Advertisement

Higher Education Policy

, Volume 28, Issue 3, pp 295–313 | Cite as

Translating Governance Ideas in Danish Higher Education

  • Lise Degn
Article
First Online:

Abstract

Many of the same ideas seem to crop up repeatedly in the higher education governance reform wave in recent decades, with accountability, flexibility, and strategic capacity being a few of the common concepts. Several studies have shown, however, that national higher education systems receive these inputs very differently, leading to dissimilar implementation and interpretations of the same ideas, indicating that national contexts deserve particular attention when investigating the influence and impact of new concepts. The present paper presents results from a study of how central ideas about management and governance of higher education institutions have shaped and reshaped Danish national higher education policy since the 1970s. This study demonstrates the dynamics of how powerful ideas ‘travel’ over time, and adds to our knowledge about how ‘global’ ideas become ‘local’.

Keywords

higher education higher education governance Danish politics policy ideas 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Aagaard, K. (2011) ‘Kampen om basismidlerne: Historisk institutionel analyse af basisbevillingsmodellens udvikling på universitetsområdet i Danmark’, Ph.D. dissertation, Danish Centre for Studies in Research and Research Policy, Aarhus University.Google Scholar
  2. Amaral, A., Jones, G.A. and Karseth, B. (eds.) (2002) Governing Higher Education: National Perspectives on Institutional Governance, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amaral, A., Meek, V.L. and Larsen, I.M. (eds.) (2003) The Higher Education Managerial Revolution? Vol. 3, Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andersen, N.Å. and Thygesen, N.T. (2004) ‘Styring af styringsværktøjer’, Nordisk Administrativt Tidsskrift 85 (1): 28–37.Google Scholar
  5. Béland, D. and Cox, R.H. (2011) Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research Ideas and Politics, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bleiklie, I. (1998) ‘Justifying the evaluative state: New public management ideals in higher education’, Journal of Public Affairs Education 4 (2): 87–100.Google Scholar
  7. Bleiklie, I. and Kogan, M. (2007) ‘Organization and governance of universities’, Higher Education Policy 20 (4): 477–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blyth, M. (1997) ‘“Any more bright ideas?” The ideational turn of comparative political economy’, Comparative Politics 29 (2): 229–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Braun, D. (2006) ‘The mix of policy rationales in science and technology policy’, Melbourne Journal of Politics 31 (7): 8–35.Google Scholar
  10. Callon, M. and Latour, B. (1981) ‘Unscrewing the Big Leviathan: How Actors Macro-Structure Reality and How Sociologists Help Them to Do So’, in K. Knorr-Cetina and A.V. Cicourel (eds.) Advances in Social Theory and Methodology, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, pp. 277–303.Google Scholar
  11. Campbell, J.L. (2002) ‘Ideas, politics, and public policy’, Annual Review of Sociology 28 (2): 21–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Campbell, J.L. (2004) Institutional Change and Globalization, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Carstensen, M.B. (2010) ‘The nature of ideas, and why political scientists should care: analysing the Danish jobcentre reform from an ideational perspective’, Political Studies 58 (5): 847–865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Christensen, T. (2011) ‘University governance reforms: potential problems of more autonomy?’ Higher Education 62 (4): 503–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Christensen, T. and Lægreid, P. (2001) New Public Management: The Transformation of Ideas and Practice, Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  16. Clark, B. (1998) Creating Entrepreneurial Universities, Organisational Pathways of Transformation, Oxford/New York: Pergamon Elsevier.Google Scholar
  17. Corbett, A. (2003) ‘Ideas, institutions and policy entrepreneurs: towards a new history of higher education in the European Community’, European Journal of Education 38 (3): 315–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Czarniawska, B. (2009) ‘Emerging institutions: pyramids or anthills?’ Organization Studies 30 (4): 423–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Czarniawska, B. and Sevón, G. (2005) Global Ideas: How Ideas, Objects and Practices Travel in a Global Economy, Malmö: Liber & Copenhagen Business School Press.Google Scholar
  20. de Boer, H. and File, J. (2009) Higher Education Governance Reforms across Europe (MODERN Project), Brussels: ESMU.Google Scholar
  21. Degn, L. and Sørensen, M.P. (2012) ‘Universitetsloven fra 2003. På vej mod konkurrenceuniversitetet’, in K. Aagaard and N. Mejlgaard (eds.) Dansk forskningspolitik efter årtusindskiftet, Aarhus: Aarhus University Press, pp. 59–94.Google Scholar
  22. Ejersbo, N. and Greve, C. (2005) Moderniseringen af den offentlige sektor, Copenhagen: Børsen.Google Scholar
  23. European Commission (2005) ‘Mobilising the brainpower of Europe: enabling universities to make their full contribution to the Lisbon Strategy’, COM 152, Brussels.Google Scholar
  24. Etzkowitz, H. and Leydesdorff, L. (2000) ‘The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a triple helix of university–industry–government relations’, Research Policy 29 (2): 109–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fägerlind, I. and Strömqvist, G. (eds.) (2004) Reforming Higher Education in the Nordic Countries: Studies of Change in Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden, Paris: International Institute for Educational Planning.Google Scholar
  26. Folketinget (1970) Forslag til Lov om universiteternes styrelse, The Danish Parliament: Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  27. Folketinget (1973) Forslag til Lov om styrelse af højere uddannelsesinstitutioner, The Danish Parliament: Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  28. Folketinget (1988) Forslag til Lov om ændring af lov om styrelse af højere uddannelsesinstitutioner, The Danish Parliament: Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  29. Folketinget (1993) Forslag til Lov om universiteter, The Danish Parliament: Copenhagen. Available at: https://www.retsinformation.dk/Forms/R0710.aspx?id=111293&exp=1, accessed 2 February 2014.Google Scholar
  30. Folketinget (1999) Forslag til Lov om ændring af lov om universiteter m.fl., The Danish Parliament: Copenhagen. Available at: www.retsinformation.dk/Forms/R0710.aspx?id=88632, accessed 2 February 2014.Google Scholar
  31. Folketinget (2003) Forslag til Lov om universiteter, The Danish Parliament: Copenhagen. Available at: www.retsinformation.dk/Forms/R0710.aspx?id=100418, accessed 2 February 2014.Google Scholar
  32. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P. and Trow, M. (1994) The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies, London: Sage.Google Scholar
  33. Gornitzka, Å. and Maassen, P. (2000) ‘National policies concerning the economic role of higher education’, Higher Education Policy 13 (3): 225–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gornitzka, Å., Stensaker, B., Smeby, J.-C. and de Boer, H. (2004) ‘Contract arrangements in the Nordic countries: solving the efficiency-effectiveness dilemma?’ Higher Education in Europe 29 (1): 87–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hall, P. (1993) ‘Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: the case of economic policymaking in Britain’, Comparative Politics 25 (3): 275–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hansen, K.E. (1971) Universiteternes styrelseslov — kommenteret udgave, Copenhagen: Gads Forlag.Google Scholar
  37. Hansen, H.F. (2012) ‘Fusionsprocesserne: Frivillighed under tvang’, in K. Aagaard and N. Mejlgaard (eds.) Dansk Forskningspolitik efter Årtusindskiftet, Aarhus: Aarhus University Press, pp. 195–228.Google Scholar
  38. Hay, C. (2001) ‘The “Crisis” of Keynesianism and the Rise of Neoliberalism in Britain: An Ideational Institutionalist Approach’, in J.L. Campbell and O.K. Pedersen (eds.) The Rise of Neoliberalism and Institutional Analysis, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 193–218.Google Scholar
  39. Hood, C. (1995) ‘The “New Public Management” in the 1980s: variations on a theme’, Accounting, Organizations and Society 20 (2): 93–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kooiman, J. (2008) ‘Exploring the concept of governability’, Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 10 (2): 171–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Latour, B. (1986) ‘The Powers of Association’, in J. Law (ed.) Power, Action and Belief, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, pp. 261–277.Google Scholar
  42. Menahem, G. (2008) ‘The transformation of higher education in Israel since the 1990s: the role of ideas and policy paradigms’, Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions 21 (4): 499–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mehta, J. (2011) ‘The Varied Roles of Ideas in Politics: From “Whether” to “How”’, in D. Béland and R.H. Cox (eds.) Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research Ideas and Politics, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Mukhtarov, F. (2012) ‘Rethinking the travel of ideas: policy translation in the water sector’, Policy & Politics, doi:10.1332/030557312X655459.Google Scholar
  45. Neave, G. and van Vught, F. (eds.) (1991) Prometheus Bound, the Changing Relationship between Government and Higher Education in Western Europe, London: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  46. Neave, G. and van Vught, F. (eds.) (1994) Government and Higher Education Relationships across Three Continents: The Winds of Change, Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  47. OECD (2009) Higher Education to 2030, Volume 2. Globalisation, Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.Google Scholar
  48. Olsen, J.P. (2005) The Institutional Dynamics of the (European) University, Oslo: ARENA — Centre for European Studies, University of Oslo.Google Scholar
  49. Paradeise, C., Ferlie, E., Bleiklie, I. and Reale, E. (eds) (2009) University Governance: Western European Comparative Perspectives, Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Petersen, N. (1997) ‘Autonomy and Professionalism — Danish Higher Education and the Problems of State Interference’, in K.D. Wolff (ed.) Autonomy and External Control: The University in Search of the Golden Mean, Munich: Ludicium verlag GmbH, pp. 155–168.Google Scholar
  51. Piironen, O. (2013) ‘The transnational idea of university autonomy and the reform of the Finnish universities act’, Higher Education Policy 26 (1): 127–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pinheiro, R. and Stensaker, B. (2013) ‘Designing the entrepreneurial university: the interpretation of a global idea’, Public Organization Review, published online on 20 July 2013, doi:10.1007/s11115-013-0241-z.Google Scholar
  53. Polanyi, M. (1962) ‘The republic of science: its political and economic theory’, Minerva 1 (1): 54–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pollitt, C. (1995) ‘Justification by works or by faith? Evaluating the new public management’, Evaluation 1 (2): 133–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Rhodes, R.A.W., Binder, S.A. and Rockman, B.A. (2008) The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Romzek, B.S. (2000) ‘Dynamics of public accountability in an era of reform’, International Review of Administrative Sciences 66 (1): 21–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sahlin, K. and Wedlin, L. (2008) ‘Circulating Ideas: Imitation, Translation and Editing’, in R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby and K. Sahlin-Andersson (eds.) Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, Thousand Oaks: SAGE, pp. 218–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Schmidt, V.A. (2008) ‘Discursive institutionalism: the explanatory power of ideas and discourse’, Annual Review of Political Science 11: 303–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Slaughter, S. and Leslie, L.L. (1997) Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies, and the Entrepreneurial University, Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Trow, M. (1996) ‘Trust, markets and accountability in higher education: a comparative perspective’, Higher Education Policy 9 (4): 309–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wandel, C.F. (1985) Betænkning nr. 1055 fra Udvalget til forberedelse af en revision af lov om styrelse af højere uddannelsesinstitutioner. Available at: http://www.statensnet.dk/betaenkninger/1001-1200/1055-1985/1055-1985_pdf/searchable_1055-1985.pdf, accessed 2 February 2014.

Copyright information

© International Association of Universities 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lise Degn
    • 1
  1. 1.The Danish Centre for Studies in Research and Research Policy, School of Business and Social Sciences, Aarhus UniversityAarhus CDenmark

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options