Advertisement

Higher Education Policy

, Volume 26, Issue 2, pp 173–191 | Cite as

Academic Drift in Dutch Non-University Higher Education Evaluated: A Staff Perspective

  • Didi M E Griffioen
  • Uulkje de Jong
Article

Abstract

In the context of a European knowledge economy, the Dutch non-university institutions systematically develop research activities at a higher frequency than before. With this development, they have been accused of academic drift, of striving to receive a status comparable to traditional universities. This study considers the perceptions of both managers and lecturers in non-university higher education concerning the organisational aims for research activities. The intention is to add an empirical base to the debate of academic drift, especially to the potential of academic drift on the staff level. The results show a moderate indication of potential for academic drift on the staff level. In addition, managers have more positive perceptions regarding all aims for research than lecturers, but both groups prioritise that the results of research should, first and foremost, be directed towards improving the quality of education.

Keywords

academic drift non-university vocational innovation research policy 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would very much like to thank the reviewers for their advice on how to adjust this article.

References

  1. Advisory Council for Science and Technology Policy. (2005) Ontwerp en ontwikkeling. De functie en plaats van onderzoeksactiviteiten in hogescholen, The Hague: Advisory Council for Science and Technology Policy.Google Scholar
  2. Baggen, P. (2005) ‘De wereld veranderen: universiteit en overheidsbeleid in Nederland, 1960-2000’, in L.J. Dorsman and P. Knegtmans (eds.) Universitaire vormingsidealen. De Nederlandse universiteiten sedert 1876, Hilversum: Verloren, pp. 93–108.Google Scholar
  3. Barnett, R. (ed.) (2006) Reshaping the University. New Relationships between Research, Scholarship and Teaching, Berkshire/New York: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Beijaard, D., Meijer, P.C. and Verloop, N. (2004) ‘Reconsidering research on teacher's professional identity’, Teaching and Teacher Education 20 (2): 107–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boei, F. and Griffioen, D.M.E. (2011) ‘Promoveren in het Hoger Beroepsonderwijs: een verkenning, Onderzoek van Onderwijs’, Vakblad voor docenten in het Hoger Onderwijs 40 (1): 4–9.Google Scholar
  6. Boerma, K., Griffioen, D.M.E. and de Jong, U. (2011) ‘The Executive's Standard on Research Competence of Teachers in Dutch non-university Higher Education’, Proceedings of the Conference of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction (EARLI); 30 August–3 September 2011, Exeter, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
  7. Brew, A. (2010) ‘Transforming academic practice through scholarship’, International Journal for Academic Development 15 (2): 105–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Christensen, S.H. and Erno-Kjolhede, E. (2011) ‘Academic drift in Danish professional engineering education. Myth or reality? Opportunity or threat?’ European Journal of Engineering Education 36 (3): 285–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. de Boer, H.F., Enders, J. and Leisyte, L. (2007) ‘Public sector reform in Dutch higher education: The organisational transformation of the university’, Public Administration 85 (1): 27–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. de Jong, H. and de Jager, G. (2007) ‘Van hogeschool naar kennisorganisatie. Investeren in professionals’, THEMA 7 (3): 25–28.Google Scholar
  11. de Weert, E. and Leijnse, F. (2010) ‘Practice-oriented Research: The Extended Function of Dutch Universities of Applied Science’, in S. Kyvik and B. Lepori (eds.) The Research Mission of Higher Education Institutions Outside the University Sector. Striving for Differentiation, London: Springer, pp. 199–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dijstelbloem, H. and Schuyt, C.J.M. (2003) ‘Kennismaken: nieuw overheidsbeleid voor de kennissamenleving’, Bestuurskunde 12 (4): 152–159.Google Scholar
  13. Dutch Ministry of Education Culture and Science. (2011) Kwaliteit in Verscheidenheid. Strategische Agenda Hoger Onderwijs, Onderzoek en Wetenschap, The Hague: Dutch Ministry of Education Culture and Science.Google Scholar
  14. Dutch Ministry of Education Culture and Science and Netherlands Association of Universities of Applied Sciences. (2001) Convenant Lectoren en Kenniskringen in het hoger beroepsonderwijs, The Hague: Dutch Ministry of Education Culture and Science, and Netherlands Association of Universities of Applied Sciences.Google Scholar
  15. Duursma, M. (2005) ‘Hogescholen schurken tegen universiteiten aan’, NRC, 8 June, NRC Handelsblad, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  16. Edwards, R. and Miller, K. (2008) ‘Academic drift in vocational qualifications? Explorations through the lens of literacy’, Journal of Vocational Education and Training 60 (2): 123–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Elsen, M., Visser-Wijnveen, G.J., Van der Rijst, R.M. and Van Driel, J.H. (2008) ‘How to strengthen the connection between research and teaching in undergraduate university education’, Higher Education Quarterly 63 (1): 64–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Geijsel, F., Sleegers, P., Van den Berg, R. and Kelchtermans, G. (2001) ‘Conditions fostering the implementation of large-scale innovation programs in schools: teachers’ perspectives’, Education Administration Quarterly 37 (1): 130–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Griffioen, D.M.E. and Boei, F. (2010) ‘Promoveren in het hoger beroepsonderwijs: een stand van zaken’, THEMA 12 (5): 4–9.Google Scholar
  20. Griffioen, D.M.E. and De Jong, U. (2007) ‘De positie van onderzoek in het HBO; geschiedenis van een discussie’, Proceedings of the Onderwijs Research Dagen; 6–8 June; Groningen, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
  21. Griffioen, D.M.E., De Jong, U. and Jak, S. (2013) ‘Research self-efficacy of lecturers in non-university higher education’, Innovation in Education and Teaching International, 50 (1).Google Scholar
  22. Harwood, J. (2010) ‘Understanding academic drift: on the institutional dynamics of higher technical and professional education’, Minerva 48 (4): 413–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Healey, M. (2005) ‘Linking Research and Teaching: Exploring Disciplinary Spaces and the Role of Inquiry-based Learning’, in R. Barnett (ed.) Reshaping the University: New Relationships between Research, Scholarship and Teaching, McGraw Hill: Open University Press, pp. 67–78.Google Scholar
  24. Hill, M.F. and Haigh, M.A. (2011) ‘Creating a culture of research in teaching education: Learning research within communities of practice’, Studies in Higher Education iFirst apublication 12 August. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2011.559222.Google Scholar
  25. Huisman, J. (2008) ‘Shifting Boundaries in Higher Education: Dutch Hogescholen on the Move’, in J.S. Taylor, J. Brites Ferreira, M. De Lourdes Machado and R. Santiago (eds.) Non-University Higher Education in Europe, London: Springer, pp. 147–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Huisman, J. and Kaiser, F. (2001) Fixed and Fuzzy Boundaries in Higher Education. A Comparative Study of (binary) Structures in Nine Countries, The Hague: Advisory Council for Science and Technology Policy.Google Scholar
  27. Kyvik, S. (2004) ‘Structural changes in higher education systems in Western Europe’, Higher Education in Europe 29 (3): 393–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kyvik, S. (2007) ‘Academic Drift — A Reinterpretation’, in The Officers and Crew of HMS Network (ed.) Towards a Cartography of Higher Education Policy Change. A Festschrift in Honour of Guy Neave, CHEPS: Enschede, pp. 333–338.Google Scholar
  29. Kyvik, S. (2009) The Dynamics of Change in Higher Education, Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  30. Kyvik, S. and Skodvin, O.-J. (2003) ‘Research in non-university higher education sector — tensions and dilemmas’, Higher Education 45 (2): 203–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Leijnse, F. (2005a) ‘Hogeschool is domein nieuwe kennis’, De Volkskrant, 6 September.Google Scholar
  32. Leijnse, F. (2005b) Hooggeleerde domheid en andere gebreken. Over kennisproductie in de polder, Utrecht: Hogeschool Utrecht.Google Scholar
  33. Lepori, B. and Kyvik, S. (2010) ‘The research mission of universities of applied sciences and the future configuration of higher education systems in Europe’, Higher Education Policy 23 (3): 295–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McRoy, I. and Gibbs, P. (2009) ‘Leading change in higher education’, Educational Management Administration and Leadership 37 (5): 687–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mudde, R.F. (2005) ‘Dikdoenerij en mannetjesmakerij passen HBO niet’, NRC, 11 August, NRC Handelsblad, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  36. Neave, G. (1978) ‘Polytechnics: A policy drift?’ Studies in Higher Education 3 (1): 105–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Neave, G. (1979) ‘Academic drift: Some views from Europe’, Studies in Higher Education 4 (2): 143–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Peterson, M.W. and White, T.W. (1992) ‘Faculty and administrator perceptions of their environments: Different views or different models of organization?’ Research in Higher Education 33 (2): 177–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Runhaar, P. (2008) ‘Promoting teachers’ professional development’, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Twente.Google Scholar
  40. Rupp, J.C.C. (1997) Van oude en nieuwe universiteiten. De verdringing van Duitse door Amerikaanse invloeden op de wetenschapsbeoefening en het hoger onderwijs in Nederland, 1945–1995, Den Haag: Sdu Uitgevers.Google Scholar
  41. Seyd, R. (2000) ‘Breaking down barriers: The administrator and the academic’, Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education 4 (2): 35–37.Google Scholar
  42. Tabachnick, B.G. and Fidell, L.S. (2007) Using Multivariate Statistics, Boston: Pearson.Google Scholar
  43. Teichler, U. (2008) ‘The End of Alternatives to Universities or New Opportunities?’, in J.S. Taylor, J.B. Ferreira, M. De Lourdes Machado and R. Santiago (eds.) Non-University Higher Education in Europe, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. van den Berg, R. and Sleegers, P.J.C. (1996) ‘Building Innovative Capacity and Leadership’, in K. Leithwood (ed.) International Handbook of Educational Leadership and Administration, London: Springer.Google Scholar
  45. van den Berg, R., Sleegers, P., Geijsel, F. and Vandenberghe, R. (2000) ‘Implementation of an innovation: meeting the concerns of teachers’, Studies in Educational Evaluation 26 (4): 331–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. van der Linden, W., Bakx, A., Ros, A., Beijaard, D. and Vermeulen, M. (2012) ‘Student teachers’ development of a positive attitude towards research and research knowledge and skills’, European Journal of Teaching iFirst publication 23 January. doi: 10.1080/02619768.2011.643401.Google Scholar
  47. van Lieshout, H. and Borgdorff, H. (2005) ‘Onderzoek onmisbaar in HBO’ Hanzehogeschool, Groningen, (Unpublished).Google Scholar
  48. Verburgh, A., Schouteden, W. and Elen, J. (2009) ‘Onderzoek in het hoger onderwijs: onderzoeksbetrokken doelen in Vlaamse hogescholen’, Onderzoek van Onderwijs. Vakblad voor docenten in het Hoger Onderwijs 28 (3): 43–48.Google Scholar
  49. Visser-Wijnveen, G.J., Van Driel, J.H., Van der Rijst, R.M., Verloop, N. and Visser, A. (2009) ‘The relationship between academics’ conceptions of knowledge, research and teaching — A metaphor study’, Teaching in Higher Education 14 (6): 673–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. VKO. (2010) ‘Validatiecommissie Kwaliteitszorg Onderzoek’, Kwaliteitszorg voor het onderzoek aan hogescholen, online publication, http://www.vkohogescholen.nl/, accessed February 2012.
  51. Vogel, M.P. (2009) ‘The professionalism of professors at German fachhochschulen’, Studies in Higher Education 34 (8): 873–888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Witte, J., Van der Wende, M. and Huisman, J. (2008) ‘Blurring boundaries: How the bologna process changes the relationship between university and non-university higher education in Germany, the Netherlands and France’, Studies in Higher Education 33 (3): 217–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Association of Universities 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Didi M E Griffioen
    • 1
  • Uulkje de Jong
    • 2
  1. 1.Staff Department Education and Applied ResearchAmsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Spui 25, room 1.19AmsterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of EducationUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations