Financial services ads and viewer response profiles: Psychometric properties of a shortened scale
- First Online:
- 6 Downloads
Schlinger's Viewer Response Profile is a widely used tool in advertising research, in both commercial and academic environments. It is used in ad testing to gauge viewer reactions to television commercials. Initial research on its psychometric properties was critical of the scale; however, more recent work using more sophisticated statistical techniques and larger, more realistic, samples has been much more complimentary. This article reports on the use of a shorter version of the Schlinger scale to test financial services advertisements. The findings generally indicate that the scale can be used with confidence in that environment, and that the shorter scale generally performed well. The limitations of the study are acknowledged, managerial implications are discussed, and avenues for future research are identified.
KeywordsSchlinger VRP financial services ads likeability psychometric properties
- Phillips, L.E. (2006) Financial services online marketing, http://www.emarketer.com/Report.aspx?code=finance_jul06, accessed 5 July 2010.
- Howard, T. (2005) Financial services ads on the rise. USA Today 13 November, http://www.usatoday.com/money/advertising/adtrack/2005-11-13-chase_x.htm, accessed 5 July 2010.
- Wells, W.D., Leavitt, C. and McConville, M. (1971) A reaction profile for TV commercials. Journal of Advertising Research 11 (6): 11–17.Google Scholar
- Chen, Q. and Wells, W.D. (1999) Attitude toward the site. Journal of Advertising Research 39 (5): 27–37.Google Scholar
- Lipstein, B.F. and Neelankavil, J.P. (1982) Television Advertising Copy Research Practices Among Major Advertisers and Advertising Agencies: An Advertising Research Foundation Survey. New York: Advertising Research Foundation.Google Scholar
- Schlinger, M.J. (1979) A profile of responses to commercials. Journal of Advertising Research 19 (2): 37–46.Google Scholar
- Du Plessis, E. (1994) Understanding and using likeability. Journal of Advertising Research 34 (5): RC3–RC10.Google Scholar
- Walker, D. and Dubitsky, T.M. (1994) Why liking matters. Journal of Advertising Research 34 (3): 9–17.Google Scholar
- Callcott, M.F. and Phillips, B.J. (1996) Observations: Elves make good cookies: Creating likable spokes-character advertising. Journal of Advertising Research 36 (5): 73–80.Google Scholar
- Murphy, W.H. and Tang, S.S.L. (1998) Continuous likeability measurement. Marketing Research 10 (2): 29–35.Google Scholar
- Ewing, M.T., Napoli, J. and du Plessis, E. (1999) Factors affecting in-market recall of food product advertising. Journal of Advertising Research 39 (4): 29–33.Google Scholar
- Schlinger, M.J. (1982) Respondent characteristics that affect copy-test attitude scales. Journal of Advertising Research 22 (1): 29–35.Google Scholar
- Nunnally, J.C. (1978) Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Carman, J.M. (1990) Consumer perceptions of service quality: An assessment of the SERVQUAL dimensions. Journal of Retailing 66 (1): 33–55.Google Scholar
- Hair Jr, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J. and Anderson, R.E. (2010) Multivariate Data Analysis, 7th edn. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar