Advertisement

Higher Education Policy

, Volume 28, Issue 2, pp 235–257 | Cite as

The Effects of a State Need-based Access Grant on Traditional and Non-traditional Student Persistence

  • J Cody Davidson
Article
First Online:
  • 177 Downloads

Abstract

In 2011–2012, more than 236.7 billion dollars of student financial aid was disbursed to undergraduate and graduate students at postsecondary institutions in the United States. Today, many groups and organizations are advocating for financial aid to increase student access and success as well as to assist the neediest students. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of the College Access Program (CAP) grant, which is a need-based state access grant, on persistence from the first to second year at Kentucky’s 2- and 4-year public institutions using logistic regression and propensity score matching. A dependent full-time student who receives the CAP grant has 51% greater odds of persisting from the first to second year, but receiving the CAP grant was not statistically significant for part-time or independent students. These findings have practical and policy implications if institutional, state and federal financial aid is to align to increase student access and success.

Keywords

logistic regression need-based financial aid propensity score matching student success state policy 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Advisory Committee on Student Financial Assistance (2012) Pathways to success: Integrating learning with life and work to increase national college completion. February, http://www2.ed.gov/about/bdscomm/list/acsfa/ptsreport2.pdf, accessed 11 November 2013.
  2. Alon, S. (2011) ‘Who benefits most from financial aid? The heterogeneous effect of need-based grants on students’ college persistence’, Social Science Quarterly 92 (3): 807–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Angrist, J., Lang, D. and Oreopulos, P. (2009) ‘Incentives and services for college achievement: evidence from a randomized trial’, American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 1 (1): 136–163.Google Scholar
  4. Austin, P.C. (2011) ‘An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies’, Multivariate Behavioral Research 46 (3): 399–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bean, J.P. and Metzner, B.S. (1985) ‘A conceptual model of nontraditional undergraduate student attrition’, Review of Educational Research 55 (4): 485–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bettinger, E. (2004) How financial aid effects persistence. Working Paper 10242, http://www.nber.org/papers/w10242.pdf?new_window=1, accessed 11 November 2013.
  7. Bettinger, E. (2010) Need based aid and student outcomes: The effects of the Ohio College Opportunity Grant. May, http://www.sesp.northwestern.edu/docs/need-based-aid-why.pdf, accessed 11 November 2013.
  8. Braxton, J.M., Sullivan, A.V. and Johnson, R.M. (1997) ‘Appraising Tinto’s Theory of College Student Departure’, in J.C. Smart (ed.) Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research. Vol. XII, New York: Agathon Press, pp. 107–164.Google Scholar
  9. Brock, T. and Richburg-Hayes, L. (2006) Paying for persistence: Early results of a Louisiana scholarship program for low-income parents attending community college. May, http://www.mdrc.org/paying-persistence, accessed 11 November 2013.
  10. Burd, S., Carey, K., Delisle, J., Fishman, R., Holt, A., Laitinen, A. and McCann, C. (2013) Rebalancing resources and incentives in federal student aid. January, http://www.insidehighered.com/sites/default/server_files/files/NAF_Rebalancing%20Resources%20FINAL%20(2).pdf, accessed 11 November 2013.
  11. Cabrera, A.F., Nora, A. and Castaneda, M.B. (1993) ‘College persistence: Structural equations modeling test of an integrated model of student retention’, The Journal of Higher Education 64 (2): 123–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. California State University (2010) Using data for decision: Beyond retention and graduation rates toward leading indicators of student success. June, http://www.calstatela.edu/academic/aa/gradinitiatives/Leading%20Indicators%20062010.pdf, accessed 11 November 2013.
  13. Chen, R. and St. John, E.P. (2011) ‘State financial policies and college student persistence: A national study’, The Journal of Higher Education 82 (5): 629–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chen, X. and Carroll, C.D. (2005) First generation students in postsecondary education: A look at their college transcripts (NCES 2005–171). July, http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2005/2005171.pdf, accessed 11 November 2013.
  15. Clark, M.H. and Cundiff, N.L. (2011) ‘Assessing the effectiveness of a college freshman seminar using propensity score matching’, Research in Higher Education 52: 616–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. College Access Program Grant (2013a) College Access Program Grant. https://www.kheaa.com/website/kheaa/cap?main=2, accessed 11 November 2013.
  17. College Access Program Grant (2013b) Participating schools. https://www.kheaa.com/website/kheaa/kyschools?main=2&type=cap, accessed 11 November 2013.
  18. College Board (2012) Trends in students aid 2012. http://advocacy.collegeboard.org/sites/default/files/student-aid-2012-full-report.pdf, accessed 11 November 2013.
  19. Crockett, K., Heffron, M. and Schneider, M. (2012) Can financial and improve student success at Lovisinna’s Community Colleges? A study of the potential impact of redistributing state gift aid on the success of Pell grant receipients, http://www.cir.org/sites/default/files/downloads/report/AIR_LA_PELL_STUDY-2012_0.pdf, accessed 11 November 2013.
  20. D’Agostino, Jr. R.B. (1998) ‘Tutorial in biostatistics propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group’, Statistics in Medicine 17: 2265–2281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Davidson, J.C. (2013) ‘Leading indicators: increasing statewide bachelor’s degree completion rates at four-year public institutions’, Higher Education Policy 27: 85–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Davidson, J.C. and Wilson, K.B. (2013–2014) ‘Reassessing Tinto’s concepts of social and academic integration in student retention’, Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice 15 (3): 329–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. DesJardins, S.L. (2001) A comment on interpreting odds-ratios when logistic regression coefficients are negative. Association for Institutional Research for Management Research, Policy Analysis, and Planning, 81. http://airweb3.org/airpubs/81.pdf, accessed 11 November 2013.
  24. DesJardin, S.L. and McCall, B.P. (2010) ‘Simulating the effects of financial aid packages on college student stopout, reenrollment spells, and graduation chances’, The Review of Higher Education 33 (4): 513–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dowd, A.C. (2004) ‘Income and financial aid effects on persistence and degree attainment in public colleges’, Educational Policy Analysis Archives 12 (21): 1–35.Google Scholar
  26. Doyle, W.R. (2013) A new partnership: Reshaping the federal and state commitment to need-based aid. January, http://www.insidehighered.com/sites/default/server_files/files/A%20New%20Partnership%20Financial%20Aid_Report.pdf, accessed 11 November 2013.
  27. Duran, C. (2013) Colorado commission on higher education financial aid allocation methodology. January, http://highered.colorado.gov/CCHE/Meetings/2013/jan/jan13_iiia.pdf, accessed 11 November 2013.
  28. Dynarski, S.M. (2003) ‘Does aid matter? Measuring the effect of student aid on college attendance and completion’, The American Economic Review 93 (1): 279–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Dynarski, S. and Scott-Clayton, J. (2013) Financial aid policy: Lessons from research. NBER Working Paper no. 18710, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  30. Dynarski, S. and Wiederspan, M. (2012) ‘Student aid simplification: Looking back and looking ahead’, National Tax Journal 65 (1): 211–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Engle, J. and Theokas, C. (2010) Top gap closers: Some public colleges and Universities have made good progress in closing graduation rate gaps. January, http://cpe.ky.gov/nr/rdonlyres/f5ae8793-0686-44f1-a315-48989/0/edtrsuttopgapclosers.pdf, accessed 11 November 2013.
  32. Fan, X. and Nowell, D.L. (2011) ‘Using propensity score matching in educational research’, Gifted Child Quarterly 55 (74): 74–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Fields, A. and Miles, J. (2010) Discovering Statistics Using SAS, London: SAGE Publications Ltd..Google Scholar
  34. Goldrick-Rab, S., Harris, D.N., Kelchen, R. and Benson, J. (2012) Need-based financial aid and college persistence: Experimental evidence from Wisconsin. October, www.finaidstudy.org/documents/Goldrick-Rab%20Harris%20Kelchen%20Benson%202012%20FULL.pdf, accessed 11 November 2013.
  35. Graham, S.E. and Kurlaender, M. (2011) ‘Using propensity scores in educational research: general principles and practical applications’, The Journal of Educational Research 104: 340–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Harris, D.N. and Goldrick-Rab, S. (2012) Improving the productivity of education experiments: Lessons from a randomized study of need-based financial aid. http://itp.wceruw.org/documents/HarrisandGoldrick-Rab2012.pdf, accessed 11 November 2013.
  37. Heller, D.E. (1999) ‘The effects of tuition and state financial aid on public college enrollment’, The Review of Higher Education 23 (1): 65–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hurley, D.J., Harnisch, T.L., Moran, R.L. and Parker, E. (2013) Top 10 higher education state policy issues for 2013. January, http://www.aascu.org/policy/publications/policy-matters/topten2013.pdf, accessed 11 November 2013.
  39. Jacobs, J.A. and King, R.B. (2002) ‘Age and college completion: A life-history analysis of women aged 15–44’, Sociology of Education 75 (3): 211–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kiley, K. (2013) Fewer bucks, more bang. 29 January, http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2013/01/29/colorado-shifts-focus-state-grant-affordability-completion, accessed 11 November 2013.
  42. Kim, D. (2004) ‘The effect of financial aid on students’ college choice: Differences by racial groups’, Research in Higher Education 45 (1): 43–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kim, J. (2012) ‘Exploring the relationship between state financial aid policy and postsecondary enrollment choices: A focus on income and races differences’, Research in Higher Education 53 (2): 123–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Leinbach, D.T. and Jenkins, D. (2008) Using Longitudinal Data to Increase Community College Students Success: A Guide to Measuring Milestone and Momentum Point Attainment, New York: Community College Research Center Teachers College, Columbia University New York, Retrieved from ERIC database (ED499922).Google Scholar
  45. Lumina Foundation (2012) A stronger nation through education: Kentucky. March, www.luminafoundation.org, accessed 11 November 2013.
  46. McCormick, A.C. and Carroll, C.D. (1999) Credit production and progress toward a bachelor’s degree: An analysis of postsecondary transcripts for beginning students at 4-year institutions (NCES 1999–179). February, http://nces.ed.gov/pubs99/1999179.pdf, accessed 11 November 2013.
  47. Melguizo, T., Kienzl, G.S. and Alfonso, M. (2011) ‘Comparing the educational attainment of community college transfer students and four-year college rising juniors using propensity score matching methods’, Journal of Higher Education 82 (3): 265–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Menard, S. (2002) Applied Logistic Regression Analysis Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Science 07–106, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Metzner, B.S. and Bean, J.P. (1987) ‘The estimation of a conceptual model of nontraditional undergraduate student attrition’, Research in Higher Education 27 (1): 15–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Moore, C., Shulock, N. and Offenstein, J. (2009) ‘Steps to success: Analyzing milestone achievement to improve community college outcomes’. The Institute for Higher Education Leadership & Policy: 1–20. October, http://inpathways.net/R_CCC_Milestones.pdf, accessed 11 November 2013.
  51. Myers, R. (1990) Classical and Modern Regression with Applications, 2nd edn, Boston, MA: Duxbury.Google Scholar
  52. National Association of State Student Grant Aid Administrators (2012) 42nd annual survey report on state-sponsored students financial aid: 2010–2011 academic year. http://www.nassgap.org/viewrepository.aspx?categoryID=3, accessed 11 November 2013.
  53. National College Access Network (2012) Increasing return on investment from federal student aid. https://www.collegeaccess.org/Policy, accessed 11 November 2013.
  54. Newbart, D. (2010) Students in race for state’s college financial aid funds. March, http://www.economicprogress.org/assets/events/Sun%20Times_Newbart.pdf.
  55. Offenstein, J., Moore, C. and Shulock, N. (2010) ‘Advancing by degrees: A framework for increasing college completion’, Institute for Higher Education Leadership & Policy and The Education Trust: 1–20.Google Scholar
  56. Patel, R. and Rudd, T. (2012) Can scholarship along help students success? Lessons from two New York city community colleges. November, http://www.mdrc.org/can-scholarships-alone-help-students-succeed, accessed 11 November 2013.
  57. Perna, L.W. (1998) ‘The contribution of financial aid to undergraduate persistence’, Journal of Student Financial Aid 28 (3): 25–40.Google Scholar
  58. Perna, L.W., Rowan-Kenyon, H., Bell, A., Thomas, S.L. and Li, C. (2008) ‘A typology of federal and state programs designed to promote college enrollment’, Journal of Higher Education 79 (3): 243–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rethinking Student Aid Study Group (2008) Fulfilling the commitment: Recommendation for reforming federal student aid. September, http://professionals.collegeboard.com/profdownload/rethinking-stu-aid-fulfilling-commitment-recommendations.pdf, accessed 11 November 2013.
  60. Richburg-Hayes, L., Brock, T., LeBlanc, A., Paxson, C., Rouse, C.E. and Barrow, L. (2009) Rewarding persistence: Effects of a performance-based scholarship program for low-income parents. January, http://www.mdrc.org/sites/default/files/Rewarding%20Persistence%20ES.pdf, accessed 11 November 2013.
  61. Rosenbaum, P.R. and Rubin, D.B. (1983) ‘The central role of propensity score in observational studies for causal effects’, Biometrika 70 (1): 41–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Rosenbaum, P.R. and Rubin, D.B. (1984) ‘Reducing bias in observational studies subclassification on the propensity score’, Journal of the American Statistical Association 79 (387): 516–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Rosenbaum, P.R. and Rubin, D.B. (1985) ‘Constructing a control group using multivariate matched sampling methods that incorporate the propensity score’, The American Statistician 39 (1): 33–38.Google Scholar
  64. Rubin, R.B. (2011) ‘The Pell and the poor: A regression-discontinuity of on-time college enrollment’, Research in Higher Education 52 (7): 675–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Seftor, N. and Turner, S. (2002) ‘Back to school: Federal student aid policy and adult college age enrollment’, Journal of Human Resources 37 (2): 336–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Shavelson, R.J. (1996) Statistical Reasoning for the Behavioral Sciences, 3rd edn, Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  67. St. John, E.P. (1999) ‘Evaluating state student grant programs: A case study of Washington’s grant program’, Research in Higher Education 40 (2): 149–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. St. John, E.P., Cabrera, A.E., Nora, A. and Asker, E.H. (2000a) ‘Economic Influences on Persistence Reconsidered: How Can Finance Research Inform the Reconceptualization of Persistence Models?’ in J.M. Braxton (ed.) Reworking the Student Departure Puzzle, Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press, pp. 29–47.Google Scholar
  69. St. John, E.P., Hu, S. and Weber, J. (2000b) ‘Keeping public colleges affordable: A study of persistence in Indiana’s public colleges and universities’, NASFAA Journal of Student Financial Aid 30 (1): 21–32.Google Scholar
  70. Stevens, J. (2002) Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences, 4th edn, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  71. The American Dream 2.0 (2013) The American dream 2.0: How financial aid can help improve college access, affordability, and completion. http://www.hcmstrategists.com/americandream2-0/report/HCM_Gates_Report_1_17_web.pdf, accessed 11 November 2013.
  72. Tinto, V. (1975) ‘Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research’, Review of Educational Research 45 (1): 89–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Tinto, V. (1993) Leaving College: Rethinking the Causes and Cures of Student Attrition, 2nd edn, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  74. Titus, M.A. (2006) ‘No college student left behind: The influence of financial aspects of a state’s higher education policy on college completion’, The Review of Higher Education 29 (3): 293–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. U.S. Department of Education (2011) Fall enrollment survey. (IPEDS-EF: 90–99). http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d11/tables/dt11_200.asp?referrer=report, accessed 11 November 2013.
  76. Young Invincibles (2012) The student perspective on federal financial aid reform. November, http://younginvincibles.org/2012/11/the-student-perspective-on-federal-financial-aid-report/, accessed 11 November 2013.

Copyright information

© International Association of Universities 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • J Cody Davidson
    • 1
  1. 1.Kentucky Council on Postsecondary EducationFrankfortUSA

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options