Advertisement

Higher Education Policy

, Volume 28, Issue 3, pp 393–410 | Cite as

Fabrications, Time-Consuming Bureaucracy and Moral Dilemmas — Finnish University Employees’ Experiences on the Governance of University Work

  • Arto Jauhiainen
  • Annukka Jauhiainen
  • Anne Laiho
  • Reeta Lehto
Article
First Online:

Abstract

This article explores how the university workers of two Finnish universities experienced the range of neoliberal policymaking and governance reforms implemented in the 2000s. These reforms include quality assurance, system of defined annual working hours, outcome-based salary system and work time allocation system. Our point of view regarding these practices is based on the ideas of the governmentality research tradition, which means that they can be seen as technologies through which the ideology, values and aims of the neoliberal policy are carried out in every day work at university. This article draws on a survey that is based on open-ended questions concerning those managerial techniques. These experiences can be summarised into three themes from the perspective of performativity culture: techniques that confirm a culture of fabrication, moral dilemmas and increase in the new type of bureaucracy in their work.

Keywords

university work policy technologies performativity governance 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Aarrevaara, T., Dobson, I.R. and Elander, C. (2009) ‘Brave new world: Higher education reform in Finland’, Higher Education Management and Policy 21 (2): 89–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, G. (2006) ‘Carving out time and space in the managerial university’, Journal of Organizational Change Management 19 (5): 578–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ball, S.J. (2003) ‘The teachers’ soul and terrors of performativity’, Journal of Education Policy 18 (2): 215–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ball, S.J. (2006) ‘Performativity and Fabrications in the Education Economy: Towards the Performativity Society’, in H. Lauder, P. Brown, J.-A. Dillabough and A.H. Halsey (eds.) Education, Globalisation & Social Change, Oxford: University Press, pp. 692–701.Google Scholar
  5. Ball, S.J. (2012) Global Education. New Policy Networks and the Neo-Liberal Imaginary, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Bansel, P. and Davies, B. (2010) ‘Through a Love of What Neoliberalism Puts at Risk’, in J. Blackmore, M. Brennan and L. Zipin (eds.) Re-Positioning University Governance and Academic Work, Rotterdam: Sense Publishers, pp. 133–145.Google Scholar
  7. Bennich-Björkman, L. (2007) ‘Has academic freedom survived? — An interview study of the conditions for researchers in an era of paradigmatic change’, Higher Education Quarterly 61 (3): 334–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blackmore, J., Brennan, M. and Zipin, L. (eds.) (2010) ‘Repositioning University Governance and Academic Work: On Overview’, in Re-Positioning University Governance and Academic Work, Rotterdam: Sense Publishers, pp. 1–16.Google Scholar
  9. Butler, L. (2012) ‘Using a balanced approach to bibliometrics: Quantitative performance measures in the Australian research quality framework’, Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics 8 (January): 1–10.Google Scholar
  10. Chandler, J., Barry, J. and Clark, H. (2002) ‘Stressing academe: The wear and tear of the new public management’, Human Relations 55 (9): 1051–1069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Davies, B. (2003) ‘Death to critique and dissent? The policies and practices of new managerialism and of “evidence based practice”’, Gender and Education 15 (1): 91–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Davies, B. and Bansel, P. (2010) ‘Governmentality and academic work. Shaping the hearts and minds of academic workers’, Journal of Curriculum Theorizing 26 (3): 5–20.Google Scholar
  13. Dean, M. (2010) Governmentality. Power and Rule in Modern Society, 2nd edn, Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  14. Deem, R. (2001) ‘Globalisation, new managerialism, academic capitalism and entrepreneurialism in universities: Is the local dimension still important?’ Comparative Education 37 (1): 7–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Deem, R. (2009) ‘“Managing” Academic Research in Universities or Cat-Herding for Beginners?’ in M. Simons, M. Olssen and M. Peters (eds.) Re-Reading Education Polices. A Handbook Studying in Policy Agenda of the 21st Century, Rotterdam: Sense Publishers, pp. 319–336.Google Scholar
  16. Farrell, C. and Morris, J. (2003) ‘The “neo-bureaucratic” state: Professionals, managers and professional managers in schools, general practices and social work’, Organization 10 (1): 129–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Foucault, M. (2000) ‘The Subject of Power’, in J.D. Faubion (ed.) Michel Foucault. Power. Essential works of Foucault 1954–1984. Vol. 3 London: Penguin Books, pp. 326–348.Google Scholar
  18. Gillies, D. (2008) ‘Developing governmentality: Conduct and education policy’, Journal of Education Policy 23 (4): 415–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Harvey, L. (2002) ‘The end of quality?’ Quality in Higher Education 8 (1): 5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Henkel, M. (2005) ‘Academic identity and autonomy in a changing policy environment’, Higher Education 49 (1–2): 155–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hey, V. (2004) ‘Perverse pleasures — Identity work and the paradoxes of greedy institutions’, Journal of International Women’s Studies 5 (3): 33–42.Google Scholar
  22. Hoecht, A. (2006) ‘Quality assurance in UK higher education: Issues of trust, control, professional autonomy and accountability’, Higher Education 51 (4): 541–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Höpfl, H. (2006) ‘Post-bureaucracy and Weber’s “modern” bureaucrat’, Journal of Organizational Change Management 19 (1): 8–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hornibrook, S. (2012) ‘Policy implementation and academic workload planning in the managerial university: Understanding unintended consequences’, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 34 (1): 29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jauhiainen, A., Jauhiainen, A. and Laiho, A. (2009) ‘The dilemmas of the “efficiency university” policy and the everyday life of university teachers’, Teaching in Higher Education 14 (4): 417–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kekäle, J. (2008) ‘The negotiation process toward the new salary system in the Finnish university sector’, Higher Education Management and Policy 20 (3): 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kivistö, J. (2005) ‘The government-higher education institution relationship: Theoretical considerations from the perspective of agency theory’, Tertiary Education and Management 11 (1): 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kuo, H.-M. (2009) ‘Understanding relationships between academic staff and administrators: An organisational culture perspective’, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 31 (1): 43–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Laiho, A. and Jauhiainen, A. (2012) ‘Kohti post-Humboldtilaista yliopistoa — opetus-tutkimus yhteys uusliberalistisessa yliopistossa. [Towards Post-Humboldtian University — Teaching-research Relationship in Neoliberal University]’, in J. Kivirauma, A. Jauhiainen, P. Seppänen and T. Kaunisto (eds.) Koulutuksen yhteiskunnallinen ymmärrys [Social Understanding of the Education]. Suomen kasvatustieteellinen seura, Kasvatusalan tutkimuksia 59, Jyväskylä: Finnish Educational Research Association, Research in educational sciences, pp. 62–88.Google Scholar
  30. Larner, W. (2000) ‘Neo-liberalism: Policy, ideology, governmentality’, Studies in Political Economy 63 (Autumn): 5–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mäntylä, H. (2007) ‘On “good” academic work. Practicing respect at close range’, Ph.D. dissertation, Helsinki School of Economics.Google Scholar
  32. Morley, L. (2003) Quality and Power in Higher Education, Maidenhead: Society for Research into Higher Education Open University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Nixon, J., Marks, A., Rowland, S. and Walker, M. (2001) ‘Towards a new academic professionalism: A manifesto of hope’, British Journal of Sociology of Education 22 (2): 227–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Olssen, M. and Peters, M.A. (2005) ‘Neoliberalism, higher education and the knowledge economy: From the free market to knowledge capitalism’, Journal of Education Policy 20 (3): 313–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Opetus — ja kulttuuriministeriö [Ministry of Education and Culture] (2012) Yliopistolakiuudistuksen vaikutusten arviointi [Evaluation of the Effects of the New Universities Act], Helsinki: Opetus — ja kulttuuriministeriö, Opetus — ja kulttuuriministeriön julkaisuja.Google Scholar
  36. Power, M. (2000) ‘The audit society — Second thoughts’, International Journal of Auditing 4 (1): 111–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Power, M. (2003) ‘Evaluating the audit explosion’, Law and Policy 25 (3): 185–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Räsänen, K. (2008) ‘Meaningful academic work as praxis in emergence’, Journal of Research Practice 4(1), ArticleP1, http://jrp.icaap.org/index.php/jrp/article/view/78/102, accessed 27 August 2012.
  39. Rinne, R. (2010) ‘The Nordic University Model from a Comparative and Historical Perspective’, in J. Kauko, R. Rinne and H. Kynkäänniemi (eds.) Restructuring the Truth of Schooling — Essays on Discursive Practices in Sociology and the Politics of Education, Jyväskylä: Finnish Educational Research Association, Research in educational sciences, pp. 85–112.Google Scholar
  40. Rinne, R. and Jauhiainen, A. (2012) ‘In the Shifting Sands of Policy — University Academics‘ and Employees’ Views and Experiences of Finnish New Higher Education Policy’, in S. Ahola and D.M. Hoffman (eds.) Higher Education Research in Finland. Emerging Structures and Contemporary Issues, Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä. Finnish Institute for Educational Research, pp. 89–110.Google Scholar
  41. Rinne, R., Jauhiainen, A., Simola, H., Lehto, R., Jauhiainen, A. and Laiho, A. (2012) Valta, uusi yliopistopolitiikka ja yliopistotyö Suomessa. Managerialistinen hallintapolitiikka yliopistolaisten kokemana [Power, New Higher Education Policy and University Work in Finland. Managerial Governmentality Experienced by University Workers], Jyväskylä: Finnish Educational Research Association, Research in educational sciences.Google Scholar
  42. Rinne, R., Kallo, J. and Hokka, S. (2004) ‘Too eager to comply? OECD education policies ant thee Finnish response’, European Educational Research Journal 3 (2): 454–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rizvi, F. and Lingard, B. (2010) Globalizing Education Policy, London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  44. Rose, N. (1991) ‘Governing by numbers: Figuring out democracy’, Accounting Organizations and Society 16 (7): 673–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rose, N. (1999) Powers of Freedom. Reframing Political Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Salminen, A. (2003) ‘New Public Management and Finnish Public Sector Organisations: The Case of Universities’, in A. Amaral, V. Meek and I. Larsen (eds.) The Higher Education Managerial Revolution? Dordrecht: Springer Science + Business, pp. 55–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Simola, H. (2009) ‘Trans-national technologies, national techniques and local mechanisms in finnish university governance: A journey through the layers’, Nordic Educational Research 29 (1): 6–17.Google Scholar
  48. Tieteentekijöiden liitto ja professoriliitto [The Finnish Union of University Researchers and Teachers and The Finnish Union of University Professors] (2010) Yliopistouudistusta koskeva kysely [Inquiry concerning the university reform], http://www.tieteentekijoidenliitto.fi/news/578, accessed 6 June 2013.
  49. Tjeldvoll, A. (2011) ‘Change leadership in universities: The Confucian dimension’, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 33 (3): 219–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Universities Act (1997) 27 March 1997/645.Google Scholar
  51. Universities Act (2009) 24 July 2009/558.Google Scholar
  52. Vanttaja, M. (2010) Yliopiston villit vuodet. Suomalaisen yliopistolaitoksen muutoksia ja uudistuksia 1990-luvulta 2000-luvun alkuun [The Wild Years of the University. Changes and Reforms of the Finnish University Institution from 1990’s to Beginning of the 2000’s], Turku: Turun yliopiston kasvatustieteiden tiedekunnan julkaisuja.Google Scholar
  53. Winter, R. (2010) ‘Academic manager or managed academics? Academic identity schisms in higher education’, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 31 (3): 121–131.Google Scholar
  54. Ylijoki, O.-H. and Mäntylä, H. (2003) ‘Conflicting time perspectives in academic work’, Time & Society 12 (1): 55–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Ylijoki, O.-H. and Ursin, J. (2013) ‘The construction of academic identity in the changes of finnish higher education’, Studies in Higher Education 38 (8): 1145–1149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Association of Universities 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arto Jauhiainen
    • 1
  • Annukka Jauhiainen
    • 1
  • Anne Laiho
    • 1
  • Reeta Lehto
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EducationUniversity of TurkuTurkuFinland

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options