Advertisement

Higher Education Policy

, Volume 29, Issue 2, pp 199–217 | Cite as

Research Universities and The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act: Competition, Resource Concentration, and the ‘Great Recession’ in the United States

  • Barrett J Taylor
  • Brendan Cantwell
Article

Abstract

This paper conceptualizes the US federal government’s response to the ‘Great Recession’ as a ‘natural experiment’ whose broad emphasis on counter-cyclical spending contrasts with the tendency towards stratification within the quasi-market for academic research support. Regression results indicate that resources tended to flow towards a few already-advantaged universities, but also supported universities with lower levels of investment in research equipment and smaller bases of support from business and industry. Because the extent to which these results describe quasi-market mechanisms generally or merely reflect the peculiarities of the US system is unclear, the paper concludes with propositions that could be critiqued and refined through studies in other national contexts.

Keywords

United States quasi-markets competition stratification 

References

  1. Agasisti, T. and Catalano, G. (2006) ‘Governance models of university systems — Toward quasi-markets? Tendencies and perspectives: A European comparison’, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 28 (3): 245–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aizenman, J. and Pasricha, G. (2011) ‘The net fiscal expenditure stimulus in the U.S., 2008–2009: Less than what you might think, and less than the fiscal stimuli of most OECD countries’, The Economists’ Voice 8 (2): 1–6.Google Scholar
  3. Berube, A., Bradley, J., Muro, M., Puentes, R., Rahman, S. and Reamer, A. (2009) Metro Potential in ARRA: An Early Assessment of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, Washington DC: The Brookings Institute.Google Scholar
  4. Boone, C., Dube, A. and Kaplan, A. (2014) The political economy of discretionary spending: Evidence from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity (Spring): 375–428.Google Scholar
  5. Calero, J. (1998) ‘Quasi-market reforms and equity in the financing of higher education’, European Journal of Education 33 (1): 11–20.Google Scholar
  6. Cameron, A.C. and Trivedi, P.K. (2010) Microeconometrics Using Stata, College Station: Stata Press.Google Scholar
  7. Cantwell, B. and Taylor, B.J. (2013a) ‘Global status, inter-institutional stratification, and organizational segmentation: A time-dynamic Tobit analysis of ARWU position among US universities’, Minerva 51 (2): 195–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cantwell, B. and Taylor, B.J. (2013b) ‘Internationalisation of the postdoctorate in the United States: Analyzing the demand for international postdoc labor’, Higher Education 66 (5): 551–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cantwell, B. and Taylor, B.J. (2015) ‘The rise of the postdoctorate and the restructuring of academic research’, The Journal of Higher Education 86 (5): 667–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carley, S., Nicholson-Crotty, S. and Fisher, E.J. (2015) ‘Capacity, guidance, and the implementation of the American recovery and reinvestment act’, Public Administration Review 75 (1): 113–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching (2013) ‘Carnegie classifications|standard listings’, http://classifications.carnegiefoundation.org/lookup_listings/srp.php?clq=%7B%22basic2005_ids%22%3A%2216%22%7Dandstart_page=standard.phpandbackurl=standard.phpandlimit=0,50, accessed 14 November 2013.
  12. Dadush, U., Burtless, G., Gros, D., Abberger, K., Taylor, J.B. and Wolverson, R. (2010) Is More Fiscal Stimulus Needed?, Washington DC: Council on Foreign Relations.Google Scholar
  13. Delaney, J.A. (2014) ‘Federal stimulus funds under the ARRA did not protect state student financial aid, further eroding higher education affordability’, USAPP: The LSE’s Daily Blog on American Policy and Politics, http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/usappblog/2014/09/11/federal-stimulus-funds-under-the-arra-did-not-protect-state-student-financial-aid-further-eroding-higher-education-affordability/, accessed 4 June 2015.
  14. Delaney, J.A. and Doyle, W.R. (2011) ‘State spending on higher education: Testing the balance wheel over time’, Journal of Education Finance 36 (4): 343–368.Google Scholar
  15. Desrochers, D.M. and Wellman, J.V. (2011) Trends in College Spending 1999–2009, Washington DC: The Delta Cost Project.Google Scholar
  16. Douglass, J.A. (2010) Higher Education Budgets and the Global Recession, Berkeley, CA: Center for Studies in Higher Education, University of California.Google Scholar
  17. Ehrenberg, R.G., Rizzo, M.J. and Jakubson, G.H. (2007) ‘Who Bears the Growing Cost of Science at Universities?’ in P. Stephan and R.G. Ehrenberg (eds.) Science and The University, Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, pp. 19–35.Google Scholar
  18. Elsby, M.W., Hobijn, B. and Sahin, A. (2010) ‘The Labor Market in the Great Recession’, NBER Working Paper #15979, Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  19. Gale, W.G. (2010) The Bush Tax Cuts, Washington DC: The Brookings Institute.Google Scholar
  20. Glennerster, H. (1991) ‘Quasi-markets for education?’ The Economic Journal 101 (408): 1268–1276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gordon, T. (2011) State Budgets in Recession and Recovery, Washington DC: The Brookings Institute.Google Scholar
  22. Gordon, T. (2012) State and Local Budgets and the Great Recession, Stanford, CA: Stanford Center on Poverty and Inequality.Google Scholar
  23. Hearn, J.C. and Rosinger, K.O. (2014) ‘Socioeconomic diversity in selective private colleges: An organizational analysis’, The Review of Higher Education 38 (1): 71–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hurd, M.D. and Rohwedder, S. (2010) ‘Effects of the Financial Crisis and Great Recession on American Households’, NBER Working Paper #16407. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  25. Jagannathan, R., Kapoor, M. and Schaumburg, E. (2009) ‘Causes of the Great Recession of 2007–2009’, NBER Working Paper #15404. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  26. Jennings, E.T., Hall, J.L. and Zhang, Z. (2012) ‘The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act and state accountability’, Public Performance and Management Review 35 (3): 527–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Johnes, G. and Johnes, J. (2009) ‘Higher education institutions’ costs and efficiency: Taking the decomposition a further step’, Economics of Education Review 28 (1): 107–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Johnson, N., Collins, C. and Singham, A. (2010) State Tax Changes in Response to the Recession, Washington DC: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.Google Scholar
  29. Jonas, J. (2012) ‘Great Recession and Fiscal Squeeze at U.S. Subnational Government Level’, IMF Working Paper WP/12/184. Washington DC: International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
  30. Karseth, B. and Solbrekke, T.D. (forthcoming) ‘Curriculum Trends in European Higher Education: The Pursuit of the Humboldtian University Ideas’, in S. Slaughter and B.J. Taylor (eds.) Higher Education, Stratification, and Workforce Development: Competitive Advantage in Europe, the US, and Canada. Chapter ten Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  31. Kirby, D. (2011) ‘Strategies for widening access in a quasi-market higher education environment: Recent developments in Canada’, Higher Education 62 (3): 267–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lacy, T.A. (2010) ‘Institutions of Higher Education as Multi-Product Firms: An Empirical Analysis’, in R. Ahrweiler (ed.) Innovation in Complex Social Systems, New York: Routledge, pp. 175–186.Google Scholar
  33. LeGrand, J. and Bartlett, W. (1993) Quasi-Markets and Social Policy, London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  34. Leslie, L.L., Slaughter, S., Taylor, B.J. and Zhang, L. (2012) ‘How do revenue variations affect expenditures within US research universities?’ Research in Higher Education 53 (6): 614–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mendoza, P. (2012) ‘The role of context in academic capitalism: The industry-friendly department case’, Journal of Higher Education 83 (1): 26–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Meyer, J.W., Ramirez, F.O., Frank, D.J. and Schofer, E. (2008) ‘Higher Education as an Institution’, in P.J. Gumport (ed.) Sociology of Higher Education: Contributions and their Contexts, Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 187–221.Google Scholar
  37. Morphew, C.C. (2009) ‘Conceptualizing change in the institutional diversity of US colleges and universities’, The Journal of Higher Education 80 (3): 243–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Murnane, R.J. and Willett, J.B. (2011) Methods Matter: Improving Causal Inference in Educational and Social Science Research, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  39. National Association of College and University Business Officers (2010) 2009 NACUBO-Commonfund Study of Endowments, Washington DC: NACUBO.Google Scholar
  40. National Science Board (2014) Science and Technology Indicators, 2013, Arlington, VA: NSF.Google Scholar
  41. Orszag, P.R. (2009) ‘Memorandum for the heads of departments and agencies’, http://www.recovery.gov/arra/About/Documents/InitialRecoveryActImplementingGuidance_Feb18.pdf, accessed 2 December 2014.
  42. Recovery Accountability and Transparency Board (2013a) ‘The Recovery Act’, http://www.recovery.gov/About/Pages/The_Act.aspx, accessed 8 November 2013.
  43. Recovery Accountability and Transparency Board (2013b) ‘Contract, grant, and loan programs’, http://www.recovery.gov/Transparency/fundingoverview/Pages/contractsgrantsloans-details.aspx#ResearchDevelopmentScience, accessed 8 November 2013.
  44. Slaughter, S. and Cantwell, B. (2012) ‘Transatlantic moves to the market’, Higher Education 63 (5): 583–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. St. John, E.P., Daun-Barnett, N. and Moronski-Chapman, K.M. (2012) Public Policy and Higher Education, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  46. Stephan, P. (2012) How Economics Shapes Science, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Taylor, B.J. and Cantwell, B. (2015) ‘Global competition, US research universities, and international doctoral education: Growth and consolidation of an organizational field’, Research in Higher Education 56 (5): 411–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Taylor, B.J., Cantwell, B. and Slaughter, S. (2013) ‘Quasi-markets in US higher education: The humanities and institutional revenues’, The Journal of Higher Education 84 (5): 675–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Toutkoushian, R.K. (2001) ‘Trends in Revenues and Expenditures for Public and Private Higher Education’, in M.B. Paulsen and J.C. Smart (eds.) The Finance of Higher Education: Theory, Research, Policy, and Practice, New York: Agathon Press, pp. 11–38.Google Scholar
  50. Weisbrod, B.A., Ballou, J.P. and Asch, E.D. (2008) Mission and Money: Understanding the University, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Winston, G.C. (2004) ‘Differentiation among U.S. colleges and universities’, Review of Industrial Organization 24 (4): 331–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wright, S. (forthcoming) ‘The Imaginators of English University Reform’, in S. Slaughter and B.J. Taylor (eds.) Higher Education, Stratification, and Workforce Development: Competitive Advantage in Europe, the US, and Canada. Chapter six Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Association of Universities 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Barrett J Taylor
    • 1
  • Brendan Cantwell
    • 2
  1. 1.College of Education, University of North TexasDentonUSA
  2. 2.Michigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA

Personalised recommendations