Higher Education Policy

, Volume 22, Issue 2, pp 225–244 | Cite as

GATS and Higher Education: State of Play of the Liberalization Commitments

  • Antoni Verger
Article

Abstract

Higher education is the education level under the most pressure to be internationally liberalized. Currently, the main global instrument to achieve this liberalization goal is the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) of the World Trade Organization. In this paper, the process of trade liberalization of higher education in the GATS framework is examined. The analysis is divided into two main parts. First, the state of the current situation of higher education liberalization and that of other education sectors are reviewed and compared. Second, the factors that influence the undertaking of liberalization commitments on education, specifically higher education, are analyzed. To make these comparative analyses, EduGATS, a novel index to measure the degree of liberalization of educational services, is introduced.

Keywords

GATS WTO liberalization privatization higher education 

References

  1. Barrow, C.W., Didou-Aupetit, S. and Mallea, J. (2004) Globalisation, Trade Liberalization, and Higher Education in North America: The Emergence of a New Market under NAFTA? Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  2. Carnoy, M. (1999) ‘Globalización y reestructuración de la educación’, Revista de Educación 318: 145–162.Google Scholar
  3. Francois, J. and Wooton, I. (2000) ‘Market structure, trade liberalization and the GATS’, Centre for International Economic Studies. Policy Discussion Paper 3.Google Scholar
  4. García-Guadilla, C. (2002) ‘General agreement of trade in services, higher education and Latin America’, Paper prepared for the Convention of Universities Members of Columbus, Paris, July 2002.Google Scholar
  5. Kachur, J.L. (2003) ‘Whose intellectual property? Whose rights? GATS, TRIPS and education in Canada’, Globalisation, Societies and Education 1 (3): 375–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Knight, J. (2002) Trade in Higher Education Services: The Implications of GATS, London: The Observatory on Borderless Higher Education.Google Scholar
  7. Knight, J. (2003) GATS, Trade and Higher Education Perspective 2003. Where Are We? London: The Observatory on Borderless Higher Education, Retrieved from www.obhe.ac.uk/products/reports/publicaccesspdf/May2003.pdf, 24 May 2004.Google Scholar
  8. Larsen, K., Martin, J.P. and Morris, R. (2002) ‘Trade in educational services: trends and emerging issues’, The World Economy 25 (6): 849–868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Larsen, K., Momii, K. and Vincent-Lancrin, S. (2004) Cross-Border Higher Education: An Analysis of Current Trends, Policy Strategies and Future Scenarios, London: Observatory on Borderless Higher Education.Google Scholar
  10. Larsen, K. and Vincent-Lancrin, S. (2002) ‘International trade in educational services: good or bad?’ Higher Education and Management Policy 14 (3): 2–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Malo, S. (2003) ‘La comercialización de la educación superior’, in C. García-Guadilla (ed.) El difícil equilibrio. La educación superior como bien público y comercio de servicios, Caracas: Editorial Latina, pp. 101–107.Google Scholar
  12. Mundy, K. and Iga, M. (2003) ‘Hegemonic exceptionalism and legitimating bet-hedging: paradoxes and lessons from the US and Japanese approaches to education services under the GATS’, Globalisation, Societies and Education 1 (3): 321–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. OBHE. (2002) International Branch Campuses: Scale & Significance, London: The Observatory on Borderless Higher Education, Briefing Note 5.Google Scholar
  14. OBHE. (2003) Mapping the Educational Industry (1). Public companies — Share Price & Financial Results, London: The Observatory on Borderless Higher Education, Briefing Note 9.Google Scholar
  15. OECD. (2001) Education at a Glance. Education Indicators 2001, Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  16. OECD. (2002a) Indicators on Internationalization and Trade of Post-Secondary Education, Washington, DC: OECD/US Forum on Trade in Educational Services, May 2002.Google Scholar
  17. OECD. (2002b) Current Commitments under the GATS in Educational Services, Washington, DC: OECD/US Forum on Trade in Education Services, May 2002.Google Scholar
  18. Robertson, S., Bonal, X. and Dale, R. (2002) ‘GATS and the education services industry: the politics of scale and global reterritorialization’, Comparative Education Review 46 (4): 472–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Robertson, S. and Dale, R. (2003a) ‘This is what the fuss is about! The implications of GATS for education systems in The North and The South’, UK Forum for International Education and Training, Commonwealth Secretariat, May 2003.Google Scholar
  20. Robertson, S. and Dale, R. (2003b) ‘Changing geographies of power in education: the politics of rescaling and its contradictions’, GENIE — the Globalisation and Europeanization Network in Education, Retrieved from http://www.genie-tn.net/genie019.htm, 12 March 2005.
  21. Rodrigues Dias, M.A. (2002) ‘Utopía y comercialización en la educación superior del s. XXI’, in M.A. Rodrigues Dias (ed.) Lecciones de la Conferencia Mundial sobre Educación Superior — Perspectivas de la Educación Superior en el s. XXI, Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI, pp. 11–44.Google Scholar
  22. Rodríguez Gómez, R. (2003) ‘La educación superior en el Mercado: configuraciones emergentes y nuevos proveedores’, in M. Mollis (ed.) Las universidades en América Latina: ¿Reformadas o alteradas? Buenos Aires: CLACSO, pp. 87–107.Google Scholar
  23. Rodríguez Gómez, R. (2004) ‘Inversión Extranjera Directa en Educación Superior. El caso de México’, Revista Educación Superior XXXIII (2): 130, Retrieved from http://www.anuies.mx/servicios/p_anuies/publicaciones/revsup/130/02.html#e, 15 February 2005.Google Scholar
  24. Saner, R. and Fasel, S. (2003) ‘Negotiating trade in educational services within the WTO/GATS context’, Aussenwirtschaft 59 (2): 257–308.Google Scholar
  25. Shashikant, S. (2005) ‘GATS talks will move only with A “big leap” in mode 4’, TWN Info Service on WTO and Trade Issues, 198, Retrieved from www.twnside.org.sg/title2/twninfo198.htm, 17 March 2005.
  26. UNCTAD. (2005) ‘Trade in services and development implications’, Retrieved from http://www.unctad.org/en/docs/c1d71_en.pdf, 12 May 2005.
  27. UNESCO. (2006) Global Education Digest 2006, Montreal: UNESCO Institute for Statistics.Google Scholar
  28. Van der Wende, M.C. (2003) ‘Globalisation and access to higher education’, Journal of Studies in International Education 7 (2): 193–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Verger, A. (2008) ‘Measuring educational liberalization. A global analysis of GATS’, Globalisation, Societies and Education 6 (1): 13–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Verger, A. and Bonal, X. (2006) ‘Against GATS: the sense of a global struggle’, Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies 4 (1), Retrieved from http://www.jceps.com/?pageID=article&articleID=55, 14 November 2006.
  31. WTO. (2000) Guide to the GATS. An Overview of Issues for Further Liberalization of Trade in Services, The Hague: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
  32. WTO. (2005) Initial and Revised Offers. A Factual Assessment of the Sate of Play, Geneva: Council of Trade in Services-WTO.Google Scholar
  33. Zhang, C. (2003) Transnational Higher Education in China: Why Has the State Encouraged its Development? School of Education-University of Stanford, Retrieved from www.stanford.edu/dept/SUSE/ICE/monographs/Zhang.pdf, 01 November 2006.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Antoni Verger
    • 1
  1. 1.AMIDSt-Amsterdam Institute for Metropolitan and International Development Studies, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Nieuwe Prinsengracht 130AmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations