Advertisement

Higher Education Policy

, Volume 28, Issue 1, pp 69–89 | Cite as

The Regional Dimension of Education Hubs: Leading and Brokering Geopolitics

  • Jack T Lee
Article

Abstract

Several education hubs have emerged in the last decade in Asia and the Middle East. These ambitious policy initiatives share a common interest in cross-border higher education even though diverse rationales underpin their development. While some claim to be an international education hub, others claim to be a regional education hub or simultaneously international and regional. Considerable rhetoric and assumptions of uniformity exist in the discourse of education hub development. This paper clarifies the regional dimension of education hubs in terms of concepts, rationales, and strategies of regional engagement. Policymakers pursue different definitions of region as they leverage higher education to gain geopolitical influence in targeted spheres. Furthermore, the distinction between the role of a regional leader and regional broker presents different opportunities for an education hub. The paper compares the development of three key education hubs in Asia: Malaysia, Singapore, and Hong Kong.

Keywords

cross-border education internationalization education hub regional geopolitics soft power 

References

  1. 5th Malaysia Plan (1986) 5th Malaysia Plan 1986–90, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Prime Minister’s Department.Google Scholar
  2. 6th Malaysia Plan (1991) 6th Malaysia Plan 1991–95, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Prime Minister’s Department.Google Scholar
  3. A*STAR (2011) Science, Technology & Enterprise Plan 2015, Singapore: Agency for Science, Technology and Research.Google Scholar
  4. Ang, K. and Kwok, Y. (2012) ‘Elite boarding schools spreading through Asia’, New York Times, 23 December.Google Scholar
  5. Borneo Post (2013) ‘UEM Land taps land-starved Singapore to sell Iskandar property’, 28 May.Google Scholar
  6. Chan, D. and Ng, P.T. (2008) ‘Similar agendas, diverse strategies: The quest for a regional hub of higher education in Hong Kong and Singapore’, Higher Education Policy 21 (4): 487–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Economic Committee (1986) The Singapore Economy: New Directions, Report of the Economic Committee, Singapore: Economic Committee.Google Scholar
  8. Economic Review Committee (2003) Report of the Economic Review Committee: New Challenges, Fresh Goals, Singapore: Ministry of Trade and Industry.Google Scholar
  9. Economic Strategies Committee (2010) Report of the Economic Strategies Committee, Singapore: Economic Strategies Committee.Google Scholar
  10. ETP (2010) Economic Transformation Programme: A Roadmap for Malaysia, Malaysia: Performance Management and Delivery Unit (PEMANDU), Prime Minister’s Department.Google Scholar
  11. Finnemore, M. and Sikkink, K. (1998) ‘International norm dynamics and political change’, International Organisation 52 (4): 887–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. GKC (2013) Guangzhou Knowledge City: Strategic Location, from http://www.ssgkc.com/gkc-project/strategic-location, accessed 1 November 2014.
  13. IE Singapore (2013) IE Singapore Launches Singapore Talent Development Alliance for Education and Training Players to Better Access China [Press release], from http://www.iesingapore.gov.sg/Media-Centre/Media-Releases/2013/1/IE-Singapore-Launches-Singapore-Talent-Development-Alliance-for-education-and-training-players, accessed 1 November 2014.
  14. IPSC (2013) Intellectual Property Hub Master Plan: Developing Singapore As a Global IP Hub in Asia, Singapore: Intellectual Property Steering Committee.Google Scholar
  15. IRDA (2011) Invest Education Iskandar Malaysia: Asia’s Education Destination of Choice, Malaysia: Iskandar Regional Development Authority.Google Scholar
  16. JTC (2010) ‘Nepal Hill — hub for leadership training and alternative investment’, Periscope (3): 13, JTC Corporation.Google Scholar
  17. Knight, J. (ed.) (2014) International Education Hubs: Student, Talent, Knowledge-Innovation Models, Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Knight, J. and Lee, J. (2014) ‘Three Types of Education Hubs: Student, Talent and Knowledge’, in J. Knight (ed.) International Education Hubs: Student, Talent, Knowledge-Innovation Models, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 29–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kristof, N. (1992) ‘China sees Singapore as a model for progress’, New York Times, 9 August.Google Scholar
  20. Kvale, S. and Brinkmann, S. (2009) InterViews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing, Los Angeles: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  21. Lai, A. and Maclean, R. (2014) ‘Managing Human Capital in World Cities: Reflections on Hong Kong Developing into an Education Hub’, in K.H. Mok and K.M. Yu (eds.) Internationalization of Higher Education in East Asia, New York: Routledge, pp. 42–57.Google Scholar
  22. Lau, S.K. (2010) Speech at the Symposium on The Quest for Regional Hub of Education in Hong Kong: Challenges and Opportunities in Greater China [translated from Chinese], 26 October 2010. The Hong Kong Institute of Education.Google Scholar
  23. Lee, J.T. (2014) ‘Education hubs and talent development: Policymaking and implementation challenges’, Higher Education 68 (6): 807–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Li, A.K.C. (2004) Welcome speech by the secretary for education and manpower. Opening Ceremony of the international conference ‘Internationalization of Lifelong Education: Policy and Issues’, 3 December 2004.Google Scholar
  25. MOHE (2011) Internationalization Policy 2011, Malaysia: Ministry of Higher Education.Google Scholar
  26. Mok, K.H. (2011) ‘The quest for regional hub of education: Growing heterarchies, organizational hybridization, and new governance in Singapore and Malaysia’, Journal of Education Policy 26 (1): 61–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mok, K.H. and Yu, K.M. (2014) Internationalization of Higher Education in East Asia: Trends of Student Mobility and Impact on Education Governance, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. NHESP2 (2011) The National Higher Education Strategic Plan 2. Malaysia’s Global Reach, Malaysia: Ministry of Higher Education.Google Scholar
  29. Ng, S.W. (2011) ‘Can Hong Kong export its higher education services to the Asian markets?’ Education Research for Policy and Practice 10 (2): 115–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Olds, K. (2007) ‘Global assemblage: Singapore, foreign universities, and the construction of a global education hub’, World Development 35 (6): 959–975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pereira, A.A. and Tong, C.K. (2005) ‘Power and developmental regimes in Singapore, China and Malaysia’, Global Economic Review 34 (1): 129–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. PRDBC (2010) Hong Kong’s Roles and Positioning in the Economic Development of the Nation. Hong Kong: Pearl River Delta Business Council.Google Scholar
  33. PRDBC (2012) Term Report 2010–12. Hong Kong Pearl River Delta Business Council.Google Scholar
  34. PWC (PricewaterhouseCoopers) (2008) Malaysia: Asia’s Islamic finance hub, from http://www.pwc.com/en_my/my/assets/publications/islamic-finance-hub.pdf, accessed 1 November 2014.
  35. Schein, E. (1996) Strategic Pragmatism: The Culture of Singapore’s Economic Development Board, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  36. SEAMEO (2010) M-I-T Student Mobility Programme: Pilot Project Review 2010, Bangkok: Regional Centre for Higher Education and Development, Southeast Asian Ministers of Education Organisation.Google Scholar
  37. Shanmugam, K. (2012) Speech by Minister for Law K. Shanmugam. Parliamentary debate 6 March 2012. Singapore.Google Scholar
  38. Stubbs, R. (1999) ‘War and economic development: Export-oriented industrialization in East and Southeast Asia’, Comparative Politics 31 (3): 337–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tan, C.M. (2002) ‘Services: A Road Less Travelled’, in C.B. Chan (ed.) Heart Work, Singapore: Economic Development Board, pp. 260–267.Google Scholar
  40. Taylor, S., Rizvi, F., Lingard, B. and Henry, M. (1997) Educational Policy and the Politics of Change, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Tham, S.Y. (2010) ‘Trade in higher education services in Malaysia: Key policy challenges’, Higher Education Policy 23 (1): 99–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tham, S.Y. (2011) Exploring access and equity in Malaysia’s private higher education. ADBI Working Paper Series No. 280. Tokyo: Asian Development Bank Institute.Google Scholar
  43. UGC (2004) Hong Kong Higher Education: To Make a Difference, to Move with the Times, Hong Kong: University Gants Committee.Google Scholar
  44. Wendt, A. (1992) ‘Anarchy is what states make of it: The social construction of power politics’, International Organization 46 (2): 391–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wong, J., Tan, K.S., Yang, M., Tong, S., Lim, T.S. and Lim, C.K. (2009) A study on Singapore’s experience in regional cooperation. Report submitted to the Central Policy Unit, Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.Google Scholar
  46. World Bank (2012) World development indicators, from http://data.worldbank.org/indicator, accessed 20 December 2012.
  47. Yip, L. (2011) Speech by Mr. Leo Yip, Chairman, Economic Development Board, at Unilever’s Four Acres Singapore groundbreaking, 19 July 2011, Nepal Park.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Association of Universities 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jack T Lee
    • 1
  1. 1.Graduate School of Education, Nazarbayev UniversityAstanaKazakhstan

Personalised recommendations