Advertisement

Higher Education Policy

, Volume 27, Issue 3, pp 403–423 | Cite as

When and How Does Europe Matter? Higher Education Policy Change in Croatia, Serbia and Slovenia

  • Martina Vukasovic
Article
First Online:

Abstract

The study underlying this article investigates the factors under which European policy initiatives with respect to higher education (HE), such as the Bologna Process, lead to policy change at the national level. In theoretical terms, it uses institutionalist approaches to the Europeanization of public policy developed in the fields of comparative politics and international relations. The empirical focus is on HE policy changes in three countries of former Yugoslavia from 1990 onwards. More specifically, the focus is on changes of policy goals, normative basis and instruments with regard to quality assurance. A process-tracing approach based on document analysis and interviews with policy actors is used to safeguard against overestimating the influence of European initiatives on national policy change. What matters for European influences on national policy changes are clarity of European initiatives and consequences of non-compliance, as well as density of veto players in the domestic policy context. While legitimacy of European initiatives, the strength of domestic institutional legacies and the participation of domestic actors in the European epistemic communities may also be conducive to European influence on national policy change, the study identifies points where better operationalization and further research in relation to these factors are necessary.

Keywords

Bologna Process quality assurance policy change Europeanization former Yugoslavia 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank Mari Elken, Jens Jungblut, Peter Maassen, Bjørn Stensaker, other members of the Higher Education: Institutional Dynamics and Knowledge Cultures research group at the Department of Education of the University of Oslo, two anonymous reviewers and the editor of the journal for very helpful comments on previous versions of this article.

References

  1. Berlin Communiqué (2003) Realising the European Higher Education area: Communiqué of the Conference of Ministers responsible for Higher Education in Berlin on 19 September, Berlin.Google Scholar
  2. Bologna Declaration (1999) The Bologna Declaration of 19 June 1999: Joint declaration of the European Ministers of Education, Bologna.Google Scholar
  3. Börzel, T.A. and Risse, T. (2003) ‘Conceptualizing the Domestic Impact of Europe’, in K. Featherstone and C.M. Radaelli (eds.) The Politics of Europeanization, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 57–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Branković, J. (2010) ‘Decision making on decision making: Deciding governance in higher education in Serbia 2002–2005’, Master thesis, Department of Education, University of Oslo.Google Scholar
  5. Bruno, I., Jacquot, S. and Mandin, L. (2006) ‘Europeanization through its instrumentation: Benchmarking, mainstreaming and the open method of co-ordination … toolbox or Pandora’s box?’ Journal of European Public Policy 13 (4): 519–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Checkel, J.T. (2005) ‘International institutions and socialization in Europe: Introduction and framework’, International Organization 59 (4): 801–826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clark, B.R. (1983) The Higher Education System: Academic Organization in Cross-National Perspective, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  8. Cohen, M.D., March, J.G. and Olsen, J.P. (1972) ‘A garbage can model of organizational choice’, Administrative Science Quarterly 17 (1): 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dobbins, M. and Knill, C. (2009) ‘Higher education policies in central and eastern Europe: Convergence toward a common model?’ Governance 22 (3): 397–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Doolan, K. (2011) ‘Reconfiguring Higher Education: Discourses and Practices’, in D. Belyaev and Z. Roca (eds.) Contemporary Croatia: Development Challenges in a Socio-Cultural Perspective, Lisbon: Edições Universitárias Lusófonas, pp. 75–100.Google Scholar
  11. Elken, M., Gornitzka, Å., Maassen, P. and Vukasović, M. (2011) European Integration and the Transformation of Higher Education, Oslo: University of Oslo.Google Scholar
  12. ENQA (2005) Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in European Higher Education Area, Brussels: European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education.Google Scholar
  13. ENQA (2010) ENQA: 10 Years (2000–2010). A Decade of European Co-operation in Quality Assurance in Higher Education, Helsinki: ENQA.Google Scholar
  14. Etzioni, A. (1961) A Comparative Analysis of Complex Organizations: On Power, Involvement, and their Correlates, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  15. Exadaktylos, T. and Radaelli, C.M. (2012) Research Design in European Studies: Establishing Causality in Europeanization, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gornitzka, Å. (1999) ‘Governmental policies and organisational change in higher education’, Higher Education 38 (1): 5–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gornitzka, Å. (2006) ‘What is the Use of Bologna in National Reform? The Case of Norwegian Quality Reform in Higher Education’, in V. Tomusk (ed.) Creating the European Higher Education Area: Voices from the Periphery, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 19–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gornitzka, Å. and Maassen, P. (2000) ‘Hybrid steering approaches with respect to European higher education’, Higher Education Policy 13 (3): 267–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Haas, P.M. (1992) ‘Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy coordination’, International Organization 46 (1): 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hall, P.A. (1993) ‘Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: the case of economic policymaking in Britain’, Comparative Politics 25 (3): 275–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Haverland, M. (2005) ‘Does the EU cause domestic developments? The problem of case selection in Europeanization research’, European Integration online Papers, http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2005-002a.htm, accessed 29 October 2013.
  22. Heinze, T. and Knill, C. (2008) ‘Analysing the differential impact of the Bologna process: Theoretical considerations on national conditions for international policy convergence’, Higher Education 56 (4): 493–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Héritier, A. (2005) ‘Europeanization Research East and West: A Comparative Assessment’, in F. Schimmelfennig and U. Sedelmeier (eds.) The Europeanization of Central and Eastern Europe, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, pp. 199–209.Google Scholar
  24. Kehm, B., Huisman, J. and Stensaker, B. (2009) The European Higher Education Area: Perspectives on a Moving Target, Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  25. Maassen, P. (2009) ‘European Higher Education in Search of Institutional Order’, in B. Kehm, J. Huisman and B. Stensaker (eds.) The European Higher Education Area: Perspectives on a Moving Target, Rotterdam: Sense publishers, pp. 281–293.Google Scholar
  26. Maassen, P. and Musselin, C. (2009) ‘European Integration and the Europeanisation of Higher Education’, in A. Amaral, G. Neave, C. Musselin and P. Maassen (eds.) European Integration and the Governance of Higher Education and Research, Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, pp. 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Musselin, C. (2009) ‘The Side Effects of the Bologna Process on National Institutional Settings: The Case of France’, in A. Amaral, G. Neave, C. Musselin and P. Maassen (eds.) European Integration and the Governance of Higher Education and Research, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 181–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Neave, G. and Maassen, P. (2007) ‘The Bologna Process: An Intergovernmental Policy Perspective’, in P. Maassen and J.P. Olsen (eds.) University Dynamics and European Integration, Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, pp. 135–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nikolić, R. and Malbaša, V. (2002) Akreditacija u visokom školstvu Republike Srbije, Belgrade: AAEN and Ministry of Education and Sports.Google Scholar
  30. Olsen, J.P. (2002) ‘The many faces of Europeanization’, Journal of Common Market Studies 50 (5): 921–952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Orosz, A. (2008) ‘The Bologna process in Croatia’, European Education 40 (2): 66–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pabian, P. (2009) ‘Europeanisation of Higher Education Governance in the Post-Communist Context: The Case of the Czech Republic’, in A. Amaral, G. Neave, C. Musselin and P. Maassen (eds.) European Integration and the Governance of Higher Education and Research, Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, pp. 257–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Primeri, E. and Reale, E. (2012) ‘How Europe shapes academic research: Insights from participation in European union framework programmes’, European Journal of Education 47 (1): 104–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Radaelli, C.M. (2003) ‘The Europeanization of Public Policy’, in K. Featherstone and C.M. Radaelli (eds.) The Politics of Europeanization, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 27–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sedelmeier, U. (2011) ‘Europeanisation in new member and candidate states’, Living Reviews in European Governance 6 (1); doi: 10.12942/lreg-2011-1.Google Scholar
  36. Tsebelis, G. (2002) Veto players: How Political Institutions Work, Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Turajlić, S., Babić, S. and Milutinović, Z. (2001) Evropski univerzitet 2001?, Beograd: Alternativna akademska obrazovna mreža.Google Scholar
  38. Voegtle, E., Knill, C. and Dobbins, M. (2011) ‘To what extent does transnational communication drive cross-national policy convergence? The impact of the Bologna Process on domestic higher education policies’, Higher Education 61 (1): 77–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Vukasovic, M. (2013) ‘Change of higher education in response to European pressures: Conceptualization and operationalization of Europeanization of higher education’, Higher Education 66 (3): 311–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Westerheijden, D.F., Brennan, J. and Maassen, P. (1994) Changing Contexts of Quality Assurance: Recent Trends in West European Higher Education, Utrecht: Lemma.Google Scholar
  41. Witte, J. (2006) ‘Change of degrees and degrees of change: Comparing adaptations of European higher education systems in the context of the Bologna Process’, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Twente.Google Scholar
  42. Zahariadis, N. (2007) ‘The Multiple Streams Framework: Structure, Limitations, Prospects’, in P. Sabatier (ed.) Theories of the policy process, Boulder, CO: Westview Press, pp. 65–92.Google Scholar
  43. Zgaga, P. (2002) ‘Changes in Slovenian higher education: Governance, autonomy, admission, and quality’, Higher Education in Europe 27 (3): 325–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zgaga, P. and Miklavič, K. (2011) ‘Reforming higher education in ‘Transition’: Between national and international reform initiatives: The case of Slovenia’, European Education 43 (3): 13–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Association of Universities 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martina Vukasovic
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EducationUniversity of OsloOSLONorway

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options