Advertisement

Higher Education Policy

, Volume 29, Issue 2, pp 149–166 | Cite as

The Impact of Market-Driven Higher Education on Student-University Relations: Investing, Consuming and Competing

  • Michael Tomlinson
Article
First Online:

Abstract

This article examines the ways in which the increasingly market-based higher education (HE) landscape of UK HE is shaping students’ attitudes and responses towards their HE. Contemporary HE policy has framed HE as a private good that generates largely private benefits. There has also been a concern that these changes will distort institutional relations and the traditional value of participating in HE, reinforcing the growing commodification of UK HE. On the basis of a qualitative study with students in a range of higher education institutions from the four UK countries, it outlines the main impacts recent policy is having on students’ attitudes and relationship to HE. Dominant market-driven discourses around investment, consumerism, employability and competition indicate widespread concerns among contemporary HE students about operating in higher-stakes markets, which are intensified by increased personal financial contribution towards HE. While the data reveal an identification with the student as ‘consumer’ and strigent expectations over what HE provides, it also points to an ethic of self-responsibility that is built on highly individualised discourses of personal application, proactivity and experience optimisation. Goal-driven and instrumental learning are evident, which relate to widespread concerns about future returns and the private good value of HE.

Keywords

marketisation student-consumers higher education policy change 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank the two anonymous reviewers for their detailed and constructive comments on an earlier draft.

References

  1. Blacker, D.J. (2013) The Falling Rate of Learning and the Neoliberal Endgame, Winchester and Washington DC: Zero Books.Google Scholar
  2. Brennan, J., Edmunds, R., Houston, M., Jary, D., Lebeau, Y., Osborne, M. and Richardson, J.T.E. (2010) Improving what is Learnt at University, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Brown, R. (ed.) (2011) Higher Education and the Market, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Collini, S. (2012) What Are Universities For? London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  5. Department for Education and Skills (2003) The Future of Higher Education, London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  6. Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (2011) Higher Education: Students are the Heart of the System, London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  7. Dill, D.D. (1997) ‘Higher education markets and public policy’, Higher Education Policy 10 (3): 167–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Higher Education Funding Council for England (2013) Impact of 2012 Reforms, Bristol: HEFCE.Google Scholar
  9. Hirsch, F. (1976) Social Limits to Growth, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Khan, P. (2014) ‘Theorising student engagement in higher education’, British Educational Research Journal 40 (6): 1005–1018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kivinen, O. and Ahola, S. (1999) ‘Higher education as human risk capital’, Higher Education 38 (2): 191–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lauder, H., Brown, P. and Tholen, G. (2012) ‘The Global Auction Model, Skills Bias Theory and Graduate Incomes’, in H. Lauder (ed.) Educating for the Knowledge Economy? London: Routledge, pp. 43–65.Google Scholar
  13. Lomas, L. (2007) ‘Are students customers? perceptions of academic staff’, Quality in Higher Education 13 (1): 31–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Marginson, S. and van der Wende, M. (2007) ‘To rank or to be ranked: the impact of global rankings in higher education’, Journal of Studies in International Education 11 (3/4): 306–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Marginson, S. (2011) ‘Higher education and the public good’, Higher Education Quarterly 65 (4): 411–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. McCulloch, A. (2009) ‘The student as co-producer: learning from public administration and the student-university relationship’, Studies in Higher Education 34 (2): 171–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Molesworth, M., Scullion, R. and Nixon, E. (2010) The Marketisation of Higher Education and the Student a Consumer, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Naidoo, R and Jamieson, I. (2005) ‘Empowering participants or corroding learning: towards a research agenda on the impact of student consumerism in higher education’, Journal of Education Policy 20 (3): 267–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Naidoo, R., Shankar, A. and Veer, E. (2011) ‘The consumerist turn in higher education: policy aspirations and outcomes’, Journal of Marketing Management 27 (11–12): 1142–1162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Office for Independent Adjudicators (2012) (for Students in HE) Annual Report, OIA: Reading.Google Scholar
  21. Reay, D., Ball, S.J. and David, M. (2006) Degree of Choice: Class, Gender and Race in Higher Education, Stoke: Trentham Books.Google Scholar
  22. Scott, P. (2014) ‘Failing tuition fees systems won’t be fixed by tinkering’, The Guardian, 1 April.Google Scholar
  23. Tight, M. (2013) ‘Students: customers, clients or pawns?’ Higher Education Policy 23 (3): 291–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Trow, M. (2006) ‘Reflections on the transition from elite to mass to universal access: forms and phases of higher education in modern societies since WWII’, International Handbook of Higher Education 18 (1): 243–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Weimer, D.L. and Vining, A.R. (1992) Policy Analysis: Concepts and Practice, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  26. Williams, J. (2012) Consuming Higher Education, London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Association of Universities 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Tomlinson
    • 1
  1. 1.Southampton Education School, University of SouthamptonSouthamptonUK

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options