Journal of Financial Services Marketing

, Volume 16, Issue 3–4, pp 210–219

Financial services ads and viewer response profiles: Psychometric properties of a shortened scale

Original Article
  • 6 Downloads

Abstract

Schlinger's Viewer Response Profile is a widely used tool in advertising research, in both commercial and academic environments. It is used in ad testing to gauge viewer reactions to television commercials. Initial research on its psychometric properties was critical of the scale; however, more recent work using more sophisticated statistical techniques and larger, more realistic, samples has been much more complimentary. This article reports on the use of a shorter version of the Schlinger scale to test financial services advertisements. The findings generally indicate that the scale can be used with confidence in that environment, and that the shorter scale generally performed well. The limitations of the study are acknowledged, managerial implications are discussed, and avenues for future research are identified.

Keywords

Schlinger VRP financial services ads likeability psychometric properties 

References

  1. Phillips, L.E. (2006) Financial services online marketing, http://www.emarketer.com/Report.aspx?code=finance_jul06, accessed 5 July 2010.
  2. Howard, T. (2005) Financial services ads on the rise. USA Today 13 November, http://www.usatoday.com/money/advertising/adtrack/2005-11-13-chase_x.htm, accessed 5 July 2010.
  3. Albers-Miller, N.D. and Straughan, R.D. (2000) Financial services advertising in eight non-English speaking countries. International Journal of Bank Marketing 18 (7): 347–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Leavitt, C. (1970) A multi-dimensional set of rating scales for television commercials. Journal of Applied Psychology 54 (5): 427–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Wells, W.D. (1964) EQ, son of EQ, and the reaction profile. Journal of Marketing 28 (4): 45–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Wells, W.D., Leavitt, C. and McConville, M. (1971) A reaction profile for TV commercials. Journal of Advertising Research 11 (6): 11–17.Google Scholar
  7. Chen, Q. and Wells, W.D. (1999) Attitude toward the site. Journal of Advertising Research 39 (5): 27–37.Google Scholar
  8. Lipstein, B.F. and Neelankavil, J.P. (1982) Television Advertising Copy Research Practices Among Major Advertisers and Advertising Agencies: An Advertising Research Foundation Survey. New York: Advertising Research Foundation.Google Scholar
  9. Schlinger, M.J. (1979) A profile of responses to commercials. Journal of Advertising Research 19 (2): 37–46.Google Scholar
  10. Zinkhan, G.M. and Burton, S. (1989) An examination of three multidimensional profiles for assessing consumer reactions to advertisements. Journal of Advertising 18 (4): 6–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Strasheim, A.C., Pitt, L.F. and Caruana, A. (2007) Psychometric properties of the Schlinger viewer response profile: Evidence from a large sample. Journal of Advertising 36 (4): 107–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Shimp, T.A. (1981) Attitude toward the ad as a mediator of consumer brand choice. Journal of Advertising 10 (2): 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mackenzie, S.B, Lutz, R.J. and Belch, G. (1986) The role of attitude toward the ad as a mediator of advertising effectiveness: A test of competing explanations. Journal of Marketing Research 23 (2): 130–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mitchell, A.A. (1986) The effect of verbal and visual components of advertisements on brand attributes and attitude toward advertisement. Journal of Consumer Research 13 (2): 12–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Zinkhan, G.M. and Fornell, C. (1985) A test of two consumer response scales in advertising. Journal of Marketing Research 22 (4): 447–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Du Plessis, E. (1994) Understanding and using likeability. Journal of Advertising Research 34 (5): RC3–RC10.Google Scholar
  17. Walker, D. and Dubitsky, T.M. (1994) Why liking matters. Journal of Advertising Research 34 (3): 9–17.Google Scholar
  18. Callcott, M.F. and Phillips, B.J. (1996) Observations: Elves make good cookies: Creating likable spokes-character advertising. Journal of Advertising Research 36 (5): 73–80.Google Scholar
  19. Murphy, W.H. and Tang, S.S.L. (1998) Continuous likeability measurement. Marketing Research 10 (2): 29–35.Google Scholar
  20. Ewing, M.T., Napoli, J. and du Plessis, E. (1999) Factors affecting in-market recall of food product advertising. Journal of Advertising Research 39 (4): 29–33.Google Scholar
  21. Schlinger, M.J. (1982) Respondent characteristics that affect copy-test attitude scales. Journal of Advertising Research 22 (1): 29–35.Google Scholar
  22. Nunnally, J.C. (1978) Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  23. Carman, J.M. (1990) Consumer perceptions of service quality: An assessment of the SERVQUAL dimensions. Journal of Retailing 66 (1): 33–55.Google Scholar
  24. Hair Jr, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J. and Anderson, R.E. (2010) Multivariate Data Analysis, 7th edn. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dennis F. Culver EMBA Alumni Chair of Business, Beedie School of Business, Simon Fraser UniversityVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations