Journal of Financial Services Marketing

, Volume 19, Issue 4, pp 253–264 | Cite as

The interplay of external punishment and internal rewards: An exploratory study of insurance fraud

Original Article

Abstract

Economic theories related to ethical consumer behaviour have for the most part examined the role of external incentives and deterrents, and relatively less focus has been given to the role of internal incentives. This study explores the independent and joint effects of internal rewards and external punishment mechanisms on the likelihood of consumers exhibiting unethical behaviour in insurance fraud (IF) contexts. By utilizing a data set consisting of survey data on over 43 000 consumers across 26 European countries, this study examines the interaction of internal moral values and external deterrents, affecting unethical consumer behaviour. Ordinal regression analysis and binary logistic regression were used to assess the role of internal rewards and external punishment mechanisms in the occurrence of IF. Attitudinal differences towards IF and perceptions of the probability of being caught were used to classify customers and to predict the incidence of IF. Demographic variables were also found to be correlated with IF. Perceptions of ineffectiveness of fraud investigation and detection systems by fraudulent customers significantly influences their likelihood to commit IF.

Keywords

insurance marketing ethics consumer fraud 

References

  1. Ajzen, I. (2011) The theory of planned behaviour: Reactions and reflections. Psychology & Health 26 (9): 1113–1127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ali, N. (2012) An exploratory study into the implementation of internal marketing in small insurance brokers in the United Kingdom. Journal of Financial Services Marketing 17 (3): 242–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alm, J., McClelland, G.H. and Schulze, W.D. (1992) Why do people pay taxes? Journal of Public Economics 48 (1): 21–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barkan, R., Zohar, D. and Erev, I. (1998) Accidents and decision making under uncertainty: A comparison of four models. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 74 (2): 118–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Becker, G.S. (1974) Crime and punishment: An economic approach. In: G.S. Becker and W.M. Landes (eds.) Essays in the Economics of Crime and Punishment. New York, NJ: UMI, pp. 1–54.Google Scholar
  6. Bond, A. and Stone, M. (2004) How the automotive insurance claims experience affects customer retention. Journal of Financial Services Marketing 9 (2): 160–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brinkmann, J. (2005) Understanding insurance customer dishonesty: Outline of a situational approach. Journal of Business Ethics 61 (2): 183–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brinkmann, J. and Lentz, P. (2006) Understanding insurance customer dishonesty: Outline of a moral-sociological approach. Journal of Business Ethics 66 (2–3): 177–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burger, K. (2003) New Yorkers show greater tolerance for insurance than Americans countrywide, IRC Survey Finds, http://www.aicpcu.org/irc/news/200307241.htm, accessed 31 January 2012.
  10. Coalition Against Insurance Fraud (CAIF) (1997) The four faces of fraud, http://www.InsuranceFraud.org, accessed 31 March 2014.
  11. Colquitt, L.L. and Hoyt, R.E. (1997) Determinants of corporate hedging behavior: Evidence from the life insurance industry. Journal of Risk and Insurance 64 (4): 649–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dean, D.H. (2004) Perceptions of ethicality of consumer insurance claim fraud. Journal of Business Ethics 72 (3): 420–445.Google Scholar
  13. Decarlo, L.T. (2003) Using the PLUM procedure of SPSS to fit unequal variance and generalized signal detection models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 35 (1): 49–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Delport, H., Steyn, T.F.J. and Mostert, P.G. (2011) Relationship intention of South African banking and life insurance customers. Journal of Financial Services Marketing 16 (3): 277–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Derrig, R.A. (2002) Insurance fraud. Journal of Risk and Insurance 69 (3): 271–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dionne, G. and Gagné, R. (2001) Deductible contracts against fraudulent claims: Evidence from automobile insurance. Review of Economics and Statistics 83 (2): 290–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Durvasula, S., Lysonski, S., Mehta, S.C. and Tang, B.P. (2004) Forging relationships with services: The antecedents that have an impact on behavioural outcomes in the life insurance industry. Journal of Financial Services Marketing 8 (4): 314–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Feld, L.P. and Frey, B.S. (2002) Trust breeds trust: How taxpayers are treated. Economics of Governance 3 (2): 87–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ganster, D.C., Hennessey, H.W. and Luthans, F. (1983) Social desirability response effects: Three alternative models. Academy of Management Journal 26 (2): 321–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gidhagen, M. and Persson, S. (2011) Determinants of digitally instigated insurance relationships. International Journal of Bank Marketing 29 (7): 517–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gill, K.M., Woolley, K.A. and Gill, M. (1994) Insurance fraud: The business as a victim. In: M. Gill (ed.) Crime at Work. Vol. 1. Leicester, UK: Perpetuity Press.Google Scholar
  22. Goel, R.K. (2014) Insurance fraud and corruption in the United States. Applied Financial Economics 24 (4): 241–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Insurance Europe. (2013) The Impact of Insurance Fraud, 7 February, http://www.insuranceeurope.eu/uploads/Modules/Publications/fraud-booklet.pdf, accessed 10 March 2013.
  24. Lago-Peñas, I. and Lago-Peñas, S. (2010) The determinants of tax morale in comparative perspective: Evidence from European countries. European Journal of Political Economy 26 (4): 441–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lesch, W.C. and Brinkmann, J. (2011) Consumer insurance fraud/abuse as co-creation and co-responsibility: A new paradigm. Journal of business ethics 103 (1): 17–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mäenpää, I. and Voutilainen, R. (2011) Value through combined offerings of bank and insurance. The International Journal of Bank Marketing 29 (7): 535–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mazar, N., Amir, O. and Ariely, D. (2008) The dishonesty of honest people: A theory of self-concept maintenance. Journal of Marketing Research 45 (6): 633–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mazar, N. and Ariely, D. (2006) Dishonesty in everyday life and its policy implications. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 25 (1): 117–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Miyazaki, A.D. (2009) Perceived ethicality of insurance claim fraud: Do higher deductibles lead to lower ethical standards? Journal of Business Ethics 87 (4): 589–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Morley, N.J., Ball, L.J. and Ormerod, T.C. (2006) How the detection of insurance fraud succeeds and fails. Psychology, Crime & Law 12 (2): 163–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nagin, D.S. and Pogarsky, G. (2003) An experimental investigation of deterrence: Cheating, self-serving bias, and impulsivity. Criminology 41 (1): 167–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nepomuceno, M.V. and Porto, J.B. (2010) Human values and attitudes toward bank services in Brazil. International Journal of Bank Marketing 28 (3): 168–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Norusis, M.J. (2012) IBM SPSS Statistics 19 Statistical Procedures Companion. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  34. O’Fallon, M.J. and Butterfield, K.D. (2005) A review of the empirical ethical decision-making literature: 1996–2003. Journal of Business Ethics 59 (4): 375–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pogarsky, G. (2002) Identifying ‘deterrable’ offenders: Implications for research on deterrence. Justice Quarterly 19 (3): 431–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Robbins, S.P. and Judge, T.A. (2014) Organizational Behavior. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Higher Education.Google Scholar
  37. Tennyson, S. (2008) Moral, social, and economic dimensions of insurance claims fraud. Social Research: An International Quarterly 75 (4): 1181–1204.Google Scholar
  38. Torgler, B. and Schneider, F. (2007) What shapes attitudes toward paying taxes? Evidence from multicultural European countries. Social Science Quarterly 88 (2): 443–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tyler, T. and Huo, Y.J. (2002) Trust in the Law: Encouraging Public Cooperation with the Police and the Courts. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Umea School of Business and Economics (USBE), Umea UniversityUmeaSweden

Personalised recommendations