar
  21. Needleman J, Buerhaus P, Mattke S, Stewart M and Zelevinsky K (2002) Nurse-staffing levels and quality of care in hospitals. New England Journal of Medicine 346(22), 1415–1422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Payne TH et al (2015) Report of the AMIA EHR 2020 task force on the status and future direction of EHRs. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 1–11.Google Scholar
  23. Peberdy MA et al (2007) Recommended guidelines for monitoring, reporting, and conducting research on medical emergency team, outreach, and rapid response systems: an utstein-style scientific statement. A Scientific Statement from the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (American Heart Association, Australian Resuscitation Council, European Resuscitation Council, Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, InterAmerican Heart Foundation, Resuscitation Council of Southern Africa, and the New Zealand Resuscitation Council ...). Circulation 116(21): 2481–2500.Google Scholar
  24. Poissant L, Pereira J, Tamblyn R and Kawasumi Y (2005) The impact of electronic health records on time efficiency of physicians and nurses: a systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 12(5), 505–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Prin M and Wunsch H (2014) The role of stepdown beds in hospital care. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 190(11), 1210–1216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Prytherch DR, Smith GB, Schmidt PE and Featherstone PI (2010) Views-towards a national early warning score for detecting adult inpatient deterioration. Resuscitation 81(8), 932–937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rothman MJ, Rothman SI and Beals J (2013) Development and validation of a continuous measure of patient condition using the electronic medical record. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 46(5), 837–848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Royal College of Physicians (2012) National early warning score (NEWS): Standardizing the assessment of acute illness severity in the NHS.London: Report of a working party.Google Scholar
  29. Saranto K and Kinnunen UM (2009) Evaluating nursing documentation – research designs and methods: systematic review. Journal of Advanced Nursing 65(3), 464–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Schmid NA (1990) Reducing patient falls: a research-based comprehensive fall prevention program. Military Medicine 155(5), 202–207.Google Scholar
  31. Smith K, Smith V, Krugman M and Oman K (2005) Evaluating the impact of computerized clinical documentation. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing 23(3), 132–138.Google Scholar
  32. Smith GB, Prytherch DR, Meredith P, Schmidt PE and Featherstone PI (2013) The ability of the national early warning score (NEWS) to discriminate patients at risk of early cardiac arrest, unanticipated intensive care unit admission, and death. Resuscitation 84(4), 465–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Subbe C, Kruger M, Rutherford P and Gemmel L (2001) Validation of a modified early warning score in medical admissions. QJM – Monthly Journal of the Association of Physicians 94(10), 521–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Swets JA (1986) Indices of discrimination or diagnostic accuracy: their ROCs and implied models. Psychological Bulletin 99(1), 100–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Yakusheva O, Lindrooth R and Weiss M (2014) Nurse value‐added and patient outcomes in acute care. Health Services Research 49(6), 1767–1786.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The OR Society 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Muge Capan
    • 1
    Email author
  • Pan Wu
    • 1
  • Michele Campbell
    • 2
  • Susan Mascioli
    • 3
  • Eric V Jackson
    • 1
  1. 1.Value Institute, Christiana Care Health SystemNewarkU.S.A.
  2. 2.Office of Quality and Patient Safety, Christiana Care Health SystemNewarkU.S.A.
  3. 3.Nursing Quality and Patient Safety, Christiana Care Health SystemNewarkU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations