Higher Education Policy

, Volume 23, Issue 1, pp 99–122 | Cite as

Trade in Higher Education Services in Malaysia: Key Policy Challenges

  • Siew Yean Tham
Article
First Online:

Abstract

In recent years, Malaysia has emerged as an unexpected contender in the world market for international students in higher education. Recognizing this sector as a potential new source of growth and export revenue, Malaysia aims to become a regional hub for higher education. In view of this, the objectives of this paper are to profile the pattern of trade in higher education services in Malaysia and to analyze the main factors that have contributed toward the trade performance of this sector. The paper also seeks to identify key policy challenges faced by the country in terms of enhancing the trade in this sector. The main findings show that the trade pattern has changed over time and this change is contributed by both external and internal changes, including unilateral liberalization measures. Key policy challenges for enhancing trade lie in removing domestic constraints in the face of increasing competition from other emerging contenders as well as attaining international accreditation and recognition for home-grown programmes. Policy directions for the future need to address these domestic hindrances as well as to rationalize the number of players. Since Malaysia's increasing trade in this sector has largely evolved without offering this sector for liberalization until recently, it is important to reassess the potential costs and benefits of further liberalization before committing this sector for liberalization in more trade agreements.

Keywords

higher education trade liberalization policy challenges 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgements

I thank the two anonymous referees of this paper for their helpful comments and suggestions for improvements, although the usual caveat applies.

References

  1. Bennell, P. and Pearce, T. (2003) ‘The internationalization of higher education: Exporting education to developing and transitional economies’, International Journal of Educational Development 23: 215–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Challenger. (2006a) Education Guide Malaysia. 10th edn, Petaling Jaya: Challenger.Google Scholar
  3. Challenger. (2006b) Study in Malaysia Handbook. 6th International Edition 2007, Petaling Jaya: Challenger.Google Scholar
  4. Charmonman, S. (2005) ‘University-level eLearning in ASEAN’, Proceedings of the Second International Conference on eLearning for Knowledge-based Society; 4–7 August; Bangkok, Thailand, www.charm.au.edu/.../University-Level%20eLearning%20in%20ASEAN.pdf
  5. De Siqueira, A.C. (2005) ‘The regulation of education through the WTO/GATS’, Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies 3 (1): 1–11.Google Scholar
  6. Dee, P. (2004) ‘Measuring the Cost of Regulatory Restrictions on Services Trade in Malaysia’, A background report to the study on ‘Improving the Investment Climate by Reducing the Regulatory Burden in Malaysia’. World Bank Study for the Economic Planning Unit (EPU), Malaysia.Google Scholar
  7. Garrett, R. (2005) ‘Fraudulent, Sub-standard, Ambiguous: The Alternative Borderless Higher Education’, OBHE Report July, Briefing Note 24.Google Scholar
  8. Ismail, M.S. (2007) ‘The Role of Private College and Universities in Malaysia: Widening Access to Quality Higher Education’, Paper presented at the 11th Malaysian Education Summit, 16–17 April. Sunway Resort Hotel.Google Scholar
  9. Knight, J. (2006) ‘Higher Education Crossing Borders: A Guide to the Implications of the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) for Cross-border Education’, Report prepared for the Commonwealth of Learning and UNESCO.Google Scholar
  10. Larsen, K., Momii, K. and Vincent-Lancrin, S. (2004) Cross-border Higher Education: An Analysis of Current Trends, Policy Strategies and Future Scenarios, London: OBHE (Report).Google Scholar
  11. Lee, M. (1999) ‘Private Higher Education in Malaysia’, Monograph Series no. 1/1999. School of Educational Studies, Universiti Sains Malaysia.Google Scholar
  12. Lim, A.H. and Honeck, D. (2009) ‘GATS and Education Services: Current Commitments and Future Prospects’, in R.M. Bassett and A. Maldonado-Maldonado (eds.) International Organizations and Higher Education Policy. Thinking Globally, Acting Locally? London: Routledge, 132–152.Google Scholar
  13. Malaysian Ministry of International Trade Industry. (1996) Seventh Malaysia Plan 1996–2000, Kuala Lumpur: National Printing Corporation Limited.Google Scholar
  14. Malaysian Ministry of International Trade and Industry. (2006) IMP3: Third Industrial Master Plan 2006–2020: Malaysia — Towards Global Competitiveness, Kuala Lumpur: National Printing Corporation Limited.Google Scholar
  15. Ministry of Higher Education (MOHE). (2006) Report by the Committee to Study, Review and Make Recommendations Concerning the Development and Direction of Higher Education in Malaysia, Shah Alam: University Publication Centre (UPENA).Google Scholar
  16. Ministry of Higher Education (MOHE). (2007) The National Higher Education Strategic Plan Beyond 2020, Putrajaya: MOHE.Google Scholar
  17. New Straits Times. (2007) ‘Nod for Malaysian quality agency’, 14 June.Google Scholar
  18. Observatory on Borderless Higher Education. (2006) ‘Malaysia launches new US$4.8 billion higher education strategy in continued pursuit of “regional hub” status’, 28 April.Google Scholar
  19. Robertson, S., Bonal, X. and Dale, R. (2002) ‘GATS and the education services industry: The politics of scale and global reterritorialization’, Comparative Education Review 46 (4): 472–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Saner, R. and Fasel, S. (2003) ‘Negotiating trade in educational services within the WTO/GATS context’, Aussenwirtschaft 59 (II): 275–308.Google Scholar
  21. Sato, M. (2005) ‘Higher education reforms in Malaysia 1957–2003’, Journal of Language, Culture and Communication 7 (1): 73–88.Google Scholar
  22. Sauvé, P. (2002) ‘Trade education and the GATS: What's in, what's out, what's all the fuss about?’ Higher Education Management and Policy 14 (3): 47–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sieh, L.M.L., Mahani, Z.A. and Loke, W.H. (2000) Liberalisation and Deregulation of Malaysia's Services Sector, Kuala Lumpur: University of Malaya Press.Google Scholar
  24. Sirat, M. (2008) ‘The impact of September 11 on international student flow into Malaysia: Lessons learned’, International Journal of Asia Pacific Studies 4 (1): 79–95.Google Scholar
  25. Tan, A.M. (2002) Malaysian Private Higher Education: Globalisation, Privatisation, Transformation and Marketplaces, London: ASEAN Academic Press.Google Scholar
  26. Tham, S.Y. and Kam, A.J.Y. (2007) ‘Trade and investment linkages in higher education services in Malaysia’, in Studies in Trade and Investment 62: Towards Coherent Policy Framework: Understanding Trade and Investment Linkages, New York: Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP), 161–192.Google Scholar
  27. Verbik, L. and Lasanowski, V. (2007) International Student Mobility: Patterns and Trends, London: OBHE.Google Scholar
  28. Williams, G (1987 ‘The international market for overseas students in the English-speaking world’, European Journal of Education 22 (1): 15–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. WTO. (1998) ‘Education Services: Background Note by the Secretariat’, Council for Trade in Services. S/C/W/49, 23 September.Google Scholar
  30. Ziguras, C. (2001) ‘Educational Technology in Transnational Higher Education in South East Asia: The Cultural Politics of Flexible Learning’, Educational Technology & Society 4 (4): 436–4522.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Association of Universities 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Siew Yean Tham
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Malaysian and International Studies (IKMAS), Universiti Kebangsaan MalaysiaBangiMalaysia

Personalised recommendations